Dec 232012
 

With respect to the B-52G nuclear turbojet testbed described HERE, some information about what the nuclear radiation was expected to do to various materials in use on the B-52.

The parameter proposed by Convair for the evaluation of radiation damage to materials
is the threshold of damage, the minimum amount of radiation that will change the properties of a material to the specification limit. The approximate thresholds of some of the
more common aircraft-system materials are listed in Table 2.12. In certain regions it
may be desirable to replace Teflon with polyethylene, which has a functional threshold
about 3000 times greater than Teflon. Polyurethane was also recommended as a replacement for Buna-N.


Except for semiconductors, gamma radiation causes most of the incipient damage to
the components. The neutron field causes only a small percentage of the damage. The
approximate isodose pattern of a 70-megawatt nuclear system is shown in Figure 2.18.
The operating lifetime of a component in this nuclear environment, designated by zones,
is calculated by dividing the functional threshold of the material by the radiation field
in the respective zones. The isodose patterns do not include air scattering, structural
scattering, nor absorption in the airframe structure.

The data is provided in ergs per gram (of the target material). This seems to be a not  entirely spectacular way to present the data, since an erg is simply a unit of energy, not of power. Thus an erg could be deposited in a nanosecond or a millenium, and the table would indicate the same response. So I’m guessing that this refers to a specific radiation dose or environment. So while the *absolute* values don;t seem to be readily apparent, relative values can be determined.

 Posted by at 4:32 pm
Dec 232012
 

No matter how little room there is, Fingers always knows that there’s room enough for her to try to move in on Raedthinn.

Raedthinn, however, often disagrees.

 Posted by at 10:55 am
Dec 232012
 

I found a photo of Clarke on the Space Station V set, providing a near-perfect reference for floor-to-ceiling height: it appears that the ceiling is right at 1.25 Clarke Units in height (527 pixels/424 pixels = 1.2429). Now if I knew what exactly a Clarke Unit was, I could dial that right in. So… anybody know? If he was 5’8″, that would give a ceiling height of just over 7 feet. 5’9″ => 7.1875 feet. And so on.

 Posted by at 10:27 am
Dec 232012
 

In order to aid separation of the S-IB first stage and the interstage (the connector between the S-IB and the S-IVb second stage)  from the upper stage of the Saturn Ib, the interstage was equipped with 4 solid rocket motors that fired “upwards.” This would push the ring-shaped structure aft and away from the S-IVb quickly, reducing the risk to the aft-protruding J-2 engine. Each Thiokol “Recruit” motor produced an average thrust of 36,720 pounds for 1.52 seconds, burning 267 pounds of propellant.

 Posted by at 9:43 am
Dec 232012
 

Here’s a neat thing: a formless gel that can be cast into a mold. When removed from said mold, it flows like a thick amorphous liquid. When immersed in water… it re-takes the form it had in the mold.

That’s *should* be pretty spiffy. But there are two issues, as I see it:

1) it’s  pink translucent goop that looks almost exactly like The Blob

2) What’s the gel made of? You got it… DNA.

Ummm.

DNA hydrogel has a long memory

[youtube RuL-c4Dht0s]

 Posted by at 2:03 am
Dec 222012
 

I was promised an apocalypse yesterday. Once again, the people on the TV failed to deliver. Typical.

Not really a whole lot on this topic I can yammer on about that other people haven’t yammered on about at very great length already. I really only have two questions:

1) What’s the next major doomsday going to be

2) All the authors and talking heads who spent years going on about this – raking in the cash while doing so – what now? Are they going to vanish like a fart in the wind? There’d be no profit in that. Will some “recalculate?” Will some admit that they must’ve been wrong? Will any admit that they were full of crap?

On that topic: much to my surprise, the billboards for Harold Camping’s May 21, 2011, doomsday prediction are *still* up in western Wyoming. And given that they’ve been up for at least a year and a half, they remain in remarkably good shape. The other billboards seem to change their ads, so I’m a bit confuzzled as to why these are still up. Perhaps the “Family Radio” people actually *bought* the billboards. Perhaps the owners of the billboards are keeping them up for entertainment value, or some other reason. Or perhaps, just perhaps, the billboard owners rented out space to the Family Radio people at a lower rate… but with a payment automatically deducted from their bank account once a month UNTIL THE END OF THE WORLD. That… would be fantastic.

In any event, I remain astonished that nobody has ripped them down. You’d think you could get a coupla bucks for a full billboard ad on ebay…

 Posted by at 6:51 pm
Dec 222012
 

Almost as impressive as the development of the nuclear bomb was the near simultaneous development of cameras fast enough  to record the initial events of the nuclear explosion:

[youtube KQp1ox-SdRI]

Two phenomena worthy of mention:

1) The “mottling” of the early fireball is due, in simplest terms, to differences in the density of “stuff” around the actual nuclear bomb. The casing of the bomb, batteries, control systems, cables, support structures, all played a role.

2) The “spikes” below the fireballs, something that became known as a “rope trick.” These were only visible on nuclear tests where the bomb was mounted on a tower. While the fireballs expanded outwards at extremely high velocity, the expansion speed was nowhere near the speed of light. And in this case, the light preceding the fireballs was bright enough to cause the steel guy wires stabilizing the towers to evaporate and superheat into incandescent plasma. The light alone was enough to cause solid steel to explode with more force than any high explosive.

 Posted by at 3:04 pm
Dec 222012
 

Obama Uses Funeral Service to Talk About Himself

President Barack Obama used the funeral for Hawaii senator Daniel Inouye to talk about himself. In the short 1,600 word speech, Obama used the word “my” 21 times, “me” 12 times, and “I” 30 times.

More than the use of “I”, “me” and “my,” the whole speech just drips with self importance. Funeral speeches are generally supposed to be about the dead guy, not the speakers childhood bus trips across Kansas.

[youtube BUG-QVVROg8]

UPDATE: Even the shrill, shrieking lefties at Slate have figured this one out:

Today We Are Gathered … To Hear More About Me

Someone needs to tell Barack Obama—it must get particularly confusing this time of year—that his own birth is not Year One, the date around which all other events are understood.

——————–

PS: For those upset about too much politics on this blog… here’s a duck.

 Posted by at 1:20 pm
Dec 222012
 

“Mayors Against Illegal Guns” (note: for these Mayors, this would mean *all* guns except those owned by the police… and by their security details, of course) have cranked out a new propaganda ad featuring a veritable “who’s that” of second-string Hollywood celebrities:

[youtube 64G5FfG2Xpg]

Now, even though these jokers might not be raking in the biggest money Hollywood has to offer, it’s a safe bet they’re making more money than *you.* And that they can afford to live behind great big high walls and hire armed guards. One wonders if any of them are planning on getting rid of their own security.

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 11:14 am