Nov 242018
 

While working I’ve had the TV on for background noise. One of the programs I’ve had on, and occasionally actually paid attention to, is “Age of Tanks” on Netflix. This is a new documentary series on, as may be obvious, the tank. It appears to be a French series, but it’s in English (interviews with lots of folks… English, French, Russian, German, American, Israeli so far). It’s actually pretty interesting.

The third episode includes, among others, the Yom Kippur War, which featured Egyptian and Syrian tanks invading Israel on a holiday when they knew that most of Israel – including the military – would be off the job. The documentary interviewed an Israeli tanker who fought that day, who said this (translated into English):

“We fought with our backs to Auschwitz.”

That’s… that’s a hell of a way to put it. And it sums up Israels defense – and need for defense – succinctly.

 Posted by at 9:53 pm
Nov 242018
 

Maybe not the best move, comrades:

Marines Were Attacked, Robbed Near “We the People” Rally in Philly

Police say these guys maced, punched, kicked, and robbed a group of Marine Corps reservists after calling them “Nazis” and “white supremacists.”

Photos of the suspects, glorious examples of human perfection all, at the link.

Interestingly, I bet a lot of these chumps are the same type of nitwit who yearn for a civil war between Americas gun owners and the federal government because the government “has nukes.” And yet they think it’s a neato-keen idea to actually attack the same military types they want to order to murder the other side. Yeah, good luck with that, ya blockheads.

 Posted by at 9:40 pm
Nov 242018
 

Childish? Yup. Funny? You betcha. A petition on the official White House website;

White House petition: Seat Alex Jones next to Jim Acosta in Brady briefing room

White House petitions carry no weight in law whatsoever, except that if a petition gets more than 100,000 signatures within 30 days the administration is supposed to address them. This one was created on November 17 and currently has 34,768 signatures.

 Posted by at 9:15 pm
Nov 232018
 

Some recent cat photos for those of y’all who like such things:

The above may look like I’ve grabbed Button’s paw, but what actually happened is that he jumped up on me, shoved his left paw into my hand then grabbed on with the right paw. He is… grabby. That’s cool and all until 3 in the morning when he decides he needs to grab my nose.

Banshee getting comfortable on my typing hand.

Speedbump sticking his tongue out.

One of a trio of orange cats that live up the road.

It writes itself:

 Posted by at 9:19 pm
Nov 232018
 

In 1972 Bell designed a STOL jet transport, a concept that competed for the Advanced Medium STOL Transport role that the McDonnell-Douglas YC-15 and the Boeing YC-14 were built for. The Bell aircraft appeared to be largely conventional in layout, but it was actually quite different from every other transport: the engine nacelles were not only fitted with Harrier-like thrust vectoring nozzles to redirect the core exhaust, the flow could be diverted from the fans to augmenters in the wings. These, it was hoped, would greatly increase static thrust, allowing the aircraft to lift off from unimproved runways in a short distance. As part of their proposal, Bell also designed a proof of concept demonstrator to be built from parts of a C-130. The demonstrator could itself be used as a fair cargo transport, though of course it would not be as well optimized as the all-new vehicles. Unfortunately, the augmenter-wing concept for vertical thrust turned out to be a major disappointment as it steadfastly refused to scale up well.

The demonstrator was recently diagrammed and described in detail in US Recon & Research Projects #03, and the operational version in US Transport Projects #08.

USRP #3 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

USTP #8 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

I’ve uploaded the full rez versions of these scans to the 2018-11 APR Extras folder on Dropbox, available to all APR Patrons at the $4 level and above. If this sort of thing is of interest, please consider signing up for the APR Patreon.

patreon-200

 Posted by at 8:06 pm
Nov 232018
 

The SST designs of the 1960’s are hardly unknown. But what’s generally not well understood is that designs such as the Boeing 2707 were *huge.* This was considered necessary because SSTs with fuselage lengths in line with existing jetliners – such as the Concorde – would have small passenger capacities due to the need for the fuselages to be *very* narrow compared to their lengths. This, as Concorde showed, was a great way to build an extremely cost-ineffective fuel hog.

So the 2707 would be terribly long and pointy, with a geometry quite a bit unlike regular jetliners. A practical concern is “how do we deal with these things at airports?” If nothing else, the long pointed nose of the SST would put the passenger door considerably further aft than for a conventional rounded-nose jetliners. So, like the 747 and the A380, it was assumed that the larger airports would have to make some infrastructure modifications in order to deal with these new beasts.

The illustration below, from a 1967 issue of Aviation Week, shows American Airlines thinking about the airports of the future. Note that the 2707 is pulled in far closer than the other craft, with the tip of t’s very pointed nose just a few feet away from the building while the others are notably further away. The SST is being serviced by two extendable jetways at maximum extension, while most of the other planes seem to be getting along with just one jetway… though one of the 747s is using four. Note that even though the 747 isn’t pulled in quite as far as the 2707, the SST nonetheless projects much further out into the airfield. For some airports this could well have meant that the taxiways would have been a cluttered mess.

 Posted by at 12:14 pm
Nov 232018
 

Coming soon to the mind of an authoritarian with dreams of domination near you, the Chinese “Sesame Credit” system:

China blacklists millions of people from booking flights as ‘social credit’ system introduced

as of May this year, the government had blocked 11.14 million people from flights and 4.25 million from taking high-speed train trips … 3 million people are barred from getting business class train tickets … slowing internet speeds, reducing access to good schools for individuals or their children, banning people from certain jobs, preventing booking at certain hotels and losing the right to own pets

It should be interesting to see what this results in. it seems that even though the system isn’t yet fully rolled out – won’t be until 2020 – a dozen million people are already being ruined by it. When humans are systematically oppressed, most will just sorta roll over an take it and/or try to survive within the system, up to and including groveling and changing whatever it is that is causing them trouble; some small percent will try to *look* like they’re getting along while working quietly to undermine the oppressors; and some will pick up a rock, a gun or a bomb and launch into all-out revolution.

A dozen million people is, on one hand, a tiny fraction of Chinas 1.3 billion. But on the other hand, that is still  whole lot of people… and in a very short time. It may be that china is going about this too far, too fast. They put a clamp down on a hundred million people, they could well be looking at three million people willing to take up arms against the government. And under the system in place, these people could really have no option but to do so. It would not surprise me if Chinese hackers are already working their way into the system. A good way to attack it would not be to try to bring it down, but to “aid” it: ruin the “social credit” of not just government officials – who are probably immune to this sort of thing anyway –  but to random millions. If you ban half the country from traveling, you’ll crush the transportation infrastructure every bit as effectively as if half the bus and train riders had decided to boycott the system… with the added bonus of millions of travelers raising a stink at the station when they are told they can’t travel. You think flying with the TSA is bad now? Imagine if there was a 50/50 chance that you would be told at the airport that you can’t go.

Such a system would be very, very difficult to enact within the US due to the Constitution. But then, so would a gun ban or speech codes, and yet here we are. We’ve seen the likes of Gab and people who espouse unpopular politics being “deplatformed” and deprived of their ability to make an income, along with a number of people whose lives and careers have been ruined because of a bad joke or a harmless, thoughtless moment of political incorrectness. “Sesame Credit” or something vaguely similar need not be a government program for it to cause substantial havoc within the US. Look, for example, at the Southern Poverty Law Center: they are the gatekeepers on who is and is not a “hate group.” You can easily have your bank decide to no longer do business with you because you end up on their list… even though the SPLC is a politically slanted organization and all you need to do to be declared a “hate group” is annoy the wrong person at the SPLC with wrongthink.

 Posted by at 11:57 am
Nov 232018
 

Attack on Chinese consulate foiled; two policemen martyred

In short: at least one suicide bomber and at least two gunmen were stopped before they could attack the Chinese consulate in Karachi, Pakistan.

Yeah… I don’t think that that sort of thing will work out so well. Commies don’t exactly pull punches when it comes to fighting terrorists. They tend to make whole populations vanish.

 Posted by at 2:26 am