Jul 082014
 

There actually seemed to be a bit of interest in the idea I posted a few days ago for an alternate history book idea I’ve been tinkering with for a while. So I’ll take it off the “nice, but probably never gonna happen” list and bump it up to “Hmm. Maybe…”

This is planned to be an official history, with the (tentative, subject to change) title: “Pax Orionis: A History of the Third World War and Its Aftermath.” Written in the alternate history 2014, it focuses on nuclear pulse propulsion, how it began in the fifties, turned into a reality as a result of a small nuclear war in the sixties and became a dominant force in geopolitics until the Third World War in the 1990’s (currently scheduled for 1994, so the book is a “20th anniversary” thing). This alternate world is quite a different place due to some very small changes that quickly spiral into massive consequences. WWIII is as bad as it gets; somewhere in the history will be population tables from before the war, right after and as of 2014, with discussions of the possibility that within the next X years the planetary population might make it back up to one billion. But on the other side, the war leaves translunar and interplanetary infrastructure largely intact; while Earth is trashed, the universe is now open and the ships are there.

In looking at what I have already put together, I’ve got about 30 pages more or less cribbed from my Nuclear Pulse Propulsion book, and a fifteen page outline of the alternate history. The history will be changed considerably from what I originally wrote; the original scribblings were in support of a collaboration with another feller, but now it’s a one-man show and a lot of stuff I’ve written will be dumped or greatly altered.

Being an official history, the usual form of third person fictional narration doesn’t work, and there are some aspects of the story where I’d really like to include that (some of the war events, for example). An idea I’ve been playing with is having the authors of the official history including snippets from autobiographies, diaries, novels and screenplays. This is not how official DoD histories are usually put together these days… but Pax Orionis is a whole different world. It is of course a very, very bad world with a whole lot of dead folk, blasted cities and whole nations that have been simply erased; but history shows that massive devastation is often an opportunity for new things.

 Posted by at 2:10 am
Jul 062014
 

So yesterday I posted about the Delta Clipper. And today, word starts filtering out that Bill Gaubatz, Delta Clipper program manager at McDonnell-Douglas, has passed away.

Sonova…

I met him a number of times through setting up Mid-Continent Space Development Conferences at Iowa State U, where he came a few times to give presentations on DC-X and how we were on the cusp of a new era in space. And he personally invited me and others down to White Sands to watch the first public launch.

Bah, I say. Bah.

 Posted by at 7:21 pm
Jul 052014
 

I thought these might interest some, even with the heavy-duty watermarks:

This one shows a Max Faget “DC-3”-type orbiter serving as the base of operations for some sort of repair or resupply using teleoperated robots. There was a lot of expectation of such devices being used with Shuttle in the early days, but they (so far) just haven’t proved to be as capable as a guy in a suit.

img0052Aimg0052B

————-

This one shows a nuclear rocket-powered manned Mars vehicle. It’s called a “nuclear powered space station” in the caption…

 

img0049Aimg0049B

———-

This image shows two “DC-3” type orbiters (they look like North American Rockwell designs to me) meeting up to build a single interplanetary probe mission. Neither shuttle was capable of lofting both the deep space booster and the payload, so two launches are required. Of course, this sort of thing never happened.

img0035Aimg0035B

—————–

This one shows another telerobot in action. The caption on the back says that it’s being used to check over the shuttle prior to re-entry, which doesn’t match the image… but might have been of interest for the crew of Columbia.

img0050Aimg0050B

————-

This shows a Boeing/Grumman TSTO Shuttle concept. The orbiter uses external propellant tanks; in these sort of designs, the tanks were usually all hydrogen. The much smaller volume of liquid oxygen would be kept in tanks that fit within the orbiter, and would of course come back. The reusable booster was necessarily gigantic.

img0019A

—————-

This one is kinda different: a plan for how astronaut David Scott was supposed to test the Astronaut Maneuvering Unit on Gemini VIII. This test was not carried out, since the spacecraft suffered a stuck valve on a thruster, went into a rapid tumble, nearly killed the crew and the mission was promptly aborted. The same sort of test was attempted on Gemini IX, and proved nearly as disastrous. Eugene Cernans space suit was specially made for the test, with an outer layer of woven steel “pants.” This was due to the fact that the AMU used hydrogen peroxide for propellant, exhausting superheated steam and oxygen exhaust. But the woven steel made the pressurized pants almost totally rigid, making the spacewalk back to the AMU a serious chore. As a result, his faceplate fogged up and he was nearly blind. He never got into the AMU, and it was never launched again. The Manned Maneuvering Unit tested on the Shuttle used cool pressurized nitrogen, negating the need for steel pants.

6673856 6673855

—————–

This one is, I believe, from the late 1970s and depicts a jetliner with a multitude of small turbofan engines along the trailing edge of the wing. The engines would deflect with the control surfaces, providing thrust vectoring for STOL flight.

htk3hb4t

——-

Finally, everyone’s favorite… a hypersonic transport.  Designs like this one from 1968 tended to be powered by scramjets which, forty-plus years later we still haven’t gotten to work in any really meaningful way. Whoopee.

4266120

 Posted by at 11:26 pm
Jul 052014
 

It somehow escaped my remembrance that September 11, 2013, was the twentieth anniversary of the first public launch of the DC-X Delta Clipper. I should’ve remembered it, since I – and some fellow Iowa State U students – was there in the viewing stands. All I had with me was a crappy little 35mm film camera; would’ve been nice to have had a modern DSLR, but then it would be nice to have a time machine, too. Other folks brought video cameras.

Many if not most of us there that day thought for sure we were seeing the dawn of a new era. Oh, well. Hopefully Falcon 9R will accomplish what McDonnell-Douglas, the BMDO and NASA never bothered to finish with Delta Clipper. A quarter century delay is better than never at all, I suppose.

[youtube Jcetv3KgEYQ]

[youtube ra5rY6gTZ0A]

And here’s a DC-X promo video from 1992. I suddenly started having flashbacks to the 80’s when I heard the narrator…

[youtube TOsS4SzEWVU]

 Posted by at 12:49 pm
Jul 042014
 

I have added another milestone to my Patreon campaign. If I get to $500 of patronage…

There are a lot of PDF (and Powerpoint) references available online that would be of interest to aerospace aficionados. But that’s kinda the problem: there are a *lot* of them. NASA alone has had millions of reports online. There are far too many for any one person to even try to get a handle on. However… I’ve got a handle on a great many of them. While they are – or in some cases were – freely available online, you’d have to know they existed first. Well… for many thousands of such reports… I know they exist. So at this milestone, I’ll post reviews, including illustrations, of two such reports or presentations per month. Additionally, I’ll post links to the reports or, in some cases, the reports themselves.

So rather than just some snipped images, you’ll get the images, a description of the report *and* the report itself, posted to the APR Blog. This is in addition to the reports, brochures, documents and diagrams that get sent to  patrons, stuff that *isn’t* otherwise available.

patreon

 Posted by at 8:11 pm
Jul 042014
 

American Apparel shares Challenger photo as ‘clouds’

Ow. Ow. My head. It hurts.

americanapparelchallenger

Seems likely that there are two explanations for this:

1) American Apparel is one of those annoying “edgy” companies that likes to push buttons, with the belief that “there’s not such thing as bad press.”

2) They hire monumentally stupid people, unaware of cultural icons.

AA has claimed that the real answer is #2, that the “international social media employee” who posted this was born after 1986, and thus, gosh, the little scamp couldn’t possibly be expected to be aware of Challenger. Uh-huh…

I vote #1. By being dicks, people are talking about them again. Hell, they even managed to get some space on the prestigious Unwanted Blog…

painrighthere

My interest here is not AA. I don’t give a damn about them or their shenanigans. But I find it sad that the excuse “whoops, too young to even know what Challenger was” is sufficiently valid to gain *any* traction. You know what? Hindenburg was slightly before my time, yet I think I’d recognize it in a photo, even if it was lightly Photoshopped.

hugemanatee

 Posted by at 12:10 pm
Jul 042014
 

The photo archives of the Baltimore Sun newspaper is being sold off on eBay. A whole lot of really old glossies of every vaguely newsworthy subject… including rockets and spacecraft. Two which caught my eye are listed as “Dyna Soar” designs, but clearly aren’t. What they are is hard to discern. They have the look of late 50’s, early 60’s aerospace concept art, but the ships shown look a little too sci-fi to necessarily be products of the aerospace industry. Instead, they might be products of the *news* industry… someone wrote an article about the Dyna Soar, and someone at the Baltimore Sun – or perhaps the AP, the LA Times or some other newscorp – painted these images, dreaming them up out of whole cloth. The certainly look “cool,” but I’m much less convinced that they look “practical.”

This one depicts what appears to be a glideback first stage, designed around the F-117’s stealth facetting principles. Those wingtips look like they aren’t long for this world, as they will almost certainly be banged into the runway. Actually, it looks like they project substantially lower than the aft landing skids, meaning that the wingtips will *necessarily* dig into the ground. No date given; however, it appears to have been associated with the following image, which dates from June, 1959.

ebay 2014-06-29 1

——————

This image shows a USAF vehicle of some type. Again it is described as “Dyna Soar,” but it clearly isn’t. It appears to be a four-jet-engine aircraft, probably a bomber; the wide, flat forward fuselage is a bit of a stumper.

baltimore sun photo 1

——————–

This one at least comes with good captioning, and is clearly an LA Times artist impression of a Dyna Soar vehicle based on a wind tunnel model.

ebay 2014-07-04 a

———————

They, especially the first two, are certainly interesting. But at $17 each, they’re a bit too rich for my blood. So if any of y’all pull the trigger and buy them, please keep me in mind if you take them near a scanner…

 

 Posted by at 8:58 am
Jul 012014
 

https://www.facebook.com/NASAHistoryOffice

It is with sincere regret that we note the passing of Fred Ordway (1927-2014). A man of many talents, he was the youngest member of the American Rocket Society (now the AIAA), having been accepted as a member at age 13. His request for membership showed a talent and interest that belied his age, which the Society only discovered when he showed up for his first meeting.

Ordway had an illustrious career as an engineer at Marshall Space Flight Center, where he worked for Wernher von Braun. He also famously worked as the scientific consultant to Stanley Kubrick on “2001: A Space Odyssey.” In this image, Ordway (conspicuous in his tennis whites) talks with (l-r) astronaut Deke Slayton, Arthur C. Clarke, Stanley Kubrick, and George Mueller (Associate Administrator for Manned Space Flight) on set.

Ordway is the author of more than 30 books, including “Visions of Spaceflight: Images from the Ordway Collection, and (with Wernher von Braun) “History of Rocketry and Space Travel.”

Bah.

I had very limited interaction with Fred many years ago. Seemed a nice feller. And his influence on space history by way of his writing and his work on “2001” will echo down the ages.

 Posted by at 10:45 pm
Jun 302014
 

I have a pretty fair supply of interesting documents and large format drawings… but not an infinite supply. Consequently, I’m in the market. Do you have interesting aerospace (aircraft, missiles, spacecraft or even perhaps unusual naval or terrestrial projects) documents, large format diagrams or actual blueprints? If so, let’s talk. I’d like to borrow, rent or buy such things. My preference is of course for unbuilt projects, but basically *anything* interesting would be… interesting.

If you have something you’d be willing to share, but not give away, I’d be happy to scan it and send it back ASAP. Alternatively, I’d be happy with good scans.

Additionally: a lot of interesting stuff pops up on eBay. I am actively trolling eBay for such things; just bought two documents tonight. But there’s so much stuff on eBay, with such weird and divergent descriptions, that I can’t possibly hope to catch everything. So if you see something on eBay that looks interesting, by all means let me know.

 Posted by at 10:19 pm