Aug 102017
 

Well, this feller sounds like fun:

Muslim Professor at CA University: “Genocide” of White Racists “Morally Required”

Also:

“Morally Required Genocide”

The latter one is written by one David Cole, a “Holocaust revisionist.” In other words, a dumbass. But he did interview the professor in question, and raises some interesting points. The professor expands the definition of “genocide” rather broadly to include wiping out “ways of life,” so that the United States stomping the the CSA flat and exterminating their slave-holding way of life was “genocide.” Well, ok. But if we accept that as a valid definition of “genocide,” then the current wave of invasion into Europe, with some regions having their prior culture being remade in the image of the newcomers… isn’t *that* genocide?

You expand the definition of politically loaded worlds at your own peril.

 Posted by at 1:02 pm
Aug 102017
 

Hmm.

Get ready for the ‘tech alt-right’ to gain power and influence in Silicon Valley

The author proposes that one of the results of Googles firing of Jame Damore will be an emboldening of those who work in the tech sector and who are “alt-right” or just plain conservative, including suggestion that alt-righties will actually pretend to be SJWs in order to sort of destroy the system from within. I don’t know about all that, but I think it’s reasonable to imagine that one result of this will be that Damore winds up with a good chunk of Googles money.

 

 Posted by at 1:32 am
Aug 102017
 

This is the sort of thing you’d think we’d already have:

Goodbye, MiG: Boeing, General Dynamics Debut Anti-Aircraft Stryker

It can pack:

  • AI-3s, a ground-launched version of the AIM-9 missiles used by US fighters, with significantly better range and maximum altitude than the old Stinger.
  • Longbow Hellfires, originally an anti-tank missile, made famous as the favored weapon of the Predator drone, and suitable for both ground targets and low-flying aircraft like helicopter gunships.
  • Hydra 2.75 inch guided rockets;
  • 0.50 caliber machineguns;
  • and even low-powered lasers capable of burning out quadcopters and other small drones.

 

 Posted by at 1:00 am
Aug 092017
 

Inside the $600-a-head Silicon Valley restaurant where Google and Apple executives eat gold-flecked steaks

Now, I’m all in favor of someone charging as much as they can for “high-end” stuff. If you can, without lying, convince the sort of executives who loudly extol “diversity” while censoring opinions they don’t like to spend a hundred bucks on a can of Campbell’s Chicken Neutical Soup… hey, great, wish I’d thought of it. But if you’re on the other end of that transaction, what exactly are you getting out of it?

There is novelty value, I suppose, as well as the presumed value in showing off. But if you’re rich, does showing off how much money you can blow on nonsense make people want to invest with you? Seems counter-intuitive.

One of the leadoff images in the article is a distressingly small piece of meat that looks like a Wendy’s burger patty with some corners cut off, dressed with Actual Gold. That’s always a way to impress people… you’re consuming *gold.* And surely that’s a good justification for the high price, right? Gold is expensive, right? Thousands of dollars per ounce? Yeah… no. One of the amazing things about gold is its ductility, meaning it can be beaten or rolled into astonishingly thin sheets, just a few microns. And you can buy edible gold foil sheets off of Amazon.

That’s ten sheets, 3.14 inches on a side, for seventeen bucks. Yeah, that piece of meat has maybe a dimes worth of gold on it. You’re looking at gold the thickness of which is probably a small handful of *atoms.*

When I first read the piece, my first thought was “the rich really are different.” But then I remembered “no, they’re not.” Because for every instance of a rich schmoe splurging what is for him undoubtedly a tiny fraction of their wealth on something fundamentally pointless, there are probably thousands of instances of poor-ish people spending money they really can’t afford on stuff almost equally overpriced and useless. Amazingly overpriced sneakers (and people rioting for them) spring immediately to mind, along with all variations of “bling.” Given the extremely minimal actual cost of edible gold foil, I’m surprised I don’t see low-end restaurants making a killing by adding a quarters’ worth of gold to a cheap piece of meat… turn an $8 steak into a $30 one. Additional cost is nothing; additional profit is huge.

Now if you’re excuse me, I’m going to go get a breakfast burrito from the gas station.

 Posted by at 9:19 am
Aug 092017
 

It can get you fired. Additionally, it can get you lied about in the media.

Here Are All The Media Outlets Blatantly Lying About The Google Memo

This is one of those tricky situations. On the one hand, Google, like YouTube, is a private company and is not bound by the 1st Amendment, and can fire people for any cause they like, including having politically unpopular (even if only unpopular with certain people) opinions or politics. On the other hand, communications companies like Google, Twitter and YouTube are so powerful, dominant and important to public discourse that when they decide to censor political opinions, there is not a whole lot that those so censored can really do about it. Could a million right wingers get together to buy up enough stock to repopulate the board of directors of these companies? Somehow I doubt it, but that might be the only way to keep these sort of companies from shutting down politics that’s right of far left.

 Posted by at 12:11 am
Aug 082017
 

A prototype animatronic Lincoln head being put through its paces. While still not what you’d call entirely convincing, it displays a remarkable range of expressions. Most of which make you think ol’ Honest Abe is being forced to sit through an SJW’s presentation on the cisnormative heteronormative white supremacist patriarchy.

 

 Posted by at 10:29 am