Nov 262018
 

Two seemingly separate news stories I’ve posted suddenly seemed like they might be related.

First, from earlier today, was a story out of China where the claim was made that the first gene-edited human babies have been produced. If the story is true, the babies have been modified to be more resistant to the likes of AIDS. Now, this makes all kinds of sense for a country like China which has what you might call a “relaxed” view on things like human rights and experimentation. My conspiracy cogitation immediately went to China working on “superbabies” that would be resistant to biological weapons, thus giving China an edge on the world scene: not only making the future Chinese populace safer against plagues but also foreign bio-weapons… and *Chinese* bio weapons that may be used against outsiders.

But another thought occurs, going in a very different direction, based on a slightly earlier story. The Chinese “social credit” system is beginning to take effect, using government ideologically controlled metrics to run Chinese peoples lives. If people say the wrong thing or buy the wrong thing or otherwise behave in ways the government doesn’t like they get “points” taken from their “social credit” score, and if it drops too low they lose the right to travel or own pets or who knows what all else. This story doesn’t seem related to the gene editing story. But… consider the possibilities.

Assume for the moment that the Chinese government is willing to think in terms not just of the short two to four year election cycles that the US government thinks in, but in terms of generations. And when you’re in a one-party totalitarian state, that begins to make sense. So if you have gene editing, social credit and generations of planning, what might you consider?

Obviously improving the national breed to make them resistant to foreign attack, and to make them more effective workers and soldiers, makes sense. But if you are a totalitarian regime based on communist ideals, it also makes sense to tinker with the breed to make them more compliant. Now, at the moment I don’t imagine that there is any genetic tinkering that can be done to alter the minds of the babies directly, to make them better subjects of the nation. But… if you tinker with them so that they may become dependent upon some new substance that only the government can provide, then you connect that need to the social credit scoring system, you have built in a *fantastic* new way to enforce compliant behavior. As in “Jurassic Park,” perhaps the ability to produce some vital some amino acid has been deleted. Or perhaps you make them *very* susceptible to the common flu, but also very receptive to annual vaccine dosing… they’re perfectly fine so long as they get the government shot, but if they don’t they soon become very, very ill. Or perhaps you make them addicted to or otherwise dependent upon some synthetic drug… the drug doesn’t make them feel great or high or whatever, but the lack of it makes them feel debilitatingly awful. (Let’s call it “Ketracel White.”)

A system like this need not be mentioned to the public, of course. However, with a public kept in the dark about how they’ve been adjusted, seeing some of their members fall out of favor with the government due to their “improper” behavior and suddenly fall extremely ill in a way that the local hospital cannot deal with… that could be fantastic PR for a totalitarian regime.

Currently, and likely for the foreseeable future, this sort of tinkering can only be done on “test tube babies.” So it will take a *long* time to filter out into the general populace, but if the governmentally desired new traits are made dominant, then each new generation created the old fashioned way will also have this. The difficulty comes in foreign relations. A Chinese citizen goes overseas or defects or whatever, they’ll take their gene code with them. On one hand, the Chinese government might be fine with this: you leave the motherland, you die in agony. On the other hand, if this happens a few too many times, other countries will start piecing things together and will sooner or later start doing genetic testing on Chinese defectors and/or their corpses, and will figure out what’s been done. Foreign countries will of course spread the word both among themselves and attempt to do so within China. This could cause trouble… but of course if the Chinese government plays it right they can convince their people that these problems are actually a conspiracy from outside.

Further down the line gene editing should be possible via retroviral infection. You could rewire the entire public by simply bringing them in for their annual shots. This sort of thing will *really* wind up the anti-vaccers.

 Posted by at 4:35 pm
Nov 232018
 

Coming soon to the mind of an authoritarian with dreams of domination near you, the Chinese “Sesame Credit” system:

China blacklists millions of people from booking flights as ‘social credit’ system introduced

as of May this year, the government had blocked 11.14 million people from flights and 4.25 million from taking high-speed train trips … 3 million people are barred from getting business class train tickets … slowing internet speeds, reducing access to good schools for individuals or their children, banning people from certain jobs, preventing booking at certain hotels and losing the right to own pets

It should be interesting to see what this results in. it seems that even though the system isn’t yet fully rolled out – won’t be until 2020 – a dozen million people are already being ruined by it. When humans are systematically oppressed, most will just sorta roll over an take it and/or try to survive within the system, up to and including groveling and changing whatever it is that is causing them trouble; some small percent will try to *look* like they’re getting along while working quietly to undermine the oppressors; and some will pick up a rock, a gun or a bomb and launch into all-out revolution.

A dozen million people is, on one hand, a tiny fraction of Chinas 1.3 billion. But on the other hand, that is still  whole lot of people… and in a very short time. It may be that china is going about this too far, too fast. They put a clamp down on a hundred million people, they could well be looking at three million people willing to take up arms against the government. And under the system in place, these people could really have no option but to do so. It would not surprise me if Chinese hackers are already working their way into the system. A good way to attack it would not be to try to bring it down, but to “aid” it: ruin the “social credit” of not just government officials – who are probably immune to this sort of thing anyway –  but to random millions. If you ban half the country from traveling, you’ll crush the transportation infrastructure every bit as effectively as if half the bus and train riders had decided to boycott the system… with the added bonus of millions of travelers raising a stink at the station when they are told they can’t travel. You think flying with the TSA is bad now? Imagine if there was a 50/50 chance that you would be told at the airport that you can’t go.

Such a system would be very, very difficult to enact within the US due to the Constitution. But then, so would a gun ban or speech codes, and yet here we are. We’ve seen the likes of Gab and people who espouse unpopular politics being “deplatformed” and deprived of their ability to make an income, along with a number of people whose lives and careers have been ruined because of a bad joke or a harmless, thoughtless moment of political incorrectness. “Sesame Credit” or something vaguely similar need not be a government program for it to cause substantial havoc within the US. Look, for example, at the Southern Poverty Law Center: they are the gatekeepers on who is and is not a “hate group.” You can easily have your bank decide to no longer do business with you because you end up on their list… even though the SPLC is a politically slanted organization and all you need to do to be declared a “hate group” is annoy the wrong person at the SPLC with wrongthink.

 Posted by at 11:57 am
Nov 212018
 

On the one hand, SpaceX has announced the date for their first planned unmanned launch of their manned Dragon spacecraft to the ISS: January 7, less than two months from now. If that works… then SpaceX will be on track to restore Americas ability to launch our own astronauts back into space. Yay! On the other hand…

Reefer Madness at NASA

In short, NASA has apparently flipped out after seeing Elon Musk,away from work, away from SpaceX property, and on his own time, smoke some weed and drink some booze. So they’re conducting safety reviews of both SpaceX and Boeing, focusing on their “workplace safety cultures.”

In that same spirit, I hope they run a similar review of themselves. I’ve heard tell that astronauts sometimes like to get tore up on their free time.

I suspect that a *lot* of this is n effort by the entrenched Old School to get into spaceX to get them to change their culture to be more Old School.

 Posted by at 3:28 pm
Nov 212018
 

This is a fun and entertaining read:

Palm Oil Was Supposed to Help Save the Planet. Instead It Unleashed a Catastrophe.

In short: in the early 2000’s the government sought to combat global warming and carbon emissions. Not, say, by doing something as monumentally sensible as building a crop of new breeder reactors, but instead by focusing on biodeisel and ethanol: the turning of food into fuel. In the midwest the corn farmers loved this, as now there was a whole new market for their crops since corn could be turned into ethanol; at the same time, poor people who kinda relied on cheap corn for, you know, eating, were just SOL because the price of corn went up. But corn was not the best source of bio-fuel. That would be oil-palm trees, whose fruit produce an oil that’s just great for that sort of thing. Problem: oil palms don’t exactly grow like champs in the US. Solution: find a place where they do, like Borneo, then chop down, clear cut and burn off the existing forest to plant crops of oil palms. Result:

The tropical rain forests of Indonesia, and in particular the peatland regions of Borneo, have large amounts of carbon trapped within their trees and soil. Slashing and burning the existing forests to make way for oil-palm cultivation had a perverse effect: It released more carbon. A lot more carbon. NASA researchers say the accelerated destruction of Borneo’s forests contributed to the largest single-year global increase in carbon emissions in two millenniums, an explosion that transformed Indonesia into the world’s fourth-largest source of such emissions. Instead of creating a clever technocratic fix to reduce American’s carbon footprint, lawmakers had lit the fuse on a powerful carbon bomb that, as the forests were cleared and burned, produced more carbon than the entire continent of Europe.

BWAAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!

So not only did this dump boatloads of CO2 into the atmosphere, it trashed the local ecosystem and has led to the usual dystopias of corruption and crackdowns. The palm-oil based fuels are now mandated by law within Indonesia.

Tell me again why we’re better off not building latest-gen nuclear power plants?

 Posted by at 12:49 pm
Nov 172018
 

Here’s some more “Humans R Teh Dum” for ya…

When Space Science Becomes a Political Liability

Basically, it is easy to play off the “don’t spend money in space when there are still problems on Earth” trope, as exemplified by this attack ad:

Fletcher, the candidate who campaigned against an opponent based on his support of space science, won. Her district? Houston, Texas. Gee, I wonder if there might be any of that nasty space-spending going on in Houston?

It boggles my tiny little mind that anti-space worked so well in a town with a major NASA center. This does not bode well for the future. However… done right this *could* be used to argue that as NASA winds down in relevancy, with space exploration becoming the province of private enterprise, perhaps the space centers of the future could be located elsewhere. While it is down to physics that launch centers should be as far south as practical, that’s not even remotely true for *other* centers. Manufacturing, testing, laboratories, planning, admin, mission control… these could be *anywhere.* Like a dream I had a while back, manufacturing of the spacecraft and launch systems of the future could be done *anywhere.* With boosters and spacecraft like the BFR, they could be built one place far from the launch site… and could self-transport themselves from the manufacturing facility near, say, Bozeman Montana to the launch facilities in Florida. This ability would allow for the location of major space centers in places that are not only substantially less Hell-like than Houston with it’s insane heat and humidity, but also where the citizenry actually appreciates them.

 Posted by at 5:53 pm
Nov 062018
 

Grenfell Tower bonfire: Police search property

Short form: Grenfell Tower was an over-populated, badly built apartment tower that burned a year ago, a bunch of people died. So then these guys made a cardboard model of the tower, set it on fire (outside, as some sort of bonfire, on private property), laughed about it and filmed it. And… now they’ve been arrested.

Crude and in poor taste? You bet. It would be akin to building a model of the Twin Towers and intentionally crashing a toy airplane into it. But what’s *illegal* here? The article says:

The men have been arrested under section 4a of the Public Order Act 1986, which covers intentional “harassment, alarm or distress” caused via the use of “threatening, abusive or insulting” words or signs.

Wait. Isn’t Britain the same county that has an annual tradition of setting fire to effigies of Guy Fawkes?

According to THIS ARTICLE, it seems as if the illegality was being simply “offensive.” Which should be frakin’ disturbing to anyone with the slightest interest in the freedom of expression. The British government is always going on about how they are a free country, so it does not make sense for people to be arrested simply for being offensive. “Laws against bad jokes” and “free people” are mutually exclusive concepts. So what’s the story here?

 Posted by at 12:48 pm
Oct 252018
 

A couple years late on the news about this, but… bah. Bah, I say.

285,000 lbs (approx) of Hard Mobile Launcher
(HML) vehicle unit

The “Hard Mobile Launcher” that had been on display at National Museum of the USAF  (Dayton, Ohio) was apparently sold  in 2015 for the bargain basement price of $27,500. The HML was  the mobile launcher for the Small ICBM (Midgetman), and it seems it is now bits of steel, likely shipped to China to be turned into nails (after careful measurements).

Bah.

item to prevent reuse, recognition or reconstruction of the item to the satisfaction of
the government appointed Verifier. Automated size reduction prior to shredding is
allowed. Demilitarization will be accomplished by cutting, chopping, crushing,
tearing and/or shearing in a manner which precludes rehabilitation or restoration to
its original intended purpose.

 

 

 

 

 

 Posted by at 11:21 pm
Oct 182018
 

The War On Anything Fun continues…

Memes lead to teenage obesity, lawmakers told

Fortunately, the “lawmakers” here are British/European ones, so they are already presiding over a civilization racing towards extinction.

There are people who – SURPRISE! – actually think that funny images of fat kids will lead to bad eating and exercise habits, and that this is the sort of thing that governmental power needs to be deployed in order to save society. The image below is the triggering one.

Because in Europe, memes are the problem. Because making fun of someone will make kids want to emulate that someone?

Riiiiiiight.

 

 Posted by at 2:11 pm
Aug 052018
 

I just caught a good documentary on TV about the history of the Bundy standoff in Burns, Oregon. Fortunately the documentary, “American Standoff,” is available on YouTube…

 

Basically, it all comes down to an over-reaching, power-mad Federal government that owns too much land out here in the west and likes to screw people over. Shocking, I know. A lot of the main figures in the story acted unwisely but were massively and disproportionately mistreated for it both by the judicial system and the media; a lot of the narrative around them is about as accurate as Gamergate, the Pink Tax and the Wage Gap. In other words: not at all accurate, but instead outright dishonesty in the form of insults and slander.

This story helps make plain some of the major political divides in the US. The two guys who basically started the whole thing, Dwight and Steven Hammond, were pardoned by President Trump a bit less than a month ago. There was considerable outrage by the professionally outraged class, because these two were nothing more than arsonists… but if you actually live in this part of the country, what they did – burning off fields – is standard agricultural practice. The way they were screwed over by the courts is why people were so upset…and why Obama (who did nothing) is so unpopular and Trump (who pardoned them) is seen as damn near a hero.

 Posted by at 12:17 pm