Aug 292019
 

From Ol’ Blighted, the latest innovation in political correctness: banning depictions of people being people.

Volkswagen and Philadelphia cream cheese ads banned over gender stereotypes

A lot of Americans think of Britain as a slightly eccentric yet still free country. But… it’s not, really. They do not have a written constitution as such; the government can basically do whatever they feel like doing, and they’ve made the ultimately suicidal mistake of assuming that Parliament will always come down on the side of sense and reason. But Britain has themselves an “Advertising Standards Agency” that feels it can ban commercials that show stereotypically (i.e. historically and biologically and culturally accurate) gendered activities. In this case, a commercial that shows a woman in a park with a baby carriage “engaged in a stereotypical care-giving role.”

One would hope that this sort of thing, like the despicable Canadian “Human Rights Tribunals” would be impossible in the United States. But don’t bet on it. The Chinese “social credit” system would be illegal for the government to enact, but it’s something definitely to watch out for among major financial and communications companies. I can see American broadcasters enacting such restrictions themselves just to keep the shrieking harpies of social justice conformity off their backs for ten seconds until the next outrage.

 Posted by at 2:46 am
Aug 282019
 

Continuing…

In 1985 Rockwell pondered the idea of an unmanned Orbiter. The US did not proceed with that concept, while the Soviets did with their Buran. It was an interesting notion and for the time reasonably advanced tech… but it’s clearly a very silly idea (even more so with Buran). The whole purpose of the Orbiter as compared to any other launch vehicle is to *return* stuff. With the Space Shuttle, the stuff it returned was sometimes payload, always avionics, engines and crew. Making the Orbiter unmanned means… why the hell are you launching a crew cabin? Buran was even worse; it didn’t even bring back the main engines.

 Posted by at 11:08 pm
Aug 282019
 

… that as of today things out here are gonna get kinda weird. More details in the future, but for now it looks as if productivity on a lot of things is going to drop off sharply.

 

If anyone had a hankering to donate a hundred grand to me, now would be the time.

 Posted by at 5:46 pm
Aug 282019
 

Around a week ago the nightly local news had a piece on a major police action in Salt Lake City. The event involved a response to a protest, then a shooting and a traffic accident. As it turns out… it was all a training exercise. However, one thing caught my eye and made me laugh: the “protestors” were all actors, of course, holding up pretty generic protest signs. But there was one that pretty effectively summed up current outrage/protest/mob culture:

 

 Posted by at 12:27 am
Aug 272019
 

I asked this before. trying again.

So let’s say you find something planet-sized in deep space, but magically it’s not spherical. Let’s say… it’s a pretzel. It’s a pretzel 10,000 kilometers wide made out of solid tungsten, kept from collapsing into a sphere due to Magic Structural Materials. Just go with it, folks. Something that big and that massive would have a terribly complex gravity field nearby. And I want to try to model it. Does anyone know of a program that would do this? It seems to me that what it’d need to be is a basic 3D CAD modeler that you build the object in, then the computer chops the model up into a thousand or ten thousand or however many individual chunks and calculates the force and vector of gravity from each chunk to each point in space and does the vector analysis. The concept is simple enough, but the coding is beyond me.

Might be possible to integrate a CAD model into Excel in some way to work out the 3D coordinates for all the chunks, I dunno. But it also seems like an obvious enough idea that it seems like it aught to already be a subroutine in some extant CAD program.

Who can hook a brother up?

 

 Posted by at 12:49 am
Aug 262019
 

Continuing…

In 1985 Rockwell suggested stretching the Orbiter to create a 75-foot-long cargo bay in order to carry longer – though clearly not heavier – payloads. Exactly what those payloads might be was not given, but they would presumably be sizable yet relatively light structures… deployable structures such as solar arrays and radar arrays seem not unlikely. Interestingly, the main landing gear were to be moved slightly forward, the nose gear well aft.

Up next: the “hump-backed” Orbiter, with the most amazing shuttle diagram EVAR.

Hey. Hey.

Tips


 

 

 Posted by at 10:05 pm
Aug 262019
 

Most of Monday, the up-ship.com website was either very reluctant to come up or didn’t come up at all; the blog surprisingly was a bit more resilient, but from time to time it, too, failed to load. The web host says this was due to “server issues.” Meh. Things *seem* to be back up and running now.

I received a few “WTF?” emails. Obviously if the blog is down I can’t post “hey, the blog is down” on the blog. But I do wonder if it might perhaps be time to finally hold my nose and sign up for Twitter or some such? Use it *solely* as sort of a mirror for the blog, posting links to the latest blog posts… and updates about the blog when it goes down, which it seems to do with irritating regularity.

I do have the APR Facebook page but holy carp I hate using Facebook.

Not sure if it would be worth the soul crushing horror that comes with using Twitter to create such a Twitter account, especially considering that I will undoubtedly wind up getting deplatformed from Twitter eventually. Thoughts?

NOTE: A few times the blog has gone down I’ve gotten emails asking if I was dead or something. For future reference, I have no immediate plans to shuffle off this mortal coil, so if I die, the way it will be reflected on the blog is that it will stop being updated, and will remain up until the web host gets annoyed at the lack of payment.

 Posted by at 9:52 pm
Aug 262019
 

Test

EDIT: Purpose of test… you might or might not have trouble accessing the main webpage, up-ship.com right now and for the past few hours. I certainly do. Turns out, according to tech support, there’s some sort of server issue. But the *blog* seems to be coming through ok. And the main page comes through on my *phone* just fine.

Sigh. I don’t friggen’ know anymore…

 Posted by at 4:05 pm