Feb 162010
 

It’s not often that those in the fantasy-based world of far leftwing whackadoodlism known as the “Progressivism” acknowledge that they are out of touch with reality. But every now and then they do. In this case, the editor of “Atlanta Progressive Review” describing why he canned a long-serving reporter.
Gentlemen, behold!

<> At a very fundamental, core level, Springston did not share our vision for a news publication with a progressive perspective. He held on to the notion that there was an objective reality that could be reported objectively, despite the fact that that was not our editorial policy at Atlanta Progressive News. It just wasn’t the right fit.

It’s rare enough to get honesty out of “Progressives.”  Honesty about *themselves* is freakin’ AWESOMENESS ON A STICK.

 Posted by at 4:32 pm

  2 Responses to ““Progressive” vs. “objective reality””

  1. Wow. Just… wow. Too bad Howard Zinn is dead, or they’d probably be trying to get him to replace this (apparently very fortunate to be dismissed) writer.

  2. Best part is it’s unlikely they’re aware of what that says about them. 🙂

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.