admin

Dec 182016
 

Hmmm…

‘Mr. Robot’ Creator Sam Esmail Developing Miniseries Based on Sci-Fi Classic ‘Metropolis’

The article is essentially devoid of all useful details. No idea when, who, what network, anything. The few snippets available are that the basic idea of the story sounds like that of the original Fritz Lang silent film, and that Esmail isn’t going to start on it until he’s done with “Mr. Robot.” If “Mr. Robot” goes the planned five years, that puts it at least three years out.

That would mean that it wouldn’t be due out until 2019-2020. Which is not that far off from being a full *century* after the original movie was released (1927), and even closer to the date the original movie was set in (2026).

One other detail: they’re apparently looking at a budget of $10 million. Per episode.

 

 Posted by at 6:54 pm
Dec 182016
 

… the dumbest thing you’ll read today.

4 Reasons Demanding ‘Objectivity’ in Social Justice Debates Can Be Oppressive

No, really, the author is serious.

1. Often, Those Who Seem ‘Objective’ Are Actually Just Privileged

2. Everyone Speaks From a Social Position and Has Biases

3. Striving Towards ‘Objectivity’ Is Used to Justify Tone-Policing

And the piece de resistance, the coop de Gracie…

4. Sometimes Emotions Are Just as Important as Facts

Ta-da…

Basically, this mental giants position is that since some people promptly lose their co0ol when their world views are challenged… their world views should not *be* challenged, and losing ones cool is a valid form of debate-winning. Behold:

We need to understand that feelings, lived experiences, and psychology are absolutely important in activism and social justice.After all, social justice is about human experiences. It’s absurd – violent, even – to discuss human experiences while leaving out such an important part of our humanity.

It’s “violent” to discuss experiences rationally.

Well, maybe it’s time to play that game. Clearly the recent election has demonstrated that there is a hunger for turning the social justice warriors playbook against them… Trump didn’t win by being rational, logical or even what you might call “honest.” Instead he won by being petulant, insulting, snide, irrational, easily offended. In other words… he played the game like a social justice warrior.

So, let’s play that game. Whenever someone throws “check your privilege” at you, just remember: “What you call ‘privilege’ is just me being better than you.” Whenever an SJW calls you cisgendered or heteronormative or some such, just point out, with a scornful look and a wagging finger, “tut-tut, I identify as ‘normal,’ thank you very much.” And, where possible, laugh at them. And accuse them of laughter-shaming if they have a problem with it.

 Posted by at 12:41 pm
Dec 172016
 

Short form: Really Good.

Longer form: it’s a very different Star Wars movie. It is indeed quite it’s own thing; it’s a one-shot, and there will be no sequel to this. And under the circumstances… that’s good and proper. There is no “opening crawl,” it launches right into the show (with a shot of a ship passing over the ring plane of a terrestrial world with a decent set of rings… for those who care, it looks a *lot* like the Asgard from my own yarns). There is no John Williams music, a first for a Star Wars movie. There are no Jedi (unless you count Vader), “force powers” are not employed, there is no “chosen one” or “child of destiny” or any of that sort of crap.

So, some largely spoiler-free observations:

One of the “good guy” characters is, like Han, a straight up murderer. But unlike Han who shot Greedo, in this case, the hero shoots dead a non-bad-guy. It’s a “yeah, I guess that makes sense” in terms of this being a war and espionage situation but still… dayum.

Tarkin appears, thanks to CGI. He *mostly* works. But whoever they got to do Peter Cushings voice… well, I don’t think he was all that close.

Princess Leia is in the movie for precisely the right amount of time.

I *think* they recycled a lot of snippets of X-Wing pilot shots and dialogue from the original Star Wars. There is a  substantial space battle at the end featuring a lot of the same rebel fighters that would take on the Death Star a few days/weeks later in Star Wars…

Darth Vader hired Saurons architect.

For nearly forty years there’s been the question of “how could the Empire have been so stupid as to design that flaw into the Death Star,” coupled with “how could the rebels analyze the blueprints and find the flaw *that* *fast.*”  Rogue One answers both of these in a perfectly cromulent fashion.

Death Star on full power? Planet goes “bang,” as we’ve seen before, and really not that impressive of a visual, just an explosion. Death Star firing on just one reactor? Freakin’ *spectacular” imagery. Think “best parts of ‘Trinity and Beyond’ on the big screen and on methamphetamines.”

Tarkin doesn’t just cameo, he’s an important character… and he’s the vicious badass he was in “Star Wars” and  the supposedly kids show “Rebels” (where he had two of his men beheaded and nuked a communications tower just to shut down a broadcast). Still… “We want to send a message, not a manifesto” is a damn good line.

Speaking of “Rebels,” there are at least three “Easter Eggs” that hearken to “Rebels” and the prior “Clone Wars” shows. Forest Whitakers character Saw Gerrara is taken straight from “Clone Wars.” The main ship “Ghost” from “Rebels” or at least one of the same class, is seen briefly and at some distance in the space battle at the end. And the rebels make good use of a “Hammerhead” cruiser… which is also from “Rebels.”

Best use of kinetic energy as a destructive force so far in “Star Wars.” The rebels shove something into other stuff. Something you really don’t want to get shoved into you.

When you reprogram a droid, sometimes you remove all its filters. And it becomes *awesome.* The droid K-2SO will tell you exactly what it thinks, and then it will shoot you in the head. And it becomes the best character in the movie.

On another matter: I’ve heard people claim that the writers said they’d inserted anti-Trump stuff into the movie. If they did, I sure didn’t catch it. I was expecting some villain to spout something about “making the galaxy great again,” but, nope.

 Posted by at 9:25 pm
Dec 152016
 

The White House has a system in pl,ace to let people set up and sign petitions and, if the petition garners 100,000 signers, the White House is supposed to address the issue. One recent one that is if nothing else a little amusing is:

The next major U.S. Navy Ship should be named “USS The Deplorables”

To honor those citizens who rose up to defend America and The Constitution from the globalists.

The petition was created December 4, runs to January 3.  So far it has a whopping 6,140 signers out of the required 100,000. Kinda behind schedule…

 

 

 Posted by at 4:19 pm
Dec 152016
 

Really vintage.

T.he world’s oldest water is even more ancient than we realised

In a three-kilometer deep mine under Canada, researchers have found a supply of water that’s about 2 billion years old (based on measurements of noble gases dissolved in the water). Article includes discussion of ongoing chemistry that could provide an energy source adequate to the task of maintaining a microbial ecosystem, trapped in place and separated from the rest of the world for *billions* of years. If such an ecosystem was trapped in place in a reservoir like this billions of years ago, I’d bet that the genetic connection between the life *there* and the life *here* would be pretty minimal.

 Posted by at 12:17 am
Dec 142016
 

In the same vein as the “Earth: Where to Colonize” thought experiment from a few months ago, I present this discussion topic: baby licenses.

Lots of places, you need to have a license for a pet dog. You need to have a license for a sidearm, or to have a lemonade stand or to do roof repair, dentistry makeup, hairstyling. And yet, we let just anybody have babies.

It’s a common enough trope in futuristic sci-fi to have “baby licenses.” But what would actually make a *good* regulatory system here? The problem is that it’s really easy to see how such a system could quickly turn into a dystopian nightmare… licenses doled out not based on a rational set of metrics, but due to political favors, bribery, nepotism, etc. And what happens when someone has more babies than allowed? That has been the subject of many a dark short story or short subject film.

But it may come about that some form of reproduction-regulation becomes necessary. China tried with their one-baby policy, which they’ve recently abandoned. In some future Lunar colony, or on a generation-starship, or a free-flying habitat… or just in an overcrowded US or UK or Sweden it may be necessary to say “ok, enough, we need to clamp down on the baby-making for a while.” This idea might *also* be applied for “Ark Selection” purposes… who gets to ride the rocket to Bronson Beta when the time comes.

So… let’s say the decision came down that only half of the couples in the land were going to be allowed to have a baby. What would make a good set of regulations?

My own thoughts: computerize the selection process to the maximum degree possible. And any humans involved are under *intense* scrutiny, with massive penalties for screwing with the system. Additionally, include a sizable truly random lottery. Lots of people are going to be shut out of the process, and they’ll know it; and when many people find out they’re not going to be allowed to reproduce they can get twitchy. A *trusted* lottery where people who want can toss their ID’s into the hat can serve as a relief valve for those who know they won’t be selected otherwise.

Some ideas…

Things that would be used to exclude:

1: A criminal record

2: Transferable genetic diseases

3: Crazy

4: Stupid

5: Poor. Sure, that one would *really* set off some folks… but let’s face it, if you’re poor, maybe you shouldn’t have more mouths to feed.

6: Being a general screwup

Things that would be used to get you a license:

1: Achievement (good and vague right there). If you have proven useful to society, not only do we want to reward you (assuming, of course, you *want* a baby), we want more like you.

2: Being rich. Rather than bribery, though, make it possible to outright purchase baby licenses for yourself. Something impressive like a million bucks a pop, or perhaps even a sliding scale (say, a million bucks until your net worth rises to $10 million… and from that point on it’s $1M plus 5% of your net worth). Beyond the funds-raising potential, you *want* the rich to have as many children as practical… because then the fortunes will presumably get split up among the many heirs, rather than passed down in a straight line. Make having many kids be a new status symbol.

3: Being physically and mentally fit.

 

I’d argue against making a baby license transferable, since if it was it could by criminals.

So: for a reasonable, rational, *just* system… what would the baby licensing system look like? Discuss.

 Posted by at 7:06 pm
Dec 142016
 

UPDATE: problem has been resolved satisfactorily.

I need this DWG file, a ~450 kb 3D CAD model of a truss, converted into an older version of DWG. I’m running Rhino 4, which can’t open it; I was told to download “DWG Truview,” and 670 megabytes later I had a program that wouldn’t install *at* *all* on my work computer and nearly killed my netbook. Someone kindly converted it into a Rhino file for me, which was awesome… but a Rhino *5* file, which Rhino 4 can’t open.

GAAAAAHHHHHH

 

Thanks in advance.

 Posted by at 5:53 pm