Sep 032019
 

Dave Chappelle’s new special on Netflix is far from right wing in its message… but it’s also far from politically correct. As mentioned a few days ago, it has irritated the frak out of the professional outrage mafia. For a while there, it had a whopping *ZERO* percent score on Rotten Tomatoes. But RT has finally added the audience score, and the difference is kinda stark:

Dave Chappelle: Sticks & Stones

I can’t help but wonder, AGAIN, if any of the woketarians realize that it is they who are badly out of step with the public and humanity as a whole. I suspect, though, that many, most, perhaps effectively all of them believe that they are superior examples of the species and the rest of humanity just needs to be led like sheep to a brighter more woke dawn.

 Posted by at 5:15 pm
Sep 032019
 

So a *lot* or people have been protesting in Hong Kong over their local government kowtowing to the Chinese Communist government. This is hardly surprising… people who lived *under* Communism for their entire lives protested the ChiComs in Tienanmen Square a few decades ago, so it makes sense that people who live under a kinda free market democratic system would chafe under the BS that Communist totalitarianism provides. But the Hong Kongers are apparently big fans not only of the United States, but Donald Trump in particular. Now, being fans of the US when faced with Communism makes sense, but I kinda figured the HKers would be more about “HK Nationalism,” or maybe even Britain. Bringing Trump into it is just amusement.

And it’s not surprising that people of Chinese/Hong Kong extraction around the world are also holding local protests. Australia has a lot of Chinese immigrants and their offspring; coupled with the fact that china is pretty close, it’s entirely unsurprising that there are pro-HK/Anti-ChiCom protests in Australia. But as they always do, Antifa goes and sows grade-A idiot level chaos. The video below features an Australian Jew interviewing Australian anti-Communism protestor, and then being told to leave said protest by PRO-Communist Antifa morons, because the Jew is a Nazi.

Clown world, baby. (Huh… looks like I can post emojis in the headlines. That’s an advancement of dubious value…)

I honestly wonder if these Antifi jackholes actually think that they are supporting the Hong Kongers when they show up to support Socialism and Communism.

 Posted by at 10:14 am
Sep 022019
 

Continuing…

As part of Rockwells 1985 ponderings of what they could do to dredge up more business, the notion of liquid propellant rocket boosters (LRBs) were floated. The idea of LRB’s has been a part of the Shuttle program since the beginning, and ran not only until the end of the program but beyond it: the Shuttle derived SLS vehicle uses derivatives of the Shuttle solid rocket boosters, and there are those who would like to see them replaced with LRBs.

LRBs would theoretically provide improved performance due to the higher specific impulse that liquid propellants offer. Their recovery, refurbishment and reuse would also theoretically be improved; as SpaceX has shown, the refurbishment of a recovered liquid rocket booster is a far simpler operation than the refurbishment of a solid rocket booster. From Rockwell’s point of view, the LRB had one great advantage over SRBs: Rockwell was not the prime contractor for the SRB. They could be for the LRB.

Note that the illustration below seems to show existing SRB casings repurposed into LRBs. This would of course not happen. The LRBs would be relatively smooth and featureless, without the raised field joints used to bolt the several segments of the casing together (this is likely an existing pen&ink sketch of the standard STS with some changes to the business ends of the boosters). However, the use of four engines per booster and the addition of clamshell waterproof closures to keep the engines dry after splashdown was a common feature of such designs. The use of a wide range of liquid fuels was studied… hydrogen, propane, methane and kerosene being the most commonly studied. Hydrogen was probably the usual favorite due to the high performance and the fact that the launch facilities were already plumbed for hydrogen. But a hydrogen fueled LRB would be very fat compared to the standard SRB; this would put the outboard engines well outside the exhaust pass-thoughts in the launch platform, meaning substantial launch facility modification would be required.

Next up: hammerhead ETs

 Posted by at 8:50 am
Sep 012019
 

Continuing…

In 1985 Rockwell gave thought to adding relatively small liquid propellant boosters to the undersides of the Orbiters wings. Even though the boosters were relatively small, with only a single RL-10 engine fed from low-density, narrow-diameter liquid hydrogen tanks. Even so, Rockwell projected an additional 15,000 pounds of payload. This would seem to require some interesting modifications to the underside of the wings… not just adding mounting hardpoints, but doors that could close over them after the boosters are jettisoned.

 

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 12:37 am
Aug 312019
 

As a followup to my previous post about masterfully crated puppet monsters, here’s a story about a haphazardly crafted monstrous puppet.

Racist troll explains how her former friends would do anything for her but give up their whiteness

One Saira Rao, famous in her little niche for reasons that escape me, recently went on a Twitter tirade about how she’d lecture and cajole and preach at her white female friends about how they have inherently evil whiteness in their DNA, then she was all kinds of shocked that they all decided that they’d be happier with her not being in their lives.

 Posted by at 7:13 pm
Aug 312019
 

RECOMMENDED.

Kudos to Netflix and the Henson company. They did NOT halfass this.

The puppetry fits *almost* seamlessly with that of the original movie… just better. There is substantial CGI here, but it is for the most part “invisible” CGI: the deletion of puppeteers and the like. There is also the addition of CGI tongues for the Skeksis… it works, but it’s a noticeable change. The story is good; it’s a prequel set years before the original movie when the Gelfling civilization is still a going concern. The story is not terribly silly, though there is some of that; instead, it is surprisingly dark at times. Death appears with some regularity. And of course there’s the knowledge hanging over the viewers heads that no matter what these characters do, they and their civilization are doomed. Sometime soon will come a genocide and the near-extinction (and perhaps eventual full extinction) of their race.

The voice acting was good. Simon Pegg – “Shaun of the Dead” – does a pretty good Chamberlain; Mark Hamill sounds different from the original “Scientist,” but that’s ok… he turns in a great semi-Joker performance. And the voice actress for Aughra is as spot-on as physically possible.

After the last episode is a “making of special” included in that is a 2016 screen test showing a puppet Skeksi and a CGI Gelfling… and, man, good thing they said “how about we just stick to puppets.”

 

Basically, if you liked the original, it’s a safe bet you’ll be pleased with this series. Here’s hoping it gets a few more seasons to finish the story they’re trying to tell. It doesn’t end on a cliffhanger as such, but it’s still far from being complete.

 Posted by at 6:46 pm
Aug 302019
 

Research Finds Genetic Links to Same-Sex Behavior

Full article is behind a paywall, but apparently the claim is that five genetic marker point towards a partial explanation of homosexuality. If borne out by further studies, this would go far towards putting to be the ridiculous notion that sexuality is a choice. And if it’s borne out, the next step will be to commercialize a simple genetic test for the newly pregnant. Which would lead to an increase in profits for certain companies and organizations. You might not like it, but you *know* it’s coming. And so some *quality* political chaps will come as all of a sudden people start switching sides on the issues of “abortion at any time for any reason” and “there’s never a good reason to abort a baby.”

 Posted by at 1:35 pm
Aug 302019
 

The forthcoming movie “Ad Astra” is, so far, pretty mysterious. It has looked pretty interesting, dare I say intriguing. And then…

Brad Pitt: Space movie ‘Ad Astra’ also about toxic masculinity

For frak’s sake. “Ad Astra” is, to all appearances, a serious, science fiction/adventure/action movie. Who the frak do you think your audience is? My guess: exactly the sort of people who are quite sufficiently sick and damn tired of hearing about the supposed evils of “toxic masculinity.”

The article itself does not read as horrible as the headline suggests. But as”First Man” showed, it doesn’t take much to irritate the potential viewers. In a story where the hero has to save the world, where if he fails everybody dies, “emotional vulnerability” is a weakness you can’t afford. It may well be fine to have a main character who has the character flaw of emotional troubles, but he has to overcome, bypass, defeat that weakness and get the damn job done. Luke Skywalker? Just lost his family, left the only home he ever knew, just saw his mentor disappear in a puff of logic. So what does he do? Sucks it up, straps on a starfighter and blows up a few million Imperial noncombatants. James T. kirk was upset from time to time, but he’d die before displaying emotional weakness.

 Posted by at 1:20 pm
Aug 302019
 

There are often massive differences between audience and professional critic scores for various movies. And then sometimes the audience and the critics agree that this movie was great or that movie sucked. It enough to make reliance upon critics a dubious prospect. You just can’t tell if the professional telling you that Entertainment Product you were interested in was good/bad is worth listening to, especially if you don’t have a track record with that critic.

But sometimes you don’t need to know a specific critic to be able to make a determination of whether that thing they’re talking about is worth your time. Behold:

Buzzfeed: Dave Chappelle Doesn’t Need To Punch Down

The Atlantic: The Fear in Dave Chappelle’s New Special

And Vice: You Can Definitely Skip Dave Chappelle’s New Netflix Special ‘Sticks & Stones’

The Woke Media basically *hated* the new Dave Chappelle special on Netflix. Why? Because he correctly pointed out that in todays culture you don’t dare offend The Alphabet People. Because he correctly called out cancel culture. Because he continued the long tradition of making uncomfortable humor. Being this cheesed off at someone who, politically, is one of their own (he is an Obama worshipper) honestly comes across like religious fanatics yelling “heretic” at a co-religionist who disagrees on some small matter of doctrine.

The plethora of *negative* reviews is honestly quite useful. If they were this angry at someone who had fallen from the true faith, but who wasn’t very good, they’d likely just mumble some stuff about “it wasn’t very good.” This level of effort at steering people away, though, tells you they *know* it’s good and they don’t want people being exposed to heresy.

If you have an hour and a half (an hour for the special,a  bit short of half an hour for an epilogue) and don;t mind being offended while laughing your butt off, and if you have Netflix, give “Sticks & Stones” a watch.

 

Note: I love the “he’s punching down” argument when it comes to making fun of the internet outrage mob. This amorphous vile entity is second only to the government in terms of power, and second to none in terms of striking speed and the ability to ruin lives at a distance for stuff that happened long prior to the term of the statute of limitations.

 Posted by at 9:56 am