Search Results : 1968 to 2001

Oct 302013
 

Reagans public talk of space weapons is, initially, just that: talk. In the latter half of the 1970’s, the USAF has no plans for space based weaponry, and is initially taken aback by Reagans public discussions. There are some ill-prepared DoD denials of such programs made by various officials; these denials only serve to convince the Soviets that the US is, in fact, developing space weaponry. So, Soviets being Soviets, they have to get there first. The CIA keeps a careful watch over these developments.

By 1980, the CIA can confidently report that the Soviets are in fact testing space-based weapons platforms, intended both to destroy space assets such as communications and recon satellites, and also to drop nuclear warheads onto ground targets. This is, of course, in violation of treaties banning nuclear weapons in space. But the Soviets are convinced that the US is ahead of them in this race. The failure by the US to publicly display their own space weapons confuses and dismays the Soviets; they read this as the Americans being confident due to a massive superiority over the Soviets. When, in fact, the US has almost nothing to show.

The Soviets launch their first Polyus space battlestation in summer, 1980. This terrifies the US public, much as Sputnik did, especially in light of the past several years of Communist advances around the world. After the early US withdrawal from Viet Nam, South Viet Nam was left vulnerable; within 8 months the armistice had broken down and the North Vietnamese Army had swept south, conquering the South. The US did nothing to stop this, being simply tired of the war and too busy with other matters. The Soviets and Chinese saw this as weakness, American unwillingness to really stand up to them. So Communism was aggressively pushed: several nations in Africa and all of Southeast Asia are under Marxist regimes by the election of 1980. The Philippines are in open civil war against a well-funded Communist insurrection; Australia and New Guinea are looking at a Communist Indonesia. Italy, Spain and France are teetering on the edge of becoming outright Communist states.

So, by the 1980 election, the world looks ready for a new global war, one likely to be fought in the heavens. The Polyus, an enlarged dual-module Salyut station armed with, supposedly, guns, rockets, lasers and nukes, is seen orbiting overhead by the US public. Reagans idle talk of space weapons now seem vitally important; his Democrat opponent, Walter Mondale, who had been publicly lampooning Reagans talk of space weapons, suddenly looks really bad. The election is a cakewalk for Reagan, and a mandate for space weaponization.

The Space Shuttle has been flying since 1978, carrying small payloads and, more importantly, crews to the various space laboratories and Space Station I. The Saturn rockets have been launching heavy payloads such as space labs, lunar missions, unmanned probes to the planets and commercial platforms. And now the Neptune comes on scene, with first launch in the spring of 1981. The first launch is officially to be merely a test launch; the initial plan was to simply carry about 800,000 pounds of water… modestly useful as an orbiting payload, but more important just as a proper mass simulator. But in the months before the launch, the water tank is replaced with… something else. What replaces the water is not clear to the public, and the President, NASA and the USAF aren’t talking. Organizations keeping an eye on events, from news media to the KGB, are only able to put together a few confusing details… whatever it is, it’s heavy, consuming the total 1,000,000 pound payload of the Neptune, while being relatively compact. Thus, it’s dense. Blurry photos taken through a hangar door show a USAF insignia on the side of a large metal cylinder. At the  same time, Aviation Week reporters start putting together a few disparate facts: several Minuteman ICBMs have been recently removed from their silos; the upper stage and their nuclear payloads have been removed. General Electric was working on a prototype of a new generation space nuclear reactor, capable of putting out in excess of one megawatt of electrical power; the prototype has disappeared from the Nevada test site. Other details come together to indicate that whatever the Neptune is launching, it is going to be impressive. Several clumsily and hurriedly planned espionage efforts are detected and  stopped. In April of 1981, with Reagan watching from the stands, the first Neptune launches, sending it’s payload into a 300 nautical mile orbit with a surprisingly high inclination for a Florida launch. Officially, the payload remains merely a “mass simulator,” but nobody believes that.

Ground based telescopes show a compact structure, bristling with sensors, antenna, solar panels, one nuclear reactor that seemingly has not yet been turned on, and doors. Lots of doors. This “mass simulator” looks like the most dangerous thing in the solar system, and it terrifies the Soviets. Any plans they may have had about using Polyus to take out American space assets are put on hold; the US space battlestation is a monster compared to the USSR’s relatively pitiful space platform. Especially since the Soviets know that the Polyus was hastily assembled, and most of the engineers who put it together are uncertain that half the systems will even work if called upon.

What the Soviets don’t know about the American “mass simulator:” That is, in fact, all it is. A mockup made from a million pounds of aluminum, with a few spare RTG’s to provide a little bit of power and neutron radiation, to make the lights blink and the phony sensor stalks to open up. The inside of the shell is merely a tightly-packed structure of spot-welded aluminum beams. Some off-the-shelf Apollo RCS systems give it the ability to orient itself, to make it look  like it’s doing something important.

The 1980’s begin with the Soviets and the Americans staring at each other across the oceans, each convinced that the other is further ahead in the race to weaponize space than it really is. But the race is now well and truly on: the “mass simulator” bought the US time to really get going; the Soviets are not willing to pull any stunts so long as that monster is overhead, but they, too, are plowing ahead at full speed to perfect weapons systems and platforms.

At the same time, NASA has plans for the Neptune booster: real lunar bases, manned missions to Mars, asteroids and Venus, and solar power satellites. But now it looks as if the American manned space program, so long a supposedly “civilian” program, is about to be overtaken by military needs. Will NASA be forced to share resources – launch vehicles, launch sites, personnel – with the USAF? Will the USAF  run the space program? Will the USAF fracture, forming a US Space Force, perhaps with a portion of the US Navy?

To be continued

 Posted by at 1:52 pm
Oct 292013
 

Nixons near-defeat via voter fraud in 1968 has made him more paranoid than he was IRL. A result of this is for him to provide greater support to the FBI; as a result of increased funding and powers of surveillance, the Soviet influence upon western anti-nuclear organizations is exposed much sooner and more completely. While this does not bring an end to organizations working to end American nuclear efforts, this tarnishes their image in the public, and the anti-nuclear protestors are less numerous, less loud, less well funded and far, far less successful. Instead, new generations of fission reactors, including breeder reactors, are put into service on a regular basis starting in the late 1970s.

Additionally, with the ongoing development of the Neptune booster, with its one-million-pound payload, solar power satellite studies that IRL led only to paper and dreams here lead to real plans. The OPEC oil embargo and subsequent energy crisis ends with a sputter, due not to American anger  but to a new sense of American defiance. The oil embargo hurts *now,* but everyone knows that, within a few years, electrical power will truly be too cheap to meter. And if OPEC doesn’t want to sell us oil… with the expected surplus in electrical energy made possible by the new reactors and SPS’s, American coal will be converted into  liquid fuel with which to run our cars and planes. By the time the 1980’s roll around, nobody much cares what the price of Middle Eastern oil is, because it’s no longer quite as important.

Still, the events of 1973 lead to an economic downturn in the US. The sense of malaise that had permeated the US since 1968 only worsens, with the revived space program providing the one real bright spot. By 1976, Nixon is a tired President, ready to leave office. Not many people want Gerald Ford for President in 1976 (Agnew having resigned in 1973, as IRL). However, a new political force comes to the fore in the form of the Governor of California, one Ronald Reagan. Reagan gains the Republican nomination, with Bob Dole as his running mate; they handily defeat the Carter/Mondale ticket.

While Reagan continues many of the policies of the Nixon administration, he brings with it a charisma that Nixon lacked. A subtle effect of this is to energize the American populace; with increased morale comes increased productivity, and thus the economy begins to improve. In effect, the 80’s come early.

One other effect of the Reagan administration: space weaponization. Reagan talks openly about arming the heavens with anti-missile systems, even though there are no real plans for that in the DoD. Now that the Saturn V (with F-1A and J-2S engines for increased performance, lighter structures and parachute splashdown recovery and re-use of the MS-IC stage, with the MS-II stage typically being left in orbit to serve as raw material or structural backbones) is launching nearly monthly, the Shuttle is in tests and the Neptune system is bending metal, it is clear to the world that the US is serious about space. This causes panic in the Kremlin. By Reagans inauguration in early 1977, the US has several space laboratories including not only Skylab but also the more impressive Space Station I, as well as two preliminary bases on the moon (little more than camps at this point) and a manned lunar orbit space station. With Neptune as a launcher and the Shuttle as a servicing system, it’s clear that the US will soon be able to orbit giant nation-killing weapons systems. The plans for solar power satellites, while loudly and clearly described as basically harmless and for solely civilian power generation, are seen by many in the Soviet Union as vast death rays. So, the Soviets have no choice but to compete in the race.

The Soviets had finally managed to get their N-1 rocket to work and had landed their first man on the moon in 1972. By 1977, they too have several space labs in the form of Salyut stations, and plans are in place for their own lunar bases. They are beginning to catch up to the US. And in true Soviet fashion, they are beginning to boast and bluster; and they are being listened to by the CIA.

To be continued

 Posted by at 9:06 pm
Oct 282013
 

Nixon has taken office under a cloud. Many are calling for RFK to be tried and imprisoned; many others believe that the released files and recordings are in fact hoaxes, and that Nixon actually stole the election from Kennedy. With that start, things look dire.

Over the next four years, a series of decisions are made that differ from Actual History. For starters: Nixon makes more of a push to get out of Viet Nam sooner; the war is massively unpopular, even more so than IRL due to the collapse in faith in the American political system. Popular opinion on the war collapses catastrophically. By late 1970, the US is on the way out.

Apollo 11 happens as IRL in July, 1969, but to slightly more public enthusiasm (due to it being something good in  a sea of bad). It is immediately decided that this should be built upon. Some voices that IRL called for Apollo to be curtailed are now not as loud: Teddy Kennedy, part of the Kennedy clan that is now under much greater media and legal scrutiny, has been arrested for the drunk-driving homicide of Mary Jo Kopechne on July 18. Soon he is out of office and sent to prison for a term of several years. Others, such as William Proxmire, remain as opposed as ever, though due to the recent collapse in popularity of politicians as a whole, he has less of a public platform . The decision by the Johnson administration to cancel Saturn V production is reversed; Apollo missions to at least 24 are pushed through.

Due to Nixon Administration pressure, Apollo 12 is pushed up by one month with negative consequences; on the way to the moon in October, 1969, a propellant tank aboard the lunar module ruptures. While the crew manages to return safely to Earth, this delays the following Apollo missions. It has the effect, however, of spurring interest in the space program. A disaster that results in the survival of heroes, right at the height of interest (right after Apollo 11), makes both the public and Congress more interested in space. This is aided by Walter Cronkite: just as he had talked down the war effort in Viet Nam after the Tet Offensive in January, 1968, here he talks up the space program. In the general malaise gripping the US after the 1968 election, Cronkite turns Apollo into a point of pride.

As Viet Nam ramps down and Apollo continues on, further plans are put into place. The Apollo Applications Program IRL led to Skylab; it does so in Alternate History as well, but it is joined by plans for lunar bases by 1976 and manned Mars missions by the early 1980’s. The NERVA program is pushed ahead; the Space Shuttle program also proceeds, but as a smaller vehicle (25K lbs payload, limited crossrange, reusable manned first stage, second stage equipped with expendable external tanks). Plans are put in place to revive the Post-Saturn launch vehicles planned a decade earlier, in 1963: in 1971, a design contest is held among major contractors and General Dynamics/Astronautics wins with an improved version of their earlier Nexus launch vehicle. A long development plan is put into place to develop this as the “Neptune” booster.

The Presidential election of 1972, between Nixon and Hubert Humphrey, is both a landslide and a bore. Humphrey goes into the election under the cloud of the Watergate scandal, even though he was uninvolved; Nixon trounces him soundly. But the turnout is the lowest on record.

As IRL, the Yom Kippur War breaks out in 1973. The war plays out as IRL, with the Israelis repelling the Arab attack. As IRL, the Arab oil producing nations respond with an oil embargo against the US. However, things play out slightly differently. With the enhanced space program requiring nuclear power and nuclear propulsion, the nuclear industry is slightly stronger and much more popular than IRL. A consequence is that the OPEC oil embargo leads to a speedup in the approval and construction of nuclear powerplants. By the Three Mile Island incident of 1979, nuclear power is growing, and is seen as not only vital, but patriotic. The collapse of the American commercial nuclear industry following TMI as IRL does not occur. Much of this is due to the events of 1976…

To be continued

 Posted by at 9:29 am
Oct 272013
 

The election of 1968, between Robert F Kennedy and Richard Nixon, is held on November 5. The count is very close, with media outlets calling it for first one, then the other. In the end, by the end of the day on November 6 it is called for RFK.

However, remembering his dubious defeat to JFK 8 years earlier, Nixon refuses to concede. And he has good reason: on November 4, the FBI, under J Edgar Hoover, had delivered to Nixon a series of files and audiotapes recorded in the weeks immediately preceding the election. These detail a number of meetings between RFK and other higher Democrat Party officials with various corrupt major city mayors and state governors… all aimed at using whatever means necessary, fair or foul, to assure RFK’s win. Nixon had not released the files to the public due to early polling that showed that he would squeak out a narrow win; releasing the files might look like dirty tricks, so it was decided to risk it. However, with the loss, the reasons for not going public were removed. So late in the day on November 6, the files and audio tapes are released to the media. Most damning was a meeting held the week before between RFK and other officials at the Watergate Hotel, where RFK is heard clearly demanding that the votes go his way in certain vital districts… whether or not the voters in those districts actually vote for him.

On November 7, with Nixon still refusing to concede, the “Watergate Scandal” breaks on radio, TV and newspapers. This immediately throws the system into chaos. Recounts and closer examination show widespread voter fraud, throwing the actual results into disarray. Over the next week, a Constitutional crisis ensues, with the RFK win being held in abeyance. Finally, it is determined that Nixon did, in fact, win both the popular and electoral college votes. RFK concedes on November 16 and Nixon is declared the winner.

In January, 1969, Nixon takes office. While generally acknowledged as the legitimate winner, he does so under a cloud; the political system is held is very low regard, on top of the racial strife of the past decade and the ongoing trouble in Viet Nam. Just about the only thing that seems to being going in the right direction is the Apollo program… and even that has issues. Two years earlier the Apollo 1 fire had killed crew and caused delays; just as bad, NASA – due to budget cuts imposed by the Johnson administration – had cancelled production of the Saturn V in August of 1968. So even though the glory days of Apollo were still ahead, it was clear to the new Nixon administration that this would only provide a rallying point for the public for a relatively brief time. So, changes must be made…

 

To be continued

 Posted by at 1:38 pm
Oct 262013
 

One of the first major historical events to follow the April premiere of 2001: A Space Odyssey was, on June 5, 1968, when Palestinian Sirhan Sirhan assassinated Democrat Presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy. The assassination is one of those things that could have *easily* been avoided; it was only made possible due to a late decision to take RFK out of the Abassador Hotel after giving a speech by walking through the kitchen rather than the ballroom, supposedly a shortcut. Had the decision gone the other way, RFK very likely would have walked out of the hotel without incident. While he was then behind in the polls to Hubert Humphrey for the Democrat Presidential nomination, it is very possible that events following his non-assassination would have led to his nomination.

So, it would then have been a race between RFK and Richard Nixon. In Real History, the election of 1968 was marred by riots; these likely would have still happened had RFK been the Dem nominee rather than Humphrey. It’s hard to tell how an RFK/Nixon election would have gone, but it seems reasonable to assume that it would have gone much the same as the Humphrey/Nixon election that actually happened, with Nixon winning a narrow margin in the popular vote.

But remember, this is a Kennedy vs. Nixon election. History had seen one of those before, in 1960. That was another close election, one that JFK won, in part, due to his close wins in Illinois and Texas. But then as now, it was known that the Democrat Party Machine was in full swing in Illinois, and Illinois politics is some of the most corrupt in the nation. Additionally, JFK’s VP candidate, LB Johnson, was one of the most immoral men ever to achieve high office in the US, and may well have helped fraudulently skew results in his home state of Texas. See a discussion of all this HERE. Whether or not this *actually* happened, many, including Nixon, *believed* it had happened. Importantly, it is by no means an unlikely scenario, and the Kennedys have hardly proven themselves paragons of honest and ethical politicking.

So: by November, 1968, RFK is polling slightly behind Nixon. Nixon assumes that RFK is going to cheat. Nixon was, it seems, on good terms with J. Edgar Hoover, head of the FBI. Hoover, however, was not on good terms with the Kennedy clan. There have been rumors over the years that the reason why JFK did not fire Hoover when he took office was because he knew than Hoover had the dirt on *him.* So… Nixon assumes that RFK will be involved in chicanery in the upcoming election. And Hoover assumes this as well. And so on November 5, 1968, the election is held…

To be continued

 Posted by at 1:04 pm
Oct 252013
 

I’m still working away on the 2001: A Space Odyssey Space Station V project (yeah, yeah, just a little slower than expected). The general concept is something I’ve been thinking about since the mid-1990’s, when 2001: In Real Life was still in the future.

Any description of “the present” merits – and usually requires – discussion of what happened in “the past.” Thus the SSV project, which is being put together as a report on the “current status” of the Station as of late 1999 (when, in 2001:ASO, Dr. Heywood Floyd passes through SSV on his way to Clavius Base), makes mention of the history of the Space Station program, including the previous 4 Stations. The question is, How to get from Real History to Fictional History while remaining believable?

I established a few grounds rules:

1) The divergence point(s) must be after the debut of 2001:ASO… April 2, 968.

2) Divergences must be based on human decisions changing history, not physical events. No cometary impacts or Yellowstone supervolcano explosions, for example.

3) The divergences must make sense… more or less.

4) The 2001:ASO movie is canon; stuff from secondary sources such as the 2001:ASO novel, 2010 (novel & movie), earlier versions of the 2001:ASO script, unused concept art, etc. can be used as backup material, so long as it does not conflict with 2001:ASO The Movie.

There is a trend in “Alternate History” to make major changes in the timeline, yet still have things kinda work out the same. See 2009’s “Star Trek,” for example: an incredibly powerful and advanced Romulan starship, enhanced with Borg technology, appears 120 years earlier. This completely alters history… yet thirty years later, Jim Kirk still winds up Captain of the USS Enterprise NCC-1701 (which while being *twice* the size of the original, still looks generally similar), with much the same crew in the same roles. But the worlds of 2001:ASO and 2001: IRL are *very* different. A massive and successful space program, a still extant Soviet Union, and an arms race in space including the Chinese, West Germans (thus implying a still extant East Germany) and French *screams* a timeline that is massively different from the world of 2001:IRL. So there is no need to try to shoehorn actual events into the world of 2001:OSO. Bill Clinton need not be President in 1999, for example.

So… how to get from April, 1968, with known historical events and world situation, to the world of 1999:ASO? I’ve come up with two known historical events that could have greatly changed things so that the disappointing space program of Real Life could perhaps have transformed into the amazing world of A Space Odyssey. And both revolve around hotels: The Ambassador and the Watergate.

 

To be continued…

 

 Posted by at 1:03 pm
Sep 232023
 

Do you want your very own genuine space suit from “2001: A Space Odyssey?” Sure, we all do. Got at least eighty grand to start bidding on it? Sure, we all don’t. But at least you can look at the pictures and dream.

Astronaut Space Suit (6) Piece Ensemble from 2001: A Space Odyssey (MGM, 1968)

 

 

 

 Posted by at 10:09 pm
Apr 032018
 

“2001: A Space Odyssey” premiered fifty years ago yesterday. Who could’ve imagined at the time that the projections of a world of giant rotating space stations, space tourism, lunar colonies and manned missions to the outer solar system would have fallen so far short… not only for the year 2001, but 2018?

I’d planned on yammering forth rather more about this, both extolling the virtues of the movie and bemoaning the sad (yet recently somewhat hopeful) reality, but I hadn’t planned on my internet computer going belly up right when it did. At the moment I’m tapping away on the netbook that the now-kaput netbook replaced, and, man, is this this thing archaic. Even so, good thing I didn’t dispose of it but kept it in storage as a backup. Took this antique half an hour to decide to boot up all the way, though. Gettin’ old sucks.

In lieu of the long stream of consciousness I doubtless would have produced, I invite y’all to revist the days of yore, back in the halcyon days of 2013, when I wrote a number of blog posts describing my concept for an alternate history that could have led from the real world of April 2, 1968. The way the blog spits things out is somewhat backwards for this purpose, with more recent posts at the top rather than the bottom (useful for daily reading, a little disjointed for reading old stuff), but start here at the bottom:

http://up-ship.com/blog/?s=1968+to+2001&searchsubmit&paged=2

And continue here:

http://up-ship.com/blog/?s=1968+to+2001&searchsubmit=

 Posted by at 5:34 pm
Aug 272017
 

There are several websites that have collections of Blu-Ray screencaps from various movies. But “2001” has somehow failed to be the number-one screengrabbed movie. Finally, though, one of the sites has made a bajillion screencaps from the “2001” Blu-Ray and posted them. Behold your new background screens!

2001: A Space Odyssey (1968)

 

Now I need to start whining about the lack of a thousand “2001” 4K screencaps…

 Posted by at 11:23 am
Dec 072013
 

As an update to Side roads on the way from 1968 to 2001: 5a, I just got a used second edition of the book “2001: Filming the Future.” It has a few more photos than the more readily available 1st edition. One of those photos shows the cars used in that in-flight movie… the GM Runabout and the Firebird IV. Since *both* of those cars – or more likely, mockups – were on-set, it’s fair to suggest that the GM-X was as well. And the second, blurry vehicle, briefly seen in a few frames? On further review, what I thought might be the “Deora” truck looks like it might’ve been the GM-X. The left, which I thought was the front of the Deora, might be the rear of the GM-X. The GM-X had something of a concave rear surface, and a forward fender that was bowed upwards and formed a long low “bump.”

gm-x-maybe

bump 198665a

So… maybe

 

If someone reading along happens to have a Blu-Ray of 2001 and the ability to make good screenshots, that might be handy. Hint, hint.

 

UPDATE to the update: read the comments. There is a good case to be made that the Blurmobile is actually the Mako Shark concept car.

FURTHER UPDATE:
Well, with a single Blu-Ray screenshot, the answer is pretty clear. Three cars on visible on screen at once: the Mako Shark, the Runabout and the Firebird IV:

cars2

 Posted by at 2:03 pm