Feb 072020
 

The quickest way for a white person to commit career suicide is to be accused of being a racist. But it seems the quickest way to career success for *other* people is to publicly and proudly declare racism. Go figure. As an example, behold:

10 Reasons Why Inviting White People to the Mythical ‘Cookout’ Is Stupid and Silly and Needs to Stop Forever

Some examples:

3. Because cookout meat is precious and sacred and not meant to be shared with interlopers, gentrifiers, and Travis ᚠᚢᚲᚲᛜ Kelce.

7. BECAUSE INVITING WHITE PEOPLE TO THE COOKOUT NEGATES ONE OF THE PRIME REASONS FOR HAVING ALL-BLACK GATHERINGS AND THAT’S TO BE IN A SAFE AND UNDERSTANDING SPACE TO DISCUSS, DEBATE, DECONSTRUCT, AND TALK ᛋᚺᛁᛏ ABOUT THE ECOSYSTEM OF PECULIAR BEHAVIORS KNOWN AS “THAT’S SOME WHITE PEOPLE ᛋᚺᛁᛏ.”

 

Feel free to imagine the response of someone getting paid to write a color-reversed version of this article, declaring why it’s important for white people to keep their own spaces and to stop socializing with “others.”

 Posted by at 2:34 pm
Feb 072020
 

The Critical Drinker presents his top five cinematic “last stands.” Last stands in both history and fiction can be damned inspiring, the sort of thing that every man worth his salt hopes to aspire to. As the man wrote: “To every man upon this earth, death cometh soon or late, And how can man die better, Than facing fearful odds, for the ashes of his fathers, And the temples of his gods.”

His top five are pretty good, but I’d actually put one of his “honorable mentions,” the last stand of Leonidas in “300” very, very close to the top. But very likely my number one would be that of Jack in “Oblivion,” who, while facing down (and telling a truncated version of Horatius at the bridge to) a Lovecraftian cosmic horror, says something that I wish was more commonly accepted: “Everyone dies. The thing is to die well.” He then goes out like a boss with a fantastic last line, God his own self smiling next to him.

Leave a comment on your favorite last stands. They need not be the actual *last* stand of a character; sometimes they manage to pull through. But a defining feature is that the character – fictional or historic – goes into it accepting that it is, indeed, the Last.

 

https://cdn.shopify.com/s/files/1/0748/0217/products/laststand_kohse.jpg?v=1538072572

 

 Posted by at 11:43 am
Feb 062020
 

In 1985, Rockwell International contemplated the business case for Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicles. The specific design illustrated used the ET and SRB’s more or less stock, but the orbiter was replaced with a recoverable propulsion and avionics module. The payload came in the form of an upper stage with something very like the Apollo Command and Service Modules. This would probably have been for a lunar mission of some kind as a Shuttle-class booster is too big for a simple capsule mission to LEO. The basic design would have roughly performed like the presumably forthcoming SLS.

 Posted by at 11:17 pm
Feb 062020
 

For those wondering why a “Space Force” might be necessary, behold:

A Russian “Inspector” Spacecraft Now Appears To Be Shadowing An American Spy Satellite

The “shadowing” is a little distant, varying from 150 to 300 kilometers. But the message is pretty clear. Since satellites can be observed from the ground (certainly with better resolution than from other satellites at 150 km range), the purpose of such a satellite is clearly intimidation. Either it can destroy the US satellite, or it is supposed to give the impression that it can do so. The US Space Force *should* eventually be able to do something about that, rather than just watch helplessly as the US is currently doing. The USSF will, hopefully, eventually be able to send inspectors of its own to rendezvous with the foreign inspectors and shadow *them,* preferably at a range of a few meters. The USSF will eventually have rapid responsive launch capabilities to not only send inspectors, interceptors and defensive craft, but also replacements and reinforcements.Refueling and orbital tugs. Orbital Banksies that can tag opponent satellites with something as simple and effective as spray paint… which will do wonders for optics, PV array and thermal balance.

 Posted by at 1:17 pm
Feb 062020
 

A couple weeks ago I made a spectacular, world-shaking post about a small RPG company that decided to insult about half of their potential customer base while also telling their base to *not* buy the product. That’s remarkable enough, but the company has not only continued to insult their potential customers, they’ve also pointed out that they fundamentally do not understand their own product.

Their game is a Cthulhu Mythos-based role playing game. One of the most important features of cosmic horror as defined and virtually invented by H. P. Lovecraft is “madness.” The universe is so vast and uncaring that if you get a good look at it, the horror of it all will likely break your tiny little brain and drive you mad or kill you outright. Madness is as fundamental to the Cthulhu Mythos as space wizards and lazer swords are to “Star Wars,” optimism and interstellar adventures are to “Star Trek” and sparkly teen vampires are to  “Twilight.” So… behold:

“There are no sanity rules in Fate of Cthulhu. We don’t require anyone to play or perform mental illness.
(If you choose to, we have guidance on how to do it respectfully.)
Instead your PC gains Corruption, a potent, alluring slice of the Elder Gods’ power.”

What. The. Frak.

Dude. Dude. Naw, dude. If you meet one of the Great Old Ones, you don’t gain superpowers… you go bugnuts, get mutated into Class A body horror, burn to a crisp, vanish from existence. You don’t get *stronger.* That’s the whole friggen’ point: you can’t deal with this ᛋᚺᛁᛏ. It’s beyond you. Your efforts to be a badass only make Nyarlathotep chuckle.

Now, if they want a game where meeting the scary transdimensional space monsters gives you superpowers, great. Go ahead and invent that universe. Nobody will complain. But that’s not what they’re doing. Instead, they’re doing the “circle of diversity” thing of colonizing an existing property and then twisting it to suit their own ends while insulting the original fans. But what’s the *real* reason why they’re not creating their own thing, when they manifestly hate what they’re actually colonizing? Let the game designer explain:

“Yes, we wanted to do something with Cthulhu because Cthulhu sells.”

Not “we wanted to do Cthulhu because Cthulhu is awesome and a great basis as-is.” Instead… cash-grab.

After seeing Ghostbusters 2016, JJTrek, STD, Disney Star Wars… I’m a bit tired of seeing people taking over franchises and iconic cultural properties and turning them not only into talentless garbage, but garbage that is directly opposed to what the actual property actually is. This kinda makes me want to revive my “War With The Deep Ones” effort. If these anti-Lovecraftian hacks could make a mint on Kickstarter… why the frak can’t I?

 Posted by at 12:41 pm
Feb 052020
 

There is a long history of screw-drive vehicles in Russia. This is due to Russia/Siberia having *vast* regions of swamp/marshland, virtually impassable by conventional wheeled or tracked vehicles. Screw-drive vehicles can simply chew their way right through the much and vegetation. But they are also terrible on roads or rocks. I imagine its possible to build a vehicle that could combine the systems, to drive on roads when possible, to ride on screws when necessary, but like any combination vehicle it’d be an expensive, over-sized, under-performing kludge.

As memory serves, NASA and/or a contractor or two looked at screw drive for lunar vehicles early on, when it was thought that the lunar surface might be a few meters of extremely fluffy dust. Wheels, as it turns out, work just fine. And Russia weren’t the only ones to look at screw-drives for swamps:

 

 Posted by at 12:13 pm
Feb 032020
 

Berkeley Weeded Out Job Applicants Who Didn’t Propose Specific Plans To Advance Diversity

The University of California rejects outright job applicants – for positions such as teachers – who do not demonstrate not only the right ideology, but the right *vehemence* of ideology. That ideology is *not* “the facts, first and always.”

a pool of 894 candidates was narrowed down to 214 based solely on how convincing their plans to spread diversity were

This is not just for the sciences of course, but every field of study. Every field of study is tainted now. UC would seem to be a bad place to invest in.

 Posted by at 8:51 pm