Nov 072014
 

I saw Interstellar today. It is visually stunning, in places, but on the whole… meh. I was disappointed.

Like prior Nolan flicks, “Interstellar” tries to be “mind blowing.” But in doing so, it comes across more as “tries too hard to be mind blowing.” Additionally, i am capable of the “willing suspension of disbelief” required to enjoy Hollywood’s idea of “science” fiction, but there is so much just plain wrongness in the science here that it’s really more of a fantasy movie. So… here’s the basic setup.

It is something like 50 years from now. The world isn’t getting ready for a collapse, as you might have gathered from the trailers; the collapse has already happened. The population has plummeted; things have fallen so far that there isn;t even war anymore. No more Marines, no more armies. At least partially responsible is “the blight,” which has already made wheat essentially extinct, has just taken out okra, and corn is about to be attacked by the blight. Dust storms sweep much of the planet.

That’s ok for a premise, I suppose. But here’s what bugged me:

1) The blight is a magical plague. Somehow or other it “breathes nitrogen,” but will also remove the oxygen from the atmosphere to the point that in a few generations people will suffocate.

2) So, Earth is doomed. The only possible option is to leave. And there is nowhere else in the solar system to go (somehow forgetting Mars, the asteroids, comets, moons of Jupiter…).

3) As seen in the trailers, a 3-engined two-stage Saturn V-like booster is used to launch a  goofy-looking wedge-shaped spaceplane into orbit. And that’s fine. But as it turns out, these spaceplanes have fantastic propulsion systems far superior to old F-1 rocket engines; they are capable of dropping from orbit over an alien world, landing vertically like a Harrier, then taking off all the way back to orbit again. If they are capable of this… why use the rocket booster? My WSoD gets especially shaky when movies are *internally* inconsistent.

Hmmmph.

The wormhole (which arrived near Saturn 48 years ago, apparently courtesy aliens or God or somebody) leads to a number of different place. Our Heroes go to the black hole system seen in the trailers. The system has three possible planets. Unmanned probes outside the wormhole have picked up minimal data on the three worlds, indicating they each may be promising. OK, sure, I guess. But the black hole system made me twitch. Yes, they clearly listened to Kip Thorne when he described what a black hole with an accretion disk would look like. But they must’ve kept pretty shoddy notes on how a black hole *works.*

The innermost world is deep in the black holes gravity well. Well outside the accretion disk, but far enough in so that time dilation is massive: one hour on the surface is seven years back home. Still, it looks promising, so they decide to go take a look.

4) The main ship stays well beyond, but the wedge-lander goes down and spends a few hours, leading to 23 years back home. The world has 1.3 G’s surface gravity, yet the spaceplane is still able to achieve orbit. So that’s really pretty good for only 50 years from now. But… the spaceplane not only leaves the surface of the planet, it also crawls up out of the black holes gravity well, back to where spacetime is fairly smooth and non-relativistic. I haven’t done the math, but I’m pretty sure that that would indicate that the spaceplane has a delta V of… what? More than 0.9 c? Yeah… no. A target that deep in that massive of a gravity well is attainable for a flyby probe or an impactor, but for rendezvous? Yeah… no.

5) The inner planet is the one with the massive waves seen in the trailers. The only logical source for these waves would be gravitational tides from the black hole. But tides that bad wouldn’t just make mountain-sized waves, they’d distort the planet as a whole. It’d be a ball of lava with an atmosphere of superheated water vapor. Not a promising home for humanity.

6) EXCESSIVE USE OF WORN-OUT SCI-FI TROPE: Once again, the astronaut who goes bugnuts and psychotic, causing a ruckus. Bah.

7) The next world they visit has frozen clouds. Not clouds of snow particles, but Avatar-esque floating glaciers. Solid, structurally unified masses just hanging in the sky. When you bump them with your ship, you break chunks off… chunks which, if memory serves, promptly fall downwards.  Ummm…. no. On so many, many levels.

8) When you bump your orbiting ship, it does not *immediately* begin plummeting out of orbit into the atmosphere.

9) To get to the third world, they need to slingshot around the black hole. And to do that they plunge inwards deeper than the first world. In fact, they skim the accretion disk. This… would be bad. Not only is that close enough to get roasted and nuked, the reason why accretion disks are glowing hot is because the tidal forces are so strong that shear in the gas in the disk causes aerothermal heating like a re-entering spacecraft. This means the tidal forces would be enough to tear the ship to bits. Probably very, very small bits.

10) OK, so the accretion disk is a plane that bisects the “sphere” of the black hole, much like the rings of Saturn. Now, imagine you were in orbit around Saturn at a radius smaller than the outer radius of the rings. There is no such thing as an orbit that wouldn’t actually take you *through* the rings. Yet the ship here somehow manages to stay on one side of the disk. Hmmmph.

11) You cannot survive entry into a black hole by careful piloting, proper trajectory planning or just going fast enough. If the hole is small enough to have an external accretion disk, then passing the event horizon will be an experience which will cause your *atoms* to get torn to bits.

12) Mystical personal revelations. Hrrrrmmmphgah.

13) Love is *not* some amazing force that can change the universe or whatever. Love ain’t even The Force.

—————-

All that said, it was a masterful movie. There were moments of greatness… the most heartbreaking “driving away scene” I can recall; just about the best parental response to idiotarian school authority figures; one really good use of “Do not go gentle into that good night” (and several “meh” uses); a number of spectacular scenes. It was clearly heavily influenced by “2001.” A lot of the musical cues were taken straight from “2001;” there are robots clearly modeled on the Monolith (thankfully, their personalities are not HAL clones); and the end… well, it’ll sure seem familiar. But I have to admit to being as let down as I was by Prometheus. The characters weren’t as mind-bogglingly stupid as those in Prometheus, but it was just as much of a letdown in the hype.

Sigh.

 Posted by at 5:47 pm
Nov 072014
 

Saw this trundling down the highway a few days back. Dunno if it was modified or built like this from the get-go. Also don;t know if it was due to the design or the driver, but it was *way* slower than everyone else on the road…

WP_20141031_007

 Posted by at 12:54 pm
Nov 062014
 

Behold what Hollywood thinks of as a hundred-million-dollar idea for a “science” fiction movie:

Scott Waugh Circles Sci-Fi ‘Inversion’

“Inversion,” unveiled at Cannes by Mark Damon’s Foresight Unlimited, follows a young Chinese scientist and a street-smart American expat in a race against the clock across the globe to save Earth from an apocalyptic threat — a reversal of gravity causing civilizations to uproot and plummet into the sky.

Wat.

Look. No. Gravity is not going to suddenly invert, not, at least, unless and until the “Phantom Energy” that seems to be a slight antigravitational force gains in strength *billions* of years from now and results in the Big Rip. If the idea  behind “Inversion” is that the Big Rip is happening *now,* there WILL BE NO RESCUE. Unless someone builds a doorway to another universe (paging Dr. Bishop), the Big Rip will be a universally unsurvivable event.

And if gravity is beginning to invert for *whatever* reason, you won’t have “civilizations” popping off the planet and shooting into space. You’ll have the *atmosphere* saying “see ya” right quick, and then the whole planet will slow-motion explode. Not in big chunks, most likely, but more like an evaporation that occurs all at once. And shortly after the planet tears itself to bits, spacecraft that might have gotten away will also shortly tear themselves to bits as the increasing antigravitational force  overcomes structural strength. Then the bodies of the astronauts will disassemble, then their cells, the molecules, the electrons will shoot away from the nuclei, the nuclei themselves will explode and then the particles will go foom.

And unless the movie is positing some sort of Doctor Doom/Lex Luthor type supervillain with a cartoonish “anti-gravity weapon”, you won;t have localized gravity reversals. it’ll be everywhere, all at once.

Arrrrgh.

 Posted by at 9:35 pm
Nov 062014
 

If you have eleven and a half minutes, the ability to remember the cheez-tastic opening credit sequences of 1970s and 1980s TV shows and an appreciation of the truly bizarre… then hey, after you get done donating to the Tip Jar up there to the right, watch this wholly indescribable bit of crazy awesomeness:

[youtube RzdRQCnDBlw]

 Posted by at 9:23 pm
Nov 062014
 

The first trailer is out for “Iron Sky: the Coming Race.”  And… wow. As nutbar as “Iron Sky” was, the sequel promises to be even nuttier. And that’s a good thing.

[youtube 3jLaf5qj8cs]

From the looks of it, these folks could probably whip up a pretty decent Lovecraftian movie.

 Posted by at 8:35 pm
Nov 062014
 

Neil Blomkamp, director of “District 9,” is working on another sci-fi movie set in South Africa. This time rather than aliens there’s a self aware robot named Chappie. It looks fairly interesting, if perhaps a whole lot of “I’ve seen this before.” Everything from “Frankenstein” to “I, Robot” to “Short Circuit,” dealing with the first artificial intelligence, trying to figure out the world and how not to get blown up by the villagers with the pitchforks and the Molotov cocktails.

But the real mind blower? It appears that Die Antwoord  have major roles in the movie…

[youtube HhNshgSYF_M]

 

If you don’t recognize “Die Antwoord,” that’s a South African musical group that pretty much defies all rational attempts at description. I don’t know if it’s art, but it’s, uhhh… interesting.

 

 Posted by at 2:26 pm