Dec 172010
… is good for the Assange. Take a look at the Wikileaks founders sad, sad attempt to woo a chick who just wasn’t into him, by way of “leaked” emails:
http://gawker.com/5714043/the-creepy-lovesick-emails-of-julian-assange?skyline=true&s=i
Some guys can’t take a hint.
3 Responses to “What’s good for the goose…”
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
had trouble downloading the link.
About as interesting as the stuff posted on wikileaks. It doesn’t really tell us anything that we didn’t already know or could figure with information already available. Most of us had already figured out that he was probably a pretty creepy guy, right?
I sometimes wonder if Assange has ever actually read anything of the things he has leaked, because they certainly aren’t as startling or revealing as he and his fanboys would have people think, unless his fanboys are truly epically ignorant about the world.
I agree… although the US government seems to be going bonkers over it, there isn’t much there that wasn’t known or at least strongly suspected before.
You expect to run into something like: “Our Illuminati Overlords are concerned that HAARP’s earthquake creating capabilities may soon be revealed.”, and instead you get; “Hillary Clinton thinks Vladimir Putin is a big silly poop, just like her husband.”
I got a kick out of the report on Pvt. Manning in Rupert Murdoch’s “The Australian” newspaper, where it’s strongly implied that when Assange wasn’t raping Swedish women, he was screwing Manning:
http://www.theaustralian.com.au/in-depth/wikileaks/warning-signs-went-unheeded-ahead-of-the-damaging-leaks/story-fn775xjq-1225969191218
This of course being based on “an alleged confession during a chat room conversation with prominent hacker Adrian Lamo”. 🙂