Aug 052019
 

Disney continues its trend towards annoying the fans. While in recent years this process has been largely through politicizing and just plain bad writing, here “Thor” director Taika Waititi goes the extra step towards directly insulting long-term fans of the Marvel character. As a result Diktor von Doomcock goes off a little bit, using some NSFC language to express his displeasure at how not only is Thor going to be a woman in the next movie (which is nonsensical; “Thor” is the guy’s name, not his job title. Similarly, “Jesus” is always the same dude, while “Christ” is actually a job description), but in how Waititi takes pleasure in *explicitly* declaring that he’s going to trash the “mythos.”

I look forward to Waititi’s movie where he portrays Muhammad as a Korean transwoman.

 Posted by at 4:48 pm
Aug 052019
 

Working as Disneyland “talent” seems like a little slice of Hell on Earth, especially in summer. But you have *got* to admire how well the actress here pulls off “Evil Queen” improv.

Disney has access to considerable talent and skill. The woman here is spot-on, both in attitude and appearance, and certainly seems to enjoy her job. But Disney also has substantial engineering talent, and I really hope that that has been tapped to create a costume that near-magically provides active cooling. Perhaps that jewel on her sternum contains a miniaturized nuclear reactor that powers a refrigeration system that pumps coolant throughout the costume, much as space suits do, and rejects heat through heat exchangers built into the cape. Because… sure, that would make more sense than a major megacorp simply roping minimum-wage-slaves into sweating bullets.

Still and all: gotta love what she can do with her eyes.

 

 Posted by at 10:48 am
Aug 052019
 

Just finished the initial cut of diagrams for US Transport Projects #9, except for the interior layout of one jetliner…


Previously…

US Transport Projects #8

Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US Transport Projects #8 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #8 includes:

  • NACA SST: a 1947 concept
  • Boeing CX-HLS: Boeings design for what became the C-5
  • Bell Operational Medium STOL Transport: vectored thrust for short takeoff
  • Convair Limited War Amphibian: A concept for a single plan to meet both land and sea plane requirements
  • Bell Hypersonic Transport 1980-1990:A two-stage turboramjet/rocket concept
  • Lockheed Hybrid Wing Body 757PF-Sized Freighter: a recent design for an advanced transport
  • Lear Liner Model 40:a small airliner/large executive transport
  • Boeing Model 759-153A Resource Carrier: A big flying wing natural gas “tanker”

 

USTP #8 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

——–


 Posted by at 2:11 am
Aug 042019
 

Hmmmm…..

SpaceX CEO Elon Musk says first orbital Starship prototype flight debut is just weeks away

An update on the whole program is due August 24, and flights of a full-scale Starship “prototype” soon thereafter.
SpaceX is building *multiple* flight test vehicles, both in Texas and in Florida. They are building them outside, which is pretty much by definition as far from “clean room” conditions as you can get, unless you go the extra step and build them within a malfunctioning and overflowing sewage treatment plant. The Starship prototypes are clearly not space-capable, but seem to be aimed mostly or entirely as subsonic or just maybe low-supersonic aerodynamic “flying mockups.” The skins are far, *FAR* from the smooth, featureless outer mold lines you want to have for something that will deal with hypersonic airflows. Still, if they can demonstrate a death swoop and pinpoint landing with a vehicle with the same aerodynamics as a true Starship, with the same weights, propulsion systems, center of gravity, etc. as the real deal…. they’ll be a heck of a lot closer to a truly reusable large launch system than anyone else ever.
 Posted by at 7:52 pm
Aug 042019
 

In 1964 Lockheed put forward a design in the US Army’s Advanced Aerial Fire Support System (AAFSS) program that would eventually win and become the AH-56 Cheyenne. But Lockheed was not alone in tendering a proposal: Sikorsky entered their S-66 design.

Both helicopters would have been advanced and fast. Lockheed made the AH-56 fast by adding a pusher prop to the tail, just aft of the conventional anti-torque rotor. But Sikorsky went a slightly different route: the S-66 used the “rotaprop” tail. This combined anti-torque duties with forward thrust in a single mechanism… a single somewhat complicated mechanism that could turn the sideways-thrusting anti-torque rotor 90 degrees to point it aft, providing forward thrust. This would have decreased drag and potentially decreased weight, but at added technical risk compared to the relatively simple solution of just adding a dedicated pusher prop. In late 1965, the Army decided that the risk was too high, and went with Lockheeds design.

The S-66 design got a fair amount of publicity during the contest, but I’ve never actually run across the proposal documentation or design diagrams. A few photos of a display model and a single cutaway drawing are presented HERE. Below are some magazine illustrations of the S-66. It would have been an impressive helicopter had it been built and if it had been successful, looking not unlike a sleeker version of the Mil 24 Hind attack helicopter.

 

 Posted by at 4:45 pm
Aug 042019
 

Somebody must be handing out the crazypills today…

A shooting with multiple fatalities and several people wounded has occurred at or near Ned Peppers Bar on East Fifth Street in the city of Dayton’s Oregon District.

Sources are telling us there are at least 10 people dead and an unknown number of wounded. We’re working to confirm some eyewitness accounts that a person who was denied entry into the bar opened fire.

Should be interesting to compare and contrast media coverage of the two events.

 

 Posted by at 1:43 am
Aug 042019
 

So, there was a mass shooting in El Paso, Texas. Preliminary reports are that the killer, who CNN seems to take great glee in stating as often as possible is a “white male,” posted a manifesto stating his opposition to mass immigration and the replacement of white Americans with Hispanics. So his response to what he doesn’t like was to shoot up a WalMart. Fortunately the cops caught him alive and unharmed; hopefully they’ll be able to pry out of him WTF he was thinking.

We’ve seen this sort of thing before. And while sometimes terrorism seem to have a recognizable goal that can be linked to the terrorism (the IRA trying to bomb the Brits out of Northern Ireland, for example), “right wing” or “white nationalist/separatist” terrorism in the US and the West seems to be uniquely pointless. Consider: after these events, when has either society or the government moved in the direction these jackholes would have wanted? Every time a white guy shoots up a mosque, a synagogue, a black church or a bordertown WalMart, any changes that result would be in the direct opposite direction.

After a “right wing” terrorist act, the left-wingers agitate for increased gun control and restrictions on speech and thought. Sometimes they succeed in getting some of what they want. If it turns out this act was based on hatred of Hispanic mass immigration, then it’s a safe bet that it will become *easier* for such mass immigration to happen. The news has already pointed out that the city government of El Paso has told the local police to enforce no immigration laws for the foreseeable future.

In contrast, after “left wing” terrorist acts, such as the BLM murders of cops in Dallas or the cop Christopher Dorner who went on a killing spree to protest the existence of the 2nd Amendment or the many, many attacks by Antifa, free speech rights aren’t expanded; gun control laws aren’t hacked back; mass immigration isn’t restrained and illegal aliens aren’t mass deported. In fact, left-wing terrorists such as Antifa often get what they want in shutting down opposing thought.

And look at Islamist terrorist attacks: after 9/11, in only seven years the US elected a guy who had been raised as a Muslim, had a Muslim middle name, extolled the supposed virtues and beauties of Islam and was believed by a *lot* of people to be a Muslim. After lesser but much more common Islamist terrorist attacks in Europe, Western Europe has not cracked down on or oppressed their Muslim minorities; in fact, just the opposite. Many Western European cities have been effectively ceded to Muslim immigrants, millions more have filled their borders, and horrific crimes are often simply officially ignored so as not to offend the new occupants.

In summary:

  • Islamist terrorism: It seems to work quite successfully in promoting Islamist goals.
  • Left Wing terrorism: It works slightly.
  • Right Wing terrorism: It is massively self-defeating.

Now, nut jobs are gonna nutjob. Right wing or left wing, you can’t reason a whacko into planning things out rationally, taking into account logical cause and effect based on history and an accurate understanding of human nature. Whackos are gonna go lynch somebody or blow something up because God told ’em to, or the neighbors dog, or hidden messages in Beatles songs, or Satan, or the historical dialectic, or whatever other crazy thing that seeps into their consciousness. But if you ever encounter an “extremist” who is thinking about committing acts of violence because he thinks that will help his cause of expanding rights and freedoms… smack his ass around a bit until he realizes that it will do the friggen’ opposite. Gentlemen, behold:

Kamala Harris willing to send cops to people’s homes to confiscate banned firearms

It took mere moments for a leading Democrat Presidential hopeful to announce that she’s ready and willing to go Gestapo on millions of Americans. A former hopeful “joked” about using weapons of mass destruction on American citizens who refused to given up their Constitutional rights. These sort of views are the sort of things that should, in earlier years, have not only disqualified a candidate from serious consideration for the Presidency, but should have gotten them laughed off the public stage. But every time some whacko hopped up on antidepressants decides that shooting up a public space is a neato-keen idea, the left wingers masterfully leap atop the still warm corpses and start bleating their goals of domination. And every time, they get a little further along. Useful idiots like the El Paso shooter only aid them.

 

 Posted by at 1:21 am