Jun 162011
 

Now available: Justo Miranda & Paula Mercado present Reichdreams Dossier No. 21: “FW190 Extreme.” This issue includes advanced versions of the WWII German Focke-Wulf FW190 fighter. Includes engine studies (piston, turbojet and ramjet), armament studies (guns, cannon, upward-firing weapons, a range of guided and unguided air-to-surface and air-to-air missiles, glide bombs, cruise missiles), alternate wing planforms, ejector seats, avionics and even parasite fighters!

This issue contains more than 80 pages of technical diagrams, many in 1/72 or 1/48 scale. Yours to download for only $20! You can also buy it in printed form through MagCloud. Check out the MagCloud page for a higher-resolution “preview” of the issue and to buy a high-qaulity printed and bound edition for $30.60.

Be sure to check out the other issues in the Reichdreams Dossiers series.

 Posted by at 12:18 am
Jun 052011
 

And on the opposite end of the scale from the Liberator, here’s a pistol presented to Hitler. With enough blingtastic mother-of-pearl and gold plating to satisfy your average pimp or rapper, this .32 caliber “Lilliput” Model 1 semi-automatic wandered out of Europe at the end of WWII in the posession of an average GI. It’s now on display at the West Point museum

 Posted by at 7:35 pm
Jun 042011
 

On display at the West Point museum is an example of the “Liberator” pistol mass produced during WWII. Little more than a stamped-metal “zip gun,” the idea was to produce at minimal cost the minimal firearm capable of putting down an enemy soldier. It was a one-shot weapon (with storage in the grip for a few extra rounds), not intended for combat use. Instead, the idea was that it would be airdropped to partisans across Europe, who would use it to cap Axis soldiers… and then take *their* guns. Relatively few of the millions produced still exist; fewer still were actually used. They came packaged in a carboard box with a cartoon instruction sheet. A wooden dowel rod was also included to help the shooter eject a spent cartrige.

Given its limited practical value, they are really rather pricy, and if you find a boxload of ’em, scrapping them for the steel would be a really, really bad idea.

 Posted by at 6:54 pm
May 262011
 

If you’re of a mind to see the sort of COMPLETELY INSANE tank concepts that appeared in the Soviet Union around about the time of WWII, check out this (Russian language) blog, loaded with bizarre goodies dug out of the  Central Defence Ministry Archive (Podolsk, Russia):

http://yuripasholok.livejournal.com/

Many people are thrilled to death with the wackier Nazi wartime tank projects, including the 1000-ton P.1000 “Ratte.” Well, that’s a tiny pipsqueak compared to this ridiculous monstrocity:

http://yuripasholok.livejournal.com/228432.html

Is that what you think it is? Well, if you think it’s fricken’ Babylon 5, loaded for bear and rolling across the farmlands, then, yes, it is. It’s a February, 1944, concept for a giant armored cylinder, apparently using tanks or train engines on the inside to roll it around, presumably to crush the invading Fascist scourge.

Which makes this concept seem absolutely tame in comparison:

http://yuripasholok.livejournal.com/223518.html

A 1942 concept for an “armored cruiser.”

Feel free to dig around the blog. A whole lot of other goodies including some nutty war bicycles.

 Posted by at 12:28 pm
May 242011
 

Immediately after WWII, the American aeronautical industry became interested in applying nuclear power to anything that could fly. In 1947, North American Aviation published a groundbreaking report on the use of atomic power in rockets and ramjets, concluding that both were possible. They designed the clear and obvious predecessors to both NERVA and Project Pluto. The NAA D44-100 nuclear ramjet vehicle was, like Pluto, a two stage intercontinental cruise missile, with the first stage being a rocket booster to get the nuclear ramjet up to speed. Unlike Pluto, the nuclear ramjet was an axially symmetric design with the payload (a single nuclear weapon) kept within the long inlet spike.

This, along with a nuclear rocket ICBM that clearly used V-2 aerodynamics, were the first serious engineering design studies of nuclear powered vehicles of which I’m aware. After more than sixty years, there’s nothing about the designs that screams “wrong.” Just a few aspect that scream “obsolete.” And, of course, some that scream “Ha Ha! Your civilization never got around to building anything nearly as cool as this!!!”

See more on these by checking out issue V2N2 of Aerospace Projects Review.

 Posted by at 8:58 pm
May 162011
 

Ya Commie bastitch…

On display at the West Point Museum is a Chinese Type 54 pistol with a difference. A difference that I heartily approve of! The description:

People’s Republic of China Type 54 Pistol

Caliber 7.62 mm

The Type 54 pistol is actually an exact copy, except for markings, of the Soviet TT-33 introduced in 1933. This model has also been produced by most of the Warsaw Pact Nations and so was very commonly used  by the North Vietnamese Army and the Viet Cong.

Those pistols made specifically for export by communist China were marked only “M20” to disguise their origin. This M20 pistol was struck by a U.S. 5.56mm rifle bullet at Phuoc Loc, South Vietnam on 3 December 1967 and found next to the body of a Viet Cong officer.

Note that the rifle bullet didn’t just dent the barrel of this pistol, it punched straight through it.

 Posted by at 3:44 pm
May 072011
 

On display at the West Point Museum are a number of experimental World War One era helmets by a number of nations, including the US. World War One was a turning point in a lot of areas, not least of which being the return of effective body armor. 

As firearms development made plate armor less and less effective on the battlefield, military planners simply gave up on the whole concept. Armor capable of stopping a bullet was so heavy that a soldier encumbered with it would be virtually immobile, so armor vanished and was replaced with… well, not much. The British famously gave their soldiers red coats, so that when they were inevitably shot (red is a bad color to wear as camouflage pretty much *anywhere*), the blood would not be obvious.

But by the time WWI rolled around, a whole lot of soldiers were dying due to head wounds from shrapnel. Thus the need for helmets became blisteringly obvious. The Germans produced their famous design, which survives to this day in general outline. The Brits produced their shallow “war hat” design… terrible for protection from the side, but effective from above. The United States put no helmet of its own into production until the M1 steel pot of WWII.

However, while the US did not field it own helmets in any quantity, it did nevertheless test a number of designs. One such helmet is the Model 8 Helmet shown below. It had a steel pot design much like that which would come along more than two decades later… and an armored face mask which would provide a measure of protection from the front. The Ford Motor Company manufactured a surprising 1,300 of these helmets, designed by curator of arms and armor at the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, based on medieval helmet design.  They apparently worked, but they messed with vision due to the narrow eyeslits.

More photos of Model 8 helmets can be seen HERE.

The concept certainly has flaws (vision and breathing, for example), but I’d be very interested in seeing a modern version. Made out of modern composites, with polycarbonate lenses over improved eyeslits, such a helmet would provide additional protection. Plus… properly painted, they could give soldiers a terrifying visage. Imagine if a helmet like this was the last thing Osama Bin Laden saw.

 Posted by at 7:47 pm
May 022011
 

A photo found at the Watervliet Arsenal museum shows the XM28 120mm recoilless gun with a warhead attached. Note, however, that while the XM28 is pretty much what was actually put into production and fielded, the warhead is entirely different to the actual M388 warhead. The actual warhead was somewhat football-shaped, while this is a simple finned cone/cylinder. The question thus is whether this was a preliminary design for the warhead, or instead was it simply a more or less random shape meant to stand in for the actual warhead. Work on the Davy Crockett at Watervliet focussed on the recoilless gun launching systems, not on the warhead (a LLNL product), and thus early on Watervliet may not have had access to a warhead or dummy warhead… and they may not have even been clued in on just what it looked like. If Watervliets staff did not know what the warhead looked like (they would not have had a Need To Know in order to work on the guns), they might have simply guessed in order to set up a display.

 Posted by at 10:53 pm