Aug 172011
 

The actual “Archangels” are done. However, there were a few more drawings…

Twenty-fourth in the series of reconstructed drawings from Paul Suhler’s book “From RAINBOW to GUSTO.” This is the Lockheed D-33 design as drawn in mid 1966. This particular drawing has a Source Grade of four:

“RAINBOW to GUSTO” is available from Amazon:

To download the high-rez version of the D-33 drawing, simply click THIS LINK. You will be prompted for a username and a password. For the D-33 drawing, use these:

Username: the FIRST word in the body of the text on page 243

Password: the LAST word in the body of the text on page 243

(Remember: Case Sensitive!)

ALSO NOTE: if all you get is a “red X,” that means the image is too large for your browser to display (I’ve not had a problem with Firefox, but have had with IE). In that event, simply hit the Back button to this page, and right click on the link above and save the image directly to your computer and view from there.

Up next: Arrow configuration

 Posted by at 5:52 pm
Aug 162011
 

In the early 1960’s the Martin Company cranked out a boatload of promo art showing aircraft and spacecraft of the future. One “design” that was featured was Dandridge Cole’s “Aldebaran,” an extremely unlikely nuclear pulse “seaplane” meant to haul millions of pounds of payload to the lunar surface. I briefly mentioned Aldebaran HERE and HERE. I just stumbled across a piece of Soviet artwork also depicting Aldebaran:

According to a commenter on the flickr site, the translation of the Russian text is:

“Pulsating giant of the future. Spaceship taking off from water.”

Interestingly, this piece of art shows the vehicle from behind, giving a good idea about the propulsion system layout. The only known Aldebaran paintings (the only ones *I* know, at any rate) show it from the front or front quarter, and leave the propulsion system something of a mystery.

 Posted by at 9:41 pm
Aug 162011
 

A 1977 Johnson Spaceflight Center evaluation report on the Solar Power Satellite concept includes this optimistic outlook on the future of space launch:

A Shuttle-derived heavy-lifter with a payload of 230,000 pounds costing between fifty and a hundred bucks a pound by 1987 or so. A million-pound payload fully reusable TSTO by 1995, with a per-pound cost in the tens of dollars.

Hmmm.

Kinda missed out on those.

 Posted by at 7:57 pm
Aug 162011
 

FYI for sci-fi authors:

Something that pops up in science fiction (and fantasy) from time to time is the idea of “impossible colors.” basically, people seeing colors that they *can’t* see. This is different from, say, people using sensors to view things in infra red, ultraviolet or gamma rays; these devices convert frequencies the human eye cannot see to frequencies it can. Thus, lots of “infra red” is actually just “red.” The impossible colors are either produced by some magical or ultra-alien/extra-dimensional whatzit, or are the result of the humans eyes or brains having been tinkered with.

One type of “impossible color” would be the afore-mentioned ultra violet. This sort of thing would be fairly easy to understand; just a slight modification of the existing hardware. How the brain would interpret that, though, is left to be seen… ultra violet light might be interpretted by the brain as a particular shade of blue, or it might show up as a wholly new, never-before-seen color. In the latter case, it would be an experience much like a color blind person might have if their vision was suddenly brought to standard: they might never before have actually processed the color “green,” and now they’re faced with a whole world full of a color that’s entirely new to them.

Another type of “impossible color” is a color that is a mixture that just doesn’t work, like blueish-yellow (*not* green) or reddish-green (*not* brown). Supposedly, some people can actually see such colors, but only if their brains are tricked into it. One such test is this:

Stare at this and let your eyes defocus, until the two central crosses line up. Supposedly, some people are able to see some Wholly New Color from the mix of yellow and blue. Me, I don’t. What I get is *three* boxes… blue on the left, yellow on the right, and a third box in the middle that morphs from blue to yellow and back over a span of several seconds. I’m guessing that this is the result of my tiny little brain trying to process the image, and switching back and forth from one eye to the other. Sadly, no impossible Colour Out Of Space for me.

But if it *does* work for you, then you apparently are able to see an Impossible Color. Good for you.

A few years ago I heard a tale on the radio. It sounded good, but I’ve found *zero* evidence to back it up. Never even come across another reference to the story. So it’s *probably* BS. But as the story goes, during WWII, there were a few missions on the coast of France that involved four people: one young man and one old man on the beach; one young man and one old man in a raft or other small boat a ways offshore.These occurred deep in the night on cloudy, moonless, *black* nights. What was going on? They were flashing signals back and forth using lamps. Old tech, but the trick is that the lamps were invisible. Any Germans on shore or out to sea would have seen nothing.How was this possible? Because the old men had had bad  cataracts. So bad that the only way to give them any sort of vision was to remove the lens from the eye entirely, and rely on thick glasses. But the thing is… the human eye-lens absorbs UV. We don’t see in ultra violet largely because UV can’t get to the retina. But that was no longer true for these old guys. Now, UV could get to their retinas, and they could see the flashes. Trained in Morse code, they could see impossible colors, and were used to transmit vital information ahead of landing parties and the like. Sounds good. Is it true? Not that I’ve been able to determine. But if there’s any truth in *any* of this, here you’ve got evidence of humans being able to see Impossible Colors.

 Posted by at 1:26 pm
Aug 162011
 

A Shuttle Derived Launch Vehicle concept studied by NASA in 1982. A predecessor to the Shuttle-C, this SDLV used a separable propulsion/Avionics module that would separate from the payload in orbit. The P/A module would re-enter and either land or splash down, to be recovered and reused. The payload shroud would be expended. Technically a better approach than Shuttle-C due to the re-use of the expensive bits, it was also a more expensive approach due to, well, the reuse of the expensive bits. Shuttle-C would attempt to be cost effective by using end-of-life SSMEs… engines that would have been thrown away anyway.

 Posted by at 9:15 am
Aug 162011
 

Stereotypes exist for a reason. Gentlemen… behold:

Mother of 13-year-old who smashed up shop blames government

A 13 year old thug took part in the BritRiots, smashing up stores with a golf club. Got arrested, and due to being an underage precious little snowflake, was not sentenced to anything meaningful. As it turns out he was turned in by his mother. Now, about that mother….

She is on benefits, does not live with the boy’s father and has 10 other children, the court heard.

Awesome. Can someone explain to me why “benefits” do not come with mandatory Norplant?

 Posted by at 9:15 am
Aug 152011
 

At the end of the 1950’s, the future of aviation was to be the supersonic transport. In order to get there, Convair suggested that their Mach 2 B-58 “Hustler” bomber be converted into testbeds for SST technologies and operations. Several aircraft were designed, from pure test aircraft to planes designed for combined passenger transport and recon… all the way to a Mach 3 transport capable of carrying 135 passengers 4000 miles.

This book describes these designs, and is richly illustrated with contemporary and modern diagrams and full-color photos and artwork.

Article 35, “B-58 Derived SSTs,” is available in three forms. It is available in printed through Magcloud ($13.00 plus shipping):

http://www.magcloud.com/browse/issue/227294
———
It is also available for purchase directly from me as a downloadable PDF ($4.00):

———
And now for the first time, it is available in both printed and digital form through MagCloud ($15.00 plus shipping):

http://www.magcloud.com/browse/issue/258319

I’ve never done this last option before, so… let me know how it goes!

 Posted by at 3:33 pm
Aug 142011
 

One idea from the dawn – or at least pre-noon hours – of the space age that I think might be worth considering for a comeback is the “Propulsive Lift Landing Aid for Entry Vehicles,” or “Propulsive Lift Concept for the Descent and Landing of Manned Entery Vehicles” which mysteriously but fortunately boils down to “PLAME.” Studied by General Dynamics around 1967, PLAME was a concept for using turbojet engines to provide vertical thrust for the landing of space capsules or small spaceplanes. The turbojets were big, and required further volume for their inlets and exhaust; but modern designs would make them smaller, lighter and more fuel efficient. The amount of fuel they’d need would be limited due to their short run time… and being turbojets, there’d be no need for oxidizer, just stock-standard jet fuel.

For future passenger/tourist space vehicles, I’d imagine that a system like this might be an effective way to provide a safe land-landing system. A single conical or biconic space capsule would be a cheaper and lighter vehicle than a wing-body or lifting body (with notably less crossrange, of course); a PLAME system would allow a capsule to not only land on the ground (rather than ocean splashdown), but also would make the capsule largely independent of runways. A PLAME-equipped capsule could land pretty much anywhere that something like a Harrier could land.

Of course, a rocket system could be used instead of a turbojet system. It might be interesting to compare the two for use in the *same* capsule. Design the capsule to use turbojets… and then remove the turbojets and place rockets in the inlet/exhaust duct. Use the ejector effect to increase the thrust of the rocket. Trade studies might just show that a pure rocket system would weigh less than a turbojet system.

A system like this would allow, say, SpaceX or some other firm to launch tourist space capsules from Florida, and recover the capsule right next to the launch site. This would not only speed up and simplify processing of the capsule for the next flight (a not inconsiderable concern), it would also get the tourists on their way that much faster and safer. After having just spent days or weeks in space, they might – or might not – be in the mood to bob around in the ocean waiting for pickup. With a PLAME-capsule, they could be back out and about within a minute or two of landing, just yards from the airport terminal.

 Posted by at 11:30 pm