Apr 192010
 

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/top-stories/2010/04/19/pay-1-200-vet-bill-or-we-ll-put-dog-down-115875-22195777/

Short form: a family brought an ailing, pregnant dog to the vet. Vet determined that the dog needed a C-section, which would cost £1,240. The family could not afford that. The vet would not allow the family to take the dog to seek cheaper treatment, and instead only offered the option of euthenasia, for the low, low price of £90. Dog and the unborn pups was put down.

Money quote: “Euthanasia may be offered on economic grounds if no form of financial assistance can be found.”

Now, I understand that medical treatment costs money. But I’ve also watched a number of episodes of “Animal Cops.” Perhaps the law is different in Britain than in the US, but in the US if you have an ailing animal and cannot afford the treatment, you can sign away your rights to the critter and the local Humane Society will take ownership, provide treatment, and then sell/adopt the critter to someone else. Sure, it sucks you’d have to give up your pet python “Cuddles” or your Chihuahua “Cerberus,” but isn’t that better than putting it down?

I’m betting the story is missing a few details.

 Posted by at 3:37 pm
Apr 192010
 

Some aerial footage of Detroit. Looks a *lot* like a European city that had been bombed flat in one of their regular wars. There are apparently forty square MILES of abandoned property that the current Mayor is looking to bulldoze. And that’s really the only solution here… clear everyone out of large areas and destroy them utterly. Ruined but still standing buildings are just sources of serious problems, while an empty field is just an empty field.

And from the relevant Fark thread, the best comment by far:

I, for one, am shocked that Detroit is not Utopia. I mean, Detroit has elected Democratic mayors for 50 years straight – how could it possibly fall apart under consecutive decades of unchecked liberal leadership? Shouldn’t everyone in Detroit have their own unicorn by now?

It’s a point I’ve made before.

 Posted by at 10:08 am
Apr 182010
 

Penn Gillette shows how it’s done. Specifically, how to feel that someone’s choices are stupid… and to yet feel that that person has the right to make those stupid choices. Anyone who thinks that other people should not be allowed to smoke, drink, own whatever firearms they want, smoke dope, snort coke, read “dangerous” literature, watch crappy sitcoms, surf porn, worship a bag of Skittles as the One True God, keep their property and do with it as they please, marry whoever they like, listen to whatever music they like, dance however they like, succeed, fail, risk their lives and their fortunes on crazy ventures or any other damned fool thing… should read this piece.

They came first for the Hummers.Then they came for the pie.

 Posted by at 12:11 pm
Apr 182010
 

Since I moved to Utah, I’ve found a total of three good hobby shops within drivable range. (For the purposes of this discussion, a “hobby shop” is defined as a store with a lot of plastic model kits, but not a hugenormous chain store like “Michaels” and “Hobby Lobby.”) One in Logan, one in Riverdale, one in Sandy.

The Logan hobby shop closed up about a month ago.

The Riverdale shop had its last day today.

The Sandy shop is still there, but I always seem to overhear people talking about it evaporating as well.

I hear this sort of thing is not uncommon. Partially this is due to the economy being sucko. Partially it’s due to kids not being as interested in building models as they are in playing Xbox (get off my lawn!). Partially its due to the Internet. And a lot of it is due to the hobby just being damned expensive.

Compared to the kits that were available when I was a kid, thirty fricken’ years ago, the current crop of kits are technologically advanced, extremely detailed and fabulously well engineered. They are also extremely expensive. Back In The Day, I could buy a decent model kit of an F-14, say, for three to five bucks. Today’s F-14 kit would easily run nearly ten times as much. A check on Squadron.com shows prices for a 1/72 F-14 model running from $18 to more than fifty damned dollars, with most about $30.

Now, I know there’s this thing called “inflation,” but it doesn’t even come close to explaining the price increase. Using this inflation calculator, three bucks in 1980 money works out to $7.92 in today’s money.

There is another source of trouble here: lawyers. Behold one particular license agreement: license.txt There was a time when a model kit company that wanted to make a model of an aircraft would ask the designing company about it, and the company would dump drawings on them to make sure they did it right. Now the companies have to jump through a whole lot of expensive legal hoops. And what’s the result? The same in scale aerospace as real aerospace: American companies are fading away, while the Chinese and Russians are going full speed ahead. It should thus come as no surprise that the manufacturer of the only 1/144 scale Boeing 787 that I’m aware of is not Monogram, or Testors, or Revell, or any other American model company… it’s Zvezda Models from Russia.

So, what do we have here. We have a model & toy culture that is seriously depleted as far as affordable replicas of actual aircraft. We have a space program that’s been dull as dishwater for decades, and has just had what remained of its harbles lopped off. We have more lawyers than engineers being produced. We have exceedingly few references to aerospace in popular music, and those that we do get (“Rocketman,” “Silent Satellite,” “Major Tom,” etc.) are all friggen’ depressing. We have a vast array of aerospace companies being merged into a very small number of monolithic, risk-averse megacorps.

It’s not just a matter of how bad things are now… but also the cultural shifts indicated by that lack of aerospace toys and models for kids means that fewer kids will be inspired to become aerospace engineers and the like. Anybody here really going to be surprised if America ceases to be relevant in the field of aerospace within the next generation?

 Posted by at 12:52 am
Apr 172010
 

Fortunately, there’s a judge in this story who has some damned sense.

Barry A. Hazle Jr. served a year in prison on a drug charge. After he got out, his parole agent sent him back for being an atheist.

Now, the 41-year-old Redding computer technician has won a ruling from a Sacramento federal judge against the state and stands to collect damages for having his constitutional rights violated.

Hazle doesn’t have a whole lot of my sympathy, being a convicted criminal and all. But being forced to attent religious indoctrination as a term of his parole? Ummm… no. Unless, of course, the system works out so that fundamentalist Christian parolees must attend Islamic training and Muslim parolees must do public service at the local Bacon And Ham Cookout.

 Posted by at 6:40 pm
Apr 172010
 

Ten friggen’ stars outta ten.

1) Gratuitous violence.

2) Foul language

3) Excessive violence

4) Children with firearms

So it’s got that going for it.

Seriously, this was the funnist movie I’ve seen in a *long* time. Short form of the plot is that some nerdy kid decides that it’s about time that someone actually tries to be a superhero, so he gets himself an outfit and sets out to right wrongs… and immediately discovers that he’s in over his head. At the other end of the scale are a father/daughter team equipped with bags of cash, a roomfull of guns, body armor, training and a willingness to not only fight the bad guys, but to shoot them in the face. I was honestly astonished as the level of profanity and violence exhibited by the 11-year-old Hit Girl… a vast bodycount, and it had me laughing the entire time. It’s a movie sure to irritate the hell out of gun-grabbing leftist weenies; the good guys, one of whom is a Batman clone, have no trouble whatsoever in obtaining – and using to deadly effect – firearms. There is no hint of the usual “guns are bad, m’kay?’ message that so many movies seem to feel the need to include.

There are several reviews I’ve read that have managed to successfully display just that level of knee-jerk anti-gunnism. Such as HERE (where the reviewer lets slip his own psychological aberations by going on and on about how Hit Girl is “sexualized” even though she’s wearing body armor and more clothes than a cast member of Sesame Street) and HERE and HERE is a summary of a number of negative reviews.

It has a lot of “willing suspension of disbelief” to it, especially the use of a particular mechanism near the end of the movie. But there are no superpowers, nothing that physically *couldn’t* happen (except that mechanism…), just a whole lot of “that’s very unlikely.”

Go see it and irritate the hell out of the prudes and Libs in your life.

 Posted by at 12:19 am