Feb 182022
 

Circa 1967, bell Aircraft produced a design for a tiltrotor VTOL aircraft that would be quite similar to the V-22 Osprey of 20 years later. the Model 266 had two T64 turboshaft engines, one at each wingtip. Each engine drove a three-bladed prop/rotor that could be tilted to provide vertical or horizontal thrust, with cross-shafts making it so that the aircraft could power both props in the event that an engine were to go out. The overall configuration was much like that of a spindlier V-22 with a conventional tail. The basic role was as a troop transport for the US Army.

 

The full-rez scan of the art has been uploaded to the 2022-02 APR Extras folder on Dropbox. This is available to all $4 and up Patrons and Subscribers. If you would like to help fund the acquisition and preservation of such things, along with getting high quality scans for yourself, please consider signing on either for the APR Patreon or the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program.




 

 Posted by at 5:49 pm
Feb 182022
 

Another hour on the line with tech support *seems* to have cleared up a few issues… the error message *should* be gone (a plugin to measure statistics is screwed up somehow, so I had to ditch it), the header image *should* be back (a problem caused by the *last* problem, with the HTTS-HTTP thing). A potential issue remains of some people apparently not able to access the Disqus commenting. I don’t know how widespread that is, but I do know comments are reduced of late. Could be any number of explanations for that, of course. Today’s HTTPS fix *might* fix the Disqus issue, dunno.

If you can comment, great (especially if you recently *couldn’t* but now can, lemme know). If not, maybe drop me an email or, if you’re so inclined, tweet about it at my (gah) twitter.

 

 Posted by at 1:52 pm
Feb 182022
 

T-33A Lockheed Shooting Star – Fuselage Assembly

Huh.

 

It’s not clear to me what an average Joe would do with a busted-up T-33, but I thought it was interesting. Might be nice to see someone get it and restore it. Not, perhaps to flight status, or even to reskin it… but as a “cutaway” display. Doubtless a lot of bits and pieces would need to be procured to flesh it out.

 

Plus… they got themselves a Thud. Huh.

 Posted by at 11:01 am
Feb 172022
 

“Moonfall” is, hands down, the silliest movie I’ve seen in a *long* time. That said, it’s also fairly entertaining.

You *have* to go into this one with your higher brain functions turned off. It’s not so much that they got the science wrong; it’s more like they took a look at the science and said “FU, Science!” and did what they wanted to do anyway. The moon has a white dwarf inside it. A Space Shuttle solid rocket booster just… shuts off for no reason. The Moon gets close enough to scrape the atmosphere and, somehow, gains a surface gravity as great as that of the Earth… and yet the Earth isn’t torn asunder. The US and Europeans are able to cobble together a manned lunar SLS mission in days; and then NASA is able to pull a Space Shuttle out of a museum, stack it up at Vandenberg, and launch it with a ground crew of *two* *guys.* A guy is able to land a completely powered-down space shuttle simply by twiddling some valves. Gravity and orbital dynamics follow the Star Wars model at the best of times.

Yeah, no.

Still, it was *largely* entertaining. There are a lot of plot-unnecessary diversions to The Folks At Home, with the now expected divorced parents, kids, hapless stepfathers. Some editing could chop those out and make a tight little hour of quality splosion-riffic entertainment.

Lots of pretty disasterpalooza.

The movie ends with a hook for a sequel. But given that the production budget was $140 million and int he first two weeks its brought in around $17 million domestically… yeah, I’m not betting on a sequel happening. The local theater is now down to two showing a day, and there were a grand total of two people in the theater when I was there. Well, at least the mask mandate thing could be ignored…

 Posted by at 7:02 pm
Feb 162022
 

In March of 1961, “Space World” magazine published a few articles about what the future would look like thanks to the onrushing new technologies of the space age. It is… well, it’s wrong.

The article is jam-packed with predictions of a glorious technological and economic future to be brought about by the Space Age. And from the standpoint of 1961, it probably made sense: technology was advancing by leaps and bounds, the budget for NASA was beginning to explode, overall space and related science spending by both government and industry were shooting upwards. It *should* have been a glorious new age. But the experts did not count on a few things. Viet Nam, for example and, worse, LBJs “Great Society” economic and social suppression/dystopia promotion programs.

Some of the predictions for 1971:

1) The “Space Industry” would be the biggest industry in America

2) The “middle class” would be working high-paying skilled jobs and would make up 80% of the population

3) Skyscrapers would dwarf the Empire State Building, using girders made from beryllium, tantalum and niobium

4) Tape recorders would be the size of a cigarette

5) You could easily send a fax from, say, New York to Australia. You’d scan the page, beam it up to a satellite passing overhead, the satellite would store the scan and, when it some time later passed over Australia, the fax would be beamed down. That’s… not how international satellite communications works, but OK.

6) There’d be cities in Antarctica

7) There’d be regular, routine and affordable suborbital rocket passenger transport. Such as from Antarctica to New York, several flights a day.

Amusingly, these predictions are considered likely to be too conservative; people would look back to the predictions and “wonder why the prophets of 1961 were so shortsighted.”

“Today it is rocket time, and the coming decade will carry us all into the Age of Astronautics.”

 

They could not have known that their glorious future would only last a small handful of years. By 1968, the Apollo program was already terminated, with no follow-on. And the maximum spending for NASA occurred only in 65-66 or so, peaking at about 4% of the federal budget. Imagine if the upward trend had continued to, say, 1970. Perhaps 6, maybe 8% of the federal budget. What a world it could have been.

Awww. I gave myself a sad.

Sigh.

The full-rez scan of the article has been uploaded to the 2022-02 APR Extras folder on Dropbox. This is available to all $4 and up Patrons and Subscribers. If you would like to help fund the acquisition and preservation of such things, along with getting high quality scans for yourself, please consider signing on either for the APR Patreon or the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program.




 

 Posted by at 11:51 pm
Feb 162022
 

Thanks to the magic of Google Translate, I can understand this news story out of Brazil:

Tio atropela ladrões ao ver sobrinhos sendo assaltados em São Paulo

Which says: “Uncle runs over thieves when he sees nephews being robbed in São Paulo”

In short, two motorbike-riding thieves stick up some people on a sidewalk. But sadly for them, they are observed doing this. They are observed by someone who doesn’t like them doing this, has a car and a willingness to use it… and the skill to get the timing *exactly* right. Soon as the dirtbags get back on their bike, they are rear-ended at high velocity and sent high into the air. It seems that somehow they survived, which, if you watch the video, is freakin’ *amazing.”

Because the security camera video is just that awesome, it’s after the break.

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 11:21 pm
Feb 162022
 

It seems that the Freedom Convoy/Protest in Canada is so successful tha tthe Canadian government is workign overtime to prove the protestors point:

Banks are moving to freeze accounts linked to convoy protests. Here’s what you need to know

In short, the Canadian government can freeze your bank account based on… well, not a whole lot.

The order says that banks and other financial entities (like credit unions, co-ops, loan companies, trusts and cryptocurrency platforms) must stop “providing any financial or related services” to people associated with the protests — a move that will result in frozen accounts, stranded money and cancelled credit cards. … There are questions about how widely this policy will be applied — whether, for example, the thousands of donors to the GoFundMe and GiveSendGo fundraising campaigns in support of this anti-mandate movement are also considered “designated persons” under the law.

The regulation’s definition of a “designated person” also includes people who “provide property to facilitate or participate in any assembly.” In other words, under these regulations, anyone sending funds to support these protests could be facing a shaky financial future.

Say, that’s neat. Thousands, hundreds of thousands of Canadians who have done far less violence than your average Mostly Peaceful Protestors could find their life savings, businesses, homes all wiped out at the stroke of a bureaucrats pen. If you suspect that you might be net on the financial chopping block, what would your next action be? Hmmm…

Trudeau inadvertently caused a bank run in Canada

Ayup, people are trying to get their money out now while they can, and of course they’re finding that banks are instituting strict withdrawal limits. Seems to me what this might end up doing is driving more and more people to “alternative economics” like crypto.

While these measures might help to bust up a protest that has severely disrupted the nation’s capital, Davis said they could also further “radicalize” a group that is already concerned about government overreach.

Gee, ya think??? Every *actually* peaceful protestor who finds his ability to bank or even be employed *ever* *again* ruined will almost certainly be radicalized. What the hell else are they going to do? Especially when they see violent rioters *not* getting de-banked.

 Posted by at 6:53 pm
Feb 162022
 

Kentucky Ballistics revisits the accident that nearly killed him. Serbu provided him a second gun for the specific purpose of blowing it up. The evidence suggests strongly that the problem was over-powered ammunition.

Props for tackling the issue head-on. A lot of people wouldn’t touch something that nearly killed them.

 Posted by at 3:18 pm