Aug 302019
 

There are often massive differences between audience and professional critic scores for various movies. And then sometimes the audience and the critics agree that this movie was great or that movie sucked. It enough to make reliance upon critics a dubious prospect. You just can’t tell if the professional telling you that Entertainment Product you were interested in was good/bad is worth listening to, especially if you don’t have a track record with that critic.

But sometimes you don’t need to know a specific critic to be able to make a determination of whether that thing they’re talking about is worth your time. Behold:

Buzzfeed: Dave Chappelle Doesn’t Need To Punch Down

The Atlantic: The Fear in Dave Chappelle’s New Special

And Vice: You Can Definitely Skip Dave Chappelle’s New Netflix Special ‘Sticks & Stones’

The Woke Media basically *hated* the new Dave Chappelle special on Netflix. Why? Because he correctly pointed out that in todays culture you don’t dare offend The Alphabet People. Because he correctly called out cancel culture. Because he continued the long tradition of making uncomfortable humor. Being this cheesed off at someone who, politically, is one of their own (he is an Obama worshipper) honestly comes across like religious fanatics yelling “heretic” at a co-religionist who disagrees on some small matter of doctrine.

The plethora of *negative* reviews is honestly quite useful. If they were this angry at someone who had fallen from the true faith, but who wasn’t very good, they’d likely just mumble some stuff about “it wasn’t very good.” This level of effort at steering people away, though, tells you they *know* it’s good and they don’t want people being exposed to heresy.

If you have an hour and a half (an hour for the special,a  bit short of half an hour for an epilogue) and don;t mind being offended while laughing your butt off, and if you have Netflix, give “Sticks & Stones” a watch.

 

Note: I love the “he’s punching down” argument when it comes to making fun of the internet outrage mob. This amorphous vile entity is second only to the government in terms of power, and second to none in terms of striking speed and the ability to ruin lives at a distance for stuff that happened long prior to the term of the statute of limitations.

 Posted by at 9:56 am
Aug 292019
 

… and there is much to say about how decisions the Disney corporation has made has squandered the legacy of Star Wars that they spent four billion dollars to acquire. But the *people* who work in the trenches at the Disney parks seem to be something quite a bit different. A while back I pointed out the fantastic “Evil Queen” they’ve got who brings the snark with verve and talent, but then there are these two incidents of the “talent” being *waaaaay* better people than those who decided to turn Han Solo into a bad joke and Luke Skywalker into a worthless dirtbag.

 

First: a non-verbal autistic kid went into sensory overload and started melting down. “Snow White” was on the job, it seems, and took care of the situation.

I am so emotional with these pictures !! Brody was having a meltdown . It was our turn to take pictures with her and he…

Posted by Lauren Bergner on Sunday, August 25, 2019

 

And then they’ve got a “Mary Poppins” who interacted with a blind girl. The blind girl, being blind and all, could not see “Mary Poppins” or her outfit… but “Mary Poppins” let the girl “see” her via touch. I would be large sums of someone else’s money that Disney has standing orders with the talent along the lines of “don’t let the plebes touch you or your costumes,” along with orders to the security to prevent the dirty, dirty masses from touching the talent. yet everyone involved here, from the “Mary Poppins” to the guards doubtless watching from the bushes, to the bored drone a thousand feet under the park watching the event via cameras hidden in “Mary Poppins'” hat, decided to let it play out.

 

I’m honestly stumped what a blind person would get out of most of an amusement park, but she seems happy, so who am I to argue?

 

I do wonder if there’s something wrong with *me* or something wrong with *society* that I’m frankly surprised to see basic decency out of people who are doubtless underpaid, overworked and subject to daily indignities from horrible, horrible park proles.

 Posted by at 10:43 pm
Aug 292019
 

In 1985 Rockwell pondered the business possibility of an “Aft Cargo Carrier” for the Shuttle. This idea, which received a fair amount of study by Martin Marietta, installed a payload shroud to the *rear* of the external tank. Doing this would allow the Shuttle to carry payloads too large in diameter to fit in the Shuttle bay; if the STS system was overall improved, this would allow the vehicle to carry payloads heavier than the Shuttle itself would be allowed to carry (the Orbiter has to *land* with whatever payload might be in the cargo bay; by moving the cargo away from the Orbiter, in an abort situation the orbit can land light and just let the aft payload go into the drink). The cargo carrier has to be insulated from a *lot* of heat, radiant energy coming from the solid and liquid rockets.

A common idea was that the Orbiter would carry some sort of satellite or other payload not capable of much self-propulsion, while an orbital tug would be carried in the ACC. The tug would be fueled with light & fluffy liquid hydrogen, which not only would be challenging to fit into the Orbiter cargo bay, it would also require new fuel line pass-throughs in either the cargo bay doors or the sides of the cargo bay… along with boiloff vents. Much preferable, went the argument, to put the LH2 in an ACC that you could poke whatever holes you want to in.

The configuration of the ACC shown in the sketch is noticeably different from all other ACC designs I’ve seen elsewhere. I don’t know if this is because Rockwell designed a rather ellipsoidal carrier, or the artist just sorta dashed this one out.

Next time: boosting the boosters

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 10:07 pm
Aug 292019
 

Bah-bwuuuuuhhh?

That’s rather remarkable. It’s miraculously fast by NASA standards.

Also of note: Musk is saying the vehicle *after* Starship/Super Heavy will be 18 meters in diameter, twice that of SH. This would seem to put it well beyond Saturn v and into the Nova/Post-Saturn scale of booster. One might wonder if they’re thinking about a sizable SSTO vehicle that can serve as a boost-back booster for heavier upper stages.

 

 Posted by at 9:33 pm
Aug 292019
 

From Ol’ Blighted, the latest innovation in political correctness: banning depictions of people being people.

Volkswagen and Philadelphia cream cheese ads banned over gender stereotypes

A lot of Americans think of Britain as a slightly eccentric yet still free country. But… it’s not, really. They do not have a written constitution as such; the government can basically do whatever they feel like doing, and they’ve made the ultimately suicidal mistake of assuming that Parliament will always come down on the side of sense and reason. But Britain has themselves an “Advertising Standards Agency” that feels it can ban commercials that show stereotypically (i.e. historically and biologically and culturally accurate) gendered activities. In this case, a commercial that shows a woman in a park with a baby carriage “engaged in a stereotypical care-giving role.”

One would hope that this sort of thing, like the despicable Canadian “Human Rights Tribunals” would be impossible in the United States. But don’t bet on it. The Chinese “social credit” system would be illegal for the government to enact, but it’s something definitely to watch out for among major financial and communications companies. I can see American broadcasters enacting such restrictions themselves just to keep the shrieking harpies of social justice conformity off their backs for ten seconds until the next outrage.

 Posted by at 2:46 am
Aug 282019
 

Continuing…

In 1985 Rockwell pondered the idea of an unmanned Orbiter. The US did not proceed with that concept, while the Soviets did with their Buran. It was an interesting notion and for the time reasonably advanced tech… but it’s clearly a very silly idea (even more so with Buran). The whole purpose of the Orbiter as compared to any other launch vehicle is to *return* stuff. With the Space Shuttle, the stuff it returned was sometimes payload, always avionics, engines and crew. Making the Orbiter unmanned means… why the hell are you launching a crew cabin? Buran was even worse; it didn’t even bring back the main engines.

 Posted by at 11:08 pm
Aug 282019
 

… that as of today things out here are gonna get kinda weird. More details in the future, but for now it looks as if productivity on a lot of things is going to drop off sharply.

 

If anyone had a hankering to donate a hundred grand to me, now would be the time.

 Posted by at 5:46 pm
Aug 282019
 

Around a week ago the nightly local news had a piece on a major police action in Salt Lake City. The event involved a response to a protest, then a shooting and a traffic accident. As it turns out… it was all a training exercise. However, one thing caught my eye and made me laugh: the “protestors” were all actors, of course, holding up pretty generic protest signs. But there was one that pretty effectively summed up current outrage/protest/mob culture:

 

 Posted by at 12:27 am