Sep 072019
 

Author Walter Mosley Quits ‘Star Trek: Discovery’ After Using N-Word in Writers Room

If you’re like me, your first thought on reading that headline is “Walter Who???” So I looked him up on Wikipedia and, much to my surprise, he actually has a *few* science fiction titles under his belt. However, the great bulk of his writing is crime fiction. Maybe he was supposed to write Dixon Hill holodeck scenarios or something.

His trouble sounds, at first glance, like the sort of nonsense we’ve come to roll our eyes at… he was called up by HR and told that his repeated use of the “N-Word” in the workplace was a firable offence. But he claims that he did not use it to refer to other people there, but instead while describing what he said were autobiographical tales of Los Angeles cops using that word on *him.*  At that level, it certainly sounds like he is in the “if this was a rational world” clear. But there are other factors to consider. Look at his Wikipedia writeup. It certainly *seems* like he may have a bit of an obsession on the subject of race; while he’s publishing books, getting paid for movie rights and working on Star Trek, he’s doubtless also complaining about how he’s oppressed by white privilege at the same time I can’t find a publisher to even look at my work and I’m pulling books off my shelf to sell. My sympathy for him declines somewhat. So it may well be that what annoyed whoever it was ho snitched on him to HR wasn’t his use of the “N-Word,” but his incessant, nonstop harping on on the subject

What’s better: when called  on the phone by HR, he promptly quit. Didn’t fight it. Now, if *I* was working on a Star Trek series that I truly believed in and someone tried farkin’ with my job there, I’d fight it tooth and nail. This guy? “Meh, I’m out.” Says much about not only his devotion to crafting quality Star Trek, but also about everyone else there as well if he is the kind of guy they bring in to write.

Even betterer:

Mosley ended his op-ed by saying, “The worst thing you can do to citizens of a democratic nation is to silence them.” He elaborated, “And the easiest way to silence a woman or a man is to threaten his or her livelihood. Let’s not accept the McCarthyism of secret condemnation. Instead let’s delve a little deeper, limiting the power that can be exerted over our citizens, their attempts to express their hearts and horrors, and their desire to speak their truths. Only this can open the dialogue of change.”

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!! yeah, good luck with that, bucko. Your pals are trying to “cancel” Dave Chappelle for saying things that hurt their feelings. The outrage mafia is taking down comedians for stuff they did  *years* ago.  Entire fire departments are getting shut down because one volunteer had gone to a few Proud Boy meetings. So don’t act shocked when you get a call from HR for saying The Naughty Word repeatedly in the workplace.

And this pretty much defines the problem with Star Trek today:

It’s worth noting that Discovery has a particularly inclusive writers room that includes three African American scribes, two Asian American writers, a Native American and Latinx woman, among others.

Inclusivity in modern Star Trek covers ethnicity, but not, it seems, a diversity of *quality* science fiction authoring experience.

 Posted by at 12:39 am
Sep 062019
 

Behold Philco-Ford Corporation’s conception of the fantastic futuristic year 1999AD. The date isn’t given, but it’s for the Corps 75th anniversary, so circa 1967.

There is, unsurprisingly, a mix of “not even close” and “well, kinda.” Your average Dad will have spent ten years in college majoring in astrophysics and minoring in biology, and as a hobby he will genetically engineer floral abominations. In 1999, your average housewife will buy clothes and other useless crap on the computer that is connected to a wide interlinked network of other computers including various online retailers. The household computer will also have cameras all over so that the whole place is under surveillance. Banking and something akin to emails (though, oddly, handwritten) are also done on the household computer. But where this, as with many predictions, gets it wrong is the assumption that different functions will be carried out by different machines, rather than one single device that can pretty  much do everything. The household sickbay is… bizarre. The remote control for the TV is *hilariously* gigantic, but at least the party where they watch the big-screen 3D TV is so awful (and full of the sort of pretentious pricks that you want to beat to death with a Louisville Slugger) it would make you want to kill yourself. Briefly shown is the Ford “Seattle-ite” concept car from 1962, which was damn near a parody of the big tailfin design ethic that had died out by the time the film was made. It was designed by Alex Tremulis and HAD A NUCLEAR POWERPLANT.

On the whole this thing comes off almost as a tie-in to “2001: A Space Odyssey.” The technology seems like it would fit squarely into that world; there’s even an almost visually identical game of computer chess played at one point.

I’ve never seen this before today, but I started having flashbacks to the 70’s when I heard the narrator voice. If you’re old enough, you too will doubtless go ‘hey, wait, I know that voice…”

ᚾᚪᛣᛚᛖᚪᚱ ᚠᚪᛣᚳᛁᚾᚷ ᚪᚪᛏᚩᛗᚩᛒᛁᛚᛖᛋ, ᛒᚪᛒᚤ!

 Posted by at 11:22 pm
Sep 062019
 

The Indian moon lander seems to have crashed. It started to go off course about 2 miles above the surface and communications shut off about 1.3 miles up.

In April the Israeli Beresheet lander also failed during the landing attempt.

This sort of thing says nothing about the organizations behind the landers other than “landing robots on distant worlds is hard.” There ain’t no shame in getting *that* close. The only shame is in either giving up… or in not trying in the first place. More than fifty years after Surveyor, the moon *should* be littered with the corpses of hundreds of first landers launched by countries large and small, corporations, organizations, private individuals. And next to those dead bits of wreckage should be the followup landers that learned from the failures and finally succeeded. And yet… when you ask here the Canadian, Australian, German, Korean, Irish, Swedish, Brazilian, KFC, USAF, USN, MIT landers are, where the *hundreds* of American and Russian landers are, you get blank stares.

India Loses Contact With Chandrayaan-2 Mission During Moon Landing Attempt

 

 Posted by at 3:44 pm
Sep 062019
 

I’m selling off a chunk of my library. Below is a link to a PDF catalog with thirty books, all of which I’m selling for five dollars ($5) each plus postage. If you are interested, just send me an email letting me know which one(s) you want and what your mailing address is. First responder for any book gets it.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/s3oc8d2tdup687f/books%20for%20sale%209-6-2019.pdf?dl=0

Also available is a multi-volume report on the Space Station as envisioned in 1984. This is available to the first responder for $60 plus postage.

https://www.dropbox.com/s/ev8cdujenszxu99/stationdocs.pdf?dl=0

If interested, send an email to

I’m also pondering selling off a whole bunch of sci-fi paperbacks in lots.

 Posted by at 3:09 pm
Sep 052019
 

In 1985, just as Rockwell thought that a case might be made for an Aft Cargo Carrier for larger-diameter payload to fit behind the Shuttle External tank, there were those who believed that a case could be made for a *forward* cargo carrier for even bigger-diameter payloads. This “hammerhead” payload shroud would be much more conventional than the ACC and would not need to deal with the thermal issues of getting baked by the SSME and RSRM exhausts. it would have to withstand aerodynamic forces, but those are much better characterized.

An advantage of the “hammerhead” was that it allowed quite sizable payloads, but at a substantial mass penalty. Details from other sources are sparse on exactly *what* payload, but one item illustrated is a space-based laser with a very large primary mirror. A NASA mission would be for a “very large space telescope,” a follow-on to Hubble with a much larger mirror. Pretty much what became the Webb.

This very concept was described further and illustrated with diagrams in US Launch Vehicle Projects #01. Why not pick up a copy?

 

 

 Posted by at 10:53 pm
Sep 052019
 

A little while ago, CNN had a reporter at the Grand Bahama airport showing damage from hurricane Dorian. The terminal appeared to have been virtually cleaned out; the external walls seemed to still be there, the ceiling and roof were still there, but the windows were blown out and all the internal structures and furnishings appeared to have been utterly blown out. it looked like a warehouse with a bit of rubbish scattered about.

This is of course bad, but the “journalist” desribing the situation decided thatn hyperbole was the order of the day: he claimed that the *airport* was destroyed and that aircraft would not be able to get in to provide relief, and that they’d have to rely on ships and such.

Ummm… I’m *pretty* sure that the US Marines would look at an airport with a trashed terminal and non-blown-up runways as a virtual paradise for cargo helicopters. I’m *pretty* sure that C-130’s would be able to land and take off from those runways with no trouble whatsoever. Maybe it would be nice if the Marines could get some V-22’s to drop off some combat engineers to, I dunno, run a sweeper over the runways to get sharp pointy bits of metal off the runway, but once that’s done, the C-130’s and C-17’s should be able to land just fine. Planes like those, *pilots* like those, don’t need terminals or towers. Jut a few hundred feet of concrete.

I suppose it’s possible that the runways themselves *are* trashed. Strong enough winds can rip up surfaces; tornadoes have from time to time been known to rip asphalt roads from the ground and send slabs flying. But tornadoes are a different order of wind speed than hurricanes; it’ll take more than sustained hurricane force winds to yoink slabs of concrete a foot or more thick out of the ground.

ᛞᚩᚾ’ᛏ ᛒᛖ ᚪ ᛞᚪᛗᛒᚪᛋᛋ

 Posted by at 10:03 am
Sep 052019
 

With my doubtless unsurprising to most realization that emojis can be slapped into blog post titles, it’s perhaps unsurprising that other non-standard symbols can as well, such as “annoy the frak out of anti-Swedish SwedesNorse runes. I suspect that not all systems will display them, though. If the headline and block of text below appear as anything other than the runes we all should have been taught in school rather than having had our time wasted in learning dead languages such as Latin and Spanish or indoctrinated with wokeness studies, let me know in the comments what you’re viewing it on.

 

ᚹᛖ’ᚢᛖ ᛗᚪᛞᛖ ᛏᚩᚩ ᛗᚪᚾᚤ ᛣᚩᛗᛇᚱᚩᛗᛁᛋᛖᛋ ᚪᛚᚱᛖᚪᛞᚤ, ᛏᚩᚩ ᛗᚪᚾᚤ ᚱᛖᛏᚱᛖᚪᛏᛋ. ᛖᚤ ᛁᚾᚡᚪᛞᛖ
ᚩᚪᚱ ᛋᛇᚪᛣᛖ, ᚪᚾᛞ ᚥᛖ ᚠᚪᛚᛚ ᛒᚪᛣᚳ. ᛖᚤ ᚪᛋᛋᛁᛗᛁᛚᚪᛏᛖ ᛖᚾᛏᛁᚱᛖ ᚥᚩᚱᛚᛞᛋ, ᚪᚾᛞ ᚥᛖ ᚠᚪᛚᛚ
ᛒᚪᛣᚳ. ᚾᚩᛏ ᚪᚷᚪᛁᚾ. ᚦᛖ ᛚᛁᚾᛖ ᛗᚪᛋᛏ ᛒᛖ ᛞᚱᚪᚥᚾ ᚻᛖᚱᛖ! ᛁᛋ ᚠᚪᚱ, ᚪᚾᛞ ᚾᚩ ᚠᚪᚱᛖᚱ!

 

 Posted by at 12:10 am
Sep 042019
 

US Bomber Projects #22 and Transport Projects #09 are now available.

US Bomber Projects #22

Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US Bomber Projects #22 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #22 includes:

  • GD/NASA Mach 5 Cruise Waverider: A 1990’s design very much like the “Aurora”
  • NASA SR-2P Dash-On-Warning: a vertically launched ICBM carrier
  • Republic MX-773B-2: a two-stage ramjet surface-to-surface missile
  • Convair Subsonic Nuclear Carrier Based Aircraft: A miniature naval NX-2
  • Consolidated Vultee “Parallel Staged Operational Missile:” an unusual early configuration for the Atlas ICBM
  • Convair MX-1626: an early B-36-carried design leading to the B-58
  • Boeing B-52X: a trie of layouts for four-engined B-52s
  • Boeing Model 988-122/123: A highly maneuverable stealthy flying wing

USBP #22 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

——–


Don’t forget to pick up the previous issue, US Bomber Projects #21

 

Also available:

US Transport Projects #09

Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US Transport Projects #09 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #09 includes:

  • Convair 58-9 SST: A design fora preliminary low-capacity test SST
  • Boeing Model 757-3150: An important step in the development of the 747
  • Convair Nuclear Powered GEM Aircraft Carrier: a fast long-range strike carrier
  • Aero Spacelines “Pregnant Princess:” A jet-propelled Saturn rocket carrier
  • Seversky Executive: A 1930’s design for a prop-powered “business jet”
  • Williams International V-Jet: A 1980’s concept for a small executive transport
  • Lockheed L-152-15: A very early jetliner
  • Lockheed Martin 777F-sized Hybrid Wing body: A very recent large and efficient cargo transport

USTP #09 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $4.25:

——–


Don’t forget the previous issue, US Transport Projects #08…

 Posted by at 12:11 am