Aug 212009
 

Finally went and bought a *real* camera, a Nikon D5000. At about $600, it’s at the low end of Good Camera prices. I spent today tinkering… and tonight taking test shots of the night sky. It has built-in long exposure settings up to 30 seconds. Here are a few early results:

The first two show the Milky Way and the skyglow of Ogden/Salt Lake City.

dsc_0039.jpg

dsc_0050.jpg

These two also show the Milky Way and skyglow… but up in the upper right corner I lucked out and caught three satellites zipping along.

dsc_0063.jpg

dsc_0063a.jpg

dsc_0064.jpg

Milky Way:

dsc_0047.jpg

dsc_0096.jpg

The last one is the least interesting to look at but in a way the most interesting in what it shows. It’s a shot of Jupiter, with an overexposed circualr disk of Jupiter visible, along with at least two moons visible. Niftily, just above and to the left of Jupiter is a blue-green speck… Neptune. I’ve never seen Neptune through a telescope before… and here it is visible via the standard lens that came with the camera.

dsc_0100.jpg

A zoom lens is on order. It’ll be interesting to see what I can see with that.

 Posted by at 12:22 am

  5 Responses to “Improved tech = improved results. Who knew?”

  1. The lens is everything. The difference between a (retail) $200 and a $1000 lens is amazing. There are some really high end SLR lenses out there (I’m a fan of Leica) that you can get cheap and can mount with an adapter. You lose any autofocus capability, but the difference in clarity can be astounding.

  2. caught a disk of Jupiter ? Not bad for $600

  3. They say, of course, it’s the photographer, not the camera, however….
    Excellent results!, especially capturing Neptune along with Jupiter,
    I particularly like the second shot down, the Milky Way looks almost 3-D,
    like smoke from a forest fire.
    What zoom lens you waiting for? A word of caution; modern zoom lenses contain a lot of glass, which means more light loss, unfortunatley, fast fixed=length lenses are better for this work, if hellishly expensive.

  4. Very nice. I’ve been thinking starting with this next year as well, when I buy an EOS 50D. I’m an old EOS user and have plenty of lenses still, so I stick with Canon.

    I’m really wondering how the view of this would be from alpine areas above 1,500 meters. I remember it being magnificent, but that was without camera and zoom lense.

  5. […] The Unwanted Blog Rockets, cats, aircraft, guns, politics, photography, science fiction. You know, the usual stuff. « Improved tech = improved results. Who knew? […]

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.