There’s justifiable outrage at “child soldiers,” then there’s the sort of hysterical whining on display here:
http://www.thisisplymouth.co.uk/news/Cadets-parade-hit-rifle-ban/article-2842270-detail/article.html
ARMY cadets in Plymouth have been banned from carrying rifles in public just days before they were due to take part in a Remembrance festival.
The children had spent weeks practising rifle drill for a display at the Plymouth Pavilions tonight.
But this week they were told by their top brass that the rifles had to go.
Devon Cadet Executive Officer Major David Waterworth told The Herald yesterday that the Plymouth cadets had been ignoring a national ruling.
“It isn’t a new regulation. It’s been in force for about ten years, ever since the UK signed the agreement against using child soldiers.
“There is no need for children to appear in public with weapons. It does upset some members of the public.
“There is no need for it. It doesn’t reflect our aims and ethos in the Army Cadet Force.”
Note that the article doesn’t seem to give the ages of these “children.” Could be 17, for all I know. But even if the cadets are 8… so what? Training with firearms is something that should begin early. Your average gun shop in Utah has a section devoted specifically for kids, typically bolt-action .22 rifles, scaled down appropriately. If there are some members of the public who are upset at the sight of cadets carrying rifles… man the hell up, Nancy, and get yourself some insensitivity training.