Aug 292016
 

Military hardware design programs often have code names that are random or nearly so, so you can’t figure out what they are if you overhear them. Concepts like “Have Blue” or “Copper Canyon” or “Science Dawn” or even “Silver Bug” are pretty opaque. But every now and then there are concepts like Avro Canada’s 1960 idea for a truck capable of carrying and launching two Minuteman ICBMs: “Big Wheel.” For once, the name matched the product.

bigwheel

One wonders what sort of career these might have had in the Monster Truck circuit after they became obsolete.

This is a document I scored off ebay a little while back; it arrived and I’ve scanned it and will include it in the very next APR Patreon catalog. If you’d like a copy, a monthly contribution of as little as $4 will get you the full-rez 300 dpi scan of each months reward documents and diagrams… currently, three documents, one large-format diagram or piece of artwork. That’s a buck an item. Give the APR Patreon a look.

bigwheel layout

 Posted by at 7:26 pm
Aug 242016
 

An early/mid 1960’s concept model of an interplanetary spacecraft using a nuclear fusion powerplant. Back then there was a LOT of faith in the idea of fusion reactors being just around the corner. One very obvious design flaw? No radiators. Any internal-fusion system (or internal-fission, for that matter) would need *vast* radiator surface area.

Details on the photo are unavailable. I originally downloaded this image from the GRIN (Great Images in NASA) website, which has now been closed in favor of a Flickr account that is difficult to search. Feh. If you want the full-rez version *another* Flickr account has it HERE.

GPN-2009-00027

 Posted by at 5:12 pm
Aug 182016
 

The San Diego Air & Space Museum uploaded a 1958 Convair film showing tests of two air launched ballistic missiles carried and launched from B-58 “Hustler” bombers. The first test was a failure, the second a success. The ALBM is a capability we don’t have anymore, but could almost certainly use… prompt hypersonic strike systems are always going to be in fashion.

The video could use some TLC. The audio is rough and the film itself was old and faded, turning everything reddish. I suspect cleaning that up would require little more than pushing a few buttons now…

A similar report was produced a year later in 1959. This one is of better audio/visual quality.

 Posted by at 8:29 am
Aug 112016
 

Starting in the 1970s and running through much of the 1980’s, the Jet Propulsion Laboratory ran numerous studies of Thousand Astronomical Unit (TAU) spacecraft. These were somewhat akin to Voyager class probes, but with important differences. instead of small RTGs for power, they would use SP-100 class fission reactors, mounted many dozens of meters away at the end of long booms. Located at the center of mass of the system would be a bank of ion engines; the nuclear electric propulsion system would operate for *years* to boost these craft to extremely high speeds. Still, it would take decades for them to travel 1,000 AU from the Sun, many times further than Pluto. There, large optical telescopes would take parallax measurements on distant stars; by positioning numerous TAU craft in every direction, the measurement baseline would be vast, and precise distance fixes could be made for stars on the other side of the galaxy.

A number of TAU designs were examined, but the one shown here in JPL art seems to be pretty representative. These probes would have to be engineered with a high degree of both reliability and autonomy as their main observation missions would only begin something like 50 years after launch. Diagrams of a different design and more information were presented in US Spacecraft Projects #3.

jpl tau

 Posted by at 1:54 pm
Aug 102016
 

The FAA recently approved plans by the company “Moon Express” to send the MX-1E probe to the lunar surface. This has garnered some press, a lot of it focused on plans to land human ashes on the moon (with some outlets being spectacularly wrong about some aspects of human ashes in space, such as claiming that this will be the first time ashes have been launched into space). Moon Express is claiming that once proven, they will be able to send missions to the moon for $10 million a pop. Included here is requisite verbiage about mining helium 3 from the moon for fusion reactors, though that of course remains a market without a market.

Moon Express has apparently contracted with Rocket Lab to launch their small lunar lander atop Rocket Lab’s “Electron” launch vehicle. If, like me, you reacted to that sentence with “Who? What?” it’s because Rocket Lab, a New Zealand company, hasn’t actually launched one of their Electrons yet.  Electron *looks* like a smaller Falcon 9 made out of carbon fiber.

 Posted by at 9:44 am
Aug 032016
 

Apparently, come September a brand-new Skycycle will attempt to launch across the Snake River Canyon. Read about it here:

Return to Snake River: A new generation prepares to complete Evel Knievel’s greatest feat

Everybody remembers Evel Knievel; relatively few remember Bob Truax, the rocket engineer who designed and built the Skycycle.  Fortunately the article does talk about two generations of Truax, including Bob Truax’s son who built the new Skycycle that will be used in the new attempt.

 

This is scheduled for September 17 near Twin Falls, Idaho. Hmmm. That’s only about 2 hours from here, easy enough for me to drive up to. Except: the launch site is on private property and you have to buy a ticket. That’s fine, of course – but the tickets cost $1,000. A bit out of my pay grade, sadly.

evelspirit

 Posted by at 8:13 pm
Jul 292016
 

The local news ran several videos shot by Utahns of the Chinese upper stage breaking up over Utah last night, and I can confidently state that whatever I saw… it wasn’t that.

  1. The upper stage appears to have been relatively low in the sky; what I saw was directly overhead
  2. The upper stage was a large collection of bits,a  stretched-out cloud of junk. What I saw was *one* distinct object that only broke into two or three just before it burned out.
  3. No matter how I work it out, what I saw seems to have been about ten minutes earlier than the upper stage entry.

It seems statistically unlikely that two man-made objects would re-enter that close together in space and time and *not* be related. So… perhaps I saw a payload fairing or an interstage structure? An upper stage includes things like propellant tanks which would react badly to re-entry dynamic pressure and heating, and should break up early resulting in the shower of sparks other people saw, but a tankless structural element might hold together as a single chunk long enough to burn out.

Or maybe that was the Chinese *payload* entering a bit early… hmmmm…

 

 Posted by at 1:32 am
Jul 282016
 

Is China militarising space? Experts say new junk collector could be used as anti-satellite weapon

Interesting:

The Aolong-1, or Roaming Dragon, is equipped with a robotic arm to remove large debris such as old satellites.

Any system capable of cleaning up “space junk” is capable of being an anti-satellite system. Since this one has an arm it uses to grab its target, it is clearly designed to rendezvous with the target, putting into very close proximity and very low relative velocities. A dandy satellite inspector.

Using a satellite like this to deorbit junk is going about it the kinda hard way. A perhaps easier approach might be to put the ASAT into a polar or even retrograde orbit, and give it a great big water tank and a substantial maneuvering system. It would maneuver so that it would pass close in front of a target, then spray out a short jet of water vapor behind it. The cloud of vapor would be directly in the path of the target, which would be slowed via drag. This might also rip solar panels and antenna off the target if the cloud is dense enough. Afterwards, the clod will simply disperse; the meager atmosphere will cause the vapor itself to quickly deorbit, leaving nothing to menace other satellites.

Do it right and the ASAT would be really quite interesting. Instead of just dumping water overboard, pass the water through a heat exchanger and then a nozzle. The analogy would be a nuclear rocket, though that’s of course unrealistic for this application, but a solar-heated chunk of, say, iridium or tungsten might work just fine. In this case the ASAT might best be put into a conventional orbit to more easily rendezvous with targets; it would get in “front” of the target and blast the target with its steam rocket. This would slow the target while boosting the ASAT. The steam itself would be substantially slowed from circular orbit velocity and should quickly deorbit.

Being solar powered, it would only need to be occasionally refueled and refilled with water. Designed *really* well, it would be designed to use high pressure, high temperature steam jets for maneuvering , so that water was the *only* consumable. It could therefore presumably rendezvous with a tanker satellite or an orbiting water deport for refilling. Here’d be a market for space ice-mining. A fleet of perhaps a dozen of these steam-based ASATs wandering through the spacelanes blasting bits of junk from orbit and meeting up with a captured iceberg from time to time to get topped off. And one the opposite side of the ASAT from the steam rocket, a few basic arms to grab satellites and give them a little shove. The ASAT could thus also serve as tugs to provide boosts for paying customers whose satellites are in decaying orbits.

 Posted by at 11:54 am