Jul 312019
 

Before Lunar Orbit rendezvous made it possible for a single Saturn V to launch a complete lunar mission, the expected mission profile included launching a rather large lunar lander to Earth orbit, mating it with n upper stage, and then fueling the whole thing using specialized tanker spacecraft. NASA lucked out with the LOR concept; while some considerable work had been done on the tankers, the fact is that NASA really didn’t know *how* to do zero-gravity propellant transfer. When the word came down to stop working on the tankers, there were undoubtedly quite a number of quiet expressions of relief.

Still: the ability to do major propellant tanking in space will be vital for a real interplanetary economy. SpaceX will need to be able to do that for many of the lunar and Mars missions planned for Starship. So, it seems that on-orbit tanking is back on the menu.

NASA agrees to work with SpaceX on orbital refueling technology

 

 

 Posted by at 4:32 pm
Jul 302019
 

When “First Man,” a biopic about Neil Armstrong, was being developed, I was interested. News broke before the release that it didn’t include the raising of the US flag on the moon; this bothered me slightly, but it was the director and main actors looney political statements that caused my interest in the movie to evaporate.

So it’s on HBO now, and I finally watched it last night. On the one hand, the lack of the flag raising makes perfect sense in the context of the film… it covers years of Armstrongs life, and the lunar landing itself is damn near an afterthought. The time spent showing Armstrong bopping around on the lunar surface is minuscule.

On the other hand: Jibbers Crabst, what a *dismal* slog that movie was. It wasn’t so much that it was dull and often rather hard to see; it was that it was little more than a series of Armstrong’s low points. Let’s see if I can recall the main points:

1) It starts with Armstrong screwing up an X-15 flight, making it look like a hypersonic horror movie.

2) Then he loses his baby girl to cancer.

3) Then he goes up on Gemini 8, the launch of which is another horror movie.

4) And then Gemini 8 goes out of control and he nearly dies.

5) But hey, at least he has a friend, Ed! Who then promptly burns to death in Apollo 1.

6) And then he crashes  the lunar lander simulator.

7) And then he goes to the moon, which is a difficult to see ride devoid of joy.

8) And then he stands on the lunar surface looking into a pitch-black crater and it all comes back to his dead child.

9) And he finally comes home… to  wife who clearly doesn’t like him.

And… that’s about it. The greatest adventure in human history reduced to a series of misery-points.

Now, I’m all in favor of the actual facts of history, warts and all. But far too much of modern western civilization seems to be able to see nothing *but* the warts anymore. The Founding Fathers weren’t great innovative leaders who forged subservient colonies of a distant empire into a proud nation with a history of greatness second to none; they were just slavers to be dumped down the memory hole. Cowboys? Fictional nonsense that didn’t exist. Cops? They’re all corrupt fascists. This fetishizing of self-flagellation has hit the space program hard. Apollo wasn’t the greatest, most inspiring achievement in history; it was “whitey on the moon” (a point driven home explicitly in “First Man”), run by Nazi war criminals. And Armstrong? Not a near-mythic hero to be emulated, but an unpopular man with a crappy family life who underwent fear and terror because he was grieving a dead child.

Bah.

If they’d made “First Man” into some sort of Lovecraftian cosmic horror fantasy… hey, that coulda been kinda neat. *Horror* can be interesting. But *dismal?* Just no.

If you want to destroy a culture, you bomb it into rubble and shoot the survivors. If you want to *ruin* a culture, you take away it’s hopes, dreams, Foundational Myths and Heroes.

 Posted by at 9:23 pm
Jul 252019
 

Not much to see in this video, since it occurred at night and was shrouded by smoke and vapor. Presumably better video will emerge. But the StarHopper seems to have done what it set out to do… it went up, it translated, it came down and it didn’t kerplat or kerplode.

A quarter century ago I went out of my mind watching the Delta Clipper do this. Now, it’s more “Huh. Well, that’s good.” Because one gets used to seeing amazing things, I suppose, which explains why people stopped caring about Apollo and didn’t string up LBJ when Apollo was strangled in the crib. Fortunately for SpaceX, they don’t need to keep the masses entertained… they just need to keep Elon Musk entertained. And hopefully he won’t be done being entertained until there is a self-sustaining space infrastructure in place.

 Posted by at 11:14 pm
Jul 232019
 

A while back I sold a few copies of a prototype of a “Booklet of General Plans” for the Space Station V from “2001.” The feedback I got suggested that the idea has merits, and with some refinement it might be something interesting.

Along with Space Station V, I have made mention of wanting to do the same sort of thing with Clavius Base and The Orville. Clavius Base is a concept at a fabulously early stage. The Orville’s 3D model is long completed, but recent news is that Eaglemoss will release a line of Orville ships starting in 2020. Since the Eaglemoss Star Trek ships come with a small magazine that provides canonical in-universe data, I will wait to see what comes out at that time.

I have a number of other Booklets in various stages of completion. Some are still in the modeling stags; some require a whole lot of tinkering with the diagrams, some are in the writeup stage. Each will have text to go along with them that will be an in-universe description of the vehicle; the “Bird One,” for example, depicts a US government attempt to reverse engineer the design as best they can based on fragmentary data. The Ajax will be another US Government attempt to describe Mongo tech after the events of “Flash Gordon.” And of course some of these, such as the Dyna Soar and the 10-meter Orion, will be non-fictional descriptions.

For those nerdy and old enough to remember the glory days of the “Booklets of General Plans” that were released for various Star trek ships, you’ll remember the pages and pages of deck plans. With a lot of these, “deck plans” won’t really be possible… for Dyna Soar, there really wasn’t a deck, and for the Helicarrier there were *way* too many decks. So each Booklet will be its own thing, with diagrams, inboard profiles, etc. that are appropriate. I’m thinking of pricing these something like $2 per page, more or less. The basic set will be 11X17 sheets, folded in half and put in a letter-sized envelope; but I’m also contemplating a limited run of each possibly on better paper, and either rolled or bound within a 12X18 binder.

If this sort of thing is of interest, take a look and let me know in the comments which one or more appeal. This is a sloooow, long-term project, more hobby than anything. So if you want one… let me know. And let your friends who might want one know. A few others arne’t included below, such as the “Men Into Space” ship and the Boeing IMIS Mars craft, which will be a *huge* set.

Continue reading »

 Posted by at 9:18 pm
Jul 212019
 

Now available… the newest and biggest issue in the US Aerospace Projects line.

US Launch Vehicle Projects #6

Cover art was provided by Rob Parthoens, www.baroba.be

US Launch Vehicle Projects #06 is now available (see HERE for the entire series). Issue #6 is devoted to the launch vehicles proposed for the 1970’s Solar Power Satellite program. This required millions of tons of payload delivered into Earth orbit over a span of decades, with flight rates of several times per day for each vehicle. This program produced some of the largest and most ambitious launch vehicles ever designed, and was the last time that launchers of this size were ever seriously contemplated. Appropriately, USLP#6 is by far the largest issue of US Aerospace projects to date at over seventy pages, three times the size of a usual issue.

Topics in this issue include the Rockwell Star-Raker, several Boeing Space Freighters, the Boeing “Big Onion” Low Cost Heavy Lift Vehicle (antecedent and descendant designs), a Grumman two-stage HLLV, a Rockwell HLLV and “small” HLLV, NASA-JSC heavy lifters, a Boeing/Rockwell Personnel Launch Vehicle and a Boeing winged SSTO. Along with orthogonal views, a number of perspective diagrams are also included.

 

 

USLP #6 can be downloaded as a PDF file for only $9:

——–

 Posted by at 4:46 am
Jul 202019
 

CBS new is again running a live stream of their historical footage, this time covering the landing of Apollo 11.

Back in ’69, they didn’t have the tech to run live TV from the actual landing. So CBS filled in the lack of footage with cel (cartoon) animation. They timed the animation to match the *planned* landing, but as is well known Armstrong had to divert to avoid landing in a field of boulders. so the animation depicts the LM on the surface well ahead of the actual event. Also of note: listening to the small sounds from the CBS news studio when it becomes clear that the LM is actually down. They (Walter Cronkite and Wally Schirra)  maintain professionalism, but only just.  Another minor note: I can think of two times when Cronkite took off his glasses on camera: announcing the death of JFK and just after the Eagle landed.

For real entertainment value, watch it with closed captioning on.  I assume a computer is transcribing the speech into text… but it’s not doing a great job of it.

It looks like CBS didn’t include the vintage commercials this time. Additionally, there’s a time jump; it was more than six hours between landing and stepping out of the LM onto the surface, but the two broadcasts are welded together here. Until Aldrin turns on the TV camera showing Armstrong on the ladder, CBS filled in the lack of video with actors in fake space suits going through the planned motions. Also interesting: Cronkite jumped the gun on when he thought Armstrong was actually standing on the lunar surface, and missed the second half of “That’s one small step for man, one giant leap for mankind.”

This was the most amazing event in TV history, and likely in *all* of history. What makes it more remarkable is how in such short order the same public that was so entranced  by this became uttering apathetic to following missions. One might argue that Apollo 11 was the first, and the first time is inherently far more interesting. And yet… turn on the TV, and chances are fair that one or more channels will be broadcasting yet again another interminable baseball, football, soccer or basketball game. There’ve been *millions* of ’em, yet billions of people still gladly pay vast sums of money, time and attention to such objectively pointless activities.

Sigh.

 Posted by at 5:19 pm
Jul 182019
 

The second trailer for the Brad Pitt movie “Ad Astra” has come out, and it remains confusing. Specifically, the timeline. Because it certainly *looks* like Tommy Lee Jones’s character, the father of Brad Pitt’s character, seems to have been an Apollo astronaut, but now in his sons day – which would therefore seem to be *approximately* *now,* involves cities on the moon, Mars bases and tether-suspended low-altitude stations, along with 3D holographic projection technology. So… alt-history? Apollo wasn’t strangled, but instead NASA funding stayed at 4% of the Fed budget?

 Posted by at 10:35 am
Jul 162019
 

Back in 1989, CBS ran an “as it happened” bit on the launch of Apollo 11… many hours of uninterrupted 1969-era news coverage of the launch. And I managed to screw up programming the VCR, ending up with nothing. Grrr. Fortunately a mere thirty years later they have done it again… but this time, on YouTube. A four and a half hour chunk of wall-to-wall vintage 1969 TV, currently downloading. 2.1 gigabytes at 500 K/sec is gonna take a little bit of a while, I suppose…

With luck they’ll do the same in a  few days for the landing itself.

 Posted by at 11:50 am