Diagrams to go with prior photos.
Now that I am, seemingly, well and truly on the mend, with my lungs no longer trying to turn themselves inside out, I’ve been back to banging away on my Nuclear Pulse Propulsion book. Yes, I’m kinda behind on this, Yes, that’s nothing especially new.
So far, I’m sitting at 270 pages. I fully expect it to be somewhere north of 350 pages when complete, maybe 400 depending onwhether or not all the images will get in, and how big they’ll be reproduced.
I somehow missed this at the end of last year… a restored version of Metropolis released on DVD and Blu Ray. In 2008, about half an hour of presumed-lost footage was found hidden away in Argentina, and this has been restored to the movie (and the movie as a whole restored). Metropolis is one of the great science fiction movies of all time, depite the fact it’s silent. Growing up, all I knew was that I wanted to grow up to be Rotwang.
I haven’t bought this yet (yay, poverty), but I sure wish I had me one of them there Blu Ray thingies. Maybe if enough of y’all click on the links below and spend, spend, spend at Amazon, I’ll be able to afford one…
This was a good, possibly great, movie. NOT a great science fiction movie – the science in it really was quite awful. But it was a damned fine combat movie.
The short form of it: aliens drop from the skies next two 20 coastal cities and start kicking up a ruckus. One of the cities is, as you may expect, Los Angeles. The movie follows a squad of Marines as they go behind enemy lines to extract some civilians.
As a war movie, it has all the cliched characters. The Tough-As-Nails Sarge. The Wet Behind The Ears Newly Minted Lieutenant. The New Guy. The Guy With Psyche Issues. The Guy From New Joisey. The Hot Chick With A Machine Gun. The Marine About To Get Married. The Guy With A Problem With Sarge.
The aliens are not developed as characters or explored in any real depth. They are apparently semi-squid aquatic critters, grown into bipedal power armor for surface locomotion. They use weapons comparable to the humans, and for some reason send out waves of grunts to shoot up the joint, rather than simply plastering the neighborhood with nukes or asteroids. And most gratingly, the movie has Experts On TV who point out that the best explanation for why they aliens are here is that they “want our water.” It was old when “V” did it more than a quarter century ago, and it still doesn’t make any sense today… dropping deep into the Solar gravity well to steal water from a heavy terrestrial world when there are ice moons and comets galore out in deep space, free for the taking. Sigh.
But if you can get past that, it’s an entertaining and in places *tense* movie. The combat scenes are really quite engaging; the characters, while pretty stock, are generally likable and you’re saddened to see them go… and a lot of them do go. And the Marines seem to act like how Marines might act under the circumstances: when they manage to collect an alien prisoner, injured when part of a building apparently fell on it, they don’t try to reason with it. They don’t attempt any communication at all, in fact. They immediately proceed to vivisect it, with the ready assistance of both their corpsman and a civilian veteranarian they picked up along the way. The Hippocratic Oath, after all, does not cover squishy spacemonsters in robosuits.
The special effects were, as far as I could tell, flawless. The aliens seem to have a fetish for rocket-powered hovering machines; while some form of antigravity seems to be in effect for their larger constructs, their smaller aerial vehicles, and even their crew-served weapons, all seem to get along by pointing a rocket engine or ten at the ground and firing nonstop. Hell, their officers seeme to hover about on rocket power, for reasons which are not explored. It’s silly… they don’t seem to understand wings, rotors or even the wheel. But once past *that,* the process was carried out well. The rockets are loud, set things on fire and break things with their exhaust.
One of my favorite little details: there are numerous scenes of TVs showing CNN news coverage. In the lower right corner, it shows that “Trading Has Been Suspended,” with the Dow at something like 4,800. Yeah, I can imagine that aliens opening up a can of whoopass on Earth – especially on New York City – would tend to depress the markets somewhat.
Comparisons with Independence Day are inevitable, but largely unwarranted. ID was, let’s face it,a pretty silly movie in tone, with World-Straddlingly Important People doing Incredibly Important Stuff. Battle:LA, in contrast, is stuck firmly down in the mud with the grunts. The President is never even mentioned. No super-science labs. No secret weapons. No real strategy. No wacky hijinks. The “Welcome To Earff” moment in Battle: LA involves not punching the alien in the head, but cutting into it repeatedly with a Ka-Bar.
It could, at least in principle, be the launching point for any of a number of sequels. There are, after all, 20 cities getting stomped (New Orleans, New York, Tokyo, Paris and others), and the movie only deals with about the first 24 hours of the invasion. Whether sequels are planned, I have no idea.
So if you’re looking for hard science fiction where the alien invaders make *any* sort of sense, this ain’t the movie for you. If you’re looking for a serious and gritty combat movie, then you might want to give this a shot.
UPDATE: Roger Ebert hated it. One more reason to ignore him as the talentless, tasteless hack that he is.
The Fukushima reactor facility has suffered a substantial explosion:
[youtube kjx-JlwYtyE]
The claim is that it’s a “hydrogen explosion,” rather than one of the reactor vessels themselves going “pop” like at Chernobyl. Even so, this is Not Good.
Anybody know why there’d be a large quantity of hydrogen on-hand at a nuclear reactor? One possibility is that water coolant was heated so much that it disassociated into hydrogen and oxygen, or the uranium in the reactor burning and tearing the water molecules apart to bond with the oxygen, leaving hydrogen. Neither one of these is a cheering possibility. If there is some more mundane reason for hydrogen to be on-hand in sizable quantites, I’d like to hear it.
So, history has taught us two important lessons about nuclear powerplant safety:
1: Don’t let it be designed, administered, regulated and operated by socialists.
2: Don’t build it on a friggen’ major earthquake zone, on the coast next to a tsunami zone.
What’s the lesson that is *likely* to be taught? The luddites and fearmongers will use this incident to further stymie efforts to restore the nuclear power program in the US. The reactor here is a forty year old design that got whacked with the seventh biggest earthquake since recording such things began, and took a thirty-foot tsunami. And since that original earthquake, it’s been kicked in the ass by *hundreds* of aftershocks, many of which would be substantial and newsworthy earthquakes in their own right.
And by the way: here’s an aerial tour of Minamisome, a coastal city of 71,000 that seems to have been completely washed away. Possibility exists that the ground subsided and the town actually *sank* into the sea. What’s especially spooky in the video is that the camera zooms in on a number of still-standing buildings… and there ain’t nobody on the roofs.
[youtube MgZlUhuKMHo]
And entire city being washed away, killing potentially 71,000 people, will have a far greater deathtoll than any possible nuclear reactor disaster. But guess which one will get the headlines.
Yikes:
http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/201103/r733037_5926950.jpg
One secondary but not-to-be-ignored issue with the hugenormous tsunami and flooding: cleanup. It looks like the layer of dirt and rubble is, in some places, *yards* deep. Getting the airport back up and running is a dire necessity. But how to clean off a runway covered in that much crap, especially without earth moving equipment (I’m assuming that there’s not a readily-accessible supply of waterproofed bulldozers on site)?
Let’s face it: if you are not emotionally, physically or financially involved with the earthquake in Japan, chances are pretty good that you find the videos of the tsunamis… well, “entertaining.” I admit that I certainly do. The scenes of massive devastation are, to be blunt, quite fascinating. And there are a lot of these videos available. Such as This One, which shows a flaming tsunami (!!!) sweeping over farmland and chasing down cars.
But I have a problem. Here’s a screenshot:
If you notice in the lower left corner you can see a road. Perpendicular across the road is a white vehicle in the process of trying to turn itself around to run the hell away from the Wave Of Grinding Flaming Death that is bearing down on it.
But at least in this video, you don’t get to see what happens. Why? Because all the friggen’ banners on the bottom cover that area of the image.
The screenshot is 640 pixels by 360 pixels, for a total of 230,400 pixels. The collection of banners and newscrawls and whatnot at the bottom is 640X106 pixels, for a total of 67,840 pixels. The “Reuters” at the top covers 84X34 pixels, for a total of 2,856 pixels. The total crap-coverage is 70,696 pixels, or a full 30.68% of the screen image.
GRRRRRR…
[youtube zY2HPT7obWE]
[youtube 4YPOK_3r8Dc]