Imam Who Said Ayaan Hirsi Ali Deserved Death Penalty Was Hired By DOJ To Teach Muslim Classes To Federal Prisoners
No comment.
Here’s an interesting article:
Long story short… when the Queen keels over, the British economy will take a mighty thwack. And for no good reason: everything will just… stop.
This is a sad thought: a modern industrialized nation will go bugnuts because one person dies. One person of objectively little actual use: she doesn’t run things; she’s not a manager or executive of any kind. She’s not an inventor. She doesn’t go to the hospital daily and perform medical miracles or even just do the occasional open heart surgery. She’s not doing vital defense research. Nothing she does can’t be done by a friggen Muppet. Keep in mind, she’s in the position she is not because of any actual skills or talents she manifested, but because one of her ancestors was a bigger, more grabby and more *successful* scumbag than the other grabby scumbags in the aristocracy. She is, in many ways, a Paris Hilton or Kim Kardashian… famous for being famous. And yet Britain will in many ways simply shut down when she does.
This will of course present certain opportunities. It seems that for a period of about two weeks, British business – civil and government – will kinda stop. So if you are a non-British corporation or government and you want to screw with the Brits… when the Queen dies, that’s the time to make lots of opportunities available, on a “sign up fast” basis. Somewhat akin to having free Bar-B-Que and fresh donuts at noon during Ramadan, I suppose. And of course, it’ll be the obvious time for Jihadis – British born and otherwise – to start blowing stuff up.
C’mon, Brits. Wander on up to the 21st Century. Where the death of a hereditary aristocrat is worthy of a few minutes on the news… and no more. If you heard tomorrow that the heir the Kaiser or the Czar had keeled over, or whoever was closest in line to Emperor Norton… would much of anyone apart from close family *really* care?
If you want to confuse the bejeebers out of a canine, it would seem that sleight of hand is an effective means:
Now let’s see him do this with cats…
I went to watch “Wanderers” again on my good laptop and found it wasn’t there, so I downloaded another copy… and found that the Sagan narration has been removed. Personally I thought the narration was just perfect, but a narration-less version is good too. Fortunately I found a copy of the original I’d downloaded, so now I have both versions.
I have no idea why Sagan was removed. Anyway, here’s the new narrationless version. if you haven’t watched it… you really gotta. “Wanderers” is the greatest Hollywood space movie that Hollywood never bothered to make. Just short of four minutes, it’s more worth the price of a ticket than any movie I can think of with *maybe* the exception of “2001.”
And here’s the original that someone else uploaded to YouTube, with the narration intact:
A question we’ve all asked, answered: So, when a nuclear reactor is switched on (i.e. the control rods are pulled out), how long does it take for the Cerenkov radiation to put in an appearance? Answer: not very long at all.
This is actually kinda brilliant… “Go!” by the band Public Service Broadcasting:
Holy crap… music that is actually “space-positive.” The sad thing is that they have to reach so far back to get audio this awesome.
Next week, March 11, ATK will do a static test fire of the QM-1 rocket motor. This is a five-segment derivative of the 4-segment Shuttle RSRM solid rocket booster. This past evening (March 5) ATK held an open house for the local community to come and take a close up look at the motor, and to get information about environmental concerns about the test (there are none, but there was someone who went bonkers a few years back…). I attended and took a number of photos of the motor and other stuff. This was one of those cases where it would have been better to get *more distance* from the subject; but you make do with what ya got.
I’ve made a bunch of these available at full resolution to APR Patreon patrons.
I heard a portion of a piece on the radio tonight featuring some people ulcerating about teenagers sexting (sending nekkid photos of their naughty bits to each other). The debate seemed to boil down to “Is sexting a Bad Thing, or is it the Worst Thing?” with a healthy dollop of “we have no idea how to deal with this.”
It occurred to me that this is a perfect example of what science fiction can be at its best. But it also occurred to me that this is probably something sci-fi missed.
Consider that sexting is wholly dependent upon the availability of particular technologies… specifically the camera phone. The first such devices came on the scene around the year 2000. When I was in high school, such a device was more than a decade away. Cell phones themselves only came around in the mid 1980s, and they were about the size of a brick. Well into the ’90’s, if you were out and about and you needed to make a phone call, you had to find a pay phone. (Hell, I only got a cell phone in 2006). So for my generation of dumbass teenagers, if we wanted to do the equivalent of sexting, we’d’ve had to have used a Polaroid camera and physical trading of the images, something on a wholly different level than digital photography and instant image distribution.
Where sci-fi comes into it: the best sci-fi is the kind that introduces some new science or technology into society and asks “what if.” So far as I’m aware, no sci-fi writer ever foresaw kids having handheld phones with built-in cameras and easy taps into a worldwide instantaneous information network. Nevertheless, the technology came about and literally covered the world before society had a chance to even understand the ramifications, never mind come up with strategies for dealing with it.
The interesting thing is that for olds like me, camera phones remain kind of an amazing thing, because we lived much of our lives without them. But for a kid in junior high, camera phones are likely older than they are. They grew up with them, didn’t know a world without them. So it’s unsurprising that Kids These Days have adapted to this technology in a way us old farts haven’t. It’s a matter of learning how to deal with the tech being done by new generations, leaving old generations flailing in the dust.
So, sci-fi can envision a whole raft of new technologies of various levels of likelihood. Hand-held energy weapons that can actually blow a hole through you. Anti-gravity. Cloaking devices. Force fields. Mr. Fusion. Replicators. Unbreakable materials. AI. Cloning. Head transplants. Immortality serums. How will society react to them? I suggest that the sexting “problem” might be a way to examine the issue… the people who were adults when the tech became available are kinda freaked out about the easy acceptance of the tech by the young… and by how the young use the tech to do unexpected and often undesirable things with it.
PS: The idea of a “video phone” was something that denoted “amazingly futuristic” ever since at least the 1920’s. Video phones popped up from time to time, but were always failures… the bandwidth needed either swamped the available infrastructure, or the image quality was just freakin’ terrible. Video phones seemed like the sort of technology that would forever remain just beyond reach, out there with jetpacks and flying cars and home nuclear reactors. But then webcams came around, and then Skype, and now video chat on cell phones, all in a remarkably short time. For *generations* video phones were the stuff of fantastical sci-fi… and now you hold it in your hand and don’t give it a second thought.
Along with the regularly scheduled “rewards,” APR Patreon patrons at the $4/month level and above also get occasional “extras.” I’ve been migrating them from the Patreon file system (which is a bit cumbersome and clumsy) to a Dropbox system (which is easy). I have just uploaded a number of documents to the Dropbox folder. These were prior extras.
Aereon SST brochure
“Introduction to Kistler” brochure
“Colonization of Space” by O’Neill
Aerial Gatling guns diagrams & info
Soviet article on a ramjet-equipped Sanger “Silverbird”
So if you’re a Patron, they’re available. If you’re not a patron but you want in, please GO HERE.
In looking through some aerospace artifacts that were auctioned off (or at least attempted to be auctioned off) back in 2004, one was a memo written by Werner von Braun while he was director of NASA-MSFC in March 1964. You’d expect there to be a bagrillion of these sort of things, mostly pretty bland stuff like scheduling appointments and the like. But this one… something seems to have happened that I’d like to know more about.
801: Dr. Wernher von Braun Autograph
Dr. Wernher von Braun Autograph on a 3/11/64 pencil memo on a red/white printed “Office of Director – MSFC” note paper addressed to Dr. von Braun that reads: “There was no letter from Dr. Welsh. He requested this information from Dr. Stuhlinger on Jan. 16th at a luncheon meeting in Washington. He asked for a written reply”. Dr. von Braun has written an extensive reply in pencil on both sides of the notepaper. He has marked this “URGENT”. The reply reads, in part: “Frank – Attached letter (not included) is a rather disastrous critique of Max Hunter’s proposal (likewise attached) (not included). I’ve known Max for many years. He is a super ? with boundless imagination and little constraint. That’s why he left Douglas and became a member of the Professional Staff of the Nat. Space Council. He hoped to “get Washington into high gear”. I hate to antagonize him and turn him into an enemy of Marshall. But Welsh apparently wants a reply. Please explore ALL political aspects of this (incl. advice from key Washington men familiar with Nat. Space Council affairs) and get the best top-level advice as to how to react to Welsh’s inquiry. (I wish we didn’t have to comment on Max’s letter at all!!). Unless you are urged to do so, don’t mail reply until I’m back from my vacation. This thing is political dynamite. So it might as well smolder a little longer. PS. The trouble is, our appraisal is properly quite right.”. He has signed this with his characteristic “B” and the date “3-11”. Fascinating.
I’d sure like to know what this “disastrous” proposal from Max Hunter was. My hand-wavy guess is that it’d be something to do with nuclear propulsion, perhaps an evolvement of his RITA concept for a nuclear SSTO.