Jun 272020
 

The SyFy channel just cancelled the show “Vagrant Queen.” The only really surprising things about that are either:

1) “What took so long?”

or

2) “Vagrant what? Never heard of it.”

I watched the first episode when it first aired and it was… half-assed. *Everything* about it was half-assed, from acting to makeup to dialogue to plot to especially production design and VFX, which made it look like a stablemate of “Andromeda.” The first episode was in the end utterly forgettable, and so I removed it from my watch list and promptly put the series out of my mind.

Now, the history of sci-fi TV in general, and SyFy in particular, is replete with crappy shows that last half a season or a full season, then quietly slip into the abyss. That’s just the way it goes: most shows are at best “meh.” You roll the dice and take your chances. But sometimes, some shows seem to be pre-doomed to incompetence and fail. Some shows, the suits should be able to determine to *not* go with before spending a dime. And “Vagrant Queen” is one such. How should they have known to pass on this? Simple… it was based on a comic book. More specifically, it was based on a comic book that failed spectacularly. It began as a six-issue miniseries. The first issue sold only 2,000 issues (“sold” meaning “sold to comic book shops,” not “sold to actual customers,” so the actual number of people who bought that issue is of course lower) in June, 2018. The second issue sold only 1,200 in July 2018. Issue 3 dropped to 993, and issue 4 fell to 769. Issues five and six? Apparently never actually printed, because in the comic book industry anything that sells below 5,000 or so is on the chopping block. Selling in the *hundreds* is laughably low. But the issues got reprinted as a bound “graphic novel” in February 2019… which sold only 200. And *then* SyFy decided “hey, lets spend buckets of cash on THIS property.”

Guh.

I cannot mock the creators of the comic book for their low sales… their lowest sales figures would make me giddy if *I* could reach those numbers. Their high numbers,  failures by comic book industry standards? Inconceivable for my piddly ass. Selling two thousand issues of, say, US Fighter Projects #4 would make me thrilled beyond the capacity for rational thought. Might even go out and buy a pizza or something. My issue here is with SyFy, spending money on something that has *already* demonstrated a stunning lack of audience. It’s not just dumb, it’s insane. It doesn’t make a lick of sense. The only thing that seems to justify the decision is the creator: a woke intersectional SJW who seems to have made a career out of that, and little else. Did SyFY think that the SJWs of the world would actually watch the show? Seems they didn’t watch… something that SyFy should have seen coming. SJWs scream for properties created by others to include quotas of inclusion… but when those properties bend the knee, the SJWs still don’t watch or buy. They care about the details of things they don’t care for.

If SyFy wants to spend a lot of money on a property with a very small existing audience, I’d recommend they go after “War With The Deep Ones,” “Pax Orionis” and the Zaneverse stories. I can guarantee these would be better received than “Vagrant Queen.”

For further details:

 Posted by at 1:46 pm
Jun 262020
 

In January I signed my very first book contract, for a heavily illustrated aerospace history text Yet To Be Publicly Described. The manuscript and all the diagrams were due to be turned in to the publisher in July. And then… Commie Cough comes along, book stores close, supply chains collapse. Perhaps surprisingly, the book was not cancelled, but instead delayed by one year. Sigh, oh well, okay.

So today, I signed a *second* book contract with the same publisher. This is for a slightly smaller text on a different subject, but similar in idea: a boatload of aerospace diagrams. Book One looks to have around 180 diagrams; Book Two will top out somewhere in the area of 120. This one has a  due date of January, 2021.

If you like the US Aerospace Projects publications I’ve put out, then you’ll go bonkers for these books.

An aside: for public discussion purposes, the first book is “Book X.” The second book would thus be either “Book Y” or perhaps “Book XX.” In which latter case if and when I sign a third book contract, that would should prove quite interesting.

 Posted by at 9:28 pm
Jun 262020
 

As a general rule, it is better to try to understand, *truly* understand, the whys and wherefores of the world. But on occasion problems are such  (as today, when confronted with a Computer Issue That Should Not Be) that figuring them out is simply too troublesome, time consuming or expensive, and it makes a lot more sense to simply replace the problematic thing and move on with life. Sometimes it’s just not worth the bother of trying to truly understand. And thus…

 

 Posted by at 2:22 pm
Jun 262020
 

Before the Convair Atlas ICBM proved that it was possible for a rocket to reach out across the world and deposit some canned sunlight reliably close to commie targets, it was understood that the only way to accomplish the task was with pilots and bombardiers. But by the mid 1950’s the idea of subsonic manned bombers sneaking into the heart of the Soviet Union without getting swatted was starting to seem nonsensical. So Bell Aircraft, under the direction of former V-2 program director Walter Dornberger, dreamed up the MX-2276: a three-stage manned rocket bomber. Looking akin to an evolved Sanger Antipodal Bomber, the MX-2276 used two manned and winged stages, with an unmanned expendable stage in between. The final stage would carry a single gliding nuclear warhead deep into the USSR, using the human crew to attain some measure of accuracy.

But then the Atlas came along and ruined all that.

The idea persisted, however, turning first into the Bomber Missile (BoMi) then the Rocket Bomber (RoBo) then Dyna Soar. With each step it became less fantastical, and also less of a dedicated weapon system; by the end of the Dyna Soar, it was a one-man experimental re-entry vehicle launched by a fully expendable Titan IIIC. Since then the idea of a “rocket bomber” has popped up from time to time, but never with the level of seriousness displayed in the mid/late 1950’s. For more on the whole BoMi program, see Aerospace projects Review issues V2N2, V2N3 and V2N4. APR issue V3N4 gives a pretty complete rundown of the final Model 2050E Dyna Soar.

 Posted by at 12:14 am
Jun 252020
 

Sparta The Mean Kitty has died.

After Raedthinn and then Fingers, this is all too damned familiar.

If you are unfamiliar, Sparta was one of the original Internet Cats, with a music video from 2007 racking up 91 million views:

 

Sigh. This year, man. Doesn’t look like it’s going to get any better. Could always get worse.

 Posted by at 11:51 pm
Jun 252020
 

Cats know more than they tend to let on. Part of that is that they ignore you when they feel like it; often they make you think that they don;t know their own names. But sometimes the facade slips. There is one word in this house that reliably brings the cats running, from rooms away and from deep sleep: “treats.” More so even than “food,” “treats” is a word that the cats have come to know and lose their little minds over.

Banshee learned it quickly, and will always put in an appearance if the word is uttered. Below is a photo of her popping out of a deep sleep after an utterance of “treats.” But even though she’s excited for the treats, she still looks judgey as hell.

 Posted by at 11:05 pm
Jun 252020
 

Ugh.

Why I Threw Away My Copy of Gone with the Wind

I threw away my copy of Gone with the Wind.

It wasn’t easy. The book spent a couple of weeks sitting recycling-adjacent before I came up with the will to toss it into the bin. I held it in my hands one last time, and I kissed the title page where my father had inscribed: “To Beth. Christmas 1975.” And then I dropped it into the garbage.

Your father must be so, so proud. “Look at me! Look at how woke I am! Look at how performatively offended I am on your behalf! Bestow upon me your adulation and diversity points!”

Bah.

Look, I *hated* “Gone With The Wind” the one time I watched it, probably around 20 years ago. I despise all those Confederate ᛗᚩᛏᚻᛖᚱᚠᚪᛣᚳᛖᚱᛋ who got themselves statues. But these vapid yahoos who are so proudly tearing down statues of Confederates – and Columbus, and Ulysses S. Grant, and Thomas Jefferson, and Francis Scott Key, and George Washington and soon enough Lincoln and the Wright Brothers and Neil Armstrong and Edison and Einstein – are all human garbage. I would be happy to see Confederate statues removed by the cities that own them… removed from their plinths and hauled off to a museum somewhere, or melted down, whatever… so long as it was the cities and counties and states that are actually responsible for them doing so in a legally approved manner. But what we’re dealing with here *isn’t* local governments deciding that idealizing traitors is not such a good idea; no, what we have here are Marxists and SJWs and idiots (but then, I repeat myself) deciding to flush as much of history as they can down the can in the hopes that in the vacuum that follows they’ll be able to build a shiny new utopia upon fluff and lies.

So if you want to toss out your copy of “Gone With The Wind,” by all means do so; it’s yours. But you are aligned with people who would gladly throw out *every* copy if they could. And in aligning yourself with the worst humans the United States has to offer, you’re proudly tossing out mementos from your father. Nice.

Bah.

I personally do not own a copy of “Gone With The Wind.” No interest in it. But I *do* own quite a number of books that actually offend me. I’ve got a first edition of “Chariots of the Gods.” I’ve got a first edition of “Plain Facts” by Kellogg. “Worlds in Collision” by Velikovsky, “Magick in Theory and Practice” by Crowley, the Maleus Malificarum, “Fingerprints of the Gods” by Hancock, a first edition of “Flying Saucers have Landed” by Adamski, the Koran and a WWII-era “Mein Kampf.” I thought I had cheap paperbacks of “Communist Manifesto” and “Das Kapital,” but I do not recall seeing them since the move from Utah. But on the other hand I’ve got a whole shelf of “Skeptic” magazine back issues, books by Randi and Penn & Teller and Sagan and Shermer and Gardner; sci-fi by L. Neill Smith and Heinlein and Brin and Clarke and Lovecraft and Anvil and van Vogt and Anderson and Niven and Pournelle and Steele and Leinster and Piper. I  suspect Ms. “Drink In My Glory For I Threw Away One Book” may not have the same sort of diversity of thought on her bookshelf. Certainly less so now that she’s learned to love trashing literature.

If such things were real, if I could I’d probably have me a copy of the “Necronomicon.” I’d never *open* the damned thing, and I’d keep it wrapped in plastic, wrapped in aluminum foil, wrapped in asbestos, locked in an iron box and stuck in a safe deposit box somewhere. I’ve often found it quite useful to read that which I fundamentally disagree with:Creationist claptrap, flat Earth nonsense, leftist yammerings. One of these days I’ll probably get around to reading whatever literature has been cranked out by the Black Hebrew Israelites. It’s good to not only expand ones horizons, but also to know what those who would harm you have to say.

 Posted by at 4:36 pm
Jun 252020
 

The diagrams of aircraft and spacecraft that I produce tend to have additional “scale references” to provide a sense of how big – or small – the vehicle in question is. For years I’ve been selecting human figures from a mess of ’em I’ve found or created… but I believe I need more. What I’m looking for are photos of soldiers, pilots, ground crew and the like shown in full-body and side or front view, sort of orthographic views. If anyone has or knows of such, I’d appreciate a heads-up.

Something I’ve considered from time to time is procuring  a large “GI Joe”-type figure and a bunch of accessories, then setting it in various poses and photographing it. But I’ve just never gotten around to that.

 Posted by at 3:29 pm