May 062019
 

Cory Booker wants to require federal license for gun owners

Because of course he does.

Booker argued that just as a driver’s license demonstrates a person’s eligibility and proficiency to drive a car, “a gun license demonstrates that a person is eligible and can meet certain safety and training standards necessary to own a gun.”

Even though there is no such thing as a requirement to have a drivers license to own a car, or even operate a car on private property. You only need a drivers license if you plan on operating a car on government property (i.e. public roads).

And because of course:

Booker’s plan also includes… universal background checks for gun buyers; the reinstitution of a ban on assault weapons and high-capacity firearm magazines

In other words, criminalizing millions of currently law-abiding citizens by making them felons for owning bits of plastic.

 

 Posted by at 12:48 pm
Apr 282019
 

A little while back the most vacuous of the current crop of congresscritters engaged in some fantasy role-play where she pretended to be a future version of herself extolling the virtues of the world accepting and enacting her Green New Deal policies. Even without the most basic surface understanding of just how nutty her ideas are, it was painful to watch as any “the world will come to understand and celebrate my greatness” self-congratulatory piece of self-insertion sci-fi literature would be.

But then you actually analyze the details and, man, this thing is stooooopid.

 Posted by at 5:59 pm
Apr 262019
 

So Carl Benjamin (Sargon of Akkad) went to Gibraltar to… I dunno, vacation or campaign or something, and Fabian Picardo, the chief minister of Gibraltar decided to smack talk about him on Twitter (with bonus extra-special high government official spelling and grammar errors):

So… how did Benjamin respond to this? Epically:

What is best in life? Mockery.

 Posted by at 11:07 pm
Apr 242019
 

Often times I’m all in favor of decriminalizing things. If the “crime” breaks no legs and picks no pockets, then I have a hard time seeing why it’s any of the governments business. So the Dallas, Texas, District Attorney John Creuzot’s recent plan on decriminalizing marijuana possession? Fine, great, wonderful. But there’s something else that I, and a *lot* of other people, do have a problem with:

Dallas County District Attorney’s Office to Dismiss Many Misdemeanor, State Jail Felony Cases

Theft of Necessary Items

Creuzot said his office will not prosecute theft cases where the value is under $750 unless the evidence shows the theft was for economic gain.

“Study after study shows that when we arrest, jail, and convict people for non-violent crimes committed out of necessity, we only prevent that person from gaining the stability necessary to lead a law-abiding life. Criminalizing poverty is counter-productive for our community’s health and safety,” Creuzot said.

Basically, he wants to legalize the theft of food and diapers and the like. If you owned a small grocery store in his jurisdiction… wouldn’t you consider packing up and closing your doors?

Not only is this economically insane (by legalizing theft, it’s essentially back-door communism), it’s also quite insulting. Just because someone is poor doesn’t mean they’re fricken’ thieves. You do not “criminalize poverty” when you make it illegal to steal stuff; you’re criminalizing theft. But the DA here sees no difference between the poor and thieves.

I look forward to watching his run for the Dem Presidential nomination with interest.

 Posted by at 6:35 pm
Apr 092019
 

With people like this in charge, how did the US ever accomplish anything?

Astronauts on the Moon in 2024? US Can’t Do It Alone, NASA Chief Says

I’m on record being skeptical of the US getting men back onto the moon by 2024. But not because we’d need to hook up with a bunch of foreign powers to do it… but because the sluggish nature of people like this.

Make it a contest that pays real winnings to make real progress and cuts through the red tape. We’d get there *early.*

 Posted by at 11:06 pm
Apr 052019
 

There is a lot of evidence of bee-keeping out here in rural Utah. You see a lot of mobile beehives parked around certain farms, the bees pollinating the plants; locally produced honey is available for sale *everywhere.* Heck, the local print shop in Tremonton has a section among the printer paper and envelopes for one brand of locally produced honey products. So bees are important.

But bees are also a pest. You get a beehive in your house, you want it *gone.* There are two approaches to that:

1) Kill it. Either hire someone or wrap yourself in bubblewrap and hose the hive down with Raid; or, if you’re feeling frisky and are none too damn bright, burn it with fire.

2) Call a local beekeeper. They are often looking to expand their “work force,” especially with the collapse in bee populations over the last couple decades. Bee keepers will often come and, for free, remove the hives.

Option #2 is obviously the preferred one. You win… you get rid of the problem for free. The bee keeper wins – they get a new presumably healthy hive for little cost. The bees win…. they ain’t dead. So, who would possibly have a problem with this setup?

Oh, look, it’s a politician.

Bee Removal To Be Illegal In Texas.

Rep. Theresa “Terry” Meza (D.) of Irving, Texas has authored House Bill 4212 that would make the process of bee removal illegal. Unless of course the person removing the bees has undergone 160 hours of both class room and field training in beekeeping and removals. That amounts to over 3 college semester classes worth of training! A normal college class of 3 semester credit hours is around 45-48 contact hours. This nonsense will make almost all bee keeping removal services illegal overnight! If this bill passes, nobody will be able to legally remove and relocate bees after January 1, 2020 until after they go through 160 hours of training and licensing.

There is currently no agency, organization or authority that is set up to train such licensed bee removers in Texas. The legislation would place licensing and training specifics under the authority of the Texas Department of Agriculture.

Additionally, the “licensed” bee remover must obtain $600,000 in liability insurance. If that wasn’t enough, the bee remover must also have $300,000 in workman’s comp before being able to legally remove bees. Oh and you have to pay a yearly licensing fee and whatever fees are associated with your 160 hours of classroom and field training.

Brilliant! Something humans have been doing for thousands of years, now made prohibitively expensive. *Why* these changes are desired does not seem to be in the text of the bill.

https://capitol.texas.gov/tlodocs/86R/billtext/pdf/HB04212I.pdf

 Posted by at 7:51 am
Mar 172019
 

NZ Threatens 10 Years In Prison For “Possessing” Mosque Shooting Video; Web Hosts Warned, “Dissenter” Banned

You can be arrested for having a piece of video that is being widely distributed. It would be like the US banning the possession of video of the 9-11 attacks. Additionally, the New Zealand  government is censoring speech well beyond a simple video… unless you use a VPN to get around it.

You want extremism? This is how you get extremism. Because banning stuff only makes it more popular.

 Posted by at 5:18 pm
Mar 102019
 

This is an entertaining story, well told. In short: a South Carolina mayor tried to Smollett by claiming that pollen landing on her car was a hate crime.

 

The next time you hear someone screaming about having been hate crimed, ask yourself: is it more likely that could bees have done this? Is springtime to blame? Would race relations be more improved by accepting the story at face value, or by cutting down all the trees and spraying Agent Orange on all the flowers?

“I’m not saying it was Hate Crime, but it was Bees.”

 

 Posted by at 1:08 pm
Mar 092019
 

We all have heard the lie that “nobody wants to take your guns,” just before some authoritarian gun-grabber proposes a law that would make you an insta-felon simply for owning the stuff you currently own. To get an idea what things would look like in a future where the gun-grabbers get their way, take a look at this BS:

A guy has stage four pancreatic cancer and uses marijuana-derived capsules to relieve the pain. Missouri has voted to make medical marijuana legal, but the la has not yet taken effect. And so thus the cops got a call that someone smelled pot, and they came to roust a guy who looks about as harmless as a squirrel.

As one of the commenters on the news site said:

If you are dying of cancer and are counting down the few remaining weeks or days, I do not care if you smoke heroin and snort oxy. I mean what harm could it do. As for the police, yeah they need to be smacked hard on the back of their heads with a Gideons Bible, but I want to know who made the call for them to roust the dying guy. Whoever called them in needs a swift kick to the “mummy and daddy parts” with steel toed boots.

No matter what arguments are made for prohibition laws, the end result is always nonsense like this.

And why do so many cops have such ridiculous haircuts? Hard to take them seriously looking like that.

 Posted by at 3:10 am
Mar 072019
 

It’s not a long-form bit of literature, but here’s a look into the future after the US adopts both the Green New Deal and Social Credit:

Life in the Green New Deal ‘Paradise’? Nasty, Brutish, and Short.

Something I’ve noticed a *lot* of over the years: a bunch of the people who push for “progressive” policies to remake the US under central control have no idea about the *scale* of the United States. A lot of this seems to be because these people seem to live within relatively small geographic confines. They tout the wonders of electric cars that get, at best, maybe sixty miles range and then need to spend eight hours recharging; sixty miles is less far than to the nearest decent book store for me. When I travel to visit family, I put one thousand two hundred miles onto my car in *two* *days*, then, a short time later, turn around and travel the same distance home. (Having flown that route last year for the first time in some years, I’ve little desire to fly it again… at least until I can fly it in something other than steerage class.)

Some years ago I traveled for a contract job… a drive of something like 2,200 miles each way. Back when I used to go on vacation, it would consist of picking a somewhat random direction and going thataway until I ran into something interesting, a week or two later looping around back home having put 4 to 6 thousand miles on the car. That’s freedom.

But the people who would make themselves my feudal lords would have me believe that being trapped within just a few dozen miles of my home, with *occasional* long distance travel by uncomfortable train (note:  the distance from my house to the nearest Amtrak depot is longer then the range of most electric cars; I’m not sure if such a car could get me to the nearest Greyhound Bus depot), is sufficient. I’m not sure if they understand that their end goals would leave tens of millions of fellow Americans essentially permanently cut off from society… or, perhaps more likely, they would simply enforce roundups and forced migrations to densely packed urban dystopias, leaving the vast center of the country largely unpopulated. I have no doubt that this would suit their leader class, who like the idea of vast unpopulated “preserves” that only they can visit, treating, say, Iowa as their own personal country estates.

 Posted by at 10:30 pm