Jun 122013
 

The Bbc once again displays a rather odd view of America:

11 TV Shows That Explain American Culture (for a British Expat)

So what are their chosen shows?

  1. Veep
  2. Portlandia
  3. The Simpsons
  4. Girls
  5. The Daily Show
  6. The Colbert Report
  7. The O’Reilly Factor
  8. Glee
  9. Duck Dynasty
  10. Nashville
  11. The View

Hmmm. With the exception of #’s 7, 9 and perhaps 10, these all have a decidedly leftist slant. The O’Reilly Factor was included specifically to make fun of right-wing Americans. Interestingly, the author says this about Duck Dynasty: “a bunch of Louisiana “rednecks” who made a fortune inventing duck hunting paraphernalia aren’t archetypal Americans.” Oddly, he doesn’t say anything like that about the casts of freaks from Portlandia, Girls or Glee.

One obvious and glaring omission: “The Walking Dead.” If you want to learn about American culture, what about a show that revolves around a small group of productive people who believe in the right to bear arms and are surrounded by unthinking, uncreative masses of the unproductive, who exist mainly to consume Our Heroes.

I would also suggest the combo of Pawn stars and Hardcore Pawn. Both demonstrate the American entrepreneurial spirit, while also demonstrating the massive cultural differences between places such as Las Vegas and Detroit.

Any other suggestions?

 Posted by at 7:18 pm
Jun 122013
 

In the late 1960s, prior to the Shuttle concept really taking off, the USAF funded studies of low cost boosters. One type that received considerable study was a two-stage pressure fed layout. This was vaguely similar to the earlier Aerojet Sea Dragon in that it would be a heavy and simple design, using shiplike construction and dense propellants. The nature of the first stage booster was such that recovery was anticipated. Propellants were hydrazine and nitric acid.

lowcost

lowcost2

 Posted by at 12:27 pm
Jun 112013
 

(Feel free to check my math!)

Recent news events have brought publicity to the NSA’s “Utah Data Center” currently being built to store vast amounts of digital data. How much data? According to sources, the storage capacity is on the scale of a yottabyte. And how much is that? A yottabyte is 10^24 bytes. Also known as one trillion terabytes. And what does that mean in physical terms? According to Wiki:

To store a yottabyte on terabyte sized hard drives would require a million city block size data-centers, as big as the states of Delaware and Rhode Island.[1] If 64 GB microSDXC cards (the most compact data storage medium available to public as of early 2013) were used instead, the total volume would be approximately 2500000 cubic meters, or the volume of the Great Pyramid of Giza.

That’s a lot. But what if you tried to print it out? Well, the first question is “how many pages equal how much data?” According to THIS site, one megabyte gets you about 60 pages of email/word processing; 250 pages of text; 20 pages of presentations, PDFs, images. Let’s just settle on 60 pages/megabyte, or thirty sheets of paper (printed double-sided) per megabyte. There are 10^18 megabytes per yottabyte, so one yottabyte would score you 3X10^19 sheets of paper. What’s that in other measurements? If the sheets were standard 8.5X11 and were put end-to-end, that’d be 5,208,333,333,333,333 miles. Since one astronomical unit (AKA AU, the distance from the Earth to the Sun) is 92,955,807 miles, this strip of paper would stretch from the earth to the sun 56,030,209 times. A bit much. OK, rather than taping the sheets end to end, simply stack ’em up. I just measured a 500-sheet ream of paper; it came out right close to 2 inches thick. So, each sheet would average 2/500 inches thick = 0.004 inches. Multiply that by 3X10^19 sheets and you get a thickness of 1,893,939,393,939 miles. Much more manageable… this would only stretch to the Sun 20,374 times. Put a bit closer to home, this stack of paper would stretch from the Earth to the Moon (238,900 miles) 7,927,749 times.

Put another way: weight. One ream of cheap copy paper weighs about 5 pounds… 5/500 = 0.01 pounds per sheet. Multiply by 3X10^19 sheets and the total weight of the stack 9not counting ink) would be about 3X10^17 pounds, or 136,363,636,363,636,363 kg. This is a pitiful 2.28×10^-8 times the mass of Earth. However, a closer match was the Chicxulub asteroid that hit the Yucatan peninsula 65 million years ago. It was *about* 1.6×10^15 kilograms, or 3.5×10^15 pounds. So the Utah Data Center, once full, could theoretically have enough data that, if printed out, would mass on the order of 100 times the asteroid that killed the dinosaurs.

Your tax dollars at work!

 Posted by at 10:10 am
Jun 092013
 

A trio of NASA-Marshall heavy lift launch vehicle concepts, circa 1985. The first two configurations used a clustered booster stage; the third configuration used series staging, with a unique feature than the booster stage had no LOX tank, only a kerosene tank. The LOX for the first stage was contained within the second stage. This would make the vehicle more complex, but it would also make the first stage more recoverable.

The three designs were designed for the same mission, launching 300,000 pounds to LEO (specifically a 100X540 nautical mile transfer orbit, with circularization at 540 n. mi. to be performed by a kick stage). All three used an all-new LOX/kerosene booster engine, the Space Transportation Booster Engine, slightly more powerful than the F-1. All three used a new LOX/LH2 upper stage engine, the Space Transportation Main Engine, on the core vehicle. The STME used an extendable nozzle for good performance at both low and high altitude.

The selected configuration was #2:

 

The boosters for Configuration 2 were independently recoverable. The five STMEs for the core stage were contained in a recoverable propulsion & avionics module, which would splash down for recovery, refurbishment and reuse.

 Posted by at 1:39 pm
Jun 092013
 

Some commercials from before  irrational hoplophobia conquered the land:

[youtube aMqd5EQXD-g]

A very young Snake Plisken starts down the road…

[youtube Kb9_0N3g5bw]

[youtube 7E1JO6bADeQ]

And Ranger Lennier gets an early start on training to take down the Shadows…

[youtube 6e7KiM9PFBk]

[youtube jiQdigSSCm4]

[youtube qDMidB2eWd0]

[youtube tKFVsgQxVBk]

[youtube GPhZsauluXM]

And this is why we can’t have nice things:

[youtube Rk8-ePGqBmM]

 Posted by at 3:14 am
Jun 082013
 

But some are trying real, real hard to convince the public that dragons were real. Because they were dinosaurs. And lived alongside humans.

DRAGON INVASION

A dazzling new exhibit will soon descend upon the Creation Museum. Dragon Legends will bring visitors face to face with fantastic tales of dragons from all over the world. …

Evolutionists struggle to explain the intriguing evidence that people lived at the same time as dinosaurs. God’s Word indicates that dinosaurs and man were created on the same day, so biblical creationists are not surprised to uncover clues that ancient man had indeed seen these beasts.

Were dinosaurs dragons? Find out at the Creation Museum’s new Dragon Legends exhibit, and prepare to believe.

funny-girl-middle-finger-face-period-week-animated-comic-pics

 Posted by at 9:14 pm