May 262014
 

A few weeks ago:

Richard Branson’s vision for NY to Tokyo in 1 hour

Branson, the moneybags behind Virgin Galactic, wants to build hypersonic intercontinental passenger transports once he’s got VG up and running (any day now…).

The idea of hypersonic passenger transport stretches back to the 1940’s, with rocket powered vehicles that would have leapt above the sensible atmosphere, flown a ballistic trajectory, and come screaming back in. Other designs over the years have been “cruisers” that use airbreathing engines to fly at Mach 5+ in the thin upper atmosphere. These certainly sounds even harder than supersonic transport, which has spent nearly fifty years being a financial bust (the US SST never got off the ground, so all the money spent on that effort can be considered a complete negative; the Concorde never made a dime, and the TU-144 was a complete CF of a program).

But a sub-orbital HST might turn out to be eminently practical, perhaps even more so than an SST. And for one simple reason: if it is sub-orbital, that means it’s above the atmosphere… and thus *silent.* No sonic boom. This means that it could overfly populated areas without legal problem. (Well, until the bureaucrats, greenies, Luddites and others try to shut it down in the courts…)

Obviously, takeoff of a large rocket powered vehicle would be impressively noisy. I would guess that the HST would be configured for horizontal takeoff and ladings using conventional jet engines; those would get it to an altitude where it would fire up the rockets and blast up and out. Much of the acceleration would occur above the atmosphere, but for those in the departing “home town,” the noise of rocket engine ignition would probably be impressive. And there would be a pretty impressive sonic boom along the re-entry track, a distance of several hundred miles. So a New-York to Tokyo flight would light up the east coast with launch noise, but the re-entry boom would be expended over the largely empty Pacific. But the return flight would have the re-entry boom over the North East US. That might be a bit troublesome. The best way to deal with that might be to re-enter *hard.* Get it done quick so that the re-entry track is as short as possible. Kinda rough on the passengers, but it’d also shorten the flight substantially. Then all they’d have to worry about is the five-hour wait in line before the flight to have their undies pawed and their junk juggled, and then a two-hour wait after their flight for their luggage.

 Posted by at 4:30 pm
May 132014
 

People have heard me bitch about major international space programs for years. I much prefer *national* space programs, or programs among a small group of allies. Here’s a good reason why:

Russia to ban US from using Space Station over Ukraine sanctions

The article says that Russia’s deputy Prime Minister Dmitry Rogozin wants to ban the US from the ISS after 2020. In my view… why wait? The US would be best served by simply bailing on the program *now.* Take the money we’re blowing on ISS and use it to instead build a series of *American* space stations. Preferably, stations that do more than just go round and round, but stations that host paying customers, stations that serve as construction shacks, stations that prepare us for deep space flight. You know… *real* space stations. With large internal volumes. And permanent staff large enough to do more than just maintenance. And artificial gravity. And blackjack. And hookers.

 Posted by at 2:38 pm
May 122014
 

So, there’s a new four-volume book available on “2001.” From all appearances, it is *awesome:*

The Making of Stanley Kubrick’s “2oo1: A Space Odyssey”

It’s 1386 pages, appears to be loaded with “never before seen” illustrations, high quality and hardcover. Only one small problem. Minor detail, really, pay it no mind:

$750.00

Aww, boo.

ce_kubrick_space_odyssey_2001_091_1405121527_id_814559 ce_kubrick_space_odyssey_2001_part_3_307_309_1404171757_id_728970

 Posted by at 9:43 am
May 122014
 

Because Why Not: here is a story fragment, rather than the whole thing. One of the stories I’m currently slooowly pecking away at has changed drastically several times, with a complete re-write to change plot, tone, direction, everything (it’s gone from Holy Crap This Is Dark And Depressing to Hey Look, It’s Kinda Funny), and a more recent change to try to greatly shorten it. This has left a lot of stuff on the cutting room floor, as it were. And while it now no longer fits in the story as it’s developing, I think it’s interesting on its own. There are editing troubles and the like, but hey, whadayawant, it’s abandoned text.

This features the same crew as “Mass Disappearance.” But it’s now third person, and you actually get to learn their names!

Basically there are three “scenes.” I’d pay good money to see the third scene. Preferably for real, but on an IMAX would be ok too.

“Launch” in EPUB format

“Launch” in MOBI format

“Launch” in PDF format

Feel free to comment & question.

And as always, if you *like* the story, feel free to tell others. If you *really* like it, feel free to toss cold hard PayPal cash my way via the “tip jar.”.


Fiction Tip Jar



 Posted by at 2:24 am
May 072014
 

Slowing plugging away on the greatly revised X-20 Dyna Soar article. Shown below is what it currently looks like… something of a mess. There are still a  great many more illustrations I want to add, including a bucket of my own CAD diagrams, but how many will end up here is uncertain. It’s already pushing 100 pages when you include the CAD diagrams; probably too big. Perhaps a later stand-alone version will have everything plus the kitchen sink…

Image306

And the CAD diagrams:

x-20-booklet-2014-03

 Posted by at 8:24 pm
May 072014
 

A mid-1960’s concept from General Electric showing a Manned orbital Laboratory-type space lab with two docked Gemini capsules and one nuclear reactor for power. Derived from the SNAP-10a system, this powerplant featured a small reactor at the apex of the cone; the cone itself is the radiator for the system. The SNAP-10a was not a spectacularly efficient system… it produced around 30 kilowatts of thermal energy, of which only 500 were converted to electricity. The system shown below would have been a larger, more powerful and hopefully more efficient system.

The small compact and busy-looking item on the far left of the image would have been the reactor itself. Between that and the structural truss work connected to the large radiator was a thick radiation shield, composed of something like tungsten. Even with this massive chunk in the way, the reactor was still segregated far away from the crew.

ge nuke space station

 Posted by at 11:33 am
May 042014
 

Once again, another commercial that uses the space program to sell stuff (Google, in this case). Still, it’s actually quite effective. Not in making me want to go out and buy a Google, but in making me feel all squishy about space exploration.

The big question: do commercials like this reflect a public attitude desiring spaceflight, or are they pushing that? Hmmm…

[youtube VXCH9T5Nnaw]

 Posted by at 7:06 pm