Feb 152018
 

The “expert” suggests books, snacks and Ipads as a way of appeasing the little monster. Seems to me there are more effective solutions.

Passengers Recall ‘Flight From Hell’ After 3-Year-Old Screamed for 8 Hours Straight

There is an auto-play bit of video with nice, loud audio of screeching. Must’ve been a heck of a fun time.

The obvious solution is to duct tape the little monster, both into his seat and his mouth shut. Another solution would be to drug him. Back when I used to fly I saw lots of smaller pets brought on board; and a *lot* of them were brought on board sedated. If it’s good enough for a cat, it’s good enough for a little monster. Another solution: cargo hold.

 Posted by at 9:53 am
Feb 152018
 

Updated the webpage is an irritating process compared to adding new blog posts, but I’ve finally gotten around to updating the Aerospace Projects Review main page and the US Aerospace Projects catalog page:

http://aerospaceprojectsreview.com/

http://aerospaceprojectsreview.com/bomproj.htm

 

 Posted by at 12:10 am
Feb 142018
 

Raedthinn is not overly fond of being photographed, especially when Fingers is snuggling up against him. He’s none too fond of her doing that in the first place, and being recorded allowing it to happen seems to make him miffed.

That said, so long as Fingers goes at it slowly, Raedthinn is basically too lazy to do much about it. It’s really only when she tries to curl up with him with too much enthusiasm that he gets annoyed enough to get up and leave.

 


Feline Tip Jar


 Posted by at 5:31 pm
Feb 142018
 

OK, we’ve seen this story a bunch of times.

  1. Mr. Moneybags donates a bucket of money to Candidate A of Political Party 1.
  2. Mr. Moneybags is found out to be a scumbag… a harasser, a rapist, a  murderer, athief, whatever
  3. Candidate A and Political Party 1 disavow Mr. Moneybags. They express shock and sorrow and all that.
  4. Candidate B and Political Party 2 try to make political hay out of the relationship between Mr. Moneybags and Candidate A.
  5. Included in that is a call for Candidate A to “give the money back” that Mr. Moneybags donated.

It’s at step 5 when I get lost. I have just enough empathy in me to kinda be able to pretend to understand what it’s like to be a politician who has found out that a financial supporter is a bigger dirtbag than most high-dollar-value political supporters. But presuming that the politician was honestly unaware of and uninvolved with the specific scumbaggery… *why* should the politician “give the money back?” To stretch the metaphor, let’s say someone came along and decided that my work on this blog, or my work with aerospace history or fiction writing or *whatever* was of sufficient value that they decided to gift me a million dollars. Go on, let’s say that. Let’s say that until it happens (I take PayPal, people).

And then let’s say that that benefactor is found out to have been a member of the Communist party, or is a Columbian drug lord, or a human trafficker, or a Chinese chef specializing in puppies and kittens. In that case it would certainly be valid for me to talk smack about said benefactor (though perhaps unwise in the “Columbian drug lord” instance), but how many people would make the demand that I “give the money back” or donate it to some charity or other?

As with most things political, I suspect the demand to “give the money back” is less about a demand to do the right thing, and more a cynical way to stick-to-to-’em. But it seems to happen all the time. It’s as old and moth-eaten as the claim of a suddenly retiring politician that the reason for the evacuation from public life is to “spend more time with family,” rather than hiding from that shiny new allegation hitting the press tomorrow.

 Posted by at 9:11 am
Feb 132018
 

Now available: two new US Aerospace Projects issues. Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US VTOL Projects #2

US VTOL Projects #2 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #2 includes:

  • SOS Interceptor: A US Navy Mach 3 aircraft with jettisonable wings
  • Lockheed GL-224-3: A small battlefield surveillance and ground attack plane
  • Phalanx Dragon MP-18: An unconventional small civilian transport
  • Lockheed L-161-1: An early concept for a variable geometry roadable helicopter
  • GE Supersonic V/STOL: A supersonic strike fighter with flip-out lift fans
  • Convair ANP-VTOL: A nuclear-powered ground-effect craft of the Navy of unusual configuration
  • Piasecki 16H-3: A compound helicopter for high speed passenger transport
  • Boeing Vertol Model 147: A tilt-wing close support fire support design for the US Army

USVP #2 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4:

——–


US Research & Recon Projects #2

US Research & Recon Projects #2 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #2 includes:

  • Lockheed A-1: The first true design leading to the SR-71
  • Bell MX-2147 Model 105: The high altitude “X-16”
  • Boeing/CRC/AMROC X-34 Reference Configuration: A reusable launcher test vehicle
  • Martin Model 159: A scout/observation float plane
  • NASA-Langley Low-Boom Demonstrator: a recent design to demonstrate quiet SST tech
  • McDonnell-Douglas DC-9 Super 80 Propfan Configuration 1: A fuel efficient transport demo
  • Convair “HAZEL” MC-10: An inflatable Mach 3 plane for the Navy
  • Republic Manned Hypersonic Reconnaissance Vehicle: an early scramjet concept

 

USRP #2 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4:

——–

 Posted by at 11:57 am
Feb 132018
 

OK, yeah, they don’t actually do “food stamps” as such, but debit cards. The government gives recipients money (essentially) that the recipients are supposed to spend on food. And of course, not only are there all kinds of inefficiencies in the system, there are all kinds of opportunities for fraud. So, gotta say this sounds promising:

Trump wants to slash food stamps and replace them with a ‘Blue Apron-type program’

In short: rather than giving people debit cards to procure food with, the plan is to just… give people food.

Those foods would include shelf-stable milk, juice, grains, cereals, pasta, peanut butter, beans and canned meat, fruits and vegetables, according to the USDA. The department estimates that it could supply these goods at about half the cost of retail, slashing the cost of SNAP while still feeding the hungry.

Since this is the sort of thing I have proposed here before, I gotta say this is a good idea. Make the staples free – free and nutritious and bland – and there will be little opportunity for a black market or fraud. Plus by going straight to making cheap food available directly, you can skip over whole reams of bureaucracy… and bureaucrats.

There are of course questions needing answering and problems needing resolving. Would food be delivered directly to recipients, or would they have to go pick them up? Would there be a single “box” of food for everyone from children to old folks? Would a box include food appropriate for a wide range of people leading to wastage, or different types?

Yes, yes, the ideologically pure libertarian/conservative standpoint would be to say that the only acceptable solution is to get rid of government food handouts entirely, since they are not constitutionally mandated. While that’s true, it’s not a pragmatic solution. Do that, and you will hand the proglodytes a permanent electoral majority.

 Posted by at 12:10 am
Feb 122018
 

We’ve trashed the oceans; now we are turning space into a junkyard for billionaires

Experts say rocket emissions affect our climate and cause ozone loss, yet too few people seem to care

Unless you think that that opening line doesn’t really hammer home the point, there’s this:

You might be tempted to dismiss this as an expensive publicity stunt by a billionaire playboy with too much time on his hands. But in reality it’s an important step towards a time when space travel for your average indolent millionaire will become commonplace. It will probably become another way of managing your finances when Mars inevitably becomes the ultimate off-shore tax haven.

Quite what our fetish for space exploration and spending billions on the technology required to feed this does to the environment is a serious matter. There’s a dissonance emerging here. On Earth, we’re organising summits and setting up carbon footprint-reduction targets all over the shop. Yet, up in yonder outer space we’ve established a giant garbage dump replete with huge hulks of rusting metal and, as of last week, a $200k American sports car.

Indeed, the whole issue of rocket emissions needs to be considered if we’re serious about the environment.

This is symptomatic of the modern luddite, repeating the latest version of the tired old “why spend money on space when we still have problems here on Earth” refrain. These monstrous reprobates were wrong fifty years ago when they managed to kill off Apollo and the first good chance for the conquest of space; they’re even more wrong now as they try to kill off what may well be not only the best, but perhaps the *last* opportunity for western civilization to save itself. Kill it off now with environmental laws and regulations and treaties, as the nattering chicken livered assassin of joy who wrote that opinion piece for the execrable “The Guardian” would have, and we’ll never get the chance again in any of our lifetimes. The Chinese might conquer the universe, planting their red flag of communist genocide on every chunk of rock within a hundred AU, but we’ll be stuck here in ever-increasing malaise, besieged by hopelessness and diminishing horizons, dark age Surt worshippers and astrologers and flat Earthers. Gormless chickenshittery in the face of THE ENTIRE DAMNED UNIVERSE should not be tolerated, much less celebrated, even less paid for. The yammering pinhead even finished off his ill-informed and ill-intentioned piece by suggesting that space aliens are mad at us for ” disfiguring their neighbourhood with obsolete metal junk.”

Sadly, the English language is simply far too limiting to get across the level of disdain and dislike I have for people who get paid to try to convince the western world to cut itself off at the knees.

 Posted by at 12:19 am
Feb 112018
 

Cape Town rejoices as rain falls on drought-striken city

When it finally came, restaurant diners rushed outside mid-meal to see the deluge for themselves.

A Deluge? Sounds like good news, yes?

South Africa’s second-largest city and its surrounding areas received between 2 millimeters and 10 millimeters of rainfall Friday night, according to the Cape Town Weather Office.

Ummm… averaging less than 1 centimeter is a “deluge?”

The city can expect 2 millimeters to 8 millimeters of rainfall Monday evening and into Tuesday morning — less than an inch

Holy crap! Eight millimeters is less than an inch! My whole world view has been turned upside-down! Thanks, CNN!

Later after claiming this slight drizzle to be a “deluge” the article finally mentions that it will have approximately zero impact on the actual dire water situation.

Come Day Zero, just a few short months from now, pretty much all the taps in Cape Town will be shut off. This is of course a nightmare for the city. But once again, though, Cape Town sits right on the ocean. And while the big desalination plant is still years from completion, I gotta wonder: if even a quarter of the population built themselves some solar stills, could that make a difference? From the wiki on solar stills:

In 1952 the United States military developed a portable solar still for pilots stranded on the ocean, which comprises an inflatable 24-inch plastic ball that floats on the ocean, with a flexible tube coming out the side. A separate plastic bag hangs from attachment points on the outer bag. Seawater is poured into the inner bag from an opening in the ball’s neck. Fresh water is taken out by the pilot using the side tube that leads to bottom of the inflatable ball. It was stated in magazine articles that on a good day 2.5 US quarts (2.4 l) of fresh water could be produced. On an overcast day, 1.5 US quarts (1.4 l) was produced.

2.4 liters per day is not a spectacular amount, but that’s 2.4 liters per day from a single portable solar still 24 inches in diameter. A rooftop 20 feet by 30 feet could support at least 150 of these stills, producing a theoretical 360 liters per day. In order for this to work, there would of course have to be ready access to sea water; easy enough if you’re on the beach, much less so if you’re up hill. But at this pint it seems like it would be easy enough to build some Big Ass Pumps to shove a couple hundred tons of seawater uphill every day to collection points where solar stills could turn it into a combination of fresh water and highly saline brine.

A quick check online finds the “Aquamate” inflatable solar still that sounds a whole lot like the military one from the 50’s. At $270+ each, it’s insanely expensive for this purpose, but since it seems like a  simple enough device, you’d think that an order of One Point Two Bajillion of them would serve to drop the per-unit price down to… well, not much. It’s just some plastic after all, seemingly not much more complex than a beach ball or a poncho.

I’m not picking on Cape Town here. It’s just that that town is currently in the news about a dire humanitarian crisis that seems like it can be solved, or at least greatly lessened, with the application of some STEM. And where Cape Town is now, other places will be sooner or later. If Cape Town can get it together and use science and engineering and sheer force of will to smack mother nature around and show her who’s boss, then that’ll be a sign that humans can conquer nature all over.

 Posted by at 3:29 pm