Oct 202013
 

An interesting design for a roadable aircraft:

autogyrol

See more & bigger drawings of this vehicle HERE.

For operations on the ground, it appears that the nose wheel (or nose treads, for off-road use) would be powered, while the prop would continue to provide thrust. Given Russian experience with aerosani, this is hardly surprising.

The idea of a roadable autogyro is neither new nor particularly silly. One such vehicle, the Pitcairn AC-35, was tooling around the streets of Washington, D.C. in the 1930’s:

[youtube nW9tBgmIFEU]

And, perhaps vastly more interestingly, a new roadable autogyro, the PAL-V, may soon be tooling around the streets of the less-overly-regulated parts of the world soon.

[youtube eyz8GwHFaqk]

 

 Posted by at 4:36 pm
Oct 202013
 

So there I was, workign on the X-20 drawings for V3N4. Something burped in AutoCAD, and the drawing closed on me. Sadly, it closed right after *everything* was erased. And when it closed the drawing, it *saved* the drawing. With nothign in it. And it also saved it as a new BAK (backup) file, also with nothing in it. So apart from a few scraps in separate files, I’ve lost all the X-20 2D drawings.

 

Wonderful.

Gone:

 Posted by at 11:51 am
Oct 202013
 

Here’s a ten-or-so-minute bit of audio awesome. The first-person story of Darnell, a supervillain going up against Superman. It’s occasionally funny as hell, and actually has a pretty interesting superweapon.

Evil D

 Posted by at 9:55 am
Oct 192013
 

Fantastic Plastic has re-released some kits I mastered for ’em:

Project Pluto nuclear ramjet

ProjectPlutoMissileBoxArt-4

This is a “missile only” lower-cost version of the earlier kit.

————————-

Space Station V

SSVBoxArt-500

———————-

And FP posted photos of the still-available SPECTRE rocket, assembled and painted (really well) by a customer:

SPECTRERocketSPFX SPECTRERocketInFlight

 Posted by at 4:23 pm
Oct 192013
 

Early this year, Audi released this commercial:

[youtube ANhmS6QLd5Q]

In it, a teenage boy goes to prom and kisses a girl. This might not have been much of an issue except that the boy “stole” the kiss, didn’t get her permission beforehand. Even then, I suspect most people wouldn’t have given it a second thought. But not everyone:

Audi SuperBowl Commercial Fail: Sexual Assault is Good!

Twitter Thinks Audi’s Super Bowl Ad Is Sexual Assault

Audi’s Super Bowl Ad and the Culture of Rape and Sexual Assault

… and so on.

But then about 2 months ago, Skittles put out this commercial:

[youtube XZG5VoMonuQ]

Here, the gender roles are reversed… a girl kisses a boy unbidden. This being a Skittles commercial, the reason she does so is because the boy has candy for teeth; so not only does she “steal” a kiss, she also steals his teeth (juuuuust a little creepy if ya think on it fer a sec). And of course, the girl has no actual interest in the boy at all; she just wants to steal his teeth (yeeesh). Has there been the same “Skittles promotes rape!” uproar? Nope. While there has been some discussion of this very topic, it mostly seems to be “nope, Skittles doesn’t support rape.”

Entertainingly, the very same “writer” who gave us this:

Why Are Conservatives Defending Audi’s Rapey Super Bowl Ad?

Also gave us this:

This Skittles Ad Isn’t Rapey. It’s Still Kinda Sexist.

Read ’em both. The writer – remember, the very same purpose – claims the Audi ad is rape-y in part because the girl who gets kissed seemed to like it, while the Skittles ad *isn’t* rape-y because the boy who gets kissed seemed to like it.

dontWant2Featured

 Posted by at 3:56 pm
Oct 192013
 

For what it’s worth:

I’m constantly tinkering with line settings, but I’ve largely settled on the results shown below. I do my drawings in AutoCAD 2000 and then further processing in Paint Shop Pro. The lines in ACAD are split into several layers:
1) “Outline:” This is for, obviously, the main outlines. This includes major overlaps, such as engine nacelles in front of wings of fuselages and such. Also used for sharp intersections, such as some wing/body intersections, when the angle of intersection is greater than 45 degrees. “Outline” is White (which prints black) with a lineweight of 0.40 mm.
2) “Details:” used for things like control surfaces, doors, windows, etc. Also used for intersections at less than 45 degrees. Also White, with a “default” lineweight.
3) “Lines:” Used for panels lines, faint intersections and the like. uses Color 253 (medium gray) and a default lineweight.

The process for going from ACAD 2000 to a good raster image is more complex than it would seem to need to be; I imagine more recent versions of ACAD have cleaned the process up. Anyway:
1) Plot the drawing as an EPS file at ANSI C size (22X17 inches)
2) Open the drawing in Paint Shop Pro at 200 dpi, grayscale, no transparency.
3) Crop the image just at the outer border

The image  just as-is is then saved as a GIF or PNG (not JPG, as that entails loss). It can then be plastered directly into a Word document. The drawing will print out (on paper) at a chosen scale if the border was drawn at a specific size, and when put into Word the image is formatted to be that width. If you want to print at a specific scale but don’t wnat the border, you can still go through the whole process with a border, and then simply erase it /paint it out at the last step so that the image has the right size but no border.

I’ve found plotting the CAD drawing at larger sizes initially helps smooth out curves. But this means that the image is way too big for basic online posting, and the line weights get really thin and faint when the image is just resized smaller. So before resizing smaller one or both of the following:
1) “Erode” the image. This expands line widths. At full rez it looks pretty crappy, but when resized it works well.
2) “Blur” the image. This widens the lines and helps smooth it out, but makes everything lighter. The image can be darkened via gamma correction or brightness/contrast.

Something else to consider: “Drawing Order.” With multiple line colors, it matters what lines are “over” and “under” what other lines. After the drawing is done in ACAD, the “draworder” commend lets you pick what lines are in front, what are in back. It’s best to have the “Outline” layer in front, and the “Lines” layer in back. This way, when a black Outline line intersects with a gray “Lines” line, the black line is unbroken. Sometimes I forget this step, and the results can look *wrong.*

The image below of the Lockheed CL-1170-6-2 was from issue V1N3 of Aerospace Projects Review, reformatted in AutoCAD to print out on 11X17.

v1n3-106-full rez

v1n3-106-eroded-ensmallered v1n3-106-ensmallered v1n3-106-blurred-ensmallered

 Posted by at 11:56 am
Oct 182013
 

X-20 Dyna Soar. Model being made for the purposes of illustrating the next issue of APR. Dunno if there’s enough interest in a physical model to make a stab at it, though a cutaway model showing the truss-structure innards – a thing only possible via 3D printing – seems appealing. Note that the heat panel lines are being modeled in place, so they should appear on any theoretical 3D print, and definitely appear on  rendered illustrations.

2013-10-18 x-20

Further progress on the Prometheus, mostly tinkering on the engines. You know what? These components are nightmares. But the final model is gonna be *awesome.*

 

2013-10-18 pro a 2013-10-18 pro b

So if you’ve been wondering why my blogging about old aerospace projects has fallen off of late… here ya go.

 Posted by at 10:34 pm