Jun 182013
 

A book excerpt from “The Skies Belong to Us: Love and Terror in the Golden Age of Hijacking” which looks to be a pretty interesting history of air travel in the late 1960’s/early 1970’s, when “this plane/bus/train is going to Cuba” became something of a recurring joke:

How Hijackers Commandeered Over 130 American Planes — In 5 Years

While the 1968-1972 period is a bit before my time, popular culture in the decade or so that followed remembered the burst of idiots who just had to go to Cuba and used it as a theme both dramatically and comically. But a question I’ve long not wondered about – because it never really occurred to me to care – was “what happened to those hijackers who made it to Cuba?” Well, after long and grueling interrogations by the Cuban police, the…

 lucky ones were then sent to live at the Casa de Transitos (Hijackers House), a decrepit dormitory in southern Havana, where each American was allocated sixteen square feet of living space; the two-story building eventually held as many as sixty hijackers, who were forced to subsist on monthly stipends of forty pesos each. Skyjackers who rubbed their G2 interrogators the wrong way, meanwhile, were dispatched to squalid sugar-harvesting camps, where conditions were rarely better than nightmarish. At these tropical gulags, inmates were punished with machete blows, political agitators were publicly executed, and captured escapees were dragged across razor-sharp stalks of sugarcane until their flesh was stripped away. One American hijacker was beaten so badly by prison guards that he lost an eye; another hanged himself in his cell.

Heh. Who woulda guessed it… idiots who thought Cuba was a socialist paradise find that, gee whiz, it actually kinda sucks…

 

 Posted by at 8:31 am
Apr 272013
 

Back in grade school there was a book that I was fond of… that I’ve been looking for ever since. It was, I’m pretty sure, a NASA publication from the early 1960’s on building model spacecraft and launch vehicles. One of the models was this early “Nova” design:

Does anyone know what book I’m referring to?

 Posted by at 6:05 pm
Apr 202013
 

Bill for compulsory science fiction in West Virginia schools

“To stimulate interest in math and science among students in the public schools of this state, the State Board of Education shall prescribe minimum standards by which samples of grade-appropriate science fiction literature are integrated into the curriculum of existing reading, literature or other required courses for middle school and high school students.”

About.

F’n.

Time.

This is a *really* good idea. Rather than dreary, incomprehensible and culturally irrelevant dreck like Dickens and Bronte and whatnot, how about the likes of Heinlein or L. Neill Smith?

The author of the bill, one Ray Canterbury, is “not interested in fantasy novels about dragons,” but instead “in things where advanced technology is a key component of the storyline, both in terms of the problems that it presents and the solutions that it offers.”

 

 Posted by at 9:23 am
Mar 192013
 

Supreme Court rules against publisher on copyright protections

I first mentioned this case back in October, the Supreme Court has now ruled. In short: a Thai national came to the US to get a college education, found that the price of textbooks was insanely high. The same textbooks are offered in Thailand for far less. So he had his family send him textbooks from Thailand. Then he had them send *more* textbooks from Thailand, which he then sold for a profit in the US. The textbook publishers claimed that he was violating their copyright by reselling stuff he bought legally. It has long been accepted that Americans can resell stuff they bought… so long as what they bought was made in the US. But until this case came up, many people – myself included – had been unaware that there was even a hint that you were not allowed to resell something you bought, if it was made outside the US.

Strangely, the Supreme Court ruled on the side of common sense here, in a  6-3 decision: if you bought it, you can resell it. This has a few implications:

1) Books, obviously. Why buy the “American market edition” if a foreign edition is vastly cheaper?

2) Ipods, Ipads, other electronics: Americans get to pay Full Price, yet Chinese and such pay dirt cheap prices. Now, either that means that Apple really can make a profit off of an ipad that costs (handwave) fifty bucks… or Apple loses money on these sales and makes up for it via the high American prices. In other words, American consumers are subsidizing third-world consumers. In either event, it’s safe to assume that there will not be people scooping up large numbers of cheapo Ipads and such from the dirt-world markets and reselling at a substantial markup in the US market (but still substantially cheaper than MSRP). The end result of *that* will be:

A) Either the foreign prices will skyrocket to prevent that

B) US prices will plummet

C) The foreign versions will be made fundamentally different from US versions (Chinese language only, say)

3) Drugs. How many times have we heard about an American who needs  drugs only to find that the American-available drug costs several orders of magnitude more than the exact same drug available just across the border? (such as HERE, where a $100 scorpion anti venom dose was marked up by a factor of 390 for the US market) While I have no doubt that there are a passel of laws and regulations about importing and reselling drugs, I would also have no doubt that someone – probably many someones – are going to try to use this ruling to find a workaround to allow Americans to buy much needed medicines for roughly the sort of prices the rest of the world pays. And why not? It’s about time the US stopped subsidizing everyone else.

 Posted by at 11:06 am
Feb 172013
 

A paragraph or so from Czysz/Bruno’s “Future Spacecraft Propulsion Systems,” where they discuss a little problem in aerospace: over the last generation or two, as our ability to collect and analyze data has increased, out actual physical progress has stalled or even slipped backwards.

stall

I’ve been involved with the whole spectrum of aerospace… from two guys testing rocket components out of the back of a truck in a mostly-empty parking lot, to major aerospace contractors working on NASA manned vehicles. And I gotta tell ya… there was much more progress – certainly much more forward momentum – at the small end. Why? Because we *didn’t* have all the analysis hardware and software. If we wanted to know how hot something would get, we had to actually put it in the fire. In doing so, you often learned things that you would *never* learn by simulation.

At the end of a simulation run, all you’ve done is shift some electrons around, perhaps consumed a whole lot of processed tree slices, and increased the entropy of the universe. At the end of a test run, you’ve actually *built* something. If it works, you are *far* ahead of the simulator. If it didn’t… you are very likely *still* far ahead of the simulator, if you have the wit and grit to understand what went wrong and to correct it and try again.

 Posted by at 6:43 pm
Jan 242013
 

Here’s an idea I doubt would have worked: a rocket powered war cat from the 1585 German manuscript “Feuer Buech,” kept in the Rare Book & Manuscript Library of the University of Pennsylvania.

No, I don’t think that would’ve worked at all. I don’t even know what the goal was here (it’s a book on blowin’ stuff up, so I guess these were to be rocket-powered Kamikazicritters), but there’s no chance that a rocket powered cat or bird would’ve gone in anything like a straight line. If, instead, these are just *bombs* drawn kinda strangely… nope. I’m not sure what the airspeed velocity of an unladen swallow is, but I do know that no little cheep-cheep bird is going to be able to carry a gunpowder bomb worth the effort of cobbling together.

Rocket powered cats will just have to wait.

 Posted by at 11:22 pm