Mar 252019
 

So let’s say you’re a phone company employee out on the job with your company bucket lift, when the locals tell you there is a cat who has been stuck atop a pole for hours and could you please help out. Chances are good you’d take a look at the situation and if seems reasonable, you’d pop up, grab the cat, save the day and get on with life.

And if you’re the phone company, you’d suspend the guy for operating the bucket lift outside of its designated geographic region. You’d recognize while doing it that this would be bad PR… but screw it, you can’t let an employee get away with breaking the rules, no matter how well intentioned.

Now, assume that you are a *wiser* corporation. Yes, the guy broke some rules, and that should not be ignored or glossed over. But he also did a good thing and not only provided aid, but gave the company some good PR. So… as a *wise* company, what to do? My suggestion:

1: Give him X demerits for breaking the rules.

2: Give him X  merits for being  decent human being.

End result: status quo with a warning for the employee and a positive press release for the company.

One might argue that it’s “just a cat” (if one is one of those morally dubious people who thinks of a cat as “just a cat”). But it’s entirely possible that that same sort of procedure could be used to rescue a *human.* A child hanging off the side of a building after climbing out a  window, say. Sure, that’s more realistically a job for the fire department… but you’re there, they ain’t. If you stand back and refuse to pitch in, and by waiting the kid falls… *you* will feel guilty, while the locals will very likely be quite PO’ed at you for doing nothing, and at the company for telling you to do nothing. If you can recognize that there are cases where breaking company rules is the right thing to do… we’ve established what the situation is, now we’re just haggling over the price.

Ah, ta hell with you, you say. This is Current Year where shades of gray and nuance are not allowed; if someone is not on your extreme end of whatever spectrum you’re on, then they are on the far end. Answers are only “right” or “Nazi” these days, so no matter how careful the guy was, or how much practical good he did, or how much good will he created for the company… BURN THE HERETIC.

 

 Posted by at 11:48 pm
Mar 252019
 

BREAKING: Co-Conspirator In Alleged Avenatti Fraud Scheme Is CNN Analyst, Jussie Smollett’s Lawyer, Report Says

Michael Avenatti is the lawyer who spent the last year or so trying to smear Trump and Kavenaugh… and now he’s not only discredited, he’d been arrested. And his associate Mark Geragos, lawyer for another guy who tried to smear Trump,is not only in legal hot water bu thas been fired from CNN.

Bonus round: Former CIA head John Brennan, who has spent the last couple of years smearing Trump as a Russian agent, now has this to say:

“Well, I don’t know if I received bad information but I think I suspected there was more than there actually was.”

While it’s nice to see him publicly say that he might have been wrong, it’s entertaining to think that the CIA was run by a guy who would have so readily accepted what has turned out to be a fabulously wrong assumption about the President.

The last several years have been sorta defined by false media/political narratives. Collusion. Smolletting. White privilege. Covington. Hands-Up-Don’t-Shoot. The Wage Gap. Kavenaugh as rapist. “Ghostbusters/The Last Jedi was a good movie.” The patriarchy. Nazis everywhere. The Steele Dossier.  It would be nice to think that, now that media organizations are starting to get hit with fractional-billion-dollar lawsuits and hoaxers are going to jail, that maybe, just maybe, things might change for the better. Maybe the press might actually take their job more seriously, and actually try to get the story factually right. This, I think, is unwarranted excess optimism. But who knows.

 Posted by at 8:03 pm
Mar 242019
 

An interesting and perhaps disheartening video illustrating the far, far distant fate of the universe. This covers timescales not of billions of years, not of trillions, but of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of trillions of years. In *very* short order – around a few hundred trillion years – there will be no objects left in the universe that resemble current stars. The universe will be vastly expanded, very dark and very cold; if you could time travel to a few hundred trillion years from now, there is no conceivable telescope that would be able to see the nearest galaxy, because the expansion of the universe would have driven it beyond the cosmic horizon. This would be an empty and hopeless time… and it would be the first tick on the clock of cosmic time. By far the vast majority of the lifespan of the universe will be spent in an era with nothing but the odd photon, the sole inhabitant of a volume of space larger by far than the now-observable universe.

Consider: a trillion years from now, the only stars still guttering along will be red dwarfs. The universe will be about a hundred times older than it currently is. Nearby galaxy groups will be measured not in terms of dozens of millions of light years, but in *billions* of light years. The Hubble can currently see galaxies that far away, but generally only as dim blobs. At that point in the future, those “nearby” galaxies will be old, red and quite dim; a Hubble of a trillion years hence would struggle to see them. By ten trillion years, the nearest galaxies would be about as far away as galaxies that today are on the cosmic horizon. If some planet somehow evolves intelligence, the sky would be so dark that it is very probable that the only stars in their sky would be a handful of red and white dwarfs scattered throughout their galaxy, the nearest perhaps a thousand light years away; it’s very likely that none of them would ever bother to build a telescope anywhere near as powerful as Hubble except, perhaps, to examine other planets orbiting their sad little star. They might spot those other red dwarfs and struggle to comprehend just what they’re seeing; if by chance they somehow task their one telescope with staring for *days* at a blank spot in the sky, the chances of them just happening to spot one of the rare “nearby” galaxies ten billion lightyears off – maybe a few dozen across the sky – is vanishingly low. And even then, they would still be existing at the very beginning of the universe.

This, my friends, seems to be a tad depressing. Contemplation of timescales like this and what they would contain is just that sort of thing likely to bring on some good old fashioned cosmic horror, because it shows that not only are *you* small, but the current observable universe is *microscopic* in terms of size and age in comparison to the enormity of the universe as a whole.

When Lovecraft and Co. were writing their weird fiction, their conception of the universe was trivially small compared to what we now understand. This sort of thing would, I think, have amused HPL and resulted in some interesting yarns.

One very, very hypothetical ray of hope is offered in the video. As some point in the inconceivably distant future, when our incomprehensible descendants are huddled for warmth and energy around decaying black holes, thinkigng one thought per trillion years, if they are smart enough and have access to the right resources, they could, perhaps, maybe, either open gateways into “parallel” universes, or make “baby” universes of their own, and escape to a whole different universe, there to perhaps watch *that* one slowly run down and escape again.

 Posted by at 12:46 am
Mar 232019
 

Some of the stuff you stumble upon on Wikipedia can change your view of the world…

Cat sìth

The Cat Sìth (Scottish Gaelic: [kʰaʰt̪ ˈʃiː]) or Cat Sidhe (Irish: [kat̪ˠ ˈʃiː], Cat Sí in new orthography) is a fairy creature from Celtic mythology, said to resemble a large black cat with a white spot on its chest. Legend has it that the spectral cat haunts the Scottish Highlands. The legends surrounding this creature are more common in Scottish folklore, but a few occur in Irish. Some common folklore suggested that the Cat Sìth was not a fairy, but a witch that could transform into a cat nine times.

Huh.

Never woulda guessed it of Speedbump. He’s one of those cats who only ever seems to want affection, not galactic domination. Maybe he’s just a master of deception like the evil mastermind Darth Jar Jar

 

 

 Posted by at 8:40 pm
Mar 232019
 

This high school drama club put on a stage production of Alien, and it looks fantastic

 

You know, “high school drama club puts on a play” is the sort of phrase that makes me *immediately* think “screw diplomacy, get me the frak out of here NOW.” But *this* play… I think I’d actually watch. One can hope that the whole thing was filmed and will show up on YouTube.

 

 

 Posted by at 3:24 pm
Mar 232019
 

Vikings were well-known mariners, willing to sail their vessels across rough seas for the purpose of profit and adventure.

And then there’s the cruise ship “Viking Sky,” which has suffered engine failure off the coast of Norway and has lost stabilization. Kinda sucks since they’re in storm conditions.

WHEEEEEE!

The ship is *real* close to shore. On one hand, that’s good… short trips for the rescue choppers scooping up 1,300 passengers. on the other hand, the ship doesn’t need to drift too far to run aground. If it does so, it could tear out its bottom, especially if, as it looks likely, it runs aground on jagged rocks.

 Posted by at 2:21 pm
Mar 232019
 

I was on the road yesterday when news started breaking that the Robert Mueller “Russia-Trump Ooga Booga Eternal Investigation Report” had been turned over to the Attorney General. That, and the report that the AG *might* release a summary of principal conclusions some time this weekend, was just about the sum total.

Since then, the coverage over this *incredibly* limited story has been nonstop. CNN is hyperventilating about this almost like a jetliner had been sucked into a Lemoneqsue black hole. Whether the report says that Trump committed treason, or whether he just told some lame jokes, makes little enough difference to me… I’m simply amused watching the news media twist itself into knots trying to say the same couple of lines over and over.

One thing I do know: Pelosi & Schumer are setting up the conspiracy theories in advance. It seems that they must feel fairly certain that the report *won’t* provide the deathblow to trump that they had hoped for. This is clear from one thing that noted scumbag Chuck Schumer said:

Now that special counsel Mueller has submitted his report to the attorney general, it is imperative for Mr. Barr to make the full report public. And provide its underlying documentation and findings to Congress.

Here’s how I’m pretty sure he’s trying to set up conspiracy theories: this investigation has included foreigners as well as international intelligence operations/operatives. As a consequence, portions of the full report are virtually certain to include classified information. Classified info that probably *shouldn’t* be released, and almost certainly won’t be. but if there’s so much as a single redacted line, whackadoos will speculate incessantly, claiming that the deletions are anything from links to videos of Trump committing treason to reports about how Trump is personally adding Autism Elixer to vaccines. I fully expect this report to settle things about as well as the Air force settled UFOs.

 Posted by at 2:08 pm
Mar 222019
 

Two stories… technically unrelated, but they cover similar ground.

First, lying to justify your religious beliefs. I know people with strong religious faith, faith based on… well, faith, I guess. You cannot argue with faith; there is no rational argument to be made against “I believe X.” What you *can* argue argue about is “there is hard evidence for X.” And anyone who lies about matters of fact, who claims to have done things they didn’t, who misquote people… well, one can feel justified in kinda hoping that their religious beliefs are true, at least in their case, and that there will be divine retribution for deceiving lots of people.

One such person:

How “Case for Christ” author Lee Strobel fabricated his best-selling story

In short: Strobel claimed to be an atheist,  hard-nosed investigative journalist, who tried to disprove the Bible and wound up becoming an evangelist because the evidence all turned out to be in favor of Biblical historical accuracy. His process of doing so involved “challenging” theologians, to prove they’re wrong… and lo and behold, they turn out to be right. But his actual process involved softball questions, taking things out of context, misquoting, being generally dishonest. This is not the approach of someone taking a hard-nosed approach to disproving the other guy, but instead someone *pretending.* And in his own words:

“My attitude was ethics were fine to discuss in journalism school, but they shouldn’t get in the way of getting a good story.”

Gah.

Strobel, as it turns out, was working as a pastor to a megachurch preacher (who later resigned after an army of women came forward to accuse him of sexual harassment) when he wrote a book claiming to be an atheist. Odd form of atheism, that.

And then there’s this story about Jim Jefferies, a TV comedian/interviewer who has been accused of severely editing interviews to make people look bad. It’s an easy accusation to make, but unless you can prove it… what can you do. But if you know you’re going to be involved in a hit piece, and you’re able to get away with it, set up a hidden camera in advance and then release the video showing just what a dishonest scumbag the interviewer is.

Given the lack of videos recorded by interviewees, I’m assuming that it must be standard practice for interviewers to disallow the interviewees from recording the interview. But given this new video, I think it should be standard practice to come to an interview with a GoPro or two of your own.

 

 Posted by at 11:43 pm