Jul 192010
 

http://www.irishtimes.com/newspaper/breaking/2010/0719/breaking35.html

New legislation that will allow householders to use lethal force when defending themselves or their properties has been published today.

The Criminal Law (Defence and the Dwelling) Bill 2010 allows a homeowner, tenant or visitor to stand their ground when attacked by an intruder and specifically states there is no requirement for the person to retreat.

The Bill also states that reasonable force can result in the death of the intruder in certain circumstances.

A step in the right direction.

 Posted by at 11:58 am
Jul 192010
 

This is pretty remarkable. Not that the story told happened, but that the government official admits so openly to blatant racism.

http://hotair.com/archives/2010/07/19/breitbart-hits-naacp-with-promised-video-of-racism/

Show this to all your friends/relatives/co-workers who are convinced that the Tea Partiers are the racist ones.

UPDATE:

Been lots of news on this story. To sum up, I’ll simply cut-and-paste from a response to an email about it…

> According to the NBC News report, the story in question actually occurred 20 years ago — when the speaker, Shirley Sherrod, was not yet employed by the Department of Agriculture — and was being used Sherrod as part of a larger tale of how she eventually overcame her racism.

Yup. Been following the story through the day. Imagine that… someone gets accused of racism, and it turns out that the story is incomplete/out of context. I wonder how many Tea Partiers empathize with that?

>She was nonetheless fired by the DOA, which preferred to put the fire of controversy the Brietbart article created.

Yeah, that’s the weird part. After the Obama administration went out of it’s damned way to let black racist criminals off the legal hook with the “New Black Panther” voter intimidation case, they went out of their damned way to throw this woman under the bus. My guess is that it’s in order to help create more “victims of the conservatives/Tea Party.”

The ones who really seem to be in a twist now are the NAACP, who have made a *lot* of blunders recently. They started with their politically motivated attack on Tea Partiers, based on charges of endemic racism that have long since been proven to be fraudulent, and now this. Weird.

The NAACP has added a video of the full speach to YouTube. Far better audio:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=E9NcCa_KjXk

The story seen in the earlier edits starts at about 17 minutes. There’s an odd edit at about 21 minutes where something got chopped out. On the whole, Sherrod seems to come off fairly well out of the speech (NOTE: On *this* topic. She comes off like the stereotypical brain-damaged Leftist as she trots out the usual libtard talking point that the reason why Republicans are opposed to Obamacare is because they’re racist). You know who doesn’t come off well? The NAACP. At about 17:25, she says “… I was trying to decide just how much help I was going to give him.” Audience reaction? Laughter and approval.

 The NAACP needs to look at its *own* racist membership before they start attacking other groups for having racist members.

UPDATE: She ain’t none too damned bright, or she is at least pathologically stuck on the “if they disagree, it’s because they’re racist” meme:  And on CNN, Sherrod said that people who had interpreted her comments to be racist were themselves racist.

 Posted by at 11:56 am
Jul 192010
 

The C-130 has proven to be such a successful design that it has been repeatedly re-designed for two other modes of operation: as an amphibian, and as a VTOL craft. In the 1960’s, Lockheed studied a simple approach… mounting banks of lift jet engines under the wings. Later, North American looked at giving the C-130 new wings with turbofan engines, and making use of the ejector-wing concept (that was shown to be a flop on North American Rockwell’s XFV-12). And as recently as 2003, Lockheed revisited the VTOL C-130 idea, this time giving the plane an all-new sweptback wing with embedded lift fans and tail mounted forward-thrust turbofan engines. The system would use shaft-driven fans, using technology derived from the JSF/X-35/F-35 lift fan system.

Nothing seems to have come of the idea.

vtol-c-130.jpg

 Posted by at 1:19 am
Jul 182010
 

Not Safe For Work. Not even close. Unless you work in a hospital or a morgue. 

Unless you have a fascination either with medical horrors or the results of human stupidity (or you want to scare the bejesus out of some drug-taking kids or something), don’t watch this video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EwHzBB09oBo

It’s a video out of Russia that, if I understand it correctly, shows the results of abuse of the drug Tianeptine. Apparently the story is that the drug comes in pill form, but abusers have taken to crushing, dissolving and injecting it. The problem being, they’re not getting it fully dissolved, so they’re basically injecting chemically powerful grit into their veins. Grit gets stuck in the capilarries; this causes blockage and lack of blood flow. I would imagine that the chemical lodged *right* *there* probably contributes as well. The end result of too much of that sort of thing is the death of tissue and bits of them falling off. But not always the bits at the end… sometimes the bits in the middle.

From looking at the video, it appears that many of the abusers hold off on going to the doctor until whole damned bones are exposed.

Another video showing more of the same sort of thing:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZGkO2xYcEU

 From the looks of it, leg amputation in Russia is an outpatient procedure requiring little more than a bucket and a cable saw (available at Amazon.com for tree fitty), and the assistance of the amputee in holding the limb steady during the procedure. Anasthetic? Pfff. That’s for whiny Westerners.

Ye gods, the things some people willingly do to themselves. This crap makes “Faces Of Meth” look like a beauty pageant.

The one good thing about this is that it appears that in Russia, large sums of public funds are not lavished on the medical care of the abuser. Looks like the basics, and out the door you go. That’s something the US could certainly learn from the Russians. People like these idiots should not expect to be patched up at great public expense… you act stupidly, others should not be forced to bear the burden of trying to patch your ass up.

Video also here for when YouTube gets around to yanking their copy: http://www.documentingreality.com/forum/f149/unhappy-tianeptine-users-from-russia-26157/

 Posted by at 10:33 pm
Jul 182010
 

This story brought to you by the letter “learn some damned chemistry before you go spraying water on a metal fire, dumbass!”

http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hpkiJxWwn1nPeOffnH7m3xhhHqkwD9GUTOAG0

Explosions and fire tore through a block of industrial buildings in South Los Angeles early Wednesday, hurling shrapnel and fist-sized chunks of molten titanium that injured three firefighters.

The metal was inside a company that manufactures titanium golf clubs and it “rained down in a huge fireball of sparks and burning shavings,” Fire Department Battalion Chief Mario Rueda said. “It was unbelievable.”

Titanium stacked inside one building exploded when it was hit with water from fire hoses, Rueda said.

Well, DUH.

And the author of the article goes out of his way to display his ignorance of basic science:

Burning titanium creates its own oxygen that feeds the flames, Rueda said.

(Yes, yes, he’s quoting the clearly ignorant fire chief, but he does not correct the statement.)

For those of you who don’t know (and if you don’t, I really hope you’re not a firefighter), titanium when it burns does not “create its own oxygen.” That would probably require some sort of nuclear fusion process. What it does do is burn like magnesium: white hot and angry. Burns like any other fuel… combusts with the oxygen in the air to form titanium oxide.

What titanium looks like when it burns. Don’t look too close… the bright light and UV will blind you.

Magnesium, titanium and other burnable metals become entertaining when some dumbass sprays water on ’em. The metal fire is hot enough that it actually strips the hydrogen off the oxygen in the water molecule, and then combusts with the oxygen… leaving the superheated hydrogen to float upwards to where it can find free oxygen, at which point the hydrogen now does the little combustion dance.

So if you have a titanium fire, do *not* spray water on it.

There are two basic ways to deal with a titanium fire:

1) Cover it with sand, dirt or salt. These are generally non-combustible and will melt, covering the metal with molten glass or molten salt, sheilding it from oxygen. Fire goes out. *Days* later, after things have cooled down (and not before), you can go in and try to make sense of the mess.

2) Run away. Call your insurance company and write off your losses.

#2 there is the sane choice.

Either the firefighter here were criminally ignorant/negligent, or they were mis/under-informed regarding the contents of the facility.

 NOTE: if you think you might have a metal fire, and actually think you might want to try to put it out, you need to get a “Class D” fire extinguisher. Expensive, heavy as hell, shoots out not water or carbon dioxide (NOTE: burning metals will happily tear the CO2 molecule to shreds and dine on the oxygen, so don’t use one of those, either), but salt, sand, copper powder, graphite, a few others. There are apparently a few water-based solutions which can be used with titanium, but these are specialty substances, not tap water. Each metal requires a different type of Class D extinguisher. Having seen a  few in action (just demonstrations, not, fortunately, on actual fires), they don’t shoot the salt out, they just sort of barf it out. So you have to be right on top of the fire. 

Most titanium alloys are pretty fire resistant… you can weld ’em, grind ’em (producing a shower of white – not yellow – sparks), zap ’em with lasers, and the most they’ll do is melt. But pure titanium is reasonably bad news, and pretty much any titanium alloy *will* combust if you get it hot enough, and then supply enough oxidizer.

 Posted by at 3:30 pm
Jul 182010
 

Hmmm.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/WORLD/asiapcf/07/16/facebook.skin.lightening.app/?hpt=C2

Short form: Vaseline has a Facebook application which will digitally “whiten” the skin in photos, to simulate the performance of a skin-whitening cream. This has enraged a lot of people, who see it as racist.

As did I, in fact. But then, I started to read the statement issues by Vaseline, and only got this far before my brain switched sides:

“Much like self-tanning products…”

Hmmm. If it’s racist to make a product that lightens the skin, then it seems to me it’s just as racist to make a product that *darkens* the skin. To suggest otherwise is to imply that it’s better to be dark than light… which is a generally recognized racist position to hold if you simply transpose “dark” and “light.”

So… hmmm. I’ve switched from seeing these skin lightening products as racist to seeing the *users* of these products as simply the Indian equivalent of orange-tanned Guidos.

 Posted by at 11:28 am
Jul 182010
 

Yikes:

http://torrentfreak.com/u-s-authorities-shut-down-wordpress-host-with-73000-blogs-100716/

After the U.S. Government took action against several sites connected to movie streaming recently, nerves are jangling over the possibility that this is just the beginning of a wider crackdown. Now it appears that a free blogging platform has been taken down by its hosting provider on orders from the U.S. authorities on grounds of “a history of abuse”. More than 73,000 blogs are out of action as a result.

It appears that some of the blogs hosted by Blogetery.com were being used for illegal file sharing. So the FedGuv took not only those blogs down… but *all* of them. Kinda like burning down a library because a few of the books were unauthorized copies.  Additionally, it appears that the data for the blogs may be unrecoverable. Lost forever.

First Amendment implications? Oh, you betcha.

First thing I did when I read this was to download and use the “WP-DB-Backup” plugin for my WordPress blog and make a backup that I’ve downloaded. Disturbingly, it’s only 3.5 megabytes in size, so I’m guessing that it did not back up any of the images.

 Posted by at 11:23 am
Jul 182010
 

One of the ways in which FDR helped to screw over the American populace was to make it illegal to own gold bullion and coins and certificates. And it wasn’t until Gerald Ford that people could own gold again. Well, it’s startign to look like we’re slipping back that way again:

http://www.numismaster.com/ta/numis/Article.jsp?ad=article&ArticleId=11843

What has happened is that effective Jan. 1, 2012, the whole system of giving and receiving Internal Revenue Service 1099 forms will be turned on its head and all persons (including corporations) who are in business will now have to give 1099 tax reporting forms for coins and other goods that they sell as well as buy.

The responsibility for issuing forms kicks in at $600 for coins or bullion – not a very high level and one that has already started sounding alarm bells. It doesn’t matter in what form payment is made, whether cash, check, credit card, or Yap stone money, the $600 threshold applies.

Translation: the buying or selling of a one-ounce gold coin – which last I check would run you about $1200 – would require that the IRS be informed. And in what financial reform law is this new regualtion installed within? Why, Section 9006 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“Obamacare”), of course!

What in the hell is this doing in a health care law?

 Posted by at 10:16 am
Jul 172010
 

The operating principle of the Nuclear Lightbulb is simple: a self-sustaining uranium plasma would be contained within a glass vessel; radiant energy would pass through the “bulb” and heat hydrogen gas surrounding it, which in turn would be contained within a metal chamber. The superheated gas would then pass through a nozzle and generate thrust in the normal fashion.

While simple to describe, almost nothing about this was simple to design. The engineering involved would have been monumental. And while the Nuclear Lightbulb is typically described in simple terms and illustrated with simple sketches, it turns out that a lot of work was done on this engine concept, (seemingly) mostly by the United Aircraft Corporation. The United Tech Research Lab produced a fairly detailed design for a reference engine, and did much more work – including many physical experiments – on the component designs than is generally known. The reference engine had seven separate “bulbs,” each a cylinder 6 feet long by 2.3 feet in diameter. The engine operated at 500 atmospheres pressure.

First off, the uranium plasma. Generating the plasma would be fairly straightforward… simply get enough of the right fissile material into an enclosed volume of the right size, and nuclear chain reactions will do the job. In this case, a critical mass of 34.7 pounds of Uranium 233 spread between the seven chambers would cause the uranium to melt, vaporize and finally become a plasma.

Step one in the process would be to actually gather that much U233 within the chambers. Obviously it could not be stored as a solid block, but instead scattered and diffuse so that nuclear reactions would not begin until it was in the reactor. In order to accomplish this, three methods were proposed:

1) Store the uranium in the form of uranium hexafluoride (UF6). The UF6 gas would be simply pumped or injected into the reactors like any other gas. Storage of the UF6 was not described, but it probably would have involved very large tanks of very low pressure (and thus low density) filled with a neutron absorbing foam. As the UF6 began to gather under increasing pressure and density, nuclear reactions would begin to take hold and the temperature would increase. At a pressure of 200 psi, the UF6 would totally dissociate by 13,000 degrees Rankine, allowing the fluorine to be drawn off from the Uranium. The problem, of course, is that the byproduct would be fluorine gas at about 13,000 degrees Rankine. Fluorine is trouble enough at room temperature. While the gas would be cooled prior to contact with any solid structural material, fluorine that can be described in any way as “hot” is a terrifying notion.

2) Inject molten uranium. This, however, would require some means to melt the uranium, as well as inject it. The melting temperature of uranium is 1403 degrees Kelvin; while this is by no means impossibly hot to work with (metals such as tungsten and many ceramics have melting points far higher), it would still be a complication. While the plan was that the molten uranium would be injected into the reactor in the form of an aerosol suspended within a high temperature carrier gas such as neon, it was expected that the uranium would plate on the mechanical portions of the injector system.

3) A third option was similar to the molten uranium aerosol, but with the temperature lowered so that the uranium was still a solid. Here the uranium would be divided into an extremely fine dust… pumpable, injectable, would not plate out onto the structural surfaces. As the dust begins to build up within the reactor, nuclear chain reactions would cause it to heat, eventually becoming a plasma. Once the full critical mass was injected into the reactor and the system reached equilibrium, the plasma would reach an average temperature of 42,000 degrees Rankine (23,333 Kelvin). This superheated plasma would glow fiercely, providing the radiant energy needed to superheat the hydrogen propellant. But there is no material known, certainly no transparent material, that can withstand anything remotely like the temperature of the uranium plasma. A solution to containment, however, was found.

To be continued…

 Posted by at 10:12 am
Jul 172010
 

http://abcnews.go.com/Nightline/atheists-conduct-de-baptisms/story?id=11109379&page=1

Wielding a blow-dryer, a leading atheist conducted a mass “de-baptism” of fellow non-believers and symbolically dried up the offending waters that were sprinkled on their foreheads as young children.

Silly? Obviously. What purpose does it serve? Well, it probably amuses the hell out of the atheists involved… and since it harms nobody, that’s reason enough right there. Secondly, there’s a reason given that I’ve found true quite often myself:

“I think the reason they are worried and concerned is the very deep fear that if everyone doesn’t believe it, maybe it isn’t so.

In my experience, those who are comfortable and secure in their faith don’t freak out at light-hearted blasphemy. The freaking-out is left to those who are *not* secure, those who believe not because they believe, but because they want to believe. They believe because they’ve bought into the flawed notions underlying Pascals Wager (whether or not they’ve ever actually heard of it).

There is a danger here. The danger, of course, is not from the atheists mocking religious beliefs or rituals, but from the religious getting laws passed to protect themselves from mockery. This blog has posted numerous times about humorless Islamic fanatics going nuts over some harmless cartoon, anti-blasphmey laws, and attempts on the part of the politically correct to shut down mockery or dissention on religious matters. “You can mock anything you want because you have the right to,” he said. “Humor is humor and what types of humor are you going to outlaw?” he said. What types of humor are going to be outlawed? Any type of humor that makes someone feel bad or uncomfortable would seem to be the answer to that question. Texts messages with lame, harmless jokes get met with criminal complaints.

Whether you believe in the rituals or not, whether you find the mockery amusing or not… so long as nobody is being harmed, you should find no reason to want to see them banned by law or sued out of existence. No person has the right to not be offended or to have his most cherished beliefs not be questioned or challenged. Anyone who would have laws passed to “protect” his faith is, well… a scumbag and a coward. And will spend his afterlife freezing in Niflhel until Ragnarok.

Lighten the hell up.

 Posted by at 9:22 am