If you really want to, and really really don’t have anything better do do with your time, you can download “2083 – A European Declaration of Independence” by “Andrew Berwick,” which appears to be the manifesto of Anders Behring Breivik. It’s a “.docx” file, which always gives my computer fits, but I did manage to convert it into a regular Word “.doc” file. And.. . it’s more than 1600 pages.
Clearly I haven’t read the whole thing. Nor do I intend to. But I did skim through it; it *appears* to be largely a compendium of other peoples work describing the history and evils of Islam. But it does have original work in it, such as a whole lot of blather about the Knights Templar, Marxism and Nordic races.
Page 1284:
3.84 Knights Templar and ethnocentrism
Knights Templar has three primary functions;
To act as a pan-European Crusader Movement for the banishment of Islam from Europe
To act as an Indigenous Rights Movement; to serve the interest of the European ethnic groups and to destroy cultural Marxism/multiculturalism
To act as a War Crimes Tribunal
Page 1287:
The Marxist regimes in Europe grant us privileges by either completely liberalising the biotechnology-laws. They must encourage and even directly sponsor repro-genetics programs on a private and/or state level, which facilitates reproduction clinics who focus strictly on indigenous genotypes from pure sources (non-diluted (95-99% pure) Nordic genotypes) found in Northern Sweden and other areas where this is available. The European Marxist regimes will never allow or contribute to this which only leaves two options;
Conservatives/nationalists/traditionalists in each European country are given reservations where we can exercise autonomy (political control) just like the Native Americans after their defeat against the US Army. This is not acceptable yet to a large majority of conservatives as we expect to defeat the cultural Marxist regimes of Europe within 70 years. The third option should be outlined as follows;
Conservatives must seize political and military power through a combination of armed and democratic struggle within 70 years and implement the above policies. The alternative is the continued bastardisation model, very similar to the Brazilian model; where it has been (due to the Brazilian Marxist revolution) established a melting pot of European/Asian/African mix.
Oy vey.
Page 1289:
I am extremely proud of my ethnic group, Norwegians which is a Northern-Germanic tribe.
Gah. Being proud of one’s ethnic group is just about the most pointless pride imaginable. Be proud of the things you’ve done, not of the circumstances of your birth.
Several pages of rants and blather about the evils of “race mixing” follow that.
Page 1338:
All 2nd and 3rd world countries (where the average birth rate is above 2,1) are to implement 1 child policies until their country is stabilised in regards to financial outlooks and overconsumption, saving their forests etc.
.
Decrease global consummation through implementing protectionist policies
All globalist companies will be nationalised
Page 1341:
Our planet should not exceed 3 billion individuals so radical policies will have to be implemented (we are currently more than 6,8 billion).
Page 1448: Deport all Muslims
Page 1454:
Marxists (all category A and B traitors) will be shown no mercy whatsoever. They will all be executed due to their war crimes listed in point 1-8.
Page 1475 and a whole lot beyond: Christian justification for a renewed Crusade to Christianize Europe and drive out the Muslims.
1574 to 1639: a day-to-day record of his efforts at obtaining weapons and making explosives. The last entry is on July 21. I’ve only skimmed this pa4rt, but it promises to be rather creepy. In skimming through it I haven’t yet found an explanation of just what he was planning to do, but I suspect it’s in there.
On the whole it reads like little more than a warmed-over Mein Kampf. The guy comes across not as an American-style conservative, but as an old-school “National Socialist,” i.e. “Nazi.” He may share the American conservatives dislike of Marxism and Islam, but rather than the American conservatives goal of minimum government, he seems to want a *maximum* government that controls the genetic and ethnic makeup of a people, as well as their religions. As I’ve said before, European political labels and American political labels may include the same titles but they sure mean different things.
The extreme dislike of Marxists actually fits… what political movement did the Nazis hate most? The Marxists. And what political movement did the Nazis most resemble? The Marxists. It seems to be something of a truism that some of the greatest *hate* that humans can produce is hatred of those who are really a whole lot like them… just a little different. Shia vs. Sunni, Catholic vs. protestant, Nazi vs Commie, Serb vs. Croat. To outsiders, the two sides are virtually indistinguishable.
A big difference, of course, is that this time there is a whole lot of blather about how great the Church (i.e. Catholic church) and the Masons are.
11 Responses to “Yet another nutty “Manifesto””
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.
The Masonic stuff is odd, as originally, Catholics couldn’t be Freemasons.
Way back, they had the shootout with Gordon Kahl in Medina, about 45 miles west of here.
The group he was in, the Posse Comitatus, had a loopy manifesto that sounds a lot like this also, which was based on something like a cross between Norman Law and the game Dungeons and Dragons – with everyone in the separate country that Medina was going to become getting an equal amount of silver coinage at the beginning, like in a game of Monopoly. What happened next was their own affair, but if you got in debt to someone and couldn’t repay them “weregeld”, they could enslave you till the amount of work you did equaled the debt owed.
Oh, BTW, Medina was going to have a space program. 😀
There’s a PDF of it here:
http://www.kevinislaughter.com/wp-content/uploads/2083+-+A+European+Declaration+of+Independence.pdf
For being Norwegian, he’s got a command of English like nothing you’ve ever seen; the whole manifesto is extremely professionally done.
He may be crazy, but his IQ must be right through the roof, and he does actually resemble someone who would be running a secret international organization like SPECTER or Quantum…maybe even Hydra! :-O
He’s even got a spooky insignia of a red dagger with a hilt shaped like a Maltese cross going through a skull on his uniform, which is pretty wild-looking in its own right. (page 1513)
Check out his diary from July 2 forward (Page 1464), as he’s getting aggressive from giving up his testosterone supplements…duh-huh? Shouldn’t that work the other way around?
The photo of him aiming his gun on page 1515 is really something to see; it looks like something out of a Sci-Fi movie with all its attachments.
> There’s a PDF of it here:
http://www.kevinislaughter.com/wp-content/uploads/2083+-+A+European+Declaration+of+Independence.pdf
Thanks. It appears to be the same as the “.DOCX” file, but the number of pages is distinctly different… it appears that the PDF is formatted a bit tighter. Should probably use that as the “baseline” for discussion.
I’ve seen lots of references to the guy being a “fundamentalist Christian.” This is honestly a little difficult to support, because on the one hand you get stuff like this (page 1243):
“Support the dismantlement of Protestantism in the Nordic countries, the UK, Germany
(replacing it with Catholicism).”
And then you get stuff like this (page 1403):
“At the age of 15 I chose to be baptised and confirmed in the Norwegian State Church. I
consider myself to be 100% Christian.”
But then (page 1371):
“I’m 100% of Nordic descent and a protestant Christian with no ties to any Jewish
organisation which would cloud my judgement.”
And then (page 1361):
“As this is a cultural war, our definition of being a Christian does not necessarily
constitute that you are required to have a personal relationship with God or Jesus.”
And then this kicker: (page 1307):
“If you have a personal relationship with Jesus Christ and God then you are a religious
Christian. Myself and many more like me do not necessarily have a personal relationship
with Jesus Christ and God. We do however believe in Christianity as a cultural, social,
identity and moral platform. This makes us Christian.”
Many self-describing Christians would deny that Breivek was a Christian based on his actions. This is a common rhetorical tactic… Christians cannot do evil things in the name of Christ, because the moment they do something evil like this, they’re automatically not Christian. It’s an argument I’ve heard many times before, and reject as being logically flawed. However, Breivek’s definition of what it is to be Christian conflicts fairly substantially with every definition of “Christian” I’ve seen before. If you want all the *trappings* of Christianity but don’t actually believe that Christ is the son of God who died for your sins (and so on), then I’m not sure what that makes you, but I doubt that makes you a Christian in any meaningful sense. And it sure as hell doesn’t make you a “fundamentalist Christian.”
He considers himself a 100% Christian protestant who wants to ban protestantism and replace it with the Catholic church? Buh?
And then…(page 1361): “Odinists need not fear us as they should consider us brothers in our common fight.”
Fuck you, buddy.
I may actually try to read the warped thing in whole just to figure out where he was coming from.
One interesting aspect I’d like to figure out is how he learned to write English so well that it comes across as his first, not second, launguage.
Note that on his personal photos, his arm patch is also written in English, not Norwegian.
Not being someone real “conservatives” or “fundamentalist Christians” would identify as one of their own does nothing to stop the loony left, which has no understanding of those groups reality, from identifying him as a member of said groups.
I do think that you, admin, make a mistake when you say:
“And what political movement did the Nazis most resemble? The Marxists.”
Like the Christian terrorist, you don’t know the difference between Marxism and Stalinism. The final goal in Marxism is a classless and stateless society…
It’s quite surprising to state that
“He may share the American conservatives dislike of Marxism and Islam, but rather than the American conservatives goal of minimum government, he seems to want a *maximum* government that controls the genetic and ethnic makeup of a people, as well as their religions.”
Because American Conservatives are big fans of “Big Government”… for social issues (e.g.: gay rights, reproductive rights). The minimum Government talk is only true in the economic issues.
I’m not sure what the terrorist means by “All globalist companies will be nationalised”, because nationalised may very well mean that the companies are held by private citizens of a certain nation and not the nation as a whole.
> The final goal in Marxism is a classless and stateless society…
And yet, with all the dozens of nation-sized experiments in Marxism in the last century, they never even come *close* to that. What they do all seem to share, however, is a bloodthirstiness that rivals and often exceeds exceeds that of the Nazis.
The problem with “idealistic” Marxism is that it cannot work with normal humans. Because “classless and stateless” equates to “no matter how hard you work or how smart you are or how ambitious you are, you are not allowed to live better than some lazy slob.” So, like Lenin and all those who followed in his footsteps, the Marxists are forced to just start shooting vast numbers of people to get ’em to go with the program.
> Because American Conservatives are big fans of “Big Government”… for social issues
Many are. But certainly not libertarians. As for gay rights, there’s little enough role for “big government.” As for killing babies (also known as “reproductive rights”) there’s no more need in the Religious Rights mind for big government than there is a need for big government to deal with any other form of murder. Note: Not saying I am one of those strong anti-abortion types, but if you understand what an abortion is, you cannot say that there is no merit to the argument that it is killing a baby.
> I’m not sure what the terrorist means b
Breivik’s English is impeccable. Consequently, I’d expect that he meant by that what is normally meant by “nationalizing,” in other words, stealing private property and giving it to the government.
I though it was a good text you wrote till the very ending when you say communism and nazism are virtually the same thing. It just goes to show that you, in fact dont know anything about communism and just believe in the in the backlash and misconceptions about it.
> you, in fact dont know anything about communism
What, is your problem that I didn’t stress strongly enough that Communism is on both theoretical and practical levels far, far *worse* than Nazism?
[…] blog norte-americano The Unwanted Blog fez a seleção de excertos que aí vai. Não é absolutamente necessário ler a coisa, mas talvez […]
What the author is saying is not that Marxism and Nazism are the same, but that they appear to be the same from an outsiders point of view.
The USSR wasn’t Marxist under Dzugzhavili (sp?), though.