Mar 242014
 

Well, for one night, anyway:

http://channel.nationalgeographic.com/channel/total-riff-off/

On April 1st, the guys from “Mystery Science Theater 3000” and RiffTrax are adding their very own commentary to classic National Geographic Channel programs, featuring excerpts from “Honey Badgers,” “Unlikely Animal Friends,” “Man v. Monster,” “Swamp Men,” “Alpha Dogs,” and more!

Could be good.

 Posted by at 1:25 am
Mar 232014
 

As might be slightly obvious, I am in favor of scientific literacy and opposed to anti-scientific superstitious nonsense. It is a never-ending issue… nonsense is a remarkably self-restoring force. It gets knocked down here, it rises over there.  Witness astrology.

When you have a population that is scientifically illiterate, they can be easily seduced by the siren call of superstitious stupid. And then you get stuff like this:

Bulawayo man caught using mubobobo during church service

You really need to read the article to get the full flavor of the overwhelming dumbth on display. But in short, a man was severely beaten in Zimbabwe – that bastion of collectivism success stories – because he was using “mubobobo.” What’s “mubobobo,” you ask? It’s magical witchcraft. Specifically, magic that allows a guy to have sex with someone else without their knowledge. In broad daylight. Without touching them. At some considerable distance. Telepathically.

In other words: BS.

It’s also known as “Bluetooth sex,” not because a Bluetooth wireless device is used, but because the magic supposedly allows the user to remotely violate someone. One could argue that “well, it’s Zimbabwe. Shrug.” But the thing is: the whole concept is patently absurd… but people believe it anyway. People sufficiently technologically advanced to know what “Bluetooth” is and to have digital cameras to take photos of the beating, and to post about it on the web and discuss it online. Is it really so unreasonable to consider that this level of Grade-A superstitious moronery might find its way to the US? Considering all the commercials I see on late night TV for psychic chat lines? Considering the rise of “ghost hunter” shows? The success of  homeopathic “medicines?” The relatively recent importation to the west and rise in popularity of eastern magical bullcrap such as  Reiki and feng shui indicates that “alien” absurdity can become accepted by large numbers of people who, by all rights, really should know better. So why not mubobobo?

This acceptance of utter bilge is a societal danger. As someone who generally leans libertarian, with the view that what people do with themselves is their own affair, sometimes what people do needs to be countered. The anti-vaccine movement, for example, based as it often is on the myth that vaccines cause autism, has led to a whole lot fewer kids getting vaccinated. On one hand, the “live and let die horribly” part of me is fine with that: unvaccinated kids are more likely to contract and die from diseases they don’t need to, thus thinning the herd slightly and cleaning a smidgeon of idiocy out of the gene pool. On the other hand, it’s not the kids fault that the parents are superstitious idiots. And on the gripping hand, large numbers of the unvaccinated messes with herd immunity, and can risk large numbers of other people.

Further, acceptance of anti-science, and the incorporation of it into public policy, may wind up bringing down civilization. The political Left is forever screeching about climate change and how carbon dioxide is going to kill us all. The political Right is forever screeching about how it’s a hoax. Well… the facts back up the Left more than the Right here, even when you try to eliminate the hyperbole and dubious and sometimes outright fraudulent data collection.  The world *is* getting warmer, CO2 levels *are* rising, the climate *is* changing. How much, how fast and how bad are all valid arguments. But the political Lefts anti-science comes into full force on the climate change issue. If this is a problem, fine… suggest a solution. And the only suggestions they seem to support are increasing misery in the west via economic contraction… and putting energy production into the hands of the weather via solar and wind. what they *should* be doing, instead, is supporting wholeheartedly the development of many new nuclear powerplants, including thorium reactors. But on the whole they don’t. They display virtually the same exact superstitious fear of nuclear power as many Zimbabweans seem to have for witchcraft.

I suspect a primary reason why the political Right in the US is unconcerned with global warming is because so many of those who are loudest about the issue only offer solutions that result in economic backsliding, reduced standards of living and shrunken horizons. In one of the great modern political ironies, the “Progressives” are largely opposed to actual progress, while the “Conservatives” want society to become richer and more advanced. The solution to the global warming issue is thus straightforward: propose solutions that not only fix the environment, but increase wealth and the standard of living. But the superstitious dread of nuclear reactions causes far to many people to reject that outright. And thus we enter a cultural death spiral of idiocy.

 Posted by at 9:44 am
Mar 222014
 

Sometimes an attempt to explain just how awesome a thing or a place is… just makes it look freakin’ horrible. Take this article for example:

This East Village Triplex Has A Retractable Facade

In short, it’s a 1900-square foot condo with a garage door in place of a wall. And for only $2.1 million! And with only $1521 in real estate tax (per month)!!

The article states (perhaps ironically, I dunno, I’m not well versed in Hipsterese):

You will never live in this place, or anything nearly as beautiful, but maybe just that it exists is nice? Just imagine how great it is for some family to wake up on a perfect Sunday spring day and retract the entire front side of their East 14th Street building so they can look out onto this great city.

Yeah… no. That’s not my idea of beauty, but rather horrible urban claustrophobic dystopia with some set dressing.

On the other hand, I took this photo yesterday from my driveway. I think I’ll stay here, thanks.

WP_20140321_021

 Posted by at 9:41 pm
Mar 222014
 

Desert Rock IV was a series of atomic tests in Nevada in 1952 using relatively low-yield weapons (31 kilotons) and lots of soldiers in disturbingly close proximity. Here’s a silent bit of film:

Some time back (well, about a year and a half ago) I took a number of the frames and stitched them together (and painted in the gaps) to show the whole mushroom cloud.

desert rock iv a

desert rock iv c

Not perfect but… what’reya gonna do.

Along with some rather remarkable photos and films of soldiers looking up at a mushroom cloud looming over them, this series of tests also produced some of the most amazing photos ever taken. One such is shown below. This shows a nuclear explosion a few millionths of a second old… the fireball is big enough to have consumed the “cab” the bomb was put in at the top of a steel tower, but the fireball has not yet reached the ground. The spikes below the fireball are known as “rope tricks.” The light emitted by the surface of the fireball at this stage was intense enough to cause the towers steel guy wires stabilizing the tower to simply explode. The mottling of the surface of the fireball is due to the mass distribution of the bomb components, the cab and other surroundings around the point of explosion. You can just make out the tower directly below the fireball.

Tumbler_Snapper_rope_tricks

I posted a video on this a while back.

 Posted by at 7:47 pm
Mar 222014
 

As a followup to THIS POST which discusses the idea some hold that the universe having a definite beginning is proof positive of the existence of God, I suggest a new discussion topic: how to prove Gods existence.

For simplicity, “God” in this discussion can be reduced to something like “an intelligent, thinking entity that created, intentionally, the Universe.” Probably add in “omniscient and omnipotent,” though that’s probably not necessary. Never mind whether that’s Jehovah or Zeus or Shiva or Feklar or Odin. Just “Prime Mover Guy.”

 

First off, any potential Proof Of God would have to be able to get past the concept of Really Powerful Aliens. Something like turning the moon blood red would have impressed folks a few millenia ago (or even just a few centuries ago), but today it could be explained via any of a number of physical phenomena that Really Power Aliens could employ. Or something like The Rapture: hundreds of millions of people get bodily borne up into Heaven… by, say, Really Powerful Aliens with tractor beams or transporters or phasers set to *disintegrate.* Or something like the dead returning… thanks to Really Powerful Aliens who have been watching us for a while, recording our minds, and then uploading those recordings into cloned bodies. Stuff like that doesn’t work as Proof Of God, since it could easily be explained by forces far lesser than Omniscient and Omnipotent.

OK. So, if God wanted to prove his/her/its existence, how might God go about doing it? Science Fiction brought us two possibilities that I think would be pretty damned convincing, if they came to be:

1) Carl Sagan’s “Cosmos” included the notion of a message embedded within pi. Pi is an infinitely long string of seemingly random numbers. Within any infinite string of random numbers, statistically speaking you will find sections that look like messages, but are just happenstance. But if the “message” is sufficiently complex and ordered so as to be beyond statistical probability, that would argue that the message was intelligently created. And a message embedded within pi, or the natural log of 2, or the square root of 2… this would argue strongly in favor of an intelligent creator of the universe. The hypothetical message may only start ten trillion digits into pi, and, worse, pi in base 42… but still, the message would be there and it would be accessible to anyone. Across all time and space, the message would be discoverable by anyone with sufficient math skills and number-crunching capability. Really Powerful Aliens would seem incapable of actually tinkering with the constants of the universe.

2) Stargate: Universe featured a starship billions of lightyears away, built by a long-dead species of vastly intelligent and powerful aliens who were on a mission. That mission was, as memory serves, to cross the universe in order to get observations as widely spaced as possible of the cosmic background radiation. Because they had detected a message within the CBR. Here again, Really Powerful Aliens would seem insufficient to explain a message embedded within the Big Bang.

Either of these, if confirmed and *rigorously* re-re-re-confirmed, would be strong arguments for the existence of some “god” or other. It would not necessarily follow, of course, that a message embedded within pi would imply one *particular* God. But then… it *could.* If the message in pi started off as a geometric thesis, in order to grab the mathematicians attention, and then turned into the Old Testament in binary code, ending with “To be continued in the square root of 2,” and then the New Testament is found in the square root of two… that’d be a pretty fair argument in favor not just of a generic creator-god, but the Christian God. Of course, the New Testament in root-2 might end with “To be continued in the square root of pi.”

So: what physical/scientific/mathematical discovery could, if it was made, serve as a really good Proof Of God? Discuss.

 Posted by at 11:28 am
Mar 212014
 

UPDATE: Yay, bribery works! The answer has come in… it’s ‘Ignacio – Part 1″ by Vangelis.

OK, I’m offering $50 in downloadable Space and Air Drawings and Documents, APR’s and USBPs to whoever the hell first tells me just what the hell is the music that begins at about 31:50 in the first episode of the original “Cosmos.” And when I say “Original,” apparently I mean the 1999 re-release, which featured somewhat different music from the original airing (apparently for a late 1980’s/early 1990’s  release the music was re-worked due to licensing issues). Online you can find several places that list the “Cosmos Music Cues,” but I’m thinking that those are all based on the original airing, and this bit of music wasn’t there.

[youtube Pa1ImgOcOPM]

I’ve been trying to find this damned tune for twenty friggen years. It’s a kinda depressing, doomy slow thing, kinda like a dirge with a bell. According to THIS listing, it should be “NOTTURNO from CONTRAPPUNTI [sic], Le Orme,” but from what I heard of that on YouTube, it ain’t. I’m guessing “Notturno” got replaced because it’s *horrible.*

So if you want fifty bones worth of free electronic stuff, here’s your shot. Take a listen at the 32 or so minute mark, figure out what song that is, and post a comment. If you can post a link to YouTube or Amazon or somewhere else where I can actually listen and confirm, all the better.

Argh. Ever have a song in your head you can’t get out? Try having one for TWO DECADES. I posted about this tune four years ago, but got no relief. This time… I’m hoping bribery will work.

 Posted by at 11:33 pm
Mar 212014
 

A photo taken in August, same trip that produced this photo. Anyone guess where?

UPDATE: check the comments, someone finally guessed where I went…

 

You can also download the very much larger version by LOOKING HERE (over at my long-disused photo blog), good for printing and such. Permission granted for personal use.

If you like the photo and want to toss a few coins my way… well, here ya go.


Photo Tips



 Posted by at 7:07 pm
Mar 212014
 

It’s a blog. But it’s a CNN blog, so…

Does the Big Bang breakthrough offer proof of God?

Oy.

If the universe did indeed have a beginning, by the simple logic of cause and effect, there had to be an agent – separate and apart from the effect – that caused it.

Ah… no.

As we observe the complexity of the cosmos, from subatomic particles to dark matter and dark energy, we quickly conclude that there must be a more satisfying explanation than random chance.

Ah… no.

I get a pain *right* *here* when people use bad, bad “logic” to support their positions. And people misapplying the findings of science to support their religious beliefs has long been a particularly effective abuser.

 

 Posted by at 6:25 pm
Mar 202014
 

Seems the Iranians are building themselves a large-scale model of an American aircraft carrier. Analysts assume it is meant to be towed out into the Persian Gulf, then blown up for propaganda purposes.

Iranian Ship, in Plain View but Shrouded in Mystery, Looks Very Familiar to U.S.

Seems an odd thing to do, but hey, this is a theocracy, so “odd” is pretty much to be expected.

 

UPDATE: More photos of it over here:

Why is Iran building a mock US aircraft carrier?

It looks real enough. But it looks… real crappy.

 Posted by at 7:24 pm