Sep 062019
 

The Indian moon lander seems to have crashed. It started to go off course about 2 miles above the surface and communications shut off about 1.3 miles up.

In April the Israeli Beresheet lander also failed during the landing attempt.

This sort of thing says nothing about the organizations behind the landers other than “landing robots on distant worlds is hard.” There ain’t no shame in getting *that* close. The only shame is in either giving up… or in not trying in the first place. More than fifty years after Surveyor, the moon *should* be littered with the corpses of hundreds of first landers launched by countries large and small, corporations, organizations, private individuals. And next to those dead bits of wreckage should be the followup landers that learned from the failures and finally succeeded. And yet… when you ask here the Canadian, Australian, German, Korean, Irish, Swedish, Brazilian, KFC, USAF, USN, MIT landers are, where the *hundreds* of American and Russian landers are, you get blank stares.

India Loses Contact With Chandrayaan-2 Mission During Moon Landing Attempt

 

 Posted by at 3:44 pm
Sep 062019
 

I’m selling off a chunk of my library. Below is a link to a PDF catalog with thirty books, all of which I’m selling for five dollars ($5) each plus postage. If you are interested, just send me an email letting me know which one(s) you want and what your mailing address is. First responder for any book gets it.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s3oc8d2tdup687f/books%20for%20sale%209-6-2019.pdf?dl=0

Also available is a multi-volume report on the Space Station as envisioned in 1984. This is available to the first responder for $60 plus postage.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ev8cdujenszxu99/stationdocs.pdf?dl=0

If interested, send an email to

I’m also pondering selling off a whole bunch of sci-fi paperbacks in lots.

 Posted by at 3:09 pm
Sep 052019
 

In 1985, just as Rockwell thought that a case might be made for an Aft Cargo Carrier for larger-diameter payload to fit behind the Shuttle External tank, there were those who believed that a case could be made for a *forward* cargo carrier for even bigger-diameter payloads. This “hammerhead” payload shroud would be much more conventional than the ACC and would not need to deal with the thermal issues of getting baked by the SSME and RSRM exhausts. it would have to withstand aerodynamic forces, but those are much better characterized.

An advantage of the “hammerhead” was that it allowed quite sizable payloads, but at a substantial mass penalty. Details from other sources are sparse on exactly *what* payload, but one item illustrated is a space-based laser with a very large primary mirror. A NASA mission would be for a “very large space telescope,” a follow-on to Hubble with a much larger mirror. Pretty much what became the Webb.

This very concept was described further and illustrated with diagrams in US Launch Vehicle Projects #01. Why not pick up a copy?

 

 

 Posted by at 10:53 pm
Sep 052019
 

A little while ago, CNN had a reporter at the Grand Bahama airport showing damage from hurricane Dorian. The terminal appeared to have been virtually cleaned out; the external walls seemed to still be there, the ceiling and roof were still there, but the windows were blown out and all the internal structures and furnishings appeared to have been utterly blown out. it looked like a warehouse with a bit of rubbish scattered about.

This is of course bad, but the “journalist” desribing the situation decided thatn hyperbole was the order of the day: he claimed that the *airport* was destroyed and that aircraft would not be able to get in to provide relief, and that they’d have to rely on ships and such.

Ummm… I’m *pretty* sure that the US Marines would look at an airport with a trashed terminal and non-blown-up runways as a virtual paradise for cargo helicopters. I’m *pretty* sure that C-130’s would be able to land and take off from those runways with no trouble whatsoever. Maybe it would be nice if the Marines could get some V-22’s to drop off some combat engineers to, I dunno, run a sweeper over the runways to get sharp pointy bits of metal off the runway, but once that’s done, the C-130’s and C-17’s should be able to land just fine. Planes like those, *pilots* like those, don’t need terminals or towers. Jut a few hundred feet of concrete.

I suppose it’s possible that the runways themselves *are* trashed. Strong enough winds can rip up surfaces; tornadoes have from time to time been known to rip asphalt roads from the ground and send slabs flying. But tornadoes are a different order of wind speed than hurricanes; it’ll take more than sustained hurricane force winds to yoink slabs of concrete a foot or more thick out of the ground.

ᛞᚩᚾ’ᛏ ᛒᛖ ᚪ ᛞᚪᛗᛒᚪᛋᛋ

 Posted by at 10:03 am
Sep 052019
 

With my doubtless unsurprising to most realization that emojis can be slapped into blog post titles, it’s perhaps unsurprising that other non-standard symbols can as well, such as “annoy the frak out of anti-Swedish SwedesNorse runes. I suspect that not all systems will display them, though. If the headline and block of text below appear as anything other than the runes we all should have been taught in school rather than having had our time wasted in learning dead languages such as Latin and Spanish or indoctrinated with wokeness studies, let me know in the comments what you’re viewing it on.

 

ᚹᛖ’ᚢᛖ ᛗᚪᛞᛖ ᛏᚩᚩ ᛗᚪᚾᚤ ᛣᚩᛗᛇᚱᚩᛗᛁᛋᛖᛋ ᚪᛚᚱᛖᚪᛞᚤ, ᛏᚩᚩ ᛗᚪᚾᚤ ᚱᛖᛏᚱᛖᚪᛏᛋ. ᛖᚤ ᛁᚾᚡᚪᛞᛖ
ᚩᚪᚱ ᛋᛇᚪᛣᛖ, ᚪᚾᛞ ᚥᛖ ᚠᚪᛚᛚ ᛒᚪᛣᚳ. ᛖᚤ ᚪᛋᛋᛁᛗᛁᛚᚪᛏᛖ ᛖᚾᛏᛁᚱᛖ ᚥᚩᚱᛚᛞᛋ, ᚪᚾᛞ ᚥᛖ ᚠᚪᛚᛚ
ᛒᚪᛣᚳ. ᚾᚩᛏ ᚪᚷᚪᛁᚾ. ᚦᛖ ᛚᛁᚾᛖ ᛗᚪᛋᛏ ᛒᛖ ᛞᚱᚪᚥᚾ ᚻᛖᚱᛖ! ᛁᛋ ᚠᚪᚱ, ᚪᚾᛞ ᚾᚩ ᚠᚪᚱᛖᚱ!

 

 Posted by at 12:10 am
Sep 042019
 

US Bomber Projects #22 and Transport Projects #09 are now available.

US Bomber Projects #22

Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US Bomber Projects #22 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #22 includes:

  • GD/NASA Mach 5 Cruise Waverider: A 1990’s design very much like the “Aurora”
  • NASA SR-2P Dash-On-Warning: a vertically launched ICBM carrier
  • Republic MX-773B-2: a two-stage ramjet surface-to-surface missile
  • Convair Subsonic Nuclear Carrier Based Aircraft: A miniature naval NX-2
  • Consolidated Vultee “Parallel Staged Operational Missile:” an unusual early configuration for the Atlas ICBM
  • Convair MX-1626: an early B-36-carried design leading to the B-58
  • Boeing B-52X: a trie of layouts for four-engined B-52s
  • Boeing Model 988-122/123: A highly maneuverable stealthy flying wing

USBP #22 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

——–


Don’t forget to pick up the previous issue, US Bomber Projects #21

 

Also available:

US Transport Projects #09

Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US Transport Projects #09 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #09 includes:

  • Convair 58-9 SST: A design fora preliminary low-capacity test SST
  • Boeing Model 757-3150: An important step in the development of the 747
  • Convair Nuclear Powered GEM Aircraft Carrier: a fast long-range strike carrier
  • Aero Spacelines “Pregnant Princess:” A jet-propelled Saturn rocket carrier
  • Seversky Executive: A 1930’s design for a prop-powered “business jet”
  • Williams International V-Jet: A 1980’s concept for a small executive transport
  • Lockheed L-152-15: A very early jetliner
  • Lockheed Martin 777F-sized Hybrid Wing body: A very recent large and efficient cargo transport

USTP #09 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

——–


Don’t forget the previous issue, US Transport Projects #08…

 Posted by at 12:11 am
Sep 032019
 

Dave Chappelle’s new special on Netflix is far from right wing in its message… but it’s also far from politically correct. As mentioned a few days ago, it has irritated the frak out of the professional outrage mafia. For a while there, it had a whopping *ZERO* percent score on Rotten Tomatoes. But RT has finally added the audience score, and the difference is kinda stark:

Dave Chappelle: Sticks & Stones

I can’t help but wonder, AGAIN, if any of the woketarians realize that it is they who are badly out of step with the public and humanity as a whole. I suspect, though, that many, most, perhaps effectively all of them believe that they are superior examples of the species and the rest of humanity just needs to be led like sheep to a brighter more woke dawn.

 Posted by at 5:15 pm
Sep 032019
 

So a *lot* or people have been protesting in Hong Kong over their local government kowtowing to the Chinese Communist government. This is hardly surprising… people who lived *under* Communism for their entire lives protested the ChiComs in Tienanmen Square a few decades ago, so it makes sense that people who live under a kinda free market democratic system would chafe under the BS that Communist totalitarianism provides. But the Hong Kongers are apparently big fans not only of the United States, but Donald Trump in particular. Now, being fans of the US when faced with Communism makes sense, but I kinda figured the HKers would be more about “HK Nationalism,” or maybe even Britain. Bringing Trump into it is just amusement.

And it’s not surprising that people of Chinese/Hong Kong extraction around the world are also holding local protests. Australia has a lot of Chinese immigrants and their offspring; coupled with the fact that china is pretty close, it’s entirely unsurprising that there are pro-HK/Anti-ChiCom protests in Australia. But as they always do, Antifa goes and sows grade-A idiot level chaos. The video below features an Australian Jew interviewing Australian anti-Communism protestor, and then being told to leave said protest by PRO-Communist Antifa morons, because the Jew is a Nazi.

Clown world, baby. (Huh… looks like I can post emojis in the headlines. That’s an advancement of dubious value…)

I honestly wonder if these Antifi jackholes actually think that they are supporting the Hong Kongers when they show up to support Socialism and Communism.

 Posted by at 10:14 am