Mar 292021
 

Two girls decided to car jack a guy, speeding off with the owner of the car hanging out the door. They then flipped the car, killing him; in the video you can see one of the girls is much more concerned about the phone she left in the car than the man she just butchered.

So how does CNN describe this?

An *accident.* In which he was “fatally injured.” Let me correct the wording for them:

Police said the girls, 13 and 15, assaulted an Uber Eats driver with a Taser while carjacking him, which led to the driver being murdered.

Feel free to speculate why CNN might want to water down their messaging in this story.

One hopes that it leads to a felony murder trial and, if convicted, life in prison. But it won’t, what with them being underaged and all. They will be out back into the public with a *lot* of time left to ruin more lives. Fun side note: these two aren’t alone in their disdain for human life… they’re just the two that got caught on video.

 Posted by at 6:46 pm
Mar 292021
 

This video is done as a joke… but I would not be surprised if there’s not a fair amount of truth behind it. Perhaps not window companies per se, but there are a lot of people making a lot of money – or accruing a lot of political power – by supporting the violence they then claim to want to defend people from. “Defund the cops” leads to more crime, which leads to politicians calling for gun bans, which leads to an increase in crime. *Someone* is making bank here.

 Posted by at 11:16 am
Mar 272021
 

Yaaaaaaaaaaaaaay. Dad must be *so* proud.

You know… you be you, so long as you’re not hurting anyone else. But… if you’re not helping anyone, including yourself, nobody else has any obligation to do or say anything in support of your choices. If you go out of your way to not only look far outside the mainstream, but actually devote a sizable fraction of your entire existence to making a spectacle of yourself… meh.

Once again, I suspect an interesting sci-fi story could be written base don this idea that this sort of thing is the visible manifestation of an alien “worldwrecker” attack on humanity, some sort of mind controlling/distorting field that is trying to make humanity self destructive and/or non-reproductive.

 Posted by at 12:51 pm
Mar 262021
 

Our futures are secure.

A new bill would defund new ICBMs to pay for coronavirus vaccine research

This new Congress wants to not only disarm the populace but the military as well… at least as far as strategic deterrence. I’m sure the Chinese are quaking in their boots.

If there is anyone in the FBI who’s actually interested in defending the US, I’d recommend they use the list of sponsors and supporters of this bill as the basis for an investigation into foreign influence in the US government:

The Investing in Cures Before Missiles Act, offered by Sen. Edward Markey, D-Mass., and Rep. Ro Khanna, D-Calif….

The proposed legislation has amassed some early support in the House and Senate. Co-sponsors include Sens. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md.; Bernie Sanders, I-Vt.; and Jeff Merkley, D-Ore.; as well as Reps. Earl Blumenauer, D-Ore.; Steve Cohen, D-Tenn.; Jesus Garcia, D-Ill.; Raul M. Grijalva, D-Ariz.; Jared Huffman, D-Calif.; Sheila Jackson Lee, D-Texas; Pramila Jayapal, D-Wash.; Barbara Lee, D-Calif.; James McGovern, D-Mass.; Eleanor Holmes Norton, D-D.C.; Ilhan Omar, D-Minn.; Mark Pocan, D-Wis.; and Ayanna Pressley, D-Mass.

Note that there are some of the *dumbest* members of Congress listed there.

 Posted by at 9:35 pm
Mar 262021
 

In the long, long ago, Lockheed tried to sell the F-22 to the US Navy. In order to accommodate the needs of Naval aviation, the aircraft would have had to have been massively modified… most obviously by giving the aircraft variable geometry wings like the F-14’s. Clearly the Navy didn’t go for it: the cost of the program would have been immense, as would have been the risks. The F-22 ended up being troubled enough with materials and maintenance nightmares; add to that the rigors of slamming into carrier decks, constant humidity and salt air, all the other bothersome details of operating from ships at sea; and add to THAT the fact that while the NATF (Naval Advanced Tactical Fighter)*looked* like the F-22, it would have shared very few structures in common with its Air Force cousin and would have been basically a new aircraft… it would undoubtedly have been massively expensive to a degree that even the F-35 would have been hard pressed to match.

 

The fullrez scan of the artwork has been made available at 300 DPI to all $4/month patrons/subscribers in the 2021-03 APR Extras folder at Dropbox. If you would like to help fund the acquisition and preservation of such things, along with getting high quality scans for yourself, please consider signing on either for the APR Patreon or the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program.




 Posted by at 2:08 pm