Razorfist breaks it down for you calmly in ENTIRELY SAFE FOR WORK language*.
*Note: No, it’s not.
After a couple *years* of Democrat party hacks screeching on about “collusion” and “treason,” it has been amazing to watch them pivot not on a dime but on a freakin’ quark to screeching about “obstruction of justice,” with their best evidence being that Trump wants to bring the fraudulent Russiagate investigation to an end…but didn’t actually do anything to make that happen.
One wonders if, after getting the Covington Kids half a billion dollars from the media and celebrities for slandering and libeling them, perhaps the lawyers could go after the people who most vociferously pushed the “collusion” line. I suspect that that would be covered under the 1st Amendment, especially given that Trump is a public figure… but some newly-enriched attack lawyers could tie up Pelosi and Nadler and such in court long enough to impoverish them. I’m usually quite opposed to using lawsuits to simply harass people… but some people just plain suck. Reasoning with them hasn’t worked. Providing evidence hasn’t worked.
Jonathan Frakes describes the Russiagate story for 47 seconds…