Sep 042011
 

More on Katt Williams’ comedy bit where he actually takes the insanely outrageous position that this is, in fact, the United States:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/09/03/idUS376383229020110903

“I meant what I said and I said what I meant…”

At various points in the outburst, Williams began chants of “USA! USA! USA!,” which some activists perceived as insulting but Williams defended as patriotism.

“I don’t think I need to apologize for being pro-American,” Williams said.

The CNN interview:

[youtube uZ8mIEJSFZU]

As may be obvious, I’m really not seeing the problem here. The man is proud of the US, and believes that people who love other countries more than they love the US should not be *in* the US. This makes sense to me… I can hardly imagine that the British or the French or the Japanese or, in fact, the Mexicans would be overly thrilled if I went to *their* country and started waving the US flag and talking smack about their country. But clearly my opinion here is not universal. Note in the above snippet, Reuters claimed that chanting “USA! USA!” while actually *in* the USA is seen as insulting by some activists. A look at other commentaries can be depressingly enlightening:

http://www.democratandchronicle.com/article/20110903/OPINION04/109030314

During a stand-up act last weekend, the popular comedian/actor went on a seven-minute rant insulting people of Mexican descent.

Where did he actually insult people of Mexican descent?

And YouTube is loaded with “video responses” to the original Katt Williams video that claim that what he said was racist and wrong, and that, as a black guy, he really shouldn’t be proud of the US since the US enslaved his ancestors.

Well, a few things:

1) Still looking for the “racism.” Can’t find it.

2) Should a modern American black guy be proud of his country? Well, clearly the US has a whole lot of shameful crap in its past that would irritate black people. Slavery. Jim Crow laws. The Klan. The Great Society programs. But while the US has had its share of problems… these are largely problems that the US as a whole *chose* to correct. Slavery in the US was not wiped out by a massive slave rebellion, or by the UN sending in an army of bluehelmets to put it down. It was ended by the people of the US. Some of the people of the US decided they weren’t having any of that, and launched a war of aggression against the rest of the US, but America in the end put down that criminal enterprise and ended slavery. The Democrat Party, defenders of the institution of slavery before the War of Southern Aggression, became the defenders of Jim Crow laws, the Klan and gun control regulations to keep blacks defenseless against Klan and white supremacist terror; but even these have all been largely wiped out. Admittedly, the Great Society programs that have done so much damage to the black family are still there, but I suspect a forthcoming economic collapse will bring those programs to a  rather sudden end.

So after all that, we have a nation where a native-born black person has full and equal rights (and thanks to affirmative action, in some ways *preferred* rights), and can achieve whatever is in their talents and ambitions to achieve. Katt Williams is a scrawny, goofy-lookin’ little dude who has done time in jail for having broken a number of laws, and yet he can make a pretty damned good living using his talents in a legal way: stand-up comedy. He can go on stage and make fun of celebrities. He can make fun of audience members. He can make fun of society. He can even poke fun at political “leaders,” and there ain’t jack that anybody can do about it other than not paying to see him. What’s for him *not* to be proud of the USA for?

As for the other side: I am of European descent, largely Scandinavian, with Brit, Germans and a bunch of the rest thrown in. You’ll not see me waving the Swedish flag. You won’t see me at the DMV demanding that the diverse license tests be in culturally-sensitive Swedish. I’m not demanding that the US FedGuv or the state of Utah recognize Sveriges nationaldag as a holiday . My ancestors may have been from there, but I have no allegiance to Sweden, Norway, the UK or anywhere else. Hell, I probably rant more about European political/cultural dumbassery than anywhere other than the US. And so I see “Italian-Americans” or “Irish-Americans” as being a rather odd notion… unless you hold dual citizenship… pick an identity and stick with it. But even here, on St. Patty’s Day, the “Irish Americans” get together and have their parade… and *don’t* talk about conquering whole regions of the USA to turn into an Irish homeland. The “Italian Americans” don’t yammer on about reconquista of the southwest and re-unifying it with, say, Sicily (there may be some in Jersey who dream of such, but I gather that the actual Italians don’t want ’em).

Now, you want to be proud of your Mexican/Swedish/Italian/Russian/Klingon heritage, you go right ahead. You go ahead and wave your little flag; you have the right. But if you think the US sucks in comparison to your “homeland,” then, well, why are you in fact here?

 Posted by at 12:20 pm
Sep 032011
 

A 1984 General Dynamics patent for a system to turn jetliners such as the DC-10 or L-1011 into missile launchers with minimal modification. The end result could be aircraft that would be visually identical to a commercial jetliner when readied.

The actual missiles intended are not named, but are clearly small… 10 inches diameter by 180 inches long. Many racks of them would be stored in the emptied-out passenger compartment, angled to fire forward and upward through ports in a replacement passenger compartment door. The launch rack would index forward to position missiles in launch position; launch rate would be one per second per side. 28 missiles could be fired from either side of the aircraft, for a total of 56. Presumably these would be some form of narrow-bodied cruise missile. Missiles up to 20 inches diameter and 20 feet long could also be loaded, but they would only be able to be fired from one side of the aircraft.

 Posted by at 10:48 pm
Sep 022011
 

OK, another movie review. In short, it’s a “found footage” movie like Blair Witch, but without quite so much shakeycam. The gag is that in 1974 the DoD supposedly launched an unmanned Saturn V to orbit some large defense satellite, but it was actually the Apollo 18 mission. Lands at the lunar south pole, hijinks ensue.

On the whole it pretty much actually looked like late Apollo vintage footage. Nothing much to complain about the special effects; periods spent in zero g are actually shown as zero g; movement on the lunar surface makes a good stab at 1/6 g. Without giving away too much of the plot, it’s a space horror movie… space critters and space infectious plague style. Turns out the Russians also got to the moon. Who knew?

If you are looking for a fair horror flick, this one ain’t bad. There is certainly some really effective creepiness in it, everything from the guys looking out of the LEM windows and noticing that the flag ain’t there anymore, to scenes shot in a shadowed lunar crevasse lit only by the flash on a camera, with barely discernible movement by Things That Should Not Be. There are a few head-shakable things from the science standpoint, not least of which is a launch from the lunar surface in a vehicle that couldn’t possibly work… and one hugenormous plot hole revolving around the fact that this is all “found footage” mostly in the form of 16mm film.

According to IMDB, the budget on this one was a whole five million dollars. A bit surprising… while much of it is shot in the CSM and the LEM (both of which looked to be pretty darn accurate), a fair amount is shot on the lunar surface with a functioning lunar rover, very likely all done with greenscreen and CGI.

Not the most spectacular movie, but for a low-budget, it’s not too shabby. Certainly worth the $4 ticket price if you happen to be in the area of the theater with time to kill.

Oh, and for what it’s worth: according to “Rotten Tomatoes,” only 23% of the critics liked it, but 77% of the regular schmoes did. A bit early yet, these could change, but if the ratio remains, it’s an interesting pointer towards just how relevant movie critics really are towards determining whether you’ll like a movie.

UPDATE, Sept 4, 10 PM: according to Rotten Tomatoes, the favorability stats remain about the same… 21% of critics liked it vs 75% of the audience. But at this point it hardly seems to matter… with a budget of about $5 million, it has (according to Box Office Mojo) already made $8.7 million domestically. Not a blockbuster, nothing at all like Blair Witch ($60K budget, $250M total take) or Paranormal Activity ($15K budget, $194M total take). But then, also nothing like Cowboys and Aliens ($163M budget, $146M total take) or Mars Needs Moms ($150M budget, $39M total take) or Dylan Dog ($20M budget, $4.6M total)or The Beaver ($21M budget, $6.4M total).

Ouch.

 Posted by at 10:21 pm
Sep 022011
 

What I know of the comedian Katt Williams has largely been restricted to what I’ve seen of him on the “Comedy Central Roasts.” He’s seemed fairly funny. Now, though… I think I’m starting to become a fan.

Currently making the rounds among the racebaiters is this clip of him a few days back in Phoenix Arizona (NSFW language):

[youtube oBf2xdSIYCA]

A bit short of 8 minutes, it features him pointing out that, yes, in fact, is *is* the USA, not Mexico. That if you live in the US, then your allegiance should be to… the US.

I would not have been aware of this had I not just seen a bit about it on CNN. The anchorette had on a hispanic activist who seemed to think that this constituted “hate speech.” Now, he said some NSFW things to and about a specific heckler who makes it plain that “*this* is Mexico,” when in fact it’s Phoenix. But other than that… damned if I can find any “hate speech.” Certainly nothing that rises to the level of slander and vitriol and outright racism that certain members of the Democrat party have spouted lately.

Feel free to point out any *actual* “hate speech” in this Katt Williams bit.

“Motherf***ers think they can live in this country and then still be allegiance to another f***in’ country. If you love another country more than you love America motherf***er then get to steppin. … If you love Mexico b*****, then get the f*** over there!”

 Posted by at 1:58 pm
Sep 022011
 

The SDASM archive has just posted a promotional film describing the “Big Stick.” This was Convairs idea for the Pluto project… a nuclear ramjet cruise missile. Capable of Mach 3 flight at an altitude of 500 feet, it would be virtually impossible to intercept, and would have virtually unlimited range. The YouTube video:

[youtube R1ROFw-36r0]

There is more on the Big Stick, including diagrams, in issue V2N1 of Aerospace Projects Review:

http://www.up-ship.com/blog/eAPR/ev2n1.htm

 Posted by at 10:22 am
Sep 012011
 

A recent project for a client: replicating a display model stand. The stand to be replicated was for a vintage Lockheed aircraft display model that did not have the original stand. A vintage Lockheed stand was produced to be copied. The stand was composed of a turned walnut base and a specially bent aluminum rod. The walnut based was outsourced to a local woodshop; the aluminum rod was fabricated in-house. This involved turning the exposed end of the rod, bending the rod around a special form and machining flats into the end of the rod to be inserted into the base. Once it was shaped and checked, it was potted in with epoxy, and the underside “fuzzed” in a  manner similar to the original. Two bases were fabricated simultaneously to assure that a backup was on-hand in case anything unfortunate occurred. As it turns out, both turned out just fine, so I have a spare Lockheed display stand (used for aircraft such as the F-104 Starfighter, among others). If you are interested in it, contact me.

Photos below show the original Lockheed stand and the two replicas (with blue tape on the aluminum support rods).

 Posted by at 10:50 pm
Sep 012011
 

If you want to see a whole hell of a lot of crazy (with a whole lot of NSFW profanity, so be warned), take a look at this:

[youtube OUj-m6Gq_2Y]

Ignorant worldviews like this are the reason why the US is in financial distress. The more people who believe as this woman does, that the world owes her stuff, the more people vote for the sort of politicians who promise to give them free stuff, and the worse things get.

 Posted by at 10:17 pm
Sep 012011
 

Another take on the idea of launching an ICBM from a large jet aircraft: shoot it out the nose.

Patented in 1977, this concept from Lockheed would involved firing a Minuteman-style ICBM through a single launch tube out the nose of a C-5 Galaxy cargo plane. Better still, within the cargo bay would be a rotary structure holding four ICBMs, much like the cylinder of a good old fashioned revolver. The bottom-most missile would be fired through the “barrel” by means of a high pressure gas charge; the cylinder would then rotate the next missile into place for firing.

Missile launcher for aircraft

All in all, this seems like one of the goofier concepts for an airborne ICBM launcher. The potential for catastrophic failures seems fairly large.

 Posted by at 5:44 pm
Sep 012011
 

Recordings of live TV from September 11, 2001.

http://www.archive.org/details/sept_11_tv_archive

These are – at least from the ones I’ve watched so far – the full recordings, commercials and all. I’ve not seen most of this… on that morning, I was in a van pool, listening to it on the radio.

This one is the ABC coverage:

http://www.archive.org/details/abc200109110831-0912

The news breaks at 8:51 AM local time, about 20 minutes into the video. The second plane flies into the screen live at 9:02 AM, about 31:43 into the video.

It’s old news, but it’s useful to remember that… this is the world. As angry and sad as the events of that day made *us,* there were millions of people around the world who thought that this was a wonderful thing.

 Posted by at 4:09 pm