According to THIS, out of 10,885 peer reviewed scientific papers published in 2013 on the subject of “climate change” a grand total of two came down on the side of human activity not being involved to some degree or another.
Is the compiler biased? Was the methodology flawed? Was the sample selection incomplete? Possibly. But come on… 2 out of 10,885? This must be one hell of a conspiracy.
And face it: even if “man made global warming” is purely fictitious, it is *still* worth playing along with. Turning the US in the world manufacturing powerhouse for small (neighborhood/village-sized), medium (city-sized) and large (state/region-sized) nuclear reactors (I’m a fan of thorium, but I’m not a fanatic about it), along with technologies to strain fissionables directly out of seawater, would not only enrich the US, it would impoverish the likes of Saudi Arabia, Iran, Putin’s Russia and Venezuela, reducing their influence on the world – and the future – to nil.