Ships sink with some regularity. But not many of them do it as slowly and dramatically as the container ship Mitsui O.S.K. Lines’ MOL Comfort, which broke in two and sank in the Indian Ocean. Take a look at the photos:
The Northrop Grumman x-47B unmanned strike plane recently completed a series of carrier landings. This is relatively Big News… while the carrier was clearly in relatively calm seas, it’s still a challenge. By stocking carriers with a number of these sort of planes, low-end bombardment missions will become a hell of a lot safer for the US Navy, since there are no pilots involved.
[youtube RzKDCO9KuaI]
[youtube Rc2k6G8LuqY]
[youtube 3i5iYKSuzfc]
Not exactly news, but a historical tidbit about the German cruise liner that was sunk at the end of WWII by three torpedoes launched by a submarine. Here’s what makes it worth noting:
The figures from the research of Heinz Schön make the total lost in the sinking to be about 9,343 total, including about 5,000 children. This would make it the largest loss of life in a single sinking in maritime history.
Yikes.
Before the Polaris missile was developed, the US Navy studied several approaches to using submarines to launch ballistic missiles. An early idea was taken directly from WWII Germany… store Jupiter IRBMs in special canisters, towed behind subs. These would be partially flooded whe the subs got to the launch site; this would cause the canister to tip up 90 degrees. A few hours later, the liquid fueled Jupiter would be ready to launch. Additionally, there was some thought put into the idea of installing the Jupiter vertically within subs. But nobody much liked the idea of large liquid propellant missiles in submarines. So by April 1956 the idea then moved to solid propellant rockets designed to emulate the Jupiter, carrying the same payload on more or less the same trajectory. The missile would be fatter than the standard Jupiter, but also shorter. Still, at ten feet in diameter and 41 feet in length, it was a very large missile, and only four could be carried within the body of the sub and the greatly extended sail. Fortunately, within a few months the Polaris design came on the scene, a much smaller missile made possible by both a smaller warhead and higher energy density double-base solid propellant.
Lockheed illustration.
A ship-launch demonstrates that all that kinetic energy has to go *somewhere*…
Having a two-stage rocketship is not unusual. Having a two-stage yacht? That’s a new one on me.
Why sail your multimillion dollar yacht to the Caribbean when you can load it onto a huge 685-foot ship to take if for you?
This is how you know you have not just money, but Money.
If you are the captain of a US Navy ship, this is the sort of bridge audio recording you do *not* want anywhere near your career:
Not *quite* according to plan
A building in Turkey, 2009: the plan was for it to simply implode. Ooops.
[youtube 28xTAXgDB4E]
Without the CNN screen-crawlies:
[youtube 71nxdA4OaOs]
——-
Chimney go THAT way:
[youtube t–F7E2ewq0]
——-
Or THAT way:
[youtube NnUeipeDCZ8]
——-
Or maybe THAT way:
[youtube M3JT-IT60Es]
——-
D’oh:
[youtube EzKvwYt3Zyg]
——-
And this? This is just stupid:
[youtube rL8a_M_i5GM]
——-
I’m pretty sure this isn’t how you park a boat:
[youtube svFwsJsHHGs]
——-
Nor this:
[youtube 9-nazsbpags]
————————
A lesson: each of these was, in retrospect, pretty easily preventable. And yet they happened… bad planning, bad thinking, bad luck, whatever. This can happen to *any* projects. If demolitions experts can screw up knocking over a simply chimney, imagine how wrong a missile, an airplane or a starship can go.
Historic ship in Philly short on funds, time
In short, America’s last trans-oceanic cruise ship, the SS United States, is docked in Philly and has spent many years being converted to rust. An organization was set up to restore it, but they are about out of cash. The SSUS will probably be converted into raw material in about a month.
It’s sad, but inevitable. To all accounts it’s a rust bucket. And not every ship can be saved.
And there was one good comment on the relevant Fark thread:
computerguyUT
2013-03-25 07:10:53 PM
Hey, since it’s already empty, we can use it to hold all of Obama’s bullshiat.
We’re going to need a bigger boat…
Anyone know of a source for good, clear, detailed and, most importantly, accurate diagrams for US submarines such as the Washington and Franklin class boomers and Sturgeon and Los Angeles attack subs? I have Friedmans “US Subs since 1945” and Polmars “Cold War Subs,” but they’re not doing the job.