Jun 112014
 

A “light echo” is *not* a stellar explosion per se. What is happening is that there is dust or gas near a star (spanning distances of lightyears) that is normally too dimly lit to be seen. But if a star suddenly gets much brighter, the dust is suddenly lit up. Think of it as smoke or fog on a pitch black night except for stars overhead; normally you couldn’t see the fog, but if someone nearby lights up a flashlight, suddenly to can see the fog. But the thing that throws people about light echoes is that the speed of light, which means that the fog surrounding you is effectively *instantly* lit up, is slllloooooowwwww on the scale of interstellar dust clouds. And thus the cloud is not all lit up at once, but instead you can watch the outward crawl of light from the newly bright star as it goes through the cloud.

If the star is bright for only a brief period – perhaps it blew up in a supernova, say – then the light echo will take the form of a hollow spherical shell, with ta constant wall thickness but a constantly expanding outer diameter. If the star brightens and stays bright for a span of years, then you’d get a growing solid sphere of glowing gas or dust.

Hubble managed to catch such a light echo around the star red variable star V838 Monocerotis from 2002 to 2006. In 2002 the star (20,000 light years away) suddenly grew 600,000 times brighter than it had been, becoming one of the brightest and largest stars in the galaxy, and then began to cool and shrink. A  few years ago the images were put together into a substantially awesome video:

[youtube U1fvMSs9cps]

 Posted by at 3:20 pm
Jun 112014
 

Babies pay for Detroit’s fall with mortality above Mexico

Infant mortality in Detroit (15 deaths per 1,000 live births) in 2012 was higher than in China (12), Mexico (14) and Thailand (11).

One of the more interesting lines was this:

Men in the city are “out of control. Most of them don’t have jobs, most of them couldn’t provide.

I believe a valid question is: in a place where things are so bad that infants are dropping dead at a high rate, if an adult doesn’t have a job and they can’t provide… why are they not starving to death?

 Posted by at 10:52 am
Jun 102014
 

This *may* be NSFW. It certainly is if you share my sense of humor and laugh yourself stupid at this. It’s exceedingly low-brow and disgusting. And friggen’ hilarious.

Now where are those idjits who say I don’t bring y’all the very best art, eh?

 Posted by at 11:36 pm
Jun 102014
 

In the runup to the Saturn program, American aerospace companies studied every possible variation on large launch vehicles. One idea that seemed promising was the use of large solid rocket motors, singly or in clusters, to form large booster stages. It was sensible enough… in the late 1950s large solid rockets were better developed than large liquid rockets. Solids can put out truly monstrous levels of thrust, and reasonably reliably; and they require minimal preparation once stacked up and ready to go. In contrast, liquid rockets are complex and finicky, but with the advantage of substantially higher specific impulse.

In 1959 Lockheed released the results of an early study for NASA on a series of large boosters using solid rocket motors. They studied a range of vehicles, with 2, 3 and 4 stages; 300,000, 1,000,000 and 5,000,000 pound gross weights, and targeting 300 nautical mile circular orbits, geosynchronous, escape and soft lunar landings.

Shown below are diagrams of 1,000,000-pound gross weight boosters using 180-inch diameter solid first stages (440,000 pounds of propellant) and liquid upper stages (LOX/RP-1 or LOX/LH2 for the second stage and LOX/LH2 for the third). Payload weights were given for representative vehicles rather than specific designs.

solids 1

Payload: 39,800 pounds to 300 n.m.; 9,400 pounds to geosynchronous; 12,400 to escape; 3,900 pounds to soft lunar landing

———————–solids 2

Payload: 51,500 pounds to 300 n.m.

——————————-solids 3

Payload: 39,800 pounds to 300 n.m.; 9,400 pounds to geosynchronous; 12,400 to escape; 3,900 pounds to soft lunar landing

——————–solids 4

Payload: 15,000 pounds to geosynchronous; 18,400 pounds to escape;  5,600 pounds to soft lunar landings

 Posted by at 2:32 pm