Aug 022022
 

Pelosi arrives in Taiwan, vowing U.S. commitment; China enraged

I’m torn. Telling West Taiwan to go pound sand, that the United States can have business and diplomatic relations with whomever we want? I’m all for that. On the other hand, the current administration has shown itself to be so weak and incompetent that the ChiCom junta were probably already itching to start something, and now the administration has given them one more thing to get in a snit over. On the gripping hand, if China pouts and throws a loud tantrum but *doesn’t* actually do anything, they will be in some sense weakened by this.

 Posted by at 3:21 pm
Jul 302022
 

So some friends and I are watching through “Star Trek Discovery.” We’re Trek fans from *decades* back, so it might surprise some that it’s taken us this long to get around to wading through all of STD. We’re well into season three… and we’ve made an important decision.

Star Trek, whether the episode was good or bad, was always pretty much *fun.* But STD is *not* fun. A lot of it is downright painful. So while we’re generally interested to see where the plot goes, the characters themselves are often just nightmarish. So the decision was made to stand by on the Fast Forward button. Someone starts crying? Fast forward. Someone starts a monologue about how awesome someone else is, or any form of emotional validation? Fast forward. That cringy Trill/human “couple?” They show up… fast forward.

We’re getting through episodes *really* fast now. More than anything, this cringe-edited version of STD reminds me of those Super 8 versions of sci-fi movies that were available in the late 1970s.

I remember seeing, circa 1979-1981 or so, a desktop “unit” that had a film cartridge that showed Star Wars boiled down to maybe five minute on a display just a few inches across. Until VHS, that sort of thing was the only way to watch Star Wars on demand. And fast forwarding is the only way to watch STD *at* *all.*

 Posted by at 8:16 pm
Jul 292022
 

So this guy decided to go gambling at a Las Vegas casino. Normal enough. Parked his vehicle on top of the parking garage. Normal enough. But he left his puppy in the car on a day when it reached 113 degrees. Not normal, not good. Spent two hours inside. *And* he taped the dogs mouth shut, probably to keep the famously noisy Husky from alerting people to its plight..

Fortunately the casino security found (or was alerted to) the situation and rescued the dog through the sun roof and called the local police. Police body camera footage shows the moment the owner walked up and the cops response to him. The police officer maintained discipline and professionalism…  but you can tell … just barely. The officer was PO’ed, and rightly so. You can imagine that everyone involved here might well have been hoping that the owner would do something stupid (well, additionally stupid) so as to merit a few love taps from a billyclub. The police officers tone and actions just scream “contempt.” As well they should: I imagine cops dealing with brutalized children and animals must be about the hardest parts of their jobs (after getting shot and stabbed, obviously).

Looks like the casino staff put in a good effort… there are multiple uniformed security guys, a woman caring for the pup, and a guy in a suit who looks… ummm… a bit like A Casino Guy in A Suit You Don’t Want Coming For You. Also a guy with a bicycle who might have been just a bystander, or might have been the guy who found the dog. Shrug.

Some commenters at the twitter thread note that the dogs owner was not read Miranda rights before being arrested. But… Miranda is used to make sure the suspect is aware of their rights before being interrogated. I’m not sure that that directly applies here. It will before he is questioned at the station, but “Is this your car?” doesn’t really seem like that big of a deal.

Who would do this? WHY would anyone do this? Assuming the dog pulls through, I have little doubt that the line of people wanting to adopt it will wrap around the block.

Feh.

Here’s some brain-bleach:

 Posted by at 5:32 pm
Jul 272022
 

Looks like Sylvester Stallone finally has himself a superhero movie:

Sure, he was in “Judge Dredd” and “GotG2,” but he wasn’t superpowered in either of those. I don’t recall him having been a superhero before, though I could be wrong.

I suspect the superhero genre is going to run out of steam soon enough…it’s been done to death. Marvel has recent;y announced their spate of new TV/Movie projects, and they are a whole lot of “who the hell is that, and why should I care” characters.

Marvel also recently released the trailer for “Black Panther 2.” I was unimpressed with the first one… the effects were dodgy, the story meh, the worldbuilding bizarre. We were supposed to root for a fascistic ethnostate that was essentially a high-lech primitive civilization… they select their rulers *only* from a single family, and then using trial by combat. They have antigravity and practical energy weapons… and they charge into combat atop rhinos bearing swords and spears. One thing I would like to see from the sequel – and suspect I won’t – is the actual geopolitical fallout from the effects of the first: at the end of the movie, a sci-fi-advanced hidden civilization in central Africa is revealed to the world. They’ve been hidden for centuries behind a cloaking device and holographic projectors; now that’s over. Great, fine, wonderful. But, ummm… right now, hundreds of thousands of sub-Saharan Africans are flooding into Europe annually in the hopes of grabbing themselves a better life. What do the borders of Wakanda look like? Now, a few hundred million poverty-stricken Africans can simply *walk* to a higher-tech better life. Did Wakanda open the doors, and now their original population is a distinct minority in their own land, buried under a crush of migrants? Or did they erect walls? Did the walls/deflector shields/whatever effectively prevent invasion, or are there long rows of corpses along the border, shot down as they tried to climb in?

 

 Posted by at 12:05 pm
Jul 242022
 

Something that happens a lot: violent criminality. And virtually every violent criminal has family. Most of the time, the parents or siblings of criminals are not considered in the aftermath of the crime; someone gets mugged, the press doesn’t hound the muggers dad, largely because a mugging just isn’t that newsworthy. But if the violent crime *is* newsworthy, the family often does get mentioned by the press. usually the family will wisely keep their yaps shut when Lil Johnny does something shameful, but on occasion them get set upon by the press, or they actually *seek* the press. And when they do, often enough they do so to *excuse* or *deny* the criminality.

 

But on occasion, the press talks to the family of a violent criminal, and the family has a reasonable response:

Indiana mall gunman’s family say they are ‘unable to offer any explanation’ for his actions

This family raised a kid who decided to try to shoot up a shopping mall and got his dumb ass aerated inside of fifteen seconds by a far better man. And what do they have to say about it?

“We are cooperating completely with law enforcement in efforts to provide insight into not only Jonathan’s actions, but also in the chance anything we may add could aid in preventing similar events.” 

And…

“There are no feelings of hostility toward Mr. Dicken in doing what was right given the circumstances,” Sapirman’s family said.

Which are the correct responses. Your kid went nuts: maybe he was always nuts. Maybe he snapped right there at the end. Maybe you should have seen it coming long before, maybe not. But it can’t be denied: he deserved to be riddled with holes.

 Posted by at 10:01 am
Jul 212022
 

This may well be pure BS. If it’s not, though… ruh-roh, Russian tankies…

The A-10 is, let’s face it, obsolete. As absolutely badass as the plane is, drones have kinda taken over the role… sure, they’re far more easily destroyed than the A-10, but who cares? They’re cheap and disposable and ain’t nobody on board. The modern battlefield is an unsafe place for something slow and targetable like the A-10. Buuuuuuuut…. the Russians, rather stupidly, have failed to gain absolute air dominance over all of Ukraine. This is the sort of environment that the A-10, properly employed and properly flown, can shine in. Swamp the Russian air defenses with cheap rocks and cheap drones, and then the A-10 comes striding in ten feet tall and lays waste with precision, determination and brutality. *Imagine* those long trains of resupply trucks, miles long, looking up and seeing a few A-10s drawing down on them. Whoopsie.

Of course, there are lots of problems with this idea. The A-10 is not in production, nor, I expect, are most of the spare parts needed to maintain the fleet. A Ukrainian A-10 gets damaged, repairing it might be quite problematic. Ukrainian pilots have, to my knowledge, zero training time on the A-10. Russian air defense has been kind of a joke; this might spur them to actually get on the job. And every A-10 sent to Ukraine is an A-10 that can’t be sent to the US Army (the Army should have fixed wing ground attack/support aircraft: fight me). The USAF has wanted to rid itself of the A-10 for decades, and, honestly, I guess I’d rather see them lost in combat shooting their way to Valhalla than in a scrap yard getting turned into nails and pop cans. At this point, losing airframes over enemy territory no longer holds the fear of “oh no, they’ll learn our secrets from examining the wreckage” that it might have 40 years ago.

A-10’s appear in the skies of Ukraine, the Russians will make taking them out a priority. That will certainly make for an interesting clash. And if the American plane and Ukrainian pilot put up a good showing of survivability… the Russians will probably bend themselves over backwards to take them out. The A-10s could thus be useful simply as a way to throw the Russian war effort into chaos, devoting effort and funds to some new goal, while now getting stingier on other more practical goals.

 Posted by at 3:01 pm
Jul 202022
 

It would be fantastic if the media and the culture would raise up the heroes in society with more enthusiasm than it tears them down and props up the villains.  Eli Dicken and Shay Goldman should have a movie made of their actions at the Greenwood Park Mall. Hell, the mall could do worse than to erect a bronze statue in the food court. We don’t erect statues to heroes anymore; we tear them down and erect statues of dirtbags who died due to their dirtbaggery.

But Dicken isn’t the only young hero worthy of note. Take, for example, the story of Nick Bostic:

Man saves 5 from house fire; jumps out window to save girl

Bostic was out delivering pizzas for Dominos when he happened across a house on fire, ran in and saved five kids. Four were able to be hustled out – because Bostic notified the 18-year-old babysitter what was going on – and he ran himself back into the fire to save a 6-year-old girl, receiving injuries in the process.

“You did good dude, OK?” an officer tells Bostic.

Damn straight.

I fear that a few days of news coverage will be all that comes of this… well, that and the currently half million dollars being raised on his Gofundme.

I’m all for Dicken and Bostic – not to mention Rittenhouse – walking away with financial windfalls (curiously a Gofundme set up to cover the inevitable legal fees Dicken will accrue has only gathered 23 grand). Good for them. But for *society,* they should be made into role models. Make ’em mythological role model if need be. if it turns out that one of them is actually kind of a dirtbag… the movie can either gloss over that, or show how he has overcome that and become a better person. Would that be historically accurate? Well… dunno. But given how Hollywood doesn’t give a crap about historical accuracy anyway (witness the forthcoming “The Woman King” which looks like it’s going to glorify the objectively evil kingdom of Dahomey), why not do these things in a way that makes culture *better?*

The US used to make cultural icons of war heroes, cowboys, explorers. You know, people who actually did good stuff. A lot of the stories were overblown hagiographies, true enough… but it helped craft national myths that brought us together. In my lifetime, that sort of thing has pretty much all fallen away.

 Posted by at 10:00 pm
Jul 192022
 

So, the western drought is turning the Great Salt Lake into a Great Salt Flat:

One of the suggestions made right at the end of the news piece is piping in ocean water.

Huh.

HUH.

Now, I wonder where I might have heard *that* idea before?

Oh, right: here.

Terraforming Utah: part 1

Terraforming Utah: part 2

My idea was to drain the lake, scoop out the muck, transport said muck out west a bit and build hills out of it, build pipelines from the sea to the lake. By scooping the bottom out ten, twenty, a  hundred feet and filling with ocean water, you can stock the lake with ocean life and turn it into a breeding ground for endangered fish, and an inland sea for fishing.

Sure, it’s an engineering challenge of some serious difficulty. But… step one seems to be well underway, whether we like it or not. What’s being left is a dry lake bed filled with salt and dust and arsenic; this stuff blowing around will make the atmosphere kinda horrible. So Something Must Be Done anyway. Why not go all the way?

And the lessons learned and industry spurred by the Pacific-to-Utah pipeline will come in handy when we built the Mississippi River-to-dry-western-states pipelines. Put the mouths of the pipes right at flood stage for the Mississippi, and draw out those irritating flood water out west where they can do some good filling rives and lakes and irrigating fields and putting out fires.

 Posted by at 3:33 pm
Jul 182022
 

First up, a guy does a “social experiment” where he goes to a public place and just sticks out his hand to see who will shake it. The video is obviously edited, and the audio is replaced with a rather irritating song, so a lot of the context is lost. But what appears to happen is that men will shake his hand, and women won’t. What the *actual* ratios are is of course unknowable without the full video, but undoubtedly there is a distinct difference.

@thenotoriousalvin

Man vs woman

♬ Ke$ha – Die Young – 辰歌

Had my first experience of this particular video been the video itself, my reaction would have been a kinda bland “huh,” then I would have gone back to CAD drafting and forgotten it. But I first learned of it after having been randomly directed to this “think piece” reacting to the video:

What Men Don’t Get About Street Harassment

Where we learned that it is good and proper for all women to fear and distrust all men, and it is stupid of men to not automatically agree with the rightness of that position. But more telling – or at least more directly to the point – was one of the comments on the original TikTok video:

Women know that a handshake is never just a handshake when it comes to strange men. Don’t give ‘em anything. Don’t engage.

Don’t engage with men you do not know. Greeeeeaaaat. That will do wonders for the future of the species. But what do you want to bet that that same person might well be all about hookup culture, and is seriously upset that overturning Roe might cause her to have to change her behavioral plans?

Nobody is obligated to shake hands with anybody, certainly not strangers. It’s just a little odd that men are more trusting than women, and that this difference in trust is used as an excuse to cut off the possibility of human interaction. Far more often than seems good for the species I’ve heard or read someone tell a man who has asked about how to approach a woman he finds interesting: “leave her alone.”

And thus we end up with this…

… and wonder why some guys go buggo and shoot up schools.

Who benefits from a culture where women are told to distrust and fear men, and men are conditioned to avoid interacting with women? The makers of video games, I suppose. Whoever ends up creating the first truly successful fembot will make a mint. The leaders of nations, cultures or subcultures that see the West as an impediment or an enemy and who don’t engage in this sort of thing will see this as an absolute win.

Another point: does this finally, at long last, provide an objective, scientific definition of “what is a woman?” “A woman is someone who will avoid a handshake with a stranger.” Unless we find that a woman will shake hands with a woman. Then we’re sucked back into the philosophical quandary. What if the original creator of the video goes and does it again, but this time identifies as a woman?

 Posted by at 9:45 pm
Jul 162022
 

It looks pretty doom-laden for the Tomy 1/350 scale die-cast Enterprise… with one week to go, they’re still at only 63% of their funding goal. If, as seems likely, this doesn’t come to pass, a bunch of potential buyers will be disappointed… but they won’t be too likely to be *angry*. This is not the case for *all* buyers of large scale Enterprises, however.

In December 2020 Eaglemoss announced their 27-inch long Enterprise D model. I posted about it HERE. This is a large and complex model kit, not a finished product. And Eaglemoss has an unusual way of releasing these things… instead of one big box with all the parts, you get a packet every two weeks with *some* parts. It’s a subscription service, you pay as you go. And the cost of the model stacks up… looks like over the length of time it takes to get all the packets, you’ll end up spending over $1700. Youch. But I’ve been watching some YouTubers as they’ve been getting the bits and gradually assembling the thing, and it looked promising (with some issues here and there).

*Looked.* Past tense.

Part Works publisher Eaglemoss goes out of business

It seems Eaglemoss is in a bad way. Due to Covid lockdowns in merry old England, their ability to do business was massacred and they are in a deep, deep hole… one it looks like they might not climb out of. They seem to be already out of business.

That’s bad.

It’s especially bad not only for their employees and stockholders, but those working away on the Enterprise D (and other subscription kits of similar scale and cost). Because the Enterprise D is distributed over *30* *months.* Which means if you started in January of 2021, you’d currently be about 18  months along… with 12 months to go on your kit. Twelve months worth of parts it seems unlikely you’ll get. You won’t be charged for those parts, of course… but you will have spent over a grand for sixty percent of an Enterprise, plus however much time you spent on a model you’re now unlikely to ever finish, display or sell.

This looks to be about the current state of the Enterprise. It’s… sad.

 

I’ve never liked getting big, expensive things via subscriptions spread out over years. This only reinforces that.

 Posted by at 10:23 pm