Jan 312013
 

One of the last aircraft proposed by the Curtis-Wright company (early 1960’s), this version of the Model 300 featured a single main wing with wingtip engine pods. Each pod contained to Wankel rotary internal combustion engines; each engine drove a broad-bladed propeller (one at the front of the pod, one at the rear) of the type that had been successfully demonstrated on the Curtis-Wright X-19 VTOL aircraft. In order to attain vertical lift, the forward propeller would tilt up, the aft propeller would tilt down.

At the time, there was considerable interest in fast short-ranged VTOL transport. The idea was that small VTOL aircraft would operate from various small “ports” in and around major cities, flying to and from the nearest major airport (along with other transportation hubs). The VTOL would provide a bus service for the busy businessman on the go, who might need to leave his office in a hurry and catch the next jetliner to, say, London. While no VTOL aircraft such as the Model 300 were built and put into service for this role, several attempts to fill the “VTOL bus” role were attempted with helicopter, but due to noise and cost the concept never caught on.

 Posted by at 8:14 pm
Jan 292013
 

“Parasledding.”

[youtube 1fwtNZah15g]

[youtube 1zmD9ChQBkE]

That much of a mass would seem likely to hit the ground pretty hard. Still, if someone were to mount a fan at the rear of the snowmobile, hooked up to the engine so that it could provide enough thrust to at least maintain straight & level flight, they might be on to something. Beyond the XXXTREEEEMEtards getting their kicks, a device like this might be useful for the rescue services who need to peel skiers and the XXXTREEEEMEtards off of trees and rocks and haul ’em to hospitals.

 Posted by at 10:21 am
Jan 262013
 

OK, now that the first set of prints is out and available for purchase, I’m looking down the road to the next. A couple of the ones I’m looking at are pretty bignormous, and thus expensive, so I’m considering the possibility of smaller versions of a few. However, I’ll probably only do one size, rather than both. Shown below are the next set of candidates; some are prepared, or nearly so; some have a lot of work to do. All are shown at 10% the full-size original image, so you can put ’em side by side if you want to see how they’d compare.

If you see something you like, speak up! Either in the comments or via email. Only the ones that reach a certain number of up-votes will be produced, so if you want one, ya gotta say so. Additionally, this next go-around, those who vote early will be given the chance to buy the first print run of these at some savings compared to the public release. address

First: V-2 (A-4) Rocket brownline, full size. 16.5X56 inches, $45

Second:V-2 (A-4) Rocket brownline, reduced size size. 12X41 inches, $24

Third: V-2 (A-4) Rocket Engine brownline, 24X33 inches, $40

Fourth: X-15A-3 (Delta Wing) Blueprint, 10X40 inches, $20

Fifth: B-29 Blueprint (full scale), 36X84 inches, $150 (BIG!)

Sixth: B-29 Blueprint (half size), 18X42 inches, $37

Seventh: Apollo Blueprints (full size), 24.5X47 inches, $55

Eighth: Apollo Blueprints (smaller size), 18X34 inches, $30

Ninth: Apollo trajectory plot, 8X24 inches, $10

5216a A-4 brownline 10 percent

5216a A-4 12-inch 10 percent

a-4 engine 10 percent

x-15A-3 10 percent

B-29 10 percent

B-29 half 10 percentcsm temp 18 inch 10 percentcsm temp 10 percentpath 10 percent

 Posted by at 10:33 pm
Jan 242013
 

China buys Russian bombers

China has made a deal with the Russians to buy 36 Tupolev Tu-22M3 supersonic bombers. These Soviet-era designs were intended to be carrier-killers, so it’s a reasonable bet that the Chinese – who have been getting twitchy lately over naval issues – are planning to use them to persuade the US Navy to maintain a distance from Chinese territory like the Senkaku Islands, Taiwan, Honshu…

 Posted by at 5:50 am
Jan 212013
 

The LockMart F-35 Lightning II stealthy jet fighter seems to have a flaw: if it gets struck by lightning, its fuel tank could explode. This is a bad thing.

So the UK is grounding theirs. They are not allowed to fly if there is a thunderstorm anywhere nearby. However, I’m uncertain just how many the Raf has; it’s not due to enter service in Britain until 2018 or so, and they’ve only signed up to buy 48 of the now hideously expensive aircraft.

 Posted by at 12:01 am
Jan 092013
 

A few months ago some news sites went buggo with the declassification of several reports on the Avro-Canada Project 1794, a late 1950’s effort to develop a VTOL supersonic “flying saucer.” See, for example, Wired wildly inaccurately titled: “Declassified at Last: Air Force’s Supersonic Flying Saucer Schematics,” which ignores the fact that this design had been declassified fifteen or more years ago… I got a report from the NASM in the mid/late 1990’s, and have seen it online for *years.* Heck, a year or two back I made available some Avro documents on the topic (to thunderous silence, I’ll add).

While a technical masterpiece, it suffered from one minor flaw… it didn’t work. The “Avrocar” test vehicle proved wholly incapable of flight… it could hover in ground effect, and slowly wobble about, but could not generate enough vertical thrust to lurch clear of the ground.

Anyway, a few months back the National Archives declassified a box of reports, the tech blogosphere went nuts, and very little actually got posted online, just retreads of what the National Archives put in a single blog post. So, here’s some more Project 1794 stuff.

 

 Posted by at 11:59 pm