Oct 162019
 

UPDATE: AUCTION HAS ENDED.

For sale to the highest bidder… a lot of 1/40 scale (same as the vintage Topping display model) X-15’s, mostly X-5A-3 stretched delta-winged configurations. These are solid-cast resin models that I worked on a number of years ago. From left to right:

1: An incomplete model with the Marquardt SERJ airbreathing engine

2: An incomplete X-15A-3 with upward-swept wingtip fins

3: An incomplete X-15A-3, missing fins.

4 & 5: Completed, painted and decaled X-15A-3 models

6: A vintage Topping X-15 model.One of the horizontal stabilizers had broken off, and repairs were underway.

These are, again, incomplete (except for #4&5), but a decently skilled modeler could finish the job. What you see in the photos is what you get. Except the dust. I’ll blow that off. The level of dustiness might give an indication of how long these have been sitting abandoned. Buyer also pays postage by whatever means desired. If you’d like to bid, send an email to: Bidding ends 48 hours after this is posted. There won’t be any more of these, at least not from me: the molds are not only old, they are now in a landfill.

 Posted by at 12:17 am
Oct 022019
 

Better part of 20 years ago I started building a 1/24 scale model of the Black Horse SSTO spaceplane. This USAF design was a purely rocket powered vehicle, with engines that burned kerosene-based fuel with hydrogen peroxide oxidizer; it would take off horizontally from a runway with the H2O2 tanks prit near empty, rendezvous at altitude with a tanker aircraft and bring aboard all the H2O2 it needed, then blast off for orbit. It was a cool concept, and it *might* have even worked. So for reasons of my own I decided that what the world needed was a ridiculously large model of the Black Horse. I got as far as a fiberglass shell of the main wing/body, missing only control surfaces, wingtip fins, rocket engines and surface detailing. And then… life intervened, the model got set aside and put out of the way, out of sight and out of mind.

So… anyone want it? As is, with a light dusting of genuine artisanal Utah dust. No reasonable offer refused. Shipping cost is on the buyer; I expect it’ll cost a fair amount, but it is pretty rugged since it’s fiberglass (the original was made of foam and plaster, a fiberglass mold made and a fiberglass shell cast for the final finishing which I never got to). If nobody wants it, no sweat… off to the trash. I’ll give it a day or so.

   

 Posted by at 11:33 am
Aug 192019
 

There is currently an item on ebay that the *title* of had me very interested, but the actual photos fire off my BS alarms:

North American XF-108 Rapier Aircraft Contractor Model / Topping Precise / Allyn

A vintage F-108 display model made by the NAA model shop or by an official contractor for NAA would be a very interesting item. But… that’s not what we’ve got here. Observe:

This is not a North American Aviation design. It is, in fact, copied from the 1960 ITC “F-108 Rapier” model kit. This was designed before the F-108 design was revealed to the public, and was basically a fictional concept based on the North American “Navaho” intercontinental cruise missile.

The model is not actually an assembled ITC Rapier kit. It looks like one of the Asian specially-made “genuine Philippine mahogany” models that you can have made. Which is fine if that’s what you want, but that’s not what the ebay listing says it is. Quote: “For sale is a rare XF-108 Rapier contractor style model. I am unsure of the manufacturer -possibly Topping/Precise. ” Note: “style.”

As of this writing there are 15 bids, up to $140. This seems a bit much for a meh-quality modern replica of a meh-quality model kit. If this is something you’re interested in bidding on, keep in mind that this is *not* a North American Aviation design, but a design by a short-lived (1957-64) model kit company that had no special insight.

 Posted by at 8:48 am
Aug 092019
 

We’re in something of a golden age of model kits for the Star Destroyer from Star Wars. NOTE: this applies only to the Star Destroyers form the original trilogy; if you want a model of the Star Destroyer from the sequel trilogy, you’re just plain out of luck. Just as if you’d wanted the sequel trilogy to actually be *good* Star Wars, I suppose.

Anyway, the Japanese model kit company Bandai is soon to release two new SD models.  Bandai mostly seems to focus on kits of those ridiculous anthropomorphic giant robotic “mech suit” things that are apparently overly popular in anime, but their Star Wars kits are usually exquisite.

As always: if you order one of the items from the Amazon link below, or use the link to go further into Amazon and buy other stuff, I get a small pittance. So you can help a brother out while loading up on Star Destroyers.

First up a 1/5000 scale Star Destroyer, complete with in-scale blockade runner and Millenium Falcon. The SD is modeled after the one from “Empire Strikes Back” which is substantially different from the one in “A New Hope” (and “Rogue One”), so the blockade runner is a little out of place, but I don’t suppose too many people are gonna care.

At 12.6 inches long, it’ll be a little smaller and a lot more expensive than the smaller of the Revell kits, but the detailing should be vastly improved.


Also coming soon from Bandai, a dinkyscale model of the Super Star Destroyer. Small, but cheap and very likely ridiculously detailed.


If you want a more sizable (more than 2 feet long) Super Star Destroyer, and especially if you don’t want to have to put one together, this just came on the market. It seems to be well received.


Available for a few years now is the Bandai dinkyscale Star Destroyer. Cheap, but a beautiful little thing. I’ve shown one I built hereabouts before.


Also available for some years now is the smaller of the two Revell models, a “Snaptite Build and Play” kit. Low on detail, but reasonably accurate, with a built-in sound and light system. Designed more or less to be built by kids, assembly is easy and quick, and the parts thickness is such to make it pretty rugged.


Last is the gigantic 1/2700 kit, originally released by the Russian model kit company Zvezda, re-released by Revell. Pricey, but since it’s about twice the size of the new Bandai kit while being only 25%or so more expensive, it’s a pretty good deal. Assuming, of course, you have someplace to put it.

 Posted by at 1:31 am
Jul 042019
 

Someone is selling a contractors model of an engine for a cruise missile on ebay. The engine is an unducted aft fan design. This type of engine was proposed for use on jetliners; it provides fuel efficiency benefits but in the end the brain-melting noise it put out doomed the concept. Not only did it bother people, it also tended to buzz the bejeebers out of the aircraft structure. In the end very high bypass conventional turbofan engines proved capable of doing the job. Noise, of course, would not have been much of an issue for a cruise missile, but since this design was put forward (circa 1989) the US has not fielded any new major cruise missiles.

Note:”TCAE /GEAE” likely stands for Teledyne Continental Aviation and Engineering / General Electric Aviation Engines. Teledyne CAE was known as such between 1969 and 1999, an unhelpful 30-year span.

Vtg USAF TCAE/GEAE Propfan Engine Cruise Missile App 1/5 Scale Contractor Model

 Posted by at 10:44 pm
Jul 012019
 

For much of the time while the concept of the Space Shuttle was being developed the vehicle consisted of a manned flyback booster of relatively enormous dimensions, coupled with an orbiter that included sizable internal oxygen tanks, sometimes with external hydrogen tanks, sometimes internal. The model below, a masterpiece of late 1960’s model makers craft, illustrates one such concept. the orbiter is similar to the Grumman H-33 except larger, with completely internal hydrogen and oxygen tanks.

Had this type of Space Shuttle been built and flown successfully, there is every chance that it would have been substantially less costly to operate than the Shuttle we got: flying the booster back to a runway landing and refurbishing it would theoretically have been a lot faster and easier than fishing solid rocket motor casings out of the ocean and shipping them to Utah for refurb. But getting the design to the point of operation would have been a nightmare. The booster was unlike anything previously attempted, and would have been an aircraft roughly the size of the C-5 Galaxy, with a top speed like that of the X-15

 

I have uploaded the full resolution scan of the photo to the 2019-07 APR Extras Dropbox folder, available to $4 and up subscribers to the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program.

 Posted by at 1:03 pm
Jun 282019
 

A second – and last – batch of Eaglemoss Star Trek ships has gone up on eBay. I’m preparing a bunch of books, many of aerospace interest, that will be posted soon. I’d planned on having half a dozen or so of them ready to go tonight but… shrug.

https://www.ebay.com/usr/dynascott

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #139 Vaadwaur Assault Ship & magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #103 Vidiian Warship & magazine, new, bagged

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #94 Suliban Cell Ship ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #96 Orion Scout Ship & magazine, new, still bagged

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #45 Malon Export Vessel Ship & magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #134 Vulcan Survey Ship & magazine, new, bagged

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #41 Klingon Raptor ship & magazine, new, bagged

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #18 Bajoran Solar-Sailor ship & magazine, ne

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #51 Hirogen Warship & magazine, new, still bagged

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #49 ECS Fortunate ship and magazine, new

I made an attempt to add Earth-type humor to each of the listings.

 

 

 Posted by at 10:34 pm
Jun 202019
 

Most stuff sold. I will, hopefully, regularly sell more stuff.

I’ve been meaning to sell a bunch of stuff for a good long while now, and I’m finally getting around to doing it.

https://www.ebay.com/usr/dynascott

This first batch is all sci-fi stuff, mostly Eaglemoss Star Trek ships (very nice little officially licensed models that come with glossy magazines that describe the vehicle and how it was designed). Also in this batch is the very last of the preliminary drafts of the Space Station V “booklet of general plans.” Everything has a pretty low starting price, so chances are good you can get them for cheap. Shipping gets a lot better the more of them you get…

“2001: A Space Odyssey” Space Station V Booklet of General Plans: blueprints

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #128 OV-165 ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #49 ECS Fortunate ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #109 Borg Queen’s ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #35 Klingon Bird Of Prey ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #70 Voth City Ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #62 Voth Research Vessel ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #3 Klingon Bird Of Prey ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #129 Tholian Starship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #106 Kazon Raider ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #53 Klingon Augments ship and magazine, new

Eaglemoss Star Trek Starship #138 USS Lantree NCC-1837 ship and magazine, new

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 Posted by at 7:33 pm
Jun 172019
 

A while back I made some preliminary “General Plans” for Space Station V from “2001: A Space Odyssey.” Some 19 sets were sent out; the feedback I received was positive, so it’s likely that I will revise these and do another release. Obviously sets of such “Booklets of General Plans” would be of greatest interest for the spacecraft of 2001… the Orion and the Discovery seem likely to be of greater interest than the Space Station. But what I am (very, very casually) working on is Clavius Base. Why? Honestly, I don’t know. Perhaps because it’s something others haven’t really tackled in the past. Perhaps because of the dearth of info, it’s more of a challenge. And perhaps because, as potentially dull as a moonbase is compared to a spaceship, Clavius Base represents a *vast* engineering undertaking far exceeding any mere spacecraft in terms of cost, effort and achievement.

Clavius Base is shown only twice in the movie… once through the windows of the Aries Ib, and once from the viewpoint of a trio of astronauts standing on a ridge, cliff or hill, the base stretched out below and behind them. A few photos of the model are available, such as in Adam Johnsons “2001: the Lost Science,” which I heartily recommend. It is this model photo that served as the basis of my preliminary reconstruction. The photo is taken from a shallow angle; fortunately it is built with a series of concentric circular structures meaning that with some photoshoppery, perspective adjustments can be made to produce a fairly decent plan view of the base. With that plan view created, I imported it into a CAD program and traced out the broad strokes of the geometry. And once I had that, I imported a screenshot from the movie from the “ridge” view and adjusted the angle and perspective of the CAD diagram until it matched, to reasonable approximation, the view of the base seen behind the astronauts. That gave me the position in terms of angle, distance and elevation for the astronauts viewpoint, as well as producing a line on the ground where the Aries 1B landing pad must be. The result is that the base seems to be *real* close to a tall surface feature… hill, cliff, whatever. As this is Hollywood, I am willing to fudge things somewhat; as this is 2001, I’m willing to fudge things only as far as needed. So perhaps I’m comfortable with moving the hillside another fifty percent further away than shown here. At a stretch, twice as far. But that’s really pushing it.

The bigger issue is scale. If I knew how high up on that hillside the astronauts are, I’d know exactly how big the base is. But numbers seem to be utterly lacking. So… while the Aries Ib landing facility can be scaled reasonably precisely, since it is seen in-scale with the Aries Ib, the base itself will have to be guesstimated. Mainly by assuming the smallest structures visible are sized to serve as meaningfully useful buildings. Careful examination of the available model photos might give hints of scale based on the heights of multi-story structures.

 

Yes, yes, I know…

 

 Posted by at 12:57 pm