Nov 092013
 

So, an old man dies. Nothing particularly newsworthy there… it happens all the time. In this case, the old man was Harold Jellicoe Percival, aged 99, who served in RAF Bomber Command during WWII, who died in his sleep in Lancashire (Britain) after being found injured in the street. Sad, to be sure. But adding to it: he has no close relatives or friends (he was apparently quite the loner) who can come to his funeral, so it would be a particularly sad, empty affair.

But the funeral directors have done something a little different: in the tiny little funeral announcement in the newspaper, they’ve asked for any service personnel  able to attend. The funeral director, in a fantastic example of English understatement, said:

‘I didn’t fancy the idea of an old serviceman going out on his last journey without any support.’

Once this request hit Ye Olde Internets, you might guess what’s happened. It looks like there might be several *hundred* servicemen and women attending.

FYI: The service is this coming Monday, November 11, at 11AM at the Lytham Park Crematorium. So, if you’re a current or former member of the British military, and aren’t otherwise busy that day, and happen to be in the area…

‘Hundreds of strangers’ to attend funeral of RAF serviceman after plea for mourners

 Posted by at 1:40 pm
Nov 082013
 

Well, I’ll be. Not that long ago, people were going bugnuts because someone had printed a crappy single-shot all-plastic zip gun. Looked ugly, wasn’t reliable, couldn’t hit a damned thing with it, yet the hoplophobes in the media and  politics wet themselves in panic. So how are they going to handle THIS:

World’s First 3D Printed Metal Gun

The gun is a classic 1911, a model that is at once timeless and public domain. It functions beautifully: Our resident gun expert has fired 50 successful rounds and hit a few bull’s eyes at over 30 yards. The gun is composed of 30+ 3D Printed components with 17-4 Stainless Steel and Inconel 625 materials.

3D-Printed-Metal-Gun-Low-Res-Press-Photo-1024x638

This is fairly staggering, and far sooner than I expected. Importantly:

It’s rifled and the rifling was built directly into the part – or as we like to say, “grown” into the part – using 3D Printing. This gun has NOT BEEN MACHINED. We used hand tools for some post processing (our finishers are wonderful), but we did not machine this gun.

There is, however, a downside:

The industrial printer we used costs more than my college tuition (and I went to a private university)

So… no home-printed 3D gun for *you,* ‘ceptin’ that yer some kinda bajillionaire.

At least… not yet.

And according to a later posting, there’s some more bad news:

Should we decide to sell the gun, the cost of the 1911 would be in the five-figures.

Yikes. Ten grand is a *bit* much for a 1911.

A metal printed gun requires commercial equipment that costs anywhere from $400,000 to $1,000,000+.

Drat.

Now, something a little funny seems to be going on with the action, when the feller fires three rounds in sequence:

[youtube u7ZYKMBDm4M]

Their stated purpose in creating this pistol was to demonstrate the strength and practicality of 3D laser sintered metal components. This could, of course, have been accomplished with any of a number of different non-firearm projects… but by printing up a gun, they’ve gotten themselves some press. Had they made some other sort of widget, nobody would be talking about them. So… success!

Today it’s a million dollar machine. In ten years? Maybe ten grand, who knows… still too much for most of us, but well within the means of a proper gunsmithing business.

 Posted by at 8:38 pm
Nov 082013
 

My little alternate history was dreamed up to try to come up with a more-or-less believable timeline that led from the April of 1968 as remembered by actual history, to the 1999 as envisioned in the movie 2001: A Space Odyssey. This means that the two endpoints are known and fixed, but the stuff in between is unknown and flexible. There are an infinite number of paths that lead from A to Z, so my path is, even if it is judged to be Accurate, Awesome and Reasonable, just one of many that could be dreamed up. My own little story here focused on the Big Picture, with the US President, International Relations and the Space Program being the main things.

There are a vast number of smaller stories that fit in, but don’t drive the timeline as much. Still, such things might be of interest to some… certainly to *me.*

Here’s one: commercial aviation.

History starts to diverge in 1968, and really starts to take off after July, 1969. At that time in the US, the Boeing 747 was just about to enter service, and the Boeing 2707 SST was still a forward-moving project. It was eventually cancelled IRL in 1971 after Congress cut off funding. But in the alternate timeline, the change to a more robust space program is, by 1971, starting to have some subtle changes to society and technology at large. Additionally, the Kennedy Watergate Scandal has hit the Democrat Party worse than the IRL Nixon Watergate Scandal hit the Republicans, since the RFK scandal dealt with numerous party officials and the party machine. A result of this is that the voices of the likes of William Proxmire, one of the primary opponents of the SST program, are somewhat muted. As a result, in this timeline the funding for the SST program is not cut. The prototypes are completed and fly successfully; the 2707 goes into production and a number of airlines buy and operate them.

A side effect of this is that the British-French Concorde ceases operations *years* earlier. The Concorde was a relatively tiny aircraft compared to the 2707 (about 100 seats compared to 277), and was insanely expensive. So long as it was the *only* SST out there, it was a prestige aircraft, but in a world with a much less expensive 2707, it would simply be ridiculous to keep flying it. But even though the British had insanely nationalized their aerospace industry, it seems unlikely that they, the French or Airbus would simply let the US *own* supersonic transport. So it’s fair to assume that European competition to the 2707 would arise within a decade or so.

And the 2707 would of course begin to show its age by the early 1980s. With the advances in aerospace that would necessarily follow from the beefed-up space program, much more efficient SSTs would be possible in the 1980’s. So I suggest that the Boeing 2717 would enter service in the mid ’80’s.

The Boeing SSTs would see competition from not only other SSTs (not only a hypothetical Airbus SST, but also a McDonnell-Douglas SST and a Tupolev SST better than the rushed Tu-144), but from aircraft improving on the SST. A Lockheed hypersonic transport enters service in the 1990s.

Even with great advanced in aerodynamics, materials and engines, supersonic transportation would remain substantially more expensive than subsonic transport. By alternate 1999, the skies would be crawling with jetliners that look like jetliners we knew in 1999… but subtly different. Why not a latest generation 747 where the upper deck goes all the way back to the tail, providing an Airbus A380-like monster years earlier? With the cheap electricity provided by nuclear power and the reduction in use of middle eastern petroleum, why not jetliners fueled by hydrogen, methane or propane? Blended wing bodies? Flying wings? It’s just barely possible that someone might even have a nuclear powered commercial aircraft, though I think that making that politically practical even in the alternate timeline would require a whole new type of extremely safe reactor. Something like the hafnium isomer “reactor” or cold fusion would seem a good fit… except for the little problem that these technologies just don’t seem to work. But in a world where nuclear power is not irrationally feared and repressed as in ours, who can say…

Next: Computers

 Posted by at 12:06 pm
Nov 082013
 

NASA claims to not understand this. I bet they do, and they’re just hiding The Truth. I’d think about moving away from Bellingham, Washington…

NASA’s Hubble Sees Asteroid Spouting Six Comet-Like Tails

Unlike all other known asteroids, which appear simply as tiny points of light, this asteroid, designated P/2013 P5, resembles a rotating lawn sprinkler. Astronomers are puzzled over the asteroid’s unusual appearance.

“We were literally dumbfounded when we saw it,” said lead investigator David Jewitt of the University of California at Los Angeles. “Even more amazing, its tail structures change dramatically in just 13 days as it belches out dust. That also caught us by surprise. It’s hard to believe we’re looking at an asteroid.”

 Posted by at 1:26 am
Nov 082013
 

Here’s an interesting snippet: Dan Savage, professionally offended/professional offender, suggests that what *he* wants to see happen is, for a period of thirty years, all human pregnancies be aborted. *Maybe* he was kidding (doesn’t really seem that he was), but perhaps more telling was the enthusiastic response of the audience. Mr. Savage has been mentioned hereabouts before, and very clearly has some pretty strong leftie-creds.

So… at the far end, this leftie shows that he’s not after ‘freedom of choice” after all, but complete authoritarianism. What’s more: whether you think abortion should be legal or not, at least *most* people will agree that killing a fetus without the mothers consent is murder, or at least something very close to it. So what this feller advocates, and many in the audience loudly approves of, is the murder of entire generations. Every pregnancy for thirty years would be, what, maybe a billion? Fewer, perhaps, because there wouldn’t be  children coming along in those years to mature and start getting pregnant themselves.

VIDEO: Dan Savage says ‘abortion should be mandatory’ to reduce the population.

That Mr. Savage should suggest the greatest act of mass murder in human history in order to form the sort of world *he* wants is no particular biggie. He’s a well-known attention whore; his schtick is saying things to shock people. The newsworthiness of the episode is the popularity of his authoritarian views amongst his political compatriots in the audience. One guy ranting on a streetcorner? Not news. That same guy leading a nation of suckups to commit warcrimes? That’s news.

 

 

 Posted by at 12:35 am
Nov 072013
 

When last we left alternate history, it was 1996, aiming towards 1999. Space station IV has been built; construction of Clavius and AristarchusBases on the moon began in earnest in 1994. The one-million-pound payload Neptune has just been retired, replaced by the twice as powerful Uranus. The Shuttle II is in its last days, about to be replaced by the Orion II cargo spaceplane and the Orion III passenger spaceplane (each using the turboramrocket-powered Orion I booster). There is a space station in orbit around Venus, a base on Phobos and the beginnings of a permanent base on Mars in the form of Lowell Base. The path from here to 1999, when the scenes in Earth orbit and on the moon were supposed to be set, is both clear and fairly short, so there’s not a whole lot to say.

From 1994 to 1999, Clavius base goes from groundbreaking to operational. The only way this could be feasible is with a massive spacelift operation, with pre-assembled buildings, building segments and equipment launched from Earth to LEO atop Uranus boosters. Transfer from LEO to lunar orbit would be by use of ion engines or similar extremely high Isp electrical propulsion systems. In order to provide power, a combination of on-site generation (via nuclear reactors) and remote transmission would be used. The Solar Power Satellite prototypes are not economically competative with the terrestrial commercial nuclear reactor program… but they are a fantastic way yo provide vast amounts of power to cislunar tugs. These would be composed of large, lightweight truss structures with microwave receiver mesh tht intercepts the power beams from the satellites and converts that radiation into electrical power. Ion and/or plasma engines use the massive power available to boost the payloads. But even with hundreds of megawatts to even gigawatts of power, acceleration is slow, so the massive payloads slowly spiral out of Earth orbit, taking months to reach lunar orbit. Once there, they are intercepted by lunar “taxis” that lower the payloads to the lunar surface. This is accomplished with high-thrust nuclear engines for the final landing, but LOX/aluminum powder slurry  engines – crude and inefficient, but using propellants plentiful on the lunar surface – are used for braking out of lunar orbit and for much of the descent.

The thousands of workers needed on the lunar surface are sent from Earth via Space Stations II and IV, transported up on Shuttle II and Orion III vehicles. From the space stations they are transported to the moon via Aries Ia and Ib moon ships.

The first structures build are the preliminary housing facilities (inflatable “domes” initially), followed by improved landing facilities.. Once the facilities are in place to safely house the work crews and provide for efficient cargo operations, the massive subterranean operations begin. While hundreds of thousands of square feet of facilities are being dug out underground and built up using locally produced materials, such as nuclear melted regolith castings, facilities are rapidly built up on the surface. Here greeenhouses – using natural sunlight for thee two-week-long day, artificial lights for the two-week-long night – grow plants and algae for oxygen production, carbon dioxide scrubbing and food production. By 1999, Clavius and Aristarchus Bases are officially self-supporting: in the event that transport from Earth were cut off, the bases could survive idefinitely.

By 1999, facilities are in place that will process lunar regolith into constituent elements. However, it remains more efficient to process more pure sources. So numerous geological expeditions are sent out to find veins of valuable ores and meteorites. Of great importance are carbonaceous chondrites (needed for the carbon) and subsurface ices (needed not for rocket propellant, but for the maintenance and growth of the artificial biospheres). In support of this, numerous satellites orbit the moon, scanning the surface for gravitational, magnetic and chemical anomalies. One of these satellites detects, in 1999, a magnetic anomaly at the crater Tycho. One of the many geological expedition groups examines the site, and rapidly build a small base there and excavates a large “pit.”  Due to the experience such groups have had, and the tools and techniques at their ready disposal, the pit, which is begun late in a lunar evening, is completed within the span of the lunar night. The discoveries at the pit are quickly classified. The new President, inaugurated just a few months earlier, is faced with a set of issues no President has had to face before, and makes decisions informed by a confidential report put together by the head of the NCA based on a hastilty-organized trip to the moon and a visit to the Tycho discovery.

This would seem to get us from 1968 to 1999, along one of an infinite number of paths. This particular path ends up with the USSR still a going concern, due in part to Nixon pulling out of Vietnam several years early. This has led to communism being a more powerful and aggressive force around the world. At the same time, the US has begun the true conquest of the universe, with *thousands* of people living off-world. The US – and world, except for countries that live solely on oil – economy would be substantially bigger than “our” economy, due in part to the space program, but more due to cheap electricity provided by a healthy nuclear industry. The space program would be a much vaster effort than in our world, and by this point would be about as difficult to cancel or curtail as Medicare or Social Security is in ours.

I have ideas about secondary topics for the “2001” world, but this closes out the basic story of “how we get there.”

 Posted by at 6:00 pm