Apr 092019
 

Giggity:

SpaceX’s Falcon Heavy rocket set for first commercial launch. Here’s how to watch it live online.

It will, with luck, orbit the Saudi Arabsat 6A communications satellite. It was originally meant to launch today, but weather put things off a day. The SpaceX YouTube channel will carry the launch live sometime between 6:35Pm and 8:30 PM Eastern time: Sometime Thursday. Wednesday launch scrubbed due to winds.

https://www.youtube.com/user/spacexchannel/

Following booster separation, Falcon Heavy’s two side boosters will attempt to land at SpaceX’s Landing Zones 1 and 2 (LZ-1 and LZ-2) at Cape Canaveral Air Force Station in Florida. Falcon Heavy’s center core will attempt to land on the “Of Course I Still Love You” droneship, which will be stationed in the Atlantic Ocean.

 

 Posted by at 3:40 pm
Apr 082019
 

I’ve gotten as far as roughing out the walkway and railing. Does the human figure look properly scaled here? There is some play in this, as there were several models of the Ajax that differ in important respects, and a full scale set which differed even more.

Any dissenting opinions?

 Posted by at 12:51 am
Apr 012019
 

NASA chief says a Falcon Heavy rocket could fly humans to the Moon

The launch vehicle would require a number of modifications, including the use of the ULA Interim Cryogenic Propulsion Stage and a larger payload fairing.

The article seems lean on some details. The launch vehicle thus modified with the ICPS and an Orion capsule would seem perhaps capable of sending men *around* the moon, but actually landing on the moon would seem to require a lot more capability. The obvious approach would be to go back to the original idea NASA had in the earliest Apollo days of launching multiple Saturn I’s, with separate vehicles and tankers, for a rendezvous in Earth orbit and an assembly and tanking. But beyond all that  there remains one over-riding problem: where the frak is the lunar lander?

 Posted by at 3:43 pm
Mar 272019
 

Given how it finally turned out, I think I should feel safe in saying that to a great degree I’d like to forget that I ever had anything to do with “Man Conquers Space.” Still and all I *did* do a  lot of work on it in the early aughts, and it grates on me that it all went for naught. Well, maybe it’ll provide some minor amusement for some of y’all: my contribution was in the area of launch vehicle, space vehicle and space station design. The plot as of circa 2003 was that the German built the Sanger antipodal bomber, the US caught wind of it and got Robert Goddard to slap together an interceptor (this part of the plot was cribbed *directly* from Allen Steele’s “Goddard’s People,” which makes me wonder if proper permissions to do that were obtained… shrug). As a result of this, history goes different and the “Collier’s” series of space articles from the early 1950’s come to pass. The US lands on the moon in the early 60’s with those giant landers, and on Mars in the late 60’s with those giant gliders. I did some work to try to rationalize how the Collier’s Mars gliders could work given that the Martian atmosphere turned out to be nowhere near as dense as they thought in the 50’s, but IIRC the final decision was to just sorta gloss over that little aeronautical detail.

This much is well known, but the later versions of the MCS movie would have continued the timeline forward to circa 2004. There would be solar power satellites, planetary colonies, lots of space stations and the first space habitats under construction; some discussion was had about maybe showing the start of the first starship, but I don’t think that was ever incorporated.

The design ethic for the post-Colliers vehicles was to be a blending of the purely practical with “it could have evolved from Colliers,” with, at the end, a heaping helping of “2001.” Space stations *resembling* Space Station V, Clavius Base analogs, *bits* of Discovery. The space agency, for example, would not have been NASA, but the NCA.

Still to be found on one of my hard drives are some of the diagrams I was working on for the Ferry Rocket and its descendants. Realistically I think that in a world where the US had gone full-bore into spaceflight in the 1950’s the launch vehicles of 2004 would have been very realistic-futuristic, but the idea was to carry the original Ferry Rocket design ethic forward. So a combination of practical and “that looks cool.”

The evolution of the Ferry Rocket system is shown below. The Mk 2 clearly takes after the Disney designs that followed after the Colliers series. The Mk 3 was, as requested, designed to resemble the Avro Vulcan; the booster is derived from a Martin Nova/Post-Saturn. The Mk 4 was never quite finalized; the booster took after the Boeing AMLLV, and the glider was to be fitted with variable geometry wings. By 2004 the NCA is using the Mk 5 ferry rocket, fully reusable with a first stage booster that would land itself back at the pad much like the Falcon 9. The second stage would go into orbit with the “shuttle” stage and would either be turned into payload (serving as either wet lab, or just chewed up for the raw materials) or would re-enter and again land itself back at the pad. The shuttle stage was to be the most “cool” of the designs, intended to serve in a number of capacities… including as a US Marine Corps “Drop Ship” for troop deployment; this necessitated such slightly unlikely features as VTOL jet lift.

The earlier Mk 3 system went in for a more detailed design and analysis, much of which has been lost in the intervening decade and a half.

In addition to design, I also worked on a number of props. One was a 1/72 scale Mk 1 ferry rocket display model, to be seen (IIRC) in the 1960’s era NCA heads office. This was finished while I still lived in California and shipped – at no small expense – to Australia. Where is it today? Not a clue.

 

Note the industry standard feline scale reference, the late lamented Koshka. She didn’t know what to make of the Ferry Rocket.

In addition, a 1/72 Mk 2 Ferry Rocket display model was also under construction when the project seemed to stall circa 2005. The glider was more or less finished, but I seem to have lost it.

I still have some of the fiberglass molds used to make these, though I suspect they’re a little grotty.

 

 Posted by at 10:33 pm
Mar 272019
 

Kinda hard to “shoot down” something in orbit (as the wreckage remains in orbit and unlike waht the movies show, doesn’t just immediately fall from the sky) , but it seems they bullseyed it with a ground-based interceptor.

India shoots down satellite in test, Modi hails arrival as space power

On one hand: congrats for the technical achievement.

On the other hand: this shows that such abilities are becoming more and more readily available. And while India is not an enemy state, the US *does* have both vital space-based infrastructure *and* enemies. Thus driving home the importance of developing a true Space Force capable of defending what we’ve got as well as replacing what we lose.

 Posted by at 10:35 am
Mar 262019
 

US to Return Astronauts to the Moon by 2024, VP Pence Says

On one hand… good. On the other hand… I’ll believe it when I see it. I’ll *start* to believe in the possibility of it when I see a finalized design for a lunar lander.

The US *should* be able to do this. Whether *NASA* could do this, I have substantial doubts. SpaceX? I would be unsurprised if they could do it, and it would make me happy if the first manned lunar landing of the 21st century happens in 2024 when a USSF-owned and operated SpaceX Starship lands on the lunar surface with ten scientists and ten Space Marines ready to plant the flag and claim territory for the United Federation of Planets of America, complete with had modules, regolith moving equipment, a ten megawatt nuclear reactors and a big-ass Drax Industries “Screw You Mk. 2” laser gun.

 Posted by at 2:39 pm
Mar 192019
 

Artwork of the Boeing Integrated Manned Interplanetary Spacecraft, circa 1968. This is the best known of the numerous manned Mars spacecraft designed over the last half century, and is often directly associated with Werner von Braun as he would go on to try to get congress and NASA to forge ahead with the program. Obviously he was not successful. Aspects of this spacecraft design were illustrated in great detail in US Spacecraft Projects #03 and USSP #04

I’ve seen this piece of art many times over the years, always in pretty poor resolution; I finally found a good-rez version on eBay a while back. I’ve made the full-rez scan available to above-$10-subscribers to the APR Monthly Historical Documents Program/Patreon. Clearly the original painting must have been done in color, but I do not think I’ve ever seen this image reproduced in color. I suspect that about ten seconds after I keel over someone will put on eBay a 24X26 full-color pristine lithograph with a buy-it-now price of five bucks. So keep an eye out for that: you see it, I’m like as not deadern’ disco.

If this sort of thing is of interest, consider subscribing. Even a buck a month will help out; but the more you subscribe for, the more you get… and the more you help me get from eBay and save for the ages.

 

 

 Posted by at 10:05 pm