Mar 022013
 

Popular Standard Shotgun Could Be Banned Under Proposed Bill

This Colorado bill bans any magazine that can be converted to hold more than 8 shotgun shells. But the standard tube-fed shotgun can be easily modified with an extender to hold more than 8 shells.  Thus the standard pump shotgun would be illegal.

Not mentioned in the article… there are shotgun shells of shorter than standard length, such as the 1.5 inch long Aquila minishells. Where you might get 6 standard length shotgun shells in an unmodified tube magazine, you might get 12 of the minishells in the same tube. Thus a pump shotgun that was built to *not* be extendable may very well still be illegal under this bill.

Additionally: for virtually every pistol caliber, there is a “snake shot” load readily available. So where a fifteen-round pistol magazine might at first glance appear legal under this new law, the ability to load it with snake shot would mean it would be illegal.

Additionally: you can keep your pre-ban shotgun, so long as you maintain constant possession of it. This means that if it breaks, you cannot give it to a gunsmith to fix.

I am unwilling to assume that this sort of thing is due to the gun grabbers *not* having thought things through. It seems far more likely that this is what it is… a way to ban far, far more than they claim on the surface.

 Posted by at 2:15 pm
Feb 242013
 

In Fascism And You News, we have two fabulous stories of governments that are brave enough to control your life, down to the last detail…

Bloomberg’s ban prohibits 2-liter soda with your pizza and some nightclub mixers

Also, you can’t order a pitcher of soda at a pizza joint, because that’s bigger than the 16-ounce maximum. For the children!

And…

Quebec language minister calls for moderation

Where Quebecker bureaucrats jumped on an Italian restaurant because the menu included the word “pasta.”

Ain’t it thrilling when the little people elect governments big enough to do whatever they want…

 Posted by at 11:25 pm
Feb 222013
 

First up: here’s one more reason to oppose firearms registration…

In January, the Mexico Permanent Commission reportedly voted to formally ask the United States Senate for a registry of all commercialized firearms in the border states of California, Arizona, New Mexico and Texas.

Yeah, that’d be great.

————–

And then, Incredibly Important Journalism from across the pond (or from Hollywood… either is equally far away from the US):

Spencer Pratt, Heidi Montag Say Guns Make Them ‘Proud To Be American’

I don’t know who these two are. But the important thing to note from the article:

America’s Sweethearts, who appeared on the latest season of Britain’s “Celebrity Big Brother,” reveal their arsenal of more than six firearms, including a sniper rifle and semi-automatic shotgun.

Two people, seven guns. “Arsenal.”

 Posted by at 12:53 am
Feb 192013
 

As trolling efforts go, this one – a bill proposed for the Missouri House of Representatives –  is magnificent.

HB 633

Specifies that any member of the general assembly who proposes legislation that further restricts an individual’s right to bear arms will be guilty of a class D felony

Is it going to pass? Almost certainly not. If it did somehow pass and get signed into law, would it pass Constitutional muster before the Supreme Court? Almost certainly not. But consider: another recently proposed bill in Missouri would turn perhaps millions of law abiding gun owners into felons. It’s equally unConstitutional, but probably stands a better chance of passing. So, you have one bad law being proposed to stop another bad law and to prevent further bad laws. If one bad law actually becomes law, then perhaps a handful of Missouri citizens will find themselves behind bars; the other bad law would imprison potentially hundreds of thousands.

And be honest: a bill that sends politicians to prison? That alone makes the bill worthy of discussion.

 Posted by at 11:20 am
Feb 152013
 

Perform Criminal Background Checks at Your Peril

In short:

1) Minorities commit a disproportionately high percentage of crimes

2) Minorities thus have a disproportionately high rate of criminal records

3) If as an employer you reject a job applicant because he/she has a criminal record, that policy probably disproportionately affects minorities

4) The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission will sue the employer because they are racist

The fact that some states *require* criminal background checks is irrelevant to the Feds. One case cited is a twice-convicted thief turned down for a job as a security guard for nuclear power plants, who used the EEOC to sue the employer.

 Posted by at 10:48 am
Feb 092013
 

Now this is just damned silly.

Remember a couple weeks ago how Obama got re-inaugurated? Lots of expensive pomp and ceremony for what should have been a two-minute process. Part of that was a parade. Part of the parade were a bunch of Marines in full dress uniform. And part of their uniform is the M-1 Garand semi-automatic rifle. While it’s seriously obsolete, it’s still a classy weapon, and actually much better suited for this sort of thing than the M-16 due to its size, heft and clean lines. Here’s a video of this part of the parade:

[youtube NuJRf7HNVSo]

Here’s a screenshot:

marines 1

Notice anything out of the ordinary? Probably not at this resolution. Here, try this:

marines 2

And this:

marines 3

The bolts have been removed from these rifles.

Ummmm…. why? Who was afraid that the Marines were going to turn out to be the Joker’s gang and were going to try to cap the President?

On January 13, these same Marines (along with USAF and, I think, Army) were video’ed practicing for the parade:

[youtube eAjmsu6pVE4]

The resolution isn’t as good, but it sure looks like at that time their weapons weren’t… neutered.

marines 5 marines 4

 

The rifles were not disabled for the 2009 inauguration:

[youtube 6Z5BIiBckvs]

2009

 

 Posted by at 9:00 pm
Feb 092013
 

They put it on the internet, so it must be true.

The latest bit of gossipmongering is that John Brennan, Obamas pick to head the CIA, converted to Islam while working in Saudi Arabia. The evidence for this seems lean… bsically, the FBI guy who wrote a “Muslim Brotherhood training  a manual” for the FBI, says so.

Maybe true, maybe not. If it’s true, it’ll be interesting to see how the confirmation hearings go, if the fact of him being a convert to Islam is even raised at the hearings. It is, after all, somewhat akin to finding out that a prospective head of the CIA in 1955 was a convert to Communism. It would explain why Brennan purged such training manuals from the FBI as being “offensive” to Muslims.

A common enough cliche – common because there’s a whole lot of truth to it – is that converts to different religions or political ideologies are usually more fanatical than those born into them.

Another observation: it would be difficult to argue that the 9/11 attacks weren’t successful for Islam. Consider this: after the December 7, 1941, attack on Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans got tossed into internment camps. Loyal Americans were made to suffer due solely to their ethnicity, and had to jump through many hoops in order to simply serve. The idea of  an American government official converting to the Shinto faith and becoming director of, say, the OSS is just patently ridiculous. Fast forward to the post-9/11 world: the first new President elected after the attacks was a guy raised in the Islamic faith, has an Islamic middle name and is considered by a great many people to be a Muslim.

 Posted by at 10:18 am
Jan 292013
 

Hagel supports nuclear arms cuts, then elimination

Short form: Hagel supports unilateral nuclear disarmament on the part of the US, leading eventually to a totally nuclear-free US military, and somehow or other a nuke-free world. Because the Iranians would totally want to get rid of their nuclear advantage, and we could completely trust the Russians. And the Chinese.

 Posted by at 2:49 pm